Review: ‘Predator Hunters,’ starring Tony Godwin

March 8, 2026

by Carla Hay

Tony Godwin in “Predator Hunters” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Predator Hunters”

Directed by Ross Young

Culture Representation: The true crime documentary series “Predator Hunters” features a predominantly white group of people talking about cases from the Dallas-based Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

Culture Clash: The series, which features different cases per episode, gives summaries of how the sexual predators in these cases were apprehended and eventually convicted of their sex crimes.

Culture Audience: “Predator Hunters” will appeal primarily to people who are interested true crime documentaries that takes a straightforward approach in telling stories about sexual predators who were caught and punished in the U.S. criminal justice system.

William Ross Potter (pictured at far right) during his 2017 arrest for attempted enticement of a minor in “Predator Hunters” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

Using police footage and interviews, the docuseries “Predator Hunters” has factual retellings of Texas police arrests of convicted sexual predators who target children. Unlike other shows with similar topics, this show reveals case results. People who are expecting a series that’s like “To Catch a Predator” (which was part of NBC’s “Dateline” from 2004 to 2007) might be disappointed. “Predator Hunters” avoids making the cases look like sensationalistic humiliation for the suspects and instead presents the cases in a more straightforward manner.

Directed by Ross Young, “Predator Hunters” is narrated by Steve Zirnkilton, who is best known as the narrator voice of the “Law & Order” TV series. The “Predator Hunters” series showrunner is Stuart Rose. Tony Godwin, a detective with the Dallas Police Department’s Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, is the host of the show. In “Predator Hunters,” Godwin relays the facts, but the show also gives him room to voices his opinions and share some behind-the-scenes information on what he was thinking when he was hunting these sex offenders, who ended up being convicted of the sex crimes featured in each case.

Episodes of the first season of “Predator Hunters” were not available for review in advance. This review covers the series premiere episode, titled “By Any Means Necessary.” Three cases are featured in this episode, with all of the perpetrators using the Internet in some way to commit their sex crimes.

The first case is about the 2020 arrest of James Wade King, who was 55 years old when he tried to lure what he thought was a 13-year-old girl into having sexual relations with him. The 13-year-old girl was actually Godwin being a decoy after he got a tip that the social media platform AntiLand was a hunting ground for sexual predators who target children. King had a criminal record that included prior arrest for terrorist threats and filing a false police report.

As Godwin explains in the show, law enforcement officials and other decoys have to be very careful about not committing entrapment. When decoys pose as underage children on the Internet, the decoys immediately say that they are underage, and they wait until the perpetrator is the first to initiate the sex talk. In the case of King, he asked to see a photo of his potential victim, so the task force’s lead forensic investigator Audrey Palmer was enlisted to send a photo of herself as a teenager and pretend to be 13 years old when she talked on the phone with King.

There is video footage of King being arrested and interviewed by Godwin after the arrest. At first, King acts like he didn’t know that the female he was trying to have sex with was underage. In the post-case commentary, Godwin says he never believed King’s denials. King cuts the interview short when he says he wants to speak to an attorney.

An epilogue to the case mentions that King pleaded guilty to attempted enticement of a minor. In December 2021, he was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison. This prison sentence was no doubt affected by his prior criminal record.

The second case featured in the episode is about the 2022 arrest of Jared Capizzi, who was caught with more than 2,000 child sexual abuse (CSA) materials on his technology devices and more than 8,000 CSA images. “He had one of the largest sickest collections of child pornography I have ever seen,” Godwin says while not even trying to hide his disgust. Capizzi, a construction worker who was on parole at the time of this arrest, had a criminal record that included drug-related arrests, fraud and forgery.

At the time of his arrest for CSA possession, Capizzi was living with his mother. There’s police footage of the house being searched after police got a warrant. His mother (whose face is blurred out to protect her privacy) is shown sitting in a room with another elderly woman and expressing disbelief at what is happening. It’s also mentioned that Capizzi is the father of an underage son living with the son’s mother, who is an ex-partner of Capizzi’s.

Meanwhile, in the interrogation room, Capizzi doesn’t know at first why he’s been brought in for questioning, so he signs a waiver saying that he doesn’t need to have an attorney present during this questioning. Godwin takes the two phones that Capizzi brought with him and then confronts Capizzi about Capizzi’s involvement in receiving and distributing CSA materials. Capizzi gets flustered and is caught in lies and contradictions. In 2024, Capizzi pleaded guilty to receipt of child pornography and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

The last case is the most dramatic because it shows police footage of the perpetrator almost running away nearly escaping arrest. William Ross Potter was busted in 2017, when he tried to entice what he thought were two underage teen boy cousins into having a sexual tryst with him. Potter, who was 59 at the time, was apprehended outside of a store where he bought condoms for this meetup.

Godwin comments in a repulsed tone that when Potter thought he was going to meet these “underage teens,” Potter arrogantly demanded that his potential victims had to reimburse Potter for the condoms. After his arrest, Potter is heard making a phone call to his wife, whose voice is disguised on the show, to protect her privacy. She is noticeably upset. In the phone call, Potter tries to downplay the arrest and makes it sound like he was unfairly set up by police.

It wasn’t the first time that Potter was arrested for a sex crime. He had also a 2017 arrest in Waco, Texas, for online solicitation of a minor. An epilogue mentions that Potter pleaded guilty to the attempted enticement of a minor, for the arrest that was featured on this show. He was sentenced to 19 years in federal prison.

Godwin (who has a professional and sturdy way of presenting each case) mentions that being a parent has made him especially concerned about children’s safety. Godwin and his colleagues repeatedly say that even though they witness a lot of disturbing things as part of their job, these task force members say they like doing their job because it’s about protecting children. Also featured in this episode are Godwin’s Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force detective colleagues Robert Golladay (a technology forensics expert whom Godwin describes as his best friend for more than 30 years) and Brandon Poor.

“Predator Hunters” has minimal re-enactment footage and instead makes Godwin’s storytelling and the police camera footage the driving forces for the show’s narratives. The rapport and the camaraderie seems genuine for the task force members featured on this show. An area where “Predator Hunters” can possibly improve is by using each case to give tips or advice to people on how to prevent or spot online sex predators who might be targeting children.

“To Catch a Predator” and its former host Chris Hansen are known for “gotcha”-style confrontations with suspected sex predators who arrive at decoy houses. Viewers who want to see those types of confrontations might think that “Predator Hunters” is boring in comparison. One of the biggest flaws of “To Catch a Predator” and copycat shows is that they don’t give follow-up information on what happened to the legal cases of the arrested suspects. “Predator Hunters” is admittedly predictable, because all the predators whose arrests are featured on the show were convicted as a result of those arrests. However, updates on “Predator Hunters” provide satisfying conclusions for viewers who want to know if justice was really served.

A&E premiered “Predator Hunters” on March 5, 2026.

Review: ‘Desert Law,’ starring members of police departments in Arizona’s Pima County

January 10, 2026

by Carla Hay

Isaiah Alavrez in “Desert Law” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Desert Law”

Culture Representation: The documentary series “Ozark Law” features a racially diverse group of people (mostly white, Latin and black) who are connected in some way to law enforcement in Arizona’s Pima County.

Culture Clash: Law enforcement officials deal with various people for real or perceived law violations.

Culture Audience: “Desert Law” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in low-budget true crime docuseries that show how law enforcement works in a specific region of the United States.

“Desert Law” is a very boring and inferior version of “Cops.” This docuseries takes place in Arizona’s Pima County, but the show’s generic law enforcement interactions don’t set this series apart from all the other shows that imitate “Cops.” Ever since “Cops” debuted in 1989, there’s been a slew of copycat shows that have the same format, which is supposed to give viewers the feeling that each episode is a “ride-along” with the patrol officers who are featured on the show.

“Desert Law” is produced by Twenty Twenty Productions for A&E. A&E did not make screener episodes available for review before the series premiere. Therefore, only the series’ first episode, titled “Welcome to Pima County,” will be featured in this review. Tucson is the largest city in Pima County.

“Desert Law” has the expected captioned statements that people who are seen being arrested on the show are innocent until proven guilty, and charges could be reduced or dropped. With few exceptions, if someone is shown being arrested on “Desert Law,” the show has a caption listing that person’s charge or charges. The show does not reveal the names or show the faces (which are blurred out) of most of the who are seen being questioned, detained or arrested by law enforcement in each episode.

Part of the attraction of watching a show like “Cops” is to see the expressions on people’s faces when they interact with the police, especially when people are caught doing something wrong. Because “Desert Law” doesn’t show the faces of people in these circumstances, it makes the show look blander and more generic than similar-concept shows that don’t hide the faces of people who interact with law enforcement. It’s one of the many reasons why “Desert Law” is a forgettable docuseries about cops on the job.

In the beginning of the first “Desert Law” episode, it’s mentioned that the police who work in this part of Arizona often have to work in temperatures that reach more than 100°F. You wouldn’t know it from watching this episode, which filmed Pima County police from May 23 to May 26 (Memorial Day weekend) in 2025. You don’t see anyone mentioning the heat. You don’t even see people sweating, even though most of what is shown in “Desert Law” takes place outdoors.

The police featured in the episode are hard-working and dedicated, but there isn’t much insight into who they are, other than they seem to be on their best behavior because they’re being filmed. Detective Scott McLeod gets the most screen time and talks about his many years on the job (17 years at the time this episode was filmed) and how he would quit being a law enforcement officer if he lost his ability to care about people.

In the beginning of the episode, it’s mentioned that Memorial Day is a busy weekend for law enforcement because of all the partying going on. Will these cops make a lot of arrests of rowdy, intoxicated people? No. Almost all the calls that the police are shown responding to are fairly tame, except for the first and last incidents in the episode.

The first incident shows McLeod and a deputy named Rebecca Allen as among the police who get involved in a vehicle chase that also has a police helicopter joining in on the hunt. The suspect gets out of a truck, after trying to ram other cars to get out of the way. Luckily, no one is hurt during this chase. The suspect gets tased by police and is arrested.

Fentanyl and drug paraphernalia are found in the suspect’s truck. He’s arrested on multiple charges, including resisting arrest and possession of a narcotic drug. McLeod comments, “This town is plagued with fentanyl.” It’s the only fentanyl-related arrested that’s shown in the episode.

The episode then drags with fairly uneventful incidents. Deputy Isaiah Alvarez responds to a call in the city of Ajo about a suspected thief who stole items from a gas station convenience store. The man who is stopped by police is hostile and defensive, as he’s detained in a police car and rants about being abused by police in the past. He turns out not to be the theft suspect, but he is arrested for an outstanding warrant for disorderly conduct.

A deputy named Anthony Stewart is a British immigrant who good-naturedly jokes about how people react to his British accent. Stewart is seen patrolling a park after it’s closed, to look for trespassers. On three separate occasions, Stewart is shown catching three different couples having sex in a vehicle in a deserted parking lot. No one is arrested, and he lets each couple go with a warning.

Stewart also has a friendly warning response to a nervous young woman who is seen wandering alone in the park’s parking lot. She makes repeated apologies because she says she didn’t known the park was closed. He tells her to leave (her car is parked nearby) and to drive safely. Not exactly dangerous crime-busting cases.

On a residential street away from the park, Stewart is shown responding to a noise complaint about a loud party, whose hosts agree to lower the volume of the party. One of the party hosts makes a remark to Stewart about Stewart’s British accent, by asking if Stewart is from London and asking if Brits say “bloody hell” and “crikey.” Stewart says he’s from England, but not the city of London. Stewart also tells him that although “bloody hell” is a British term, “crikey” is Australian slang from Australia.

This episode of “Desert Law” shows more people getting a warning instead of getting arrested. A man is briefly detained for driving in the wrong direction on a highway. It turns out that his SUV had an expected malfunction and can only operate in reverse. He thanks the police for helping him.

In a separate incident, McLeod detains a man who’s with a topless, emaciated-looking female passenger in the man’s car. A small amount of drugs are found in the vehicle. After McLeod asks him how long he’s been addicted, the man admits he’s addicted to drugs, especially cocaine. Because not enough drugs are found in the car, the detainee and his companion are let go with a warning. The drug-addicted man makes a not-very-convincing comment that he will consider getting professional help for his addiction.

The last incident shows someone getting arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) and failing to remain at the scene of a fatal car accident. The male suspect was driving a truck that hit another man on a highway. The accident victim was dead by the time the police arrived. The suspect, who is shown refusing to take a breathalyzer test, has a passenger who is a cooperating witness. It’s the most compelling case, but it’s rushed in so quickly in the last 10 minutes of the episode, it barely makes an impact.

Two deputies are featured in this DUI investigation: Anthony Pool and Dylan Ellis-Hollings. Pool has the more memorable personality because he brags that his nickname is The DUI Guy because of all the DUI arrests that he’s made. Pool claims that he’s responsible for “50%” of the DUI arrests in Pima County. The show doesn’t verify if this claim is true or not.

“Desert Law” might be adequate enough for people who don’t get tired of TV shows that document what law enforcement does on the streets. However, there’s a glut of these shows that all tend to look the same. The police work that helps society can be commended, but in “Desert Law,” viewers won’t learn anything new if they’ve seen these types of “ride-along” shows many times before.

A&E premiered “Desert Law” on January 7, 2026.

Review: ‘Crime in Progress,’ an episodic series about various crimes and investigations captured mostly on police camera footage

January 9, 2026

by Carla Hay

Roxanne Sanchez in “Crime in Progress” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Crime in Progress”

Culture Representation: The documentary series “Crime in Progress” features a racially diverse group of people who are connected to law enforcement or crimes in some way.

Culture Clash: The TV series has compilation of mostly police camera footage (such body cams and dashboard cams) to show how police reacted to a crime in progress.

Culture Audience: “Crime in Progress” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of low-budget true crime documentaries that show the perspectives of law enforcement at crime scenes and investigating crimes.

A fugitive tries to hide from New Mexico police in “Crime in Progress” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

Using raw footage that is mostly from police cameras, “Crime in Progress” is a gripping and suspenseful true crime documentary series, thanks to skillful editing. Each episode has a different case, with no narration or post-investigation interviews. “Crime in Progress” has captions to explain certain things in each episode. It’s a simple but compelling format.

“Crime in Progress” is produced for A&E by the A+E Factual Studios group. Kelly McClurkin is the showrunner, as well as an executive producer, for “Crime in Progress.” Only the first episode of “Crime in Progress” was available to review before the series premiered. 

The first episode, titled “Nowhere to Hide,” chronicles the race-against-time hunt for a fugitive who shot and killed police officer Justin Hare in Tucumari, New Mexico, close to 5 a.m. on March 5, 2024. Hare had been responding to a 911 call about a man wearing a hoodie who was trying to flag down passing motorists on a highway. The man was standing next to a white BMW and appeared to be in distress.

Dash cam footage and body cam footage show that Hare was alone when he drove to the scene and approached the man, who said he needed a ride to town because his car had a flat tire. Hare said he could give the man a ride. But instead of accepting this ride, the man shot Hare three times and stole the car.

The episode shows the police’s frantic search for Hare, who was found unconscious in a field off of the side of the highway. Hare later died after medical help arrived. At the same time, police also began the hunt for the fugitive, who was later identified as Jaremy Alexander Smith, someone with a long history of committing other crimes. The entire ordeal lasted 51 hours.

Law enforcement officials from the Mexico State Police are shown throughout this episode. They include police officers Antonio Esparza, Xavier Garcia, Nathan Schwebach, and Jordan Romero; deputies Mario Chavez Thicc’ums, Roxanne Sanchez, Robert Lowe and Jose De La Cruz; sergeant Robert Ramirez; sheriff Dennis Garcia; and lieutenant Nicholas Marrujo.

Mexico State Police chief W. Troy Weisler is seen in a press conference where he gets a little bit choked up when he announces that Hare has died and shows a dash cam photo of fugitive Smith, who is wanted for first-degree murder and other crimes during this manhunt. Weisler gives a harsh “we’re going to get you” warning during this press conference. The hunt for Smith includes responding to callers’ tips, interviewing witnesses, a foot chase and a shootout in a residential Albuquerque neighborhood. The legal outcome of this criminal case is included in the episode’s epilogue.

In documentaries such as “Crime in Progress,” there’s an inherent assumption that the suspect or suspects will be arrested at the conclusion of the investigation that’s documented on camera. But this show also reveals the unfiltered emotions of law enforcement on the scene, whether it’s a cop giving encouragement to a dying colleague; the adrenaline and anxiety of police chasing a suspect; or the grief of law enforcement mourning the loss of a respected colleague.

The series premiere episode of “Crime in Progress” includes footage from the funeral service of Hare, who left behind a wife and two sons. Hare is described as a fantastic person who cared deeply about other people. Only the most cynical and cold-hearted people won’t feel anything after seeing this funeral footage. “Crime in Progress” lives up to its title but it admirably doesn’t leave out the aftermath of the criminal cases that are featured in each episode.

A&E premiered “Crime in Progress” on January 1, 2026.

Review: ‘Ozark Law,’ starring members of police departments in the Ozark area of Missouri

January 8, 2025

by Carla Hay

Mark Kardula in “Ozark Law” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Ozark Law”

Culture Representation: The documentary series “Ozark Law” features a predominantly white group of people (with a few black people, Latin people and Asians) who are connected in some way to law enforcement in Missouri’s Ozark area.

Culture Clash: Law enforcement officials deal with various people for real or perceived law violations.

Culture Audience: “Ozark Law” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in low-budget true crime docuseries that show how law enforcement works in a specific region of the United States.

Caleb Harvey and K-9 Unit dog Donzi in “Ozark Law” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Ozark Law” follows the same template that originated with the docuseries “Cops.” The good news is a variety of arrests and law enforcement interactions are featured. The bad news is “Ozark Law” might over-rely on showing intoxicated people in trouble. It’s common knowledge that many people get arrested while intoxicated, but when a show about law enforcement focuses too much on intoxicated people making fools out of themselves before getting arrested, it becomes a bit tiresome and could turn into exploitation. When intoxicated people sign release forms for this footage to be shown on TV, they’re not signing these legal documents when they’re in their right minds.

“Ozark Law” has the expected captioned statements that people who are seen being arrested on the show are innocent until proven guilty, and charges could be reduced or dropped. With few exceptions, “Ozark Law” describes the legal outcomes of the arrests as “pending.” The show does not reveal the names of the people who are seen interacting with law enforcement in each episode. Some of the people have their faces blurred, which usually means they did not sign a release form to allow “Ozark Law” to reveal their faces on TV.

“Ozark Law” is produced by Lucky 8 for A&E. Only the first episode of the series was available for review before the series premiere. In this episode, titled “Welcome to the Lake,” a caption explains that Lake of the Ozarks in central Missouri has a population of about 6,993 people for nine months out of the year. But during the summer tourist season, the area gets millions of visitors, totaling more than 5 million a year.

“Welcome to the Lake” chronicles the Fourth of July 2024 weekend activities of law enforcement officials from two agencies: The Lake Ozark Police Department (LOPD) and the nearby Osage Beach Police Department (OBPD). It’s the first fourth of July weekend for LOPD chief James Boren in his new position as chief. Boren is seen briefly in the beginning of the episode and then isn’t seen again for most of the rest of the episode.

Instead, most of this episode consists of cops patrolling the streets during the day and night. At night (where the show has montages of crowds of people on the streets), most of what the cops have to deal with are responses to suspected crimes that are usually committed under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. Officer Tyler Shepherd arrests a young man who was reported as a trespasser at Marty Byrde’s, a gastropub named after the character played by Jason Bateman in Netflix’s “Ozark” series. The man gets arrested after a breathalyzer test shows that he has a blood alcohol level of .206, when the legal limit in Missouri is .08.

Sergeant Bobby McCrorey and Officer Kale Keagy of the OBPD respond to a possible driving-under-the-influence (DUI) incident at night, after a barefoot woman gets into a single-car accident that damaged the front of her car. She insists that she’s not drunk, even though she slurs her words and fails a field sobriety test. It turns out that her intoxication could have come from pills, since she confesses to possession of an unnamed drug in pill form that she has stashed in her car.

Officer Angel Macormic, who says she’s the only female officer in the LOPD, comments during a daytime patrol drive that she likes being treated like one of the guys. However, the only task she’s seen doing in this episode is the easiest task of the episode: She calls a tow truck to take away a Chevy Tahoe because it was illegally parked in a Marty Byrde’s parking space for disabled drivers.

The owner/driver of the car admits that he’s not disabled, but he’s amazed at how quickly his vehicle is being towed. Officer Macormic says that it’s because someone called the police department to report a car was illegally parked. It makes you wonder if whoever called the police knew that TV cameras would be there too, maybe to give Marty Byrde’s some extra publicity.

The episode gets more interesting when it shows something that isn’t the usual arrest for intoxication or a traffic violation. A husband and a wife in Osage Beach have had their home burglarized. Corporal Stephen Riner is the first law enforcement officer to arrive. He interviews the spouses, while Detective Steve Owens shows up later to investigate the scene of the crime.

The spouses are devastated to find out that items stolen from them include a safe containing about $80,000 in cash, jewelry (including the wife’s wedding ring), and a boat. The boat is later found abandoned. The case remained unsolved by the time this episode aired. It’s one of the unfortunate realities of non-fiction shows about law enforcement work.

Unlike many shows about law enforcement on the job, “Ozark Law” attempts to have a sense of humor and wants to show that these law enforcement officers are not always stern and imposing. On a busy night with partiers on the streets, Corporal Isaiah Huff accommodates a young man’s request to film Huff putting him under a fake arrest to be posted as a joke on social media.

Huff says that this type of interaction is to “establish rapport,” so that if the young man ends up being a witness to any crimes, it will be easier for Huff to get him to cooperate. Huff also says that when law enforcement officers are approachable and friendly to members of the public, it can help change the perception that law enforcement is all about instilling fear or abuse. Huff comments, “It makes us look like we’re not robots. We’re not. We’re normal people.”

This episode of “Ozark Law” has probably two of the most happy-go-lucky people you’ll ever see getting detained on a show of this type. Detective Sergeant Mark Kardula of the LOPD stops to assist a woman whose car ran out of gas on a freeway. It turns out she’s driving with a revoked license and gets arrested. She cheerfully says she needs to call her parents so that they can bail her out.

Officer Karl Glascock and Officer Tyler Shepherd of the LOPD detain a man for having a broken tail light on his car. He grins like he doesn’t have a care in the world while they run his driver’s license and registration through the system. The cops are suspicious that he might be carrying a weapon because of an unidentified “bulge” underneath his clothes.

But when the detainee allows them to do a body search, the cops find out it’s really just his insulin pump. The detainee’s trousers are unzipped, but he assures the cops that he’s not a pervert exposing himself. The cops believe his story that he just forgot to zip up his trousers because he was in a hurry.

“Ozark Law” falls short (at least in this episode) when it comes to giving more personal insight into the law enforcement officers who are featured. Kardula reveals only a hint of his background when he says he was born in Poland, where he lived for the first seven years of his life. Macormic gives a basic reason for why she wanted to work in law enforcement: “I want to help people.”

Based on this first episode, Kardula appears to have potential to be the show’s breakout star. He can be tough but he also has a side that’s approachable and cracks jokes on the job. There’s a scene where Kardula and a cop co-worker named Matthew Johnson give a friendly breathalyzer test to a woman who is unsure if her blood alcohol limit is safe and legal to drive. Kardula is also seen happily posing for photos with people (usually tourists) who ask.

Dennis Newberry, the mayor of Lake Ozark, is shown in a brief interview clip where he comments on the police department. And what he says sounds like something out of a press release: “They do a great job of protecting our citizens and our community.” “Ozark Law” has plenty of footage showing what these law enforcement officials do on the job, but the series would be better if it also showed more of who these law enforcement officials are as people.

A&E premiered “Ozark Law” on January 8, 2025.

Review: ‘Fugitive Hunters Mexico,’ starring an elite squad of Mexican law enforcement

January 2, 2025

by Carla Hay

A scene from “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Fugitive Hunters Mexico”

Some language in Spanish with subtitles

Culture Representation: The documentary series “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” features a predominantly Latin group of people (with some white people and African Americans) who are connected in some way to U.S. fugitives who have been accused of crimes and who have fled to Mexico.

Culture Clash: An elite squad of law enforcement officials in Mexico track down the fugitives, so that the fugitives can be extradited back to the United States to face criminal charges.

Culture Audience: “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of low-budget true crime docuseries that give an inside look at international crime fighting.

A scene from “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Fugitive Hunters Mexico” delivers exactly what the title of this no-frills docuseries promises, with expected outcomes in each episode segment about Mexican law enforcement capturing U.S. fugitives. The show capably gives insight into suspects’ motives. The fugitives are almost always people who were arrested and charged with at least one felony but they fled to Mexico to avoid court appearances.

“Fugitive Hunters Mexico” (whose showrunner is Penny Fearon) is produced by Lucky 8 for A&E and has multiple cases featured per episode. Only the show’s first episode, titled “Trouble in Paradise,” was available for review before the series premiere. “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” sticks to a specific formula where viewers can expect to see the hunted fugitives caught in the end.

What will keep viewers interested in watching is seeing how these suspects are caught and how they were living Mexico while they were fugitives from the law. The Mexican law enforcement agents featured in the series are identified by their first names only. They include Jesús, Hector, Santiago and Victoria. The agents in Mexico work with U.S. agents, such as U.S. Marshals, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Agency (the U.S. agents aren’t featured in the show) in helping catch these accused criminals.

“Fugitive Hunters Mexico” is slickly produced, with plenty of drone camera shots that highlight much of Mexico’s natural beauty, as well as urban decay, depending on which part of Mexico is being filmed. “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” has a professional-sounding narrator (Armando Valdes-Kennedy), who has a narration style/tone that’s similar to “The First 48” narrator Dion Graham. The narration for “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” tends to get a bit repetitive by re-stating something that was shown just a few minutes earlier.

In the “Trouble in Paradise” episode (which was filmed in 2024), three fugitives are featured in three separate segments.

  • Jeffrey Leonard, a fugitive from Las Vegas, had been on the run from the law since 2021. He was wanted for charges of battery by strangulation because he was arrested for assaulting the roommate of his girlfriend at the time. It’s mentioned that Leonard is a registered sex offender, who was convicted of coercion and enticement of a minor in 2014. The hunt for Leonard takes the agents to Tijuana, where law enforcement received a tip that Leonard was living at a resort.
  • Adam Pittman, a 34-year-old suspected meth dealer, was in hiding from law enforcement since 2022. The agents track him down in the city of La Esperanza. Two of the agents go undercover, pretending to be a couple interested in buying a sofa from Pittman’s live-in girlfriend. Because the agents don’t have a warrant to enter the house where Pittman lives, they come up with a logical idea to lure him out of the house.
  • Jesse Frias—a 37-year-old from Prescott, Arizona—was running away from charges of kidnapping, assault and domestic violence of his wife. Frias had been a fugitive since 2021. Ironically, his wife was the first person he called after he gets caught in the city of Mexicali.

All of the show’s field agents and translators are professional and very watchable, but the first episode of “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” doesn’t show any agents with personalities that particularly stand out. What stands out are some of the crime confessions that these fugitives willingly make on camera after they’re caught. In interviews with the arresting agents, the fugitives also talk about how they like life in Mexico more than they like life the United States because they think Mexico has a more “freeing” lifestyle.

The fugitives have different reactions when caught. Leonard is genuinely surprised and initially denies knowing why he is being arrested. Pittman is the most agitated and angry about his arrest. Frias is the calmest and seems to know it was a matter of time before he was apprehended. What all three of these fugitives have in common is that they had previous criminal convictions and fled their more recent charges because they didn’t want to go back to prison.

Leonard and Pittman were living with women at the time of their arrest. The women (whose faces are not shown on camera) seemingly did not know until the arrests that their lovers were fugitives. Frias is another story because he hints that his wife knew where he was all along. It goes without saying that being a fugitive requires help from other people, who might or might not be knowing accomplices.

Most of the outcomes of the fugitives’ cases are not revealed in the episode, except for Frias, who gets an epilogue that gives an update of what happened after he was extradited back to Arizona. “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” has the usual disclaimer stating that suspects are innocent until proven guilty, and charges could be reduced or dropped. Regardless of the outcomes of these arrests, “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” offers a brief but fascinating glimpse at what happens when the law catches up to fugitives hiding in Mexico.

A&E premiered “Fugitive Hunters Mexico” on January 2, 2025.

Review: ‘Homicide Squad New Orleans,’ starring members of the New Orleans Police Department

January 1, 2025

by Carla Hay

Detective Walter Emond in “Homicide Squad New Orleans” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Homicide Squad New Orleans”

Culture Representation: The documentary series “Homicide Squad New Orleans” features a group of mostly African American and white people involved in murder cases in New Orleans.

Culture Clash: The police detectives on these cases often have to deal with witnesses who are untruthful or refuse to cooperate.

Culture Audience: “Homicide Squad New Orleans” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of cheaply made true crime documentaries that follow a TV procedural format.

A scene from “Homicide Squad New Orleans” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

Ever since the documentary series “Cops” premiered in 1989, there’s been a growing number of docuseries or reality shows that showcase law enforcement officers doing their jobs. Most of these shows copy each other and don’t do anything that’s considered award-worthy. “Homicide Squad New Orleans,” which follows homicide investigators who work for the New Orleans Police Department, is one of these generic shows.

The homicide squad’s hard-working people are commendable in how they solve cases. They deserve better than this inferior imitation of “The First 48.” This sluggish show’s format is too formulaic and perpetuates racial stereotypes of New Orleans murders. “Homicide Squad New Orleans” is produced by Wolf Entertainment and 44 Blue Productions for A&E. “Law & Order” creator Dick Wolf is one of the executive producers of “Homicide Squad New Orleans,” which is probably why every “Homicide Squad New Orleans” episode looks like a predictable procedural with the same expected outcome.

Only the first two episode of “Homicide Squad New Orleans” were available to review before the series premiered. Although each episode focuses on a different murder case, there are alarming similarities that raise some questions about how much stereotyping this series is going to continue to have in choosing which murder cases will be featured. This series makes it look like certain people in New Orleans are most likely to commit murders and be murder victims.

Both episodes feature African Americans being murdered by gun violence for no apparent reason than a petty argument. The murder suspects are young African Americans. In a city as diverse as New Orleans, it’s hard to believe that these are the only homicides that take place in the city. You get the feeling that these are mostly the types of homicides that will be featured in this dreadfully tedious series.

Each episode has narration from the lead detectives for each case. Unfortunately, the detectives read their narration stiffly. And it’s not their fault. They are not professional actors. Still, viewers of “Homicide Squad New Orleans” have to sit through the monotonous tone of the show’s scripted portions, which are basically exposition dumps.

Episode 1, titled “My Sister’s Keeper,” is about the murder of 15-year-old Raynard Williams, who was gunned down on a residential street on March 18, 2024, after defending his younger sister Ray’Anna in a verbal argument with other teens. Raynard’s mother Anndrea describes Raynard as “intelligent, outstanding and hilarious” and a good kid who wasn’t involved in crimes. Raynard’s grandmother describes him as a “loving child. He would give you the shirt of off his back.”

Detective Maurice Stewart is the lead investigator on the case. He mostly gets assistance from Detective Tianay Marshall. Stewart’s background is mentioned briefly in the episode: When he was 8 years old, he witnessed his father being murdered by gun violence. And in a bizarre twist of fate, the family of murder victim Raynard Williams lives the same home where Stewart lived when Stewart’s father was murdererd.

Stewart shows compassion for the family members and a persistent determination to solve the case. However, “charismatic” is not the first word that comes to mind when seeing Stewart talk on screen. The only other thing he’ll say about himself is that he’s “an honorary ‘hood member” when describing how he can relate to the people in the community that he serves. As for how his father’s murder affects him as a cop, Stewart comments: “We can’t let it affect our jobs.”

Episode 2, titled “In Cold Blood,” shows the investigation of two murder victims who were both shot to death on the streets on January 6, 2024. Based on the gunshot evidence and surveillance videos, police believe that both victims were killed four hours apart by the same person. The lead investigator on the case is Detective Walter Edmond, who mostly gets assistance from Detective James Fyfe.

One of the murder victims is a beautician in her 20s named Cayla Kelley. Almost nothing is told about her in the episode except that she had no history of criminal activity. The other murder victim is a homeless man whose name and age are not mentioned in this episode.

Edmond has a more passionate personality than most of his peers. (One of the best scenes in the episode is when he interrogates the murder suspect.) But the episode falls very short of telling any meaningful information about the murder victims. There are no epilogues with updates on what happened to the arrested supsects. Instead, each episode has a disclaimer stating that suspects are innocent until proven guilty, and charges could be reduced or dropped.

If you’ve seen enough of these types of shows, then you can easily predict how the police catch most of these murder suspects who are eventually arrested for the murders—collecting evidence at the crimes scenes, interviews with witnesses, surveillance videos, searches of homes and property, and checking phone records. Considering the plethora of other “cops on the job” docuseries that already exist, there isn’t enough in “Homicide Squad New Orleans” that stands out from the rest of the pack to make it a “must see” show.

A&E premiered “Homicide Squad New Orleans” on January 1, 2025.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-EqjsQzi4U

A&E debuts dog competition series ‘America’s Top Dog’

November 20, 2019

The following is a press release from A&E:

A competitor leaps over a fence in the ultimate K9 obstacle course in A&E’s “America’s Top Dog.” (Photo by Nico Therin/A&E)

In each one-hour episode of “America’s Top Dog,” four police K9 teams, including fan-favorites from the hit series “Live PD,” and one civilian team will face off for the title of “Top Dog” in three rounds of high velocity, furry competition. The skilled teams will be tested on their speed, agility, scenting ability, and teamwork by completing a series of expert tasks on one of the biggest and toughest K9 obstacle courses ever assembled – designed by experts to mimic real-life challenges that these furry heroes face every day on the beat. Teams will navigate a complex maze to locate scented items and apprehend a suspect in a bite suit with a takedown, among a variety of other challenges. Each week’s winning team will receive $10,000 and an additional $5,000 to donate to the animal charity of their choice. In the final week of competition, top competitors will return to the finale course to battle for the title of “America’s Top Dog” and an additional $25,000 cash prize.

Series host Curt Menefee is an award-winning veteran studio and game broadcaster who currently co-hosts “Fox NFL Sunday” in addition to wrap-up show “The OT.” Alongside Menefee, expert trainer Nick White is both a former US Marine and member of the Secret Service with years of experience working with K9s as the owner of a dog training company with locations across the country. Menefee and White watch the action unfold on the course each week and provide in-depth explanation on the competition rounds. Jamie Little is a seasoned motor sports reporter covering the pit road for FOX NASCAR, as well as an animal rescue ambassador who served as a reporter at the 2019 Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show. Little acts as sideline reporter on the course speaking with the teams as they make their way through the competition.

 

2019 Tribeca Film Festival movie review: ‘I Want My MTV’

May 3, 2019

by Carla Hay

Animation image from MTV in “I Want My MTV” (Photo by Candy Kugel)

“I Want My MTV”

Directed by Tyler Measom and Patrick Waldrop

World premiere at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York City on May 1, 2019.

The documentary film “I Want My MTV” should come with a warning that the movie is primarily the story of MTV’s first decade in the 1980s. Even with that narrow view, the film misses the mark in many areas. The documentary relies too heavily on the words of the self-congratulatory executives who founded MTV, instead of taking a more responsible, investigative approach and seeking out a more diverse array of perspectives of people who are also part of MTV’s history. The film delivers if you want a predictable and superficial ride down memory lane—commentary on artists and old music videos are expected—but this documentary glosses over and ignores a lot of MTV’s real history.

The story of MTV (Music Television) has been already told in several books, news reports and articles. The network had humble beginnings, because it had a tiny start-up budget, and many people (including a few of its early executives) thought MTV was a bad idea that would fail. MTV’s early network-identification promo video that had NASA footage of the 1969 moon landing was prompted out of necessity because the footage was in the public domain (in other words, free), and MTV couldn’t really afford a fancy ad campaign at the time.  Launched on August 1, 1981, MTV started out as a 24-hour music network that initially wasn’t even available in a lot of big cities, such as New York, where MTV is headquartered.

MTV’s lack of availability on many cable systems was the impetus for the famous “I Want My MTV” ad campaign where major artists (such as Mick Jagger, Billy Idol, Cyndi Lauper, Boy George, The Police, David Bowie and The Who’s Pete Townshend) said the “I Want My MTV” slogan on camera, and urged people to call their local cable companies to add MTV to their channel lineups. Les Garland, who used to be a programming executive at MTV, takes credit for getting Jagger to do an “I Want My MTV” spot, by essentially convincing the money-minded Jagger that he would be filming a promotional video, not an ad. As a joke, Garland said he paid Jagger just $1 after the spot was filmed.

MTV’s music library also started off very small, as most of the initial videos available were from British artists (who were used to making music videos for shows like “Top of the Pops”) or American artists whose music videos usually consisted of cheaply filmed live performances with the studio recordings dubbed in post-production. The first two videos played on MTV exemplified these types of clips: the futuristic “Video Killed the Radio Star” from The Buggles (a British New Wave band) and the simple performance clip “You Better Run” from Pat Benatar, who was America’s top female rock star at the time.

Several artists who became popular on MTV in the early ‘80s are interviewed in the documentary, such as Benatar and her guitarist/husband Neil Geraldo; Idol; Sting (co-founder of The Police); Eurythmics members Annie Lennox and Dave Stewart; REO Speedwagon lead singer Kevin Cronin; and Devo lead singer Mark Mothersbaugh. Also interviewed are two of MTV’s original VJs: Mark Goodman (a radio vet who describes his MTV audition process as “a little creepy” because it was in a hotel room, not a TV studio) and Alan Hunter, a self-described failed actor who got the job, despite having a “terrible” audition and no experience in broadcasting or the music industry. (MTV’s other original VJs—Nina Blackwood and Martha Quinn—are not interviewed, although there is archival footage of all the original VJs in the documentary. J.J. Jackson, another original MTV VJ, died of a heart attack in 2004, at the age of 62.)

To its credit, the documentary does not shy away from the controversy over MTV’s programming decisions. In its first two years, the network was frequently accused of racism for not playing enough black artists. MTV’s all-white first executive team—which included John Lack, Bob Pittman, Gail Sparrow, Fred Seibert, Tom Freston, Judy McGrath, John Sykes and Andrew Setos (Garland joined MTV later, after he had a long stint in radio)—are all interviewed in this documentary. Various excuses are given for excluding top-selling black artists from MTV’s playlists in the network’s early years.

One frequently given excuse is that the original concept of MTV was that it was supposed to be a rock’n’roll music channel. However, it’s a weak excuse because among the few black artists played on MTV in its early years were non-rock acts such as Musical Youth, Eddy Grant and Herbie Hancock. Meanwhile, bigger artists such as Michael Jackson, Prince, Rick James and Earth, Wind & Fire were being ignored by MTV.

The documentary includes a clip from the notorious 1983 MTV interview that Bowie did with Goodman, where Bowie asks Goodman why so few black artists are played on MTV. Goodman uncomfortably explains that too many black artists on MTV might scare the audience, especially those in “middle America.” It’s an incredibly racist belief, not to mention a condescending insult that wrongfully stereotypes people in the Midwest as automatically more racist than people who live on the East Coast and West Coast. Bowie’s withering stare and curt response in the interview speak volumes of his disgust. In the documentary, a present-day Goodman admits to being embarrassed about the interview all these years later, and he offers a sheepish apology for it.

The Bowie/Goodman interview exposed the mentality of MTV executives at the time, but the former MTV executives interviewed for this documentary who were in charge of making those decisions are still indignant and in denial over their racism. It’s not too surprising, because people who want to be thought of as “liberal” and “open-minded” don’t want to admit on camera that they’ve been racist. The former MTV executives are quick to pat themselves on the back in this documentary (Sparrow calls herself and the other executives “trend-setters, risk-takers and rebels”), but they don’t properly acknowledge their old-fashioned bigoted beliefs that prevented a lot of people of color from being part of MTV in its early years.

One example of this hypocrisy is when Sparrow, with hatred still etched on her face, talks about how Rick James’ “Super Freak” video was unacceptable to MTV at the time because James reminded her of a pimp and she didn’t like the way women were portrayed in the video. Yet, she doesn’t mention that MTV was willing to play videos from numerous (white) heavy-metal bands that often showed women in much more degrading scenarios, such as barely clothed or locked up in cages. Maybe MTV executives like Sparrow just didn’t like to see a music video of a black man being a sex symbol with women of different races. James was an outspoken critic of MTV at the time for not playing enough black artists, so it’s likely that MTV also had an unofficial ban on James, out of spite.

One of the most irresponsible parts of the “I Want My MTV” documentary is how it fails to give the full story of how Michael Jackson broke the racial barrier at MTV. Pittman tries to rewrite MTV history in this documentary by saying about the racism accusations: “Michael Jackson single-handedly pulled us out of that controversy,” and that it was MTV’s idea to “start courting Michael Jackson.” He also makes it sound like MTV had the vision to play Jackson’s videos right when his “Thriller” album was hitting big. What Pittman and the documentary did not talk about was the well-documented fact that CBS/Epic Records (namely, record-label chief Walter Yetnikoff) demanded that MTV play Jackson’s “Billie Jean” video or else the record company would boycott MTV. When MTV caved in, and saw that Jackson became the network’s most-requested artist, that opened the doors for more black artists to be played on MTV.

Yetnikoff, who was not interviewed for this documentary, told more details about this controversy in his 2001 memoir, “Howling at the Moon,” as well as in several media interviews. His credible account of MTV playing Michael Jackson only after MTV was threatened with a boycott has also been verified by numerous non-MTV people in the music industry who were involved at the time, none of whom are interviewed in this documentary.

The movie mentions that as MTV’s popularity grew in the 1980s, tensions grew between MTV and record companies because the record companies eventually wanted MTV to pay licensing fees for the videos. However, this documentary did not interview anyone who worked at record companies at the time to give their perspective. Video-promotion executives, who were on the front lines of music-industry relations with MTV, are shamefully left out of this documentary. Unlike some big-name artists, these past and present record-company executives are not that hard to get for interviews, so not including them in this film just shows that these documentary filmmakers were too lazy to get this valuable insight or they just didn’t care.

And even though “I Want My MTV” addresses the issue of MTV excluding many top-selling black artists in the network’s early years, ironically, the documentary does some noticeable racial excluding of its own, since no women of color are interviewed in the documentary at all. The movie focuses primarily on MTV in the ‘80s, and gives a spotlight to a long list of artists from that era, so it’s mind-boggling that this documentary erases black female artists who had a big impact on MTV in the ‘80s—such as Tina Turner, Whitney Houston, Janet Jackson and Salt-N-Pepa—by not giving a spotlight to any of these women of color.

No disrespect to Tegan and Sara (who were never really big artists on MTV but are interviewed in this documentary anyway), but there are plenty of women of color who were more influential in MTV’s history who could have been interviewed for this documentary but weren’t. The few people of color in this film who are interviewed are black men who talk about hip-hop or “Yo! MTV Raps”: Fab 5 Freddy, Ed Lover and Run-DMC’s Darryl McDaniel, who says that Run-DMC was probably the first popular MTV rap act because Run-DMC incorporated a lot of rock music in its songs.

MTV’s influence in hard rock/heavy-metal’s popularity in the mid-to-late 1980s—as well as many of the genre’s sexist videos that got heavy airtime on MTV—are also addressed in the documentary. On the one hand, former MTV executive McGrath says that all that sexist content was “demoralizing.” On the other hand, she and other executives were responsible for choosing to give it so much airtime on MTV. Warrant’s “Cherry Pie” video (which shows model Bobbie Brown being blasted with a fire hose by members of the band wearing firefighter hats) is mentioned in the documentary as an example of the types of MTV-approved rock videos where women were frequently treated as nothing more than playthings and props. Poison lead singer Bret Michaels, who’s interviewed in the documentary, says the popular MTV videos that Poison made were all in good fun.

Heart guitarist Nancy Wilson offers a different perspective of how the testosterone-fueled, often-sexist hard rock videos that MTV favored had an effect on her own career. She and her lead-singer sister Ann Wilson (who co-founded the rock band Heart) became successful with Heart in the mid-‘70s, when they didn’t have to wear revealing clothing to sell records. But by the mid-‘80s, Heart’s record company was pressuring them to make sexpot videos with cleavage-baring outfits that the Wilson sisters say they now regret doing. Nancy Wilson says that a lot of that pressure was because of MTV’s preference of showing rock videos with scantily clad women.

Music-video directors are given minimal scrutiny in the documentary. Mark Pellington, an early MTV hire, is interviewed, and says he was hired even though he had no experience at the time. A few music-video directors who went on to become major film directors are barely mentioned in the documentary, such as David Fincher and Michael Bay. However, the film does talk about how Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” video (directed by John Landis) was a game-changer that impacted how videos were made, as budgets became larger and concepts became more elaborate.

In addition to “Thriller,” other music videos that are mentioned as the most-influential of the 1980s include a-ha’s “Take on Me,” Dire Straits’ “Money for Nothing” and Peter Gabriel’s “Sledgehammer.” And although there are numerous artists whose careers were boosted because their videos got played on MTV, the documentary mentions that a few artists had their careers damaged by this exposure. Billy Squier is singled out in particular, for his 1984 “Rock Me Tonite” video (in which he awkwardly dances and slithers around in a “Flashdance”-styled ripped tank top), which ruined his rock credibility, and his career was never the same.

The documentary shows that the end of MTV’s ’80s golden era was around 1987, when some of the original team of network executives and VJs began to leave. It was also around this time that MTV began introducing more non-music programs, such as the game show “Remote Control,” which had a then-unknown Adam Sandler as a cast member.

As former MTV executive Freston says in the documentary, reality TV was “a blessing and a curse” for MTV. Grammy-winning musician Jack Antonoff adds that he (just like many other people who grew up with MTV) became frustrated with the decrease in music content on MTV over the years. The documentary also interviews OK Go, Good Charlotte twins Benji and Joel Madden and indie rock twins Tegan and Sara to offer their perspectives of musicians who were toddlers or weren’t even born when MTV was launched. (By 2010, MTV removed the words “music television” from its logo.)

One of the biggest flaws in the documentary is how it barely mentions the impact of the annual MTV Video Music Awards, which launched in 1984. Many of MTV’s biggest pop-culture moments came from the MTV VMAs. Perhaps the filmmakers couldn’t get the rights to a lot of VMA footage, but that shouldn’t have prevented the documentary from giving more time to discuss the VMAs, other than a passing mention.

Because the focus of “I Want My MTV” is so heavily concentrated on 1980s-era MTV, the documentary breezes through mentions of MTV’s post-1980s programming, such as “The Real World,” “Singled Out” and “Jersey Shore.” Artists who became popular on MTV after the ‘80s are barely acknowledged, so don’t expect to see anything significant about Eminem, Nirvana, the Spice Girls, Beyoncé, Rihanna, Sean Combs, Jennifer Lopez, Kanye West, Lady Gaga, Britney Spears or any boy bands. Alice in Chains guitarist Jerry Cantrell and Tori Amos are among the few ’90s-era artists who are interviewed in the documentary. It’s briefly mentioned at the end of the film that YouTube  (which launched in 2005) has significantly decreased MTV’s influence, and YouTube is now the main outlet where people see music videos.

“I Want My MTV” could have been a better documentary if directors Tyler Measom and Patrick Waldrop didn’t let the film be dominated by executives who haven’t worked at MTV in years, and if the filmmakers included a wider variety of people whose careers were also significantly impacted by MTV. In order to do a truly comprehensive history of MTV, the documentary probably should have been an episodic series instead of a feature-length film. “I Want My MTV” also comes at a time when a lot of people don’t want MTV, because the network just isn’t that relevant to pop culture as it was in the 1980s and 1990s. But for people nostalgic about MTV’s glory days and looking for a thorough examination of MTV’s history, this documentary is ultimately an incomplete disappointment with a lot of valuable perspectives shut out of the film.

UPDATE: A&E will premiere “I Want My MTV” as part of the “Biography” series on September 8, 2020.

Copyright 2017-2026 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX