Review: ‘Murder Has Two Faces,’ starring Robin Roberts, Mayra Escobar, Reina Solis, Roger Chiang, Bobby Chacon, Tiffany Taylor and Leroy West

May 6, 2025

by Carla Hay

Laci Peterson and Evelyn Hernandez in “Murder Has Two Faces” (Photo courtesy of ABC News Studios/Hulu)

“Murder Has Two Faces”

Directed by Lisa Cortés

Culture Representation: The three-episode documentary series “Murder Has Two Faces” features a racially diverse group of people (Latin, African American, white and Asian) who are connected in some way to U.S. murder cases that have been in the news.

Culture Clash: The series compares and contrasts media coverage and law enforcement’s handling of similar murder cases where the victims were white and the victims were not white. 

Culture Audience: “Murder Has Two Faces” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in watching true crime documentaries about how race plays a role in how people perceive crime victims.

Mayra Escobar and Robin Roberts in “Murder Has Two Faces” (Photo courtesy of ABC News Studios/Hulu)

“Murder Has Two Faces” is an admirable and candid true crime series that compares how similar murder cases are given different priorities by the media and law enforcement when the victims are white or not white. Robin Roberts hosts and does interviews with professional compassion. It’s not the first true crime documentary series to show how white supremacist racism can affect what happens to these murder cases. However, it’s the first that does a notable compare-and-contrast racial examination for well-known murder cases that have striking similarities.

Directed by Lisa Cortés (who is an executive producer of the series), “Murder Has Two Faces” has three episodes that all focus on the murders of women who were under the age of 35. The first episode, titled “Motherhood Interrupted,” compares and contrasts the cases of two murdered women who were eight months pregnant and were found dismembered separately in the San Francisco area in 2002: Laci Peterson (who was white) and Evelyn Hernandez (who was Latina). The second episode, titled “The Capitol Killings,” compares and contrasts the unrelated cases of two murdered women who worked for U.S. Congressmen in Washington, D.C.: Joyce Chiang (who was Asian) in 1999, and Chandra Levy (who was white) in 2001. The third episode, titled “Good Guys Gone Bad,” compares and contrasts the murder cases of killers who targeted sex workers who were the same race as the killers: Philip Markoff (also known as the Craigslist Killer) was white and was the prime suspect in a 2009 crime spree in Boston, while Khalil Wheeler-Weaver (also known as the Tagged Killer) is black and has been convicted of a 2016 series of murders that happened in New Jersey.

A few people who give commentary in all three episodes: Amara Cofer, creator of Black Girl Gone: A True Crime Podcast, talks about the racial disparities in coverage of cases involving white people versus coverage of cases involving people of color. Bobby Chacon is a retired FBI profiler who was involved in diving searches in the cases of Laci Peterson, Evelyn Hernandez and Joyce Chiang.

The cases in “Motherhood Interrupted” are so similar, for a period of time before one of these murders ended up being solved, investigators and the media mistakenly speculated that the same person could have committed both murders. The dismembered bodies of Peterson and Hernandez were both found on the shores of the San Francisco Bay. Both women were eight months pregnant with sons. Peterson and Hernandez were reported missing just seven months apart from each other.

Laci Peterson’s murder received worldwide media attention and is still the topic of many news reports and documentaries. She was reported missing in December 2002. The bodies of 27-year-old Laci and her unborn son Conner (who was her first child) were found in April 2003. It’s common knowledge that in 2004, her husband Scott Peterson was convicted of murdering Laci and Conner. In 2020, his death penalty sentence was overturned, and he was re-sentenced to life in prison without parole. Scott Peterson still maintains that he’s not guilty of these murders.

Hernandez, whose murder remains unsolved, was reported missing in May 2002, and her body was found in July 2002. She was a 24-year-old single mother who was pregnant with a son named Fernando. The father of Fernando is a married older man named Herman Aguilera, who worked as a limousine driver at the time of her disappearance. Just like Scott Peterson, the father of Fernando was an unfaithful husband who reportedly did not want this pregnancy. It’s mentioned in the documentary that murder is the number-one cause of death for pregnant women.

Aguilera, who was married at the time he and Hernandez had their affair, was last questioned by the San Francisco Police Department in August 2002, and he was never named as a suspect. Aguilera claims that he talked to Hernandez on the phone on the day that she disappeared, but he says he didn’t see her that day. Aguilera doesn’t have a solid alibi for the entire time that Hernandez could have disappeared that day. However, there has been no evidence that he saw her that day.

The documentary mentions that Aguilera could not be reached for comment. Unlike Scott Peterson, Aguilera has never publicly commented or given any interviews. The documentary does not disclose the name of his wife, but it’s mentioned that Aguilera and his wife stayed together after Hernandez’s disapperance and murder were in the news.

Hernandez also had a 5-year-old son named Alex from another relationship. Alex also went missing on the same day that Hernandez went missing. Although her body was found, the bodies of Alex and Fernando were not found. Fernando is presumed to be dead, but Alex is still officially a missing person.

The documentary also points out that socioeconomic class has a lot to do with prejudices in how murder cases are covered. Hernandez was a working-class immigrant who was originally from El Salvador. Laci Peterson was a middle-class homemaker who was born in the United States. Both had different experiences of the American Dream, but Laci was considered the more “important” story by the news media.

Although “Murder Has Two Faces” compares and contrasts what happened in the cases where the murder victims were white and were not white, it doesn’t spend too much time rehashing the enormous amount of media coverage that the white victims got. Instead, the docuseries makes sure that the women of color who were the murder victims get a thoughtful spotlight so that loved ones can talk about what these women were like when they were alive.

For “Motherhood, Interrupted,” the interviewees who knew Fernandez personally are Mayra Escobar, a Guatemalan immigrant, who was a friend of Hernandez since they were in high school together; Reina Solis, Hernandez’s sister who happens to be deaf; Twiggy Damy, a friend of Evelyn’s; and Berta Hernandez (no relation to Evelyn Hernandez), who was Evelyn’s drama teacher at a youth center called Casa de Los Jóevnes. They all describe Evelyn as someone who had an outgoing and strong personality.

Escobar says, “Evelyn had a light around her. Evelyn was such a charismatic person. She wanted to feel that she was important.” However, Escobar doesn’t sugarcoat the difficulties that Evelyn had in her life. According to Escobar, Evelyn left home at age 16 because Evelyn was not getting along with her strict mother. Evelyn also struggled financially.

Evelyn was also feeling despondent over her disintegrating relationship with Aguilera and his lack of enthusiasm for the arrival of their unborn child. For example, he wanted nothing to do with Evelyn’s baby shower that was supposed to take place a few days after she disappeared. (The baby shower was canceled because of her disappearance.) Escobar says that during the last few months of Evelyn’s life, Evelyn distanced herself from her family and friends. Damy says that it wasn’t until after Evelyn disappeared that her friends and family found out that Aguilera was married.

Lyanne Melendez, a reporter for KABC-TV in San Francisco, says she was “outraged” about the disparity between the media coverage that Laci Peterson got compared to Evelyn Fernandez. However, she makes this admission when commenting on the media that covered the Evelyn Fernandez case: “We were not pushing police like we did with Laci Peterson.” Melendez later comments on how Latin people are treated as crime victims compared to how white victims of similar crimes are treated: “As a Latina, it made me sad. It made me feel like we were not good enough.” She also notes of KABC-TV’s coverage of the Evelyn Hernandez murder: “We could’ve done better and not let go of the story.”

Dan Dedet, a detective who handles cold cases (investigations that have reached dead ends) at the San Francisco Police Department, comments in the documentary about the case of Evelyn Hernandez and her missing sons: “We could use the help from the public. We have a [phone] tip line where people can remain anonymous. I will never forget Evelyn and Alex. I would really like to close this case before I’m gone.”

The documentary mentions that there was also a language barrier that could have hindered the investigation because it’s uncommon for police investigators to know sign language, and investigators who know sign language weren’t readily available to communicate with Evelyn’s sister Solis, who is non-verbal. In the documentary, someone does voiceover interpretation for Solis’ sign language. There are also sometimes culture barriers when most of the investigating officials in the U.S. are white and only know how to speak English, and they have to interact with communities where the majority are people of color whose first language is not English.

Solis says she is always praying for Evelyn, Alex and Fernando: “They’re in heaven, and they’re being taken care of now.” Escobar adds, “We want justice for Evelyn and the boys.” Other people interviewed in this episode are Holly Pera, a retired homicide detective for the San Francisco Police Department; and Kelly St. John, a reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle; Danielle Slakogg, professor of criminology at Cal State University.

“The Capitol Killings” episode features impactful and heart-wrenching interviews with Roger Chiang, Joyce Chiang’s younger brother, who was a tireless advocate in pushing the police and the media to not let Joyce’s case become forgotten. Joyce, who was 27 years old when she died, disappeared from Washington, D.C.’s Dupont Circle in January 1999. Her decomposed body was found in the Potomac River in April 1999.

Roger describes the childhood that he and Joyce had as two of four siblings born in the United States to parents who immigrated from Taiwan. He says that they experienced angry racist bullying from people when they lived in Chicago as children. Roger remembers that this was his parents’ response to the racism: “They pushed us to do better.”

Joyce was a protective sister, says Roger, who adds: “She was one of the most loving, caring human beings in the world.” Amy C. Well, who was Joyce’s classmate and friend at Smith College, describes Joyce as the life of the party. Judy Kim, who was Joyce’s best friend in college, also describes Joyce as caring and very charming.

After graduating from Smith College, Joyce took night classes at Georgetown University Law School while she had a day job as an immigration advisor to U.S. Congressman Howard Berman. After she graduated from law school and passed the bar, she became an attorney at the U.S. immigration and Naturalization Service, which was the job she had at the time she disappeared.

Chandra Levy was a 24-year-old intern who worked with then-U.S. Congressman Gary Condit at the time she disappeared in May 2001. Her decomposed remains were found in Rock Creek Park in May 2002. In the time period between her disappearance and when her remains were found, there was a media frenzy that included the scandal that Condit was having an affair with Levy.

Condit, who always denied accusations that he was responsible for Levy’s disappearance, was considered the main person of interest until Ingmar Guandique, an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador, was caught and convicted of murdering Levy. A jailhouse informant gave a crucial tip that Guandique confessed to the crime, and DNA evidence proved that Guandique was the killer. His 2010 murder conviction was overturned in 2016, due to prosecutorial misconduct. Instead of getting a new trial, he was deported to El Salvador in 2016.

The widespread media exposure for the Levy case helped revive interest in the Joyce Chiang case. But some people believe that it’s a shame that the media will more likely pay attention to a case of a murdered person of color if it can be linked to a case of a white person who’s been missing or has been murdered. Naomi Ishisaka, assistant managing editor for the Seattle Times, comments on this racial inequality: “Our culture has ideas of what is a universal victim. And that is dictated by race and class and age … When it comes to Asian Americans, I think we’re largely invisible.”

Joyce Chiang’s family and other loved ones did not get the same closure for her case that there was for Levy’s case. There was the additional nightmare of Joyce’s case being erroneously described as a probable suicide by Terrance “Terry” Gainer, who was assistant chief of the Metropolitan Police of the District of Columbia from 1998 to 2002, and chief of the United States Capitol Police from 2002 to 2006. Gainer made those suicide theory remarks to the media after Joyce’s body was found. Roger Chiang believes there was some racial bias from Gainer (who is white) because Gainer pushed a theory that Joyce, who was under an internal investigation in her job, could have killed herself as part of Asian culture that teaches that suicide is an option for people who want to punish themselves for disgracing their families.

It wasn’t until 2011, when two murder suspects were identified as causing Joyce’s death, that the Metropolitan Police finally admitted their mistake and described Joyce’s death as a homicide that has been solved. The police believe that the two suspects—Steven Allen and Neil Joaquin—were drug users who robbed, kidnapped, and murdered Joyce because they saw her walking alone on a street and thought she would be an easy target. Allen and Joaquin became suspects because they committed similar robbery/kidnapping crimes, according to the Metropolitan Police.

The police theory is that the suspects dumped Joyce Chiang’s body in the Anacostia River (where some of her belongings were found), which leads to the Potomac River, where her body was found. Unfortunately, no one has been arrested or charged with her murder because not enough evidence was found to definitively link any suspects to the crime. Allen is currently serving a life sentence for an unrelated crime. Joaquin was last reported to be in his native Guyana and cannot be extradited for this case.

During this episode, some of Joyce’s answering machine messages are played for people being interviewed, and it moves some people to tears when they hear the messages. Roberts gets tearful when talking to Roger, who is emotional during many moments. However, he also expresses gratitude that Joyce’s death is now rightfully classified as a homicide, not suicide. He and many people felt that the suicide theory was unnecessary damage to her reputation when she couldn’t defend herself.

Other people interviewed in this episode are Laura Ashburn, reporter for WJLA-TV Washington, D.C., from 1996 to 2000; Chuck Regini, a retired FBI agent; Joe Gentile, a retired public information officer for the Metropolitan Police; journalist Eddie Dean; and James Young, a a retired police detective for the Metropolitan Police.

The “Good Guys Gone Bad” episode is about serial killers who had deceptive appearances of being harmless and upstanding young men. Markoff, the so-called Craigslist Killer, was a medical student in Boston with no previous arrest record. Investigators say that Markoff found his victims through ads that they placed on the website Craigslist. He was accused of robbing three sex workers and murdering one of them (Julissa Brisman), all during April 2009. Markoff was arrested and pleaded not guilty. In August 2010, when Markoff was 24, he committed suicide by asphyxiation in a Boston jail where he had been awaiting a trial whose start date had not been set at the time of his death.

Wheeler-Weaver, nicknamed the Tagged Killer, also used the Internet to find his victims. He contacted them through the Tagged social network. Just like Markoff, Wheeler-Weaver (who worked as a security guard) was in his early 20s and did not have a criminal record when he was arrested for murder. Because of DNA evidence and phone records, Wheeler-Weaver (who was born in 1996) was convicted of three murders that happened from September to November 2016. He received a sentence of 160 years in prison and won’t be eligible for parole until 140 years into his sentence, which means that he will die in prison.

The three murder victims—19-year-old Robin West, 20-year-old Sarah Butler and 33-year-old Joanne Brown—were strangled or asphyxiated, and their bodies were found in Orange, New Jersey, which was Wheeler-Weaver’s hometown. In 2022, Wheeler-Weaver was charged with the murder of 15-year-old Mawa Doumbia, who died of strangulation. He has maintained that he is not guilty of these four murders. At the time this documentary was released, a trial date had not been set for the Doumbia murder case.

This episode has perhaps the most blatant example of racial and socioeconomic prejudice when comparing how the authorities handled the Craigslist Killer case and the Tagged Killer case. In both cases, there were survivors who escaped attempted murder. But in the Craigslist Killer case, the survivors were immediately believed, and the media issued widespread warnings about the Craigslist Killer’s methods and the types of women he was targeting. Markoff was arrested within two weeks of his killing spree that he was accused of doing.

By contrast, Tagged Killer survivor Tiffany Taylor (who escaped by convincing Wheeler-Weaver to go back to her motel room to retrieve her phone that had damning evidence) wasn’t taken seriously by police when she reported that Wheeler-Weaver raped her and tried to murder her by strangulation. Taylor said she knew Wheeler-Weaver’s name, address and other important identifying information. But when police questioned him, they believed his denials and didn’t investigate further. Taylor was dismissed as a disgruntled sex worker who wanted to get revenge on a customer.

Taylor is interviewed in the documentary and says she still struggles with knowing that Wheeler-Weaver killed Butler after he tried to murder Taylor. She and many other people believe that Butler’s murder could have been prevented if police had taken Taylor’s evidence seriously and had arrested Wheeler-Weaver. Instead of sensationalizing the gruesome aspects of the attempted murder, this documentary takes the time to let Taylor tell the circumstances that led her to become a sex worker.

Taylor says she and her single mother fell on hard times after her mother was diagnosed with cancer, and they became homeless. Taylor says she was “running the streets to survive.” She was five months pregnant when Wheeler-Weaver tried to murder her. Taylor says one of her biggest motivations to survive was to not only save herself but also her unborn child.

One of the most emotionally moving parts of the entire series is when Robin West’s father Rev. Leroy West meets up with Taylor and comforts her. Taylor tells him, “I really appreciate you checking up on me.” He responds, “I’ve lost a daughter but gained a daughter.” They embrace in a very heartfelt moment that looks completely authentic, not staged.

Earlier in the episode Leroy West and his son Azrien Lee-West talk about what Robin was like. They both describe her as having a lively personality but she began to become rebellious at age 15 when her parents separated in 2016. Leroy says that whatever sex worker activity that Robin was involved with, she was new to it when she was murdered. Leroy comments on being angry at Wheeler-Weaver: “My anger is not going to bring my daughter back. Helping people is a way of keeping Robin alive.”

Other people interviewed in the “Good Guys Gone Bad” episode are Michael Krusznis, retired lieutenant of the Newark Police Department; Paul Sarabando, retired sergeant of the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office; Lea Webb, New York state senator of the 52nd District; Anthony Johnson of WABC-TV New York; and journalist Julia Martin.

If there’s any constructive criticism of this docuseries, it’s that documentary could have had an episode for a murder case involving an Indigenous/Native American person. Cases involving missing and murdered people have devastated a significant percentage of the Native American population but these cases rarely get national media coverage. During the media frenzy when travel vlogger Gabby Petito went missing in Wyoming in 2021, there were 51 Indigenous/Native American people (most of them women) who were reported missing in Wyoming in 2021, according to the National Crime Information Center. None of these cases for Indigenous/Native American people got even a tiny fraction of the media attention that Petito’s case got.

“Murder Has Two Faces” might not eliminate the problem of racial inequalities in how murders are reported by the media and investigated by law enforcement. However, this documentary series is a definite step in the right direction in bringing more awareness to the added injustice of certain crime victims being treated as inferior because of their race. And hopefully, this documentary will inspire more people to make a difference in reducing this problem.

Hulu premiered “Murder Has Two Faces” on May 6, 2025.

Review: ‘John Lewis: Good Trouble,’ starring John Lewis

July 6, 2020

by Carla Hay

John Lewis in “John Lewis: Good Trouble” (Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures)

“John Lewis: Good Trouble”

Directed by Dawn Porter

Culture Representation: Taking place in various parts of the United States, the documentary “John Lewis: Good Trouble” features a racially diverse (African American, white, Latino, Asian) group of people (mostly U.S. political insiders) talking about the life and career of Georgia U.S. Representative John Lewis, including Lewis himself.

Culture Clash: Most of the documentary is about Lewis’ ongoing fight for civil rights and social justice.

Culture Audience: This movie will appeal primarily to people with politically liberal views, since Lewis’ conservative opponents and critics are not included in the documentary’s interviews.

John Lewis in “John Lewis: Good Trouble” (Photo by Ben Arnon/Magnolia Pictures)

“John Lewis: Good Trouble” (directed by Dawn Porter) is a respectful biographical documentary that puts a lot of emphasis on the important, trailblazing work that U.S. Representative John Lewis (a Democrat representing Georgia’s 5th congressional district) has done for civil rights. But in the documentary’s enthusiasm to put Lewis on a pedestal, the film shuts out any opposing opinions. Regardless of anyone’s political beliefs, there’s no doubt that Lewis (who participated in the documentary) has led an inspiring life. However, it’s ironic that a man who’s known for standing up to opponents and critics has had his current opponents and critics excluded from a biographical film of his life.

Almost everyone interviewed in the movie is part of the U.S. mainstream political establishment, a Lewis family member, or someone who works for Lewis. The only Republican interviewed in the film is U.S. Representative Jim Sensenbrenner, who’s represented Wisconsin’s 5th congressional district since 1979.

Sensenbrenner, who is a former chair of the House judiciary committee, doesn’t really say anything substantial. He essentially praises himself and Lewis for being able to work together: “I think the cooperation, which has been outstanding, between John Lewis and myself ends up being an example that we can get important things done by being bipartisan, whereas if we were not bipartisan, they never would’ve happened.

Other people interviewed in the documentary are Democratic politicians Nancy Pelosi, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, James E. Clyburn, Cory Booker, Stacey Abrams, Ayanna Pressley, Sheila Jackson Lee and the late Elijah Cummings, who said he’s flattered when people mistake him for Lewis. And there are other known Democrats who are among the chorus of praise for Lewis in the movie, such as former U.S. attorney general Eric Holder, civil rights activist Bernard Lafayette Jr. and professor/historian Henry Louis Gates Jr.

Lewis’ past and present subordinates also share their thoughts, including Anthony Johnson (Lewis’ former press secretary); Michael Collins (chief of staff); Brenda Jones (communications director); Ruth Berg (former receptionist); Rachelle O’Neill (senior constituent and external affairs liaison). Lewis’ family members and close friends who are interviewed in the documentary include siblings Henry Lewis, Ethel Lewis-Tyner and Samuel Lewis; son John Miles Lewis; and Xernona Clayton, who was a close friend of John Lewis’ late wife Lillian Miles Lewis, who passed away in 2012, at the age of 73.

Clyburn (a U.S. Representative from South Carolina) says of John Lewis: “He’s probably the most courageous person I ever met.” Ocasio-Cortez (a U.S. Representative from New York) says that she wouldn’t be where she is today had it not been for the trails blazed by John Lewis and other civil-rights activists. “So much of John Lewis’ activism was to highlight the inaction of the federal government.”

Hillary Clinton has this to say about John  Lewis: “His voice and his example are needed, now as much as they’ve ever been since he was a young man.” Abrams comments: “You cannot replace John Lewis. It’s a matter of strategy, someone who has cultivated a story to remind us that our past has not passed.”

It’s not surprising that John Lewis doesn’t get any criticism from any of the people interviewed for this documentary. (And if they did say anything negative about him, it didn’t make it into the film.) What saves this movie from completely one-sided banality is that it does present an excellent historical view of the obstacles and brutal struggles that John Lewis has faced to fight for the causes that he believes in and passionately advocates. The film does a very good job presenting him as someone who doesn’t give up easily. He’s got a fiery and opinionated personality, but he also has deep compassion for others.

John Lewis (who was born in 1940 in Troy, Alabama) was at the forefront of the U.S. civil rights movement that began in the 1950s and blossomed into groundbreaking laws and sweeping social change in the 1960s. In the documentary, he remembers how his parents discouraged him from getting involved because they feared for his safety. But he ignored their concerns and decided to join the movement, despite getting beaten up and arrested several times.

John Lewis has always been a proponent of peaceful protests (consistent with what Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. also advocated), and he says he was also heavily influenced by Rev. James M. Lawson Jr., who taught him how to organize and act in peaceful demonstrations. The “good trouble” in the documentary’s title refers to John Lewis’ well-known catch phrase for the kind of trouble he likes to get into: If it’s for a good and worthy cause, it’s “good trouble.”

People who know about Lewis’ civil-rights history and what he does as a U.S. Representative probably won’t learn anything new from watching this documentary, which includes lots of great archival footage of his civil-rights activities. There’s also newer footage, such as when he gave speeches at rallies for fellow Democrats who ran for government positions in the 2018 mid-term elections. Beto O’Rourke, Colin Allred, Marc Veasey, Abrams and Lizzie Fletcher are some of the politicians who received John Lewis’ enthusiastic endorsement during their campaigns.

Although “John Lewis: Good Trouble” doesn’t uncover anything new or surprising about him, it will be an eye-opening documentary for people who don’t know much about John Lewis, who is a bona fide hero to a lot of Democrats and liberal-leaning voters. Much of the film discusses the personal sacrifices he went through to fight for a greater cause. Therefore, it’s no wonder that the documentary includes a lot of footage of star-struck people greeting Lewis with joyful hugs, enthusiastic handshakes and sincere thank yous when he goes out in public. The documentary also shows his lighter side by mentioning the viral video of John Lewis dancing to Pharrell Wlliams’ “Happy” (which is one of John Lewis’ favorite songs) in 2014.

It’s apparent from watching the film that his life revolves around his work, but that doesn’t mean that John Lewis has lost his priorities in how he treats people close to him. His chief of staff Collins gets emotional and teary-eyed when he remembers that when his father died in 2006, John Lewis went to the funeral of Collins’ dad instead of being at the historical signing of the re-authorization of the Voting Rights Act, which eliminated policies designed to prevent people of color and financially disadvantaged people from voting.

In the documentary, Pelosi (a U.S. Representative from California) says that the re-authorization Voting Rights Act poor people and  is one of Lewis’ biggest legacies: “One of the greatest experiences in the Congress which I treasure was working under John Lewis’ leadership and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus. We put together [the re-authorization of] the Voting Rights Act, which was passed in 2006.”

Even though the documentary has a plethora of praise from John Lewis’ current Democratic allies, the film doesn’t shy away from including details of past conflicts that John Lewis had with people fighting for the same causes. He says he was essentially removed as leader of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) when Stokely Carmichael was elected national chairman in 1966, because the SNCC no longer agreed with John Lewis’ pacifist beliefs. The documentary also mentions the friendship-turned-bitter-rivalry between John Lewis and fellow civil-rights activist Julian Bond when they campaigned against each other in 1986 for the same Georgia congressional seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Carmichael died in 1998, and Bond died in 2015, but it would’ve been interesting for the documentary to include the perspectives of people who were allies of Carmichael and Bond when they were political rivals to John Lewis. The closest that the documentary comes to interviewing anyone who speaks of having political tensions with John Lewis is when Bill Clinton (who is pro-death penalty) comments that John Lewis’ anti-death penalty views helped Bill Clinton became more open-minded on the issue. Bill Clinton says of John Lewis: “He was against the death penalty as a matter of conscience.”

“John Lewis: Good Trouble” could have been a boring retrospective about a longtime politician/activist looking back on his glory days. But the documentary makes it clear that he’s still got a lot of fight in him for challenges facing the U.S. and the world today. And true to his nature, he’s not going to back down from any fights.

As he says in the opening scene of the documentary: “I feel lucky and blessed that I’m serving in the Congress, but there are forces today trying to take us back to another time and dark period. We’ve come so far, we’ve made so much progress, but as a nation and as a people, we’re not quite there yet. We have miles to go.”

Magnolia Pictures released “John Lewis: Good Trouble” in select U.S. cinemas, on digital and on VOD on July 3, 2020.

July 17, 2020 UPDATE: John Lewis died of pancreatic cancer on July 17, 2020. He was 80 years old. Lewis had publicly announced his cancer diagnosis in December 2019.

Copyright 2017-2026 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX