Review: ‘Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.,’ starring Jonas Dassler, August Diehl, David Jonsson, Flula Borg, Moritz Bleibtreu, William Robinson and Clarke Peters

November 12, 2024

by Carla Hay

Flula Borg and Jonas Dassler in “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” (Photo courtesy of Angel Studios)

“Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.”

Directed by Todd Komarnicki

Culture Representation: Taking place from 1914 to 1945, in Europe and in the United States, the dramatic film “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” (a biopic of German pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer) features a predominantly white cast of characters (with some African Americans) representing the working-class and middle-class.

Culture Clash: Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who was executed by Nazis in 1945, was an outspoken pacificist and activist against the Nazi regime that caused the Holocaust and other atrocities.

Culture Audience: “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” will appeal mainly to people who are interested in World War II-era historical dramas and faith-based films, but this heavy-handed movie distorts facts to make it look like Christianity was the driving force for the anti-Nazi movement.

David Jonsson, Clarke Peters and Jonas Dassler in “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” (Photo courtesy of Angel Studios)

“Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” is an example of a faith-based movie that tries to pass itself off as a credible historical drama but has alarmed many experts on the film’s subject matter for how this movie could be used for a Christian nationalist agenda. This tedious and inaccurate biopic of German pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer makes his suffering from Nazi hate look more important than the non-Aryan targets of the same hate. Several cast members have condemned any Christian nationalism co-opting of this movie. Even without this condemnation, “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” is a misguided movie that’s a hokey and jumbled mess.

Written and directed by Todd Komarnicki, “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” (formerly titled “God’s Spy”) seems to have very good intentions in its messages of how Bonhoeffer was an activist against Nazi hate. And to be clear: “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” does convey the same messages that say Nazi ideology is evil and poisonous to humanity. However, the offensive preachiness and inaccuracies in the movie have to do with sidelining people who’ve experienced the worst punishments from Nazi hate, in order to make it look like Bonhoeffer had a brand of “white savior” Christianity that deserves the most praise in fighting against Nazi hate.

The International Bonhoeffer Society and several principal cast members from “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” have, according to a statement, “distanced themselves from possible misuses of the film. They stand behind the calls from Bonhoeffer scholars, church leaders, and extended members of the Bonhoeffer family to stop the distortion of Bonhoeffer’s life and legacy to justify Christian Nationalism and political violence.” Read the full statement here. The International Bonhoeffer Society is a non-profit group “dedicated to advancing the theology and legacy of German pastor-theologian and Nazi resister, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, in the academy, church, and world,” according to a description on the International Bonhoeffer Society’s website.

The 10 cast members who have disavowed this movie being used by Christian nationalists or to justify political violence:

  • Jonas Dassler (who plays the adult Dietrich Bonhoeffer)
  • August Diehl (who plays German theologian Martin Niemöller)
  • David Jonsson (who plays American Baptist Church worker Frank Fisher)
  • Moritz Bleibtreu (who plays Karl Bonhoeffer, Dietrich’s father)
  • Nadine Heidenreich (who plays Paula Bonhoeffer, Dietrich’s mother)
  • James Flynn (who plays Dr. Rascher, a Nazi medical doctor)
  • Lisa Hofer (who plays Sabine Bonhoeffer, Dietrich’s twin sister)
  • Felix von Bredow (who plays Rudolf-Christoph von Gersdorf, a German intelligence officer)
  • Patrick Moelleken (who plays Walter Bonhoeffer, Dietrich’s older brother)

In “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.,” there’s plenty in the movie that shows Dietrich as a pastor. But there’s a bare minimum showing him as a spy and even less showing him as a would-be (not actual) assassin. Adding to the misleading title, the movie’s main poster shows Dietrich holding a gun, which goes completely against the real Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s pacificist beliefs.

The movie’s marketing materials make it look like “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” is about a vengeful religious crusader who’s intent on murdering Nazi leader Adolf Hitler to stop the Holocaust and to be a World War II hero. In real life, in 1945, Dietrich Bonhoeffer (who was 39 years old at the time) was executed by hanging in Flossenbürg, Germany, after he was accused of money laundering and a conspiracy to assassinate Hitler. In the movie, this death is depicted in a way that looks uncomfortably like a toned-down and misleading version of what really happened to someone imprisoned by Nazis for an accusation of planning to assassinate Hitler.

“Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” begins in 1914, by showing 8-year-old Dietrich (played by Phileas Heyblom) having an idyllic childhood in his hometown of Breslau, a city that was part of Germany at the time but is now part of Poland. Dietrich’s psychiatrist/neurologist father Karl Bonhoeffer and Dietrich’s teacher mother Paula Bonhoeffer are depicted in the movie as having six children, including Dietrich’s twin sister Sabine (played by Luise Landau) and eldest child Walter, who was Dietrich’s most beloved sibling. An early scene in the movie shows Walter playing hide-and-go-seek games with Dietrich.

Dietrich’s childhood bliss is shattered in 1914, when Walter goes away for military service in World War I and is killed during this military duty. The movie’s timeline jumps all over the place in a way that will cause confusion for anyone who doesn’t know Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s story. After Walter’s death, the movie cuts to a quick scene of Dietrich in a Nazi prison in Buchenwald, Germany, in 1945, with no real context for why he is there until much later in the movie.

The movie then abruptly cuts to 1930, to show the origins of Dietrich becoming a Lutheran pastor. But even that part of his history is truncated, because the movie completely omits his university education in Germany, where he received a Ph.D. in theology from Humboldt University of Berlin in 1927. The first time that movie shows Dietrich as a theology student, it’s in 1930, when he’s a German immigrant at Union Theological Seminary in New York City.

Dietrich is considered to be a brilliant student in this American seminary, where he gets some jealousy and curiosity from other students in the seminary. While at Union Theological Seminary, Dietrich meets and befriends fellow student Frank Fisher, who introduces Dietrich to jazz nightclubs and the Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem, where Frank is a member of the congregation. And the next thing you know, Dietrich is instantly accepted as the only white member of the congregation, and he becomes a Sunday school teacher for the church.

“Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” pretends that any realistic racial tension or racial skepticism that Dietrich might have experienced just didn’t exist for him as a white person who hung out with only African Americans. Instead, the movie makes it look like he was able to seamlessly and easily become a part of the African American community with no racial obstacles whatsoever. At a jazz club, Dietrich becomes a star attraction due to his piano-playing skills and gets even more applause and more attention than the African American musicians who regularly play there.

Dietrich is invited to a group dinner at the home of Reverend Powell Sr. (played by Clarke Peters), the leader of the Abyssinian Baptist Church. Frank is also a guest at this dinner. Once again, Dietrich is the only white person in the room, but he is treated like the most important person in the room. His thoughts and needs get the highest priorities.

When Dietrich makes an apology on behalf of white people about the white supremacist racism that he hears is rampant in America, Frank tells Dietrich that he expects Dietrich to set an example to other white people on how not to be racist: “We don’t need to you to be sorry, D. We just need you to show the world.” At this point, Dietrich might as well be wearing a T-shirt that says: “I’m a being propped up as a white Christian savior in this movie.”

The closest that “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin” comes to showing the brutality of white supremacist racism in America is in a scene where Frank wants Dietrich to learn a lesson by seeing this type of racism firsthand. When Dietrich and Frank are on a visiting trip in Washington, D.C., Frank tells Dietrich to rent a room at a nearby inn. Dietrich is able to easily rent the room from the white innkeeper (played by Scott Winters) on duty at the front desk. The manager is polite and helpful to Dietrich.

Within a few minutes of Dietrich renting the room and getting the room key, Frank goes into the inn and tells the innkeeper that he’s a friend of Dietrich’s and will be sharing the room with him. The innkeeper’s attitude immediately turns hostile. The innkeeper pulls out a shotgun, points it at Frank and Dietrich, and orders both of them to return the room key and leave the building. Dietrich is shocked, but Frank is not shocked at all.

Once again, Dietrich becomes the center of attention as the “white savior” when he insists that Frank should be allowed to use the room too. The innkeeper violently reacts by using the gun to hit Dietrich on the forehead and causes a bloody wound from this assault. The innkeeper doesn’t do anything to Frank except call him a racial insult. In real life, Frank would be more likely than Dietrich to get physically attacked by this racist, but “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” is insistent on making Dietrich look like a saintly hero who suffers and sacrifices himself more than those he’s trying to save.

As Frank and Dietrich leave the inn, Dietrich has the nerve to say to Frank about this blatant racism: “I’m so fortunate that we don’t have this in Germany.” Frank replies, “My brother, hate comes in many colors. Your eyes haven’t been fully opened yet.”

The movie never really shows Dietrich getting to know the African American people in this church community except in the context of what he can do to teach them as a white person in a “theologist knows best” role. There are never any honest or meaningful conversations about racism in this movie. What “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” has is racial condescension that doesn’t think it’s racial condescension.

By 1933, Dietrich is back in Germany with his family. He has become such a jazz aficionado, he plays jazz for his family to show off his knowledge of this new type of music that is exotic to his family. Dietrich also announces that he’s giving up his theology studies because, as he says,”In Harlem, I saw real faith.”

Dietrich is surprised and alarmed when he hears about the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany. And quicker than you can say “problematic and preachy movie,” Dietrich has become a pastor who gives blistering sermons that scold anyone in his congregation who directly or indirectly supports the Nazis. Dietrich is warned about the dangers of being an anti-Nazi activist, but he still carries on with this type of preaching.

“Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin” gives only surface-level depictions of the horrors of the Holocaust. The movie has more scenes of Dietrich being distressed by himself in a prison cell than scenes of persecuted Jewish people being sent to Nazi death camps. Any scene of Dietrich interacting with captured Jews on their way to a death camp is brief and superficial, like he’s just a pastor dropping in to give some comfort, but then he can easily go back to his own home because he has the privilege of being a white German Christian.

When Dietrich goes to England and back to New York City to visit, he is shown doing more preaching and rehearsing of speeches. He decides to return to Germany because he feels it’s the right thing to do to fight Nazism there. But even when Dietrich returns to Germany, he goes back into “preaching from the pulpit” mode and seems very aloof from the difficult activism that the real Dietrich was involved in with the Resistance movement against the Nazis.

Dietrich’s allies depicted in the movie include Bishop Martin Niemöller, who goes from being a skeptic of Dietrich to a supporter; adult Sabine, who has become the sibling who’s Dietrich’s closest friend since the death of their brother Walter; and Hans von Dohnányi (played by Flula Borg), who is married to Dietrich’s sister Christel (played by Jade Matthew). Hans is the one who comes up with the idea to assassinate Hitler. Dietrich is portrayed as someone who reluctantly goes along with the idea.

“Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin” shows Dietrich first and foremost as a recruiter for Christianity, with his Resistance activism in support of Jewish people often being secondary. When Dietrich rehearses an anti-Nazi speech, he talks about Jesus Christ and asks the intended recipients of the speech: “Will you follow him all the way to the cross?” It’s a speech that doesn’t take into account that you don’t have to be a Christian to be against Nazis.

Dietrich was obviously a Christian pastor, which undoubtedly influenced his religious views. But his brand of anti-Nazism has a somewhat condescending tone to Jewish people in this movie. No one in the movie is seen meeting with Jewish leaders to help fight the Nazis. Dietrich is only shown making plans with other Christians. And that in itself sums up the attitude of this misguided movie.

The fact of the matter is that people of many religions—as well as atheists and agnostics—joined forces to fight against Nazis during World War II. And this war against the Nazis was not just fought by white people but also by people of many different races. But you’d never know that factual history if you only believed what is presented in “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.”

The movie’s acting performances are adequate but offer nothing that deserves awards. The film editing and screenplay (which is filled with drab and trite dialogue) are so muddled and tiresome, even if this movie had been told in chronological order, it still has problems with its selective rewriting of World War II history as it related to Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The cinematography is dull and makes the movie look washed-out.

The epilogue to “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” gives emotionally rousing captioned statements about the Holocaust and the evils of Nazism, but it’s told with a very biased religious perspective of Christianity being the main reason why the Nazis were defeated in World War II. “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” might be praised by people who aren’t very knowledgeable of the real Dietrich Bonhoeffer and World War II history and just want to see a movie about a Christian pastor who preached against Nazism during World War II. The “assassin” part of this movie’s title is very misleading, so anyone expecting this film to depict assassin antics against Nazis should watch the 2009 Oscar-winning action flick “Inglourious Basterds” instead. And there are several documentaries and dramas about Dietrich Bonhoeffer that are far better than “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.”

Angel Studios will release “Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin.” in U.S. cinemas on November 22, 2024. Sneak previews of the movie were held in U.S. cinemas on November 11, November 18, and November 20, 2024.

Review: ‘The Last Vermeer,’ starring Guy Pearce and Claes Bang

November 20, 2020

by Carla Hay

Guy Pearce in “The Last Vermeer” (Photo by Jack English/TriStar Pictures)

“The Last Vermeer”

Directed by Dan Friedkin

Some language in Dutch with subtitles

Culture Representation: Taking place in the Netherlands from 1945 to 1947, and based on true events, the dramatic film “The Last Vermeer” features an all-white cast of characters representing the middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: A Dutch military captain is tasked with hunting down people who stole or illegally sold high-priced art to Nazis, and he unexpectedly believes in the innocence of one wealthy suspect.

Culture Audience: “The Last Vermeer” will appeal primarily to people who like traditionally made dramas that are set in Europe in the 1940s and that explore issues of war crimes, social classes and art.

Roland Møller, Guy Pearce and Claes Bang in “The Last Vermeer” (Photo by Jack English/TriStar Pictures)

The dramatic film “The Last Vermeer,” which is inspired by a true story, is set in post-World War II Holland during the years 1945 to 1947, but the structure of the movie is very much like an episode of the crime procedural TV series “Law & Order.” The first half of the movie is about the hunt for suspects and narrowing it down to the person who gets arrested, while the second half is about the legal procedure that culminates with the accused on trial. It’s not a movie that’s groundbreaking, but it’s elevated by the engaging performances of Guy Pearce and Claes Bang, as two men at the center of an art mystery who start out as enemies and end up becoming unexpected allies.

Directed by Dan Friedkin, “The Last Vermeer” is like comfort food to people who relish a retro movie that pays homage to the era in which it takes place. It’s set in a mid-20th century Holland that is still scarred and recovering from World War II, yet proudly clinging to its historical legacy as one of Europe’s most important cultural centers. Much like it is now, the Netherlands is viewed as a country willing to try progressive things while steeped in traditions that go back centuries.

James McGee, Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby wrote the screenplay for “The Last Vermeer,” which is an adaptation of Jonathan Lopez’s 2008 biography “The Man Who Made Vermeeers,” about the life of Han van Meegeren. “The Last Vermeer” makes van Meegeren (played by Pearce) an adversary-turned-ally of the movie’s protagonist Captain Joseph Piller (played by Bang), who is given the responsibility of investigating and tracking down people who were responsible for stealing valuable art and/or selling them to Nazis. Joseph was a lieutenant who fought in the war, and he has a very clear sense of right and wrong, but he’s not above bending the rules if it means getting to the truth.

“The Last Vermeer” is the second movie released in 2020 in which Bang portrays someone at the center of a crime thriller involving fine art. He also starred in “The Burnt Orange Heresy,” which is a fictional story about a disgraced art critic (played by Bang) who tries to make a comeback by presenting himself as someone who has access to a painting by a legendary and reclusive artist. The idea of who gets to decide what is “valuable” art and how those perceptions can determine the price of art are also prominent themes in “The Last Vermeer.”

Both movies also explore issues of social classes and ask this question: Do rich people who spend spend millions on art deserve to be cheated if they are unscrupulous in their lives? It’s a moral and ethical dilemma that comes up later in the story of “The Last Vermeer,” whose “reveal” won’t be spoiled in this review if people don’t know the true story that inspired this movie. It’s enough to say that Han isn’t what he first appears to be at the beginning of the movie, and it’s why Joseph ends up taking his side.

Joseph’s investigation involves unraveling a complicated web of lies about how much art dealers, buyers and sellers knew when they made transactions that resulted in valuable art being owned by high-ranking Nazis. Joseph has a somewhat goofy sidekick named Esper Dekker (Roland Møller), who acts as someone who is ready to physically intimidate people when necessary. Joseph also happens to be Jewish, but for obvious reasons he doesn’t make that information known to a lot of people.

When Joseph enlists Esper’s help, he tells tells Esper: “I want to avoid the Ministry of Justice because they seem to have their own agenda. And that’s why I need you. I need someone I can trust.” An ambitious detective named Alex De Klerks (played by August Diehl) from the Ministry of Justice becomes one of Joseph’s main antagonists, because each man wants the credit and the glory for hunting down the most war criminals in this case. Alex thinks that Joseph is a lowly buffoon (he taunts Joseph for having a former career as a tailor), while Joseph thinks that Alex is a corrupt cop.

Meanwhile, there’s another reason why Joseph is throwing so much of his time and energy into this investigation: His marriage is falling apart, and the investigation is an excuse to spend time away from his wife Leez (played by Marie Bach Hansen), who is also emotionally distant from Joseph. Leez did spy work for the Allied Forces by working as a secretary of a high-ranking Nazi. This espionage work and Joseph spending time away from home because of the war took a toll on their marriage.

Joseph and Leez have a son named Finn (played by Tom Mulheron), who’s about 5 or 6 years old when this story first takes place. But Joseph’s love for his son isn’t enough to want him to spend more time at home. The investigation consumes Joseph to the point where it becomes the top priority in his life.

There are several other people who are part of the investigation, including Joseph’s trustworthy administrative assistant Minna Holmberg (played by Vicky Krieps), who’s a smart, widowed woman in her 20s. (Her husband died in the war.) And when there’s an attractive young assistant who admires her older married boss who’s on the verge of breaking up with his wife, you can pretty much guess what will happen in a movie like this one. It’s completely cliché, but there are many real-life situations that play out exactly like it does in this movie.

Joseph weeds through several people before he gets to what he thinks is the “big fish” in this underground art conspiracy. Han has been named as the the mastermind behind selling extremely valuable Johannes Vermeer paintings to Nazis from 1936 to 1942. The sales of these paintings, plus other art dealings, resulted in Han becoming a very wealthy man. But these art sales have also branded him as a Nazi conspirator and are war crimes that are punishable by death.

During the course of the investigation, Joseph finds out that Han is a flamboyant and charismatic art dealer who has lived a decadent life of hosting lavish, drug-and-alcohol-fueled parties, where high-ranking Nazis were frequent guests. Han also has a free-spirited lover named Cootje Henning (played by Olivia Grant), who is married and not very discreet about the affair. She provides some important information to Joseph, which leads to him discovering some of Han’s secrets.

As a result of his debauched lifestyle and numerous infidelities, Han has gotten divorced from his ex-wife Johana (played by Susannah Doyle), and has curiously let her have almost all of his money and numerous properties in the divorce. By the time that Joseph gets around to questioning Han, this already disgraced art dealer is on his way to being an exile from high society since he’s no longer wealthy and his association with Nazis has made him a pariah.

The more that Joseph uncovers, the more he finds that Han has layers of secrets in his life. Han’s loyalties and motivations aren’t what they initially seem to be. Han started out as a struggling artist but gave up his artist dreams when his first gallery showings were critical and commercial flops. It no doubt fueled his motivation to find wealth and respect in the art world in another way, which was to become an art dealer.

Han’s dealings with Nazis might come as a huge cost to his life. But Joseph becomes convinced that Han is not guilty of what he’s been accused of in court, and Joseph becomes one of Han’s biggest defenders when Han is put on trial. There are some hijinks in the movie that involve Joseph and Esper playing a cat-and-mouse game with Detective De Klerks. A jailbreak scene is somewhat amusing, if not highly dramatized.

However, the real gist of the story comes down to the trial and what happens as the case is laid out and there are twists and turns to the story. As Joseph, Bang is every inch the crusading hero that he’s supposed to be in the movie. He does a very good job in the role, but the character is very transparent and easy to predict.

Pearce’s performance as Han is really the standout in “The Last Vermeer.” Whether or not viewers know what happened in real life with the trial’s outcome, people will be kept guessing over whether or not Han is a hero or a villain. Just like a chess master, Han seems to be steps ahead of everyone else, in terms of things he knows that other people don’t and what he plans for his “end game.”

The movie’s art direction and costume design are on point (people who love European architecture and lavish interior designs will appreciate this film’s attention to detail), but “The Last Vermeer” works best because of the performances of the main actors. Friedkin’s direction is solid, but people with short attention spans might get frustrated during the first third of the movie, which introduces a jumble of characters who might or might not be suspects. “The Last Vermeer” is not an essential movie about post-World War II Europe, but for art aficionados, it’s worth checking out for a dramatic retelling of a very intriguing real-life art mystery.

TriStar Pictures released “The Last Vermeer” in U.S. cinemas on November 20, 2020.

Copyright 2017-2024 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX