November 30, 2024
by Carla Hay
Directed by David Tedeschi
Culture Representation: The documentary film “Beatles ’64” features a predominantly white group of people (with a few African Americans), who are artists, producers, writers and Beatles fans discussing their thoughts on the Beatles in 1964, the year that the superstar British rock band first arrived in the United States.
Culture Clash: The Beatles experienced hysterical fan adulation as well as backlash from conservative adults who thought that the Beatles were harmful influences to young people.
Culture Audience: “Beatles ’64” will appeal primarily to music fans who want to get a deep-dive documentary look at an important year in the life of the Beatles.
“Beatles ’64” is a cinematic celebration about this pivotal year in Beatles history. This documentary doesn’t uncover new information, but it has great archival footage and notable interviews with Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and a variety of Beatles fans. There are already many books, news reports and other documentaries that cover the same subject of the Beatles’ 1964 arrival in America—the first time that this world-famous British band toured in the United States. “Beatles ’64” gives perspectives mostly from people who personally saw and experienced Beatlemania.
Directed by David Tedeschi, “Beatles ’64” features a lot of archival footage originally directed by documentarian brothers Albert Maysles and David Maysles, who accompanied the Beatles on the band’s first tour of America. The Maysles footage in “Beatles ’64” was restored in 4K. New interviews for this documentary are mostly from famous or semi-famous people who are in the creative arts, although there are some interviews with people who aren’t famous but who were Beatles superfans in 1964 and still consider themselves to be Beatles superfans.
“Beatles ’64” makes attempts to put Beatlemania in a cultural perspective that has been covered elsewhere numerous times. Any comprehensive book on the Beatles will probably mention how the Beatles’ February 1964 arrival in the United States came at a time when America was mourning the November 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and the Beatles came along like a breath of fresh air and pure joy. The documentary opens with a montage of President Kennedy as a way to confirm this widespread theory.
The Beatles formed in Liverpool, England, in 1960, and broke up in 1970. Beatlemania had already been a part of Europe for at least a year by the time the Beatles arrived in America in 1964. Because of America’s overwhelmingly enthusiastic response to the Beatles, the year 1964 was the year that Beatles became a worldwide phenomenon. New York City was the first U.S. city that the Beatles visited on February 7, 1964. The band’s arrival at the newly renamed John F. Kennedy Airport caused a media frenzy and is part of pop culture history that has been widely examined and parodied.
There’s no need to describe in this review how the Beatles’ appearances on “The Ed Sullivan Show” in 1964 had a tremendous impact on the band and countless people who saw these performances because these “Ed Sullivan Show” performances are such an immensely covered and discussed part of Beatles history. It was the first time on American television that people got to see Beatlemania happening live during a Beatles performance. Young people (usually teenage girls but quite a few boys too) screamed, cried, cheered, hyperventilated, and generally became obsessive fans.
“Beatles ’64” assumes that most people watching the documentary are familiar with at least some of the Beatles’ music. The Beatles songs that are featured prominently in “Beatles ’64” include “She Loves You,” “I Want to Hold Your Hand,” “In My Life,” “With Love From Me to You” and “This Boy.” The documentary doesn’t bother with a detailed examination of the Beatles’ individual personalities and the nicknames that the band members were given by the media. And even if viewers aren’t familiar with the band members’ images, the archival footage in “Beatles ’64” does a fairly good job of showing the band members’ personalities at this time.
Lead singer/bass player McCartney was the “cute” Beatle and the one most likely to be a polite charmer in interviews. Beatles drummer Starr (whose birth name is Richard Starkey) was the “funny” Beatle and the one most likely to act goofy in public. Lead guitarist/singer George Harrison was the “quiet” Beatle who seemed to be the most uncomfortable with doing interviews. Lead singer/rhythm guitarist John Lennon was the “smart” Beatle who was most likely to give witty and acerbic comments to the media.
Lennon was murdered in 1980, at the age of 40. Harrison died of cancer in 2001, at the age of 58. The documentary includes archival interview footage of Lennon from the 1970s, and Harrison from the 1980s and 1990s, where they separately talk about their Beatlemania fame.
“Beatles ’64” interviewed McCartney at New York City’s Brooklyn Museum, which had a 2024 exhibit titled “Paul McCartney Photographs 1963–64: Eyes of the Storm.” McCartney tells a few anecdotes when looking at some of the exhibit’s photographs. McCartney comments on how the Beatles felt about America at the time: “To us, it was the land of freedom. Once we got here, we learned it wasn’t quite the story.”
To its credit, “Beatles’ 64” acknowledges how racial tensions and the civil rights movement were very much a part of American history that affected how the Beatles were perceived and treated in America. On the one hand, the Beatles were extremely popular with young people. On the other hand, many older adults despised or distrusted the Beatles because rock music (which originated with African American artists) was associated with open sexuality and rebelling against the establishment.
“Beatles ’64” goes out of its way to mention that the Beatles gave credit to many African American artists for being influences on the band. Rock music pioneer Little Richard was one of those major influences. Little Richard’s signature “whoo” holler was copied by the Beatles in the Beatles hit song “She Loves You.”
In the documentary, Smokey Robinson (former lead singer of the Miracles) talks about how flattered he was that the Beatles did a cover version of the Miracles’ 1962 hit “You’ve Really Got a Hold on Me,” which was on the Beatles’ 1963 second U.K. album “With the Beatles” and the Beatles’ 1964 third U.S. album “The Beatles’ Second Album.” Ronald Isley of the Isley Brothers did not write the Isley Brothers’ 1962 hit version of “Twist and Shout” (which was originally recorded by the Top Notes in 1961), but Isley says in “Beatles ’64” that he thought it was great that the Isley Brothers’ version of the song inspired the Beatles to do their own version of “Twist and Shout” on the Beatles’ 1963 U.K. album “Please Please Me.”
The documentary also includes a 2014 interview with Ronnie Spector (former lead singer of the female trio the Ronettes) talking about how she and the Ronettes were unofficial ambassadors to the Beatles when the Beatles first came to America. Spector (who died in 2022, at age 78) tells stories about how the Beatles had an insatiable curiosity about America and asked the Ronettes to teach the Beatles as much as possible about America. And when Beatlemania almost made the Beatles prisoners in their hotels in New York City, Spector says she and the Ronettes helped the Beatles “escape” to New York City’s Harlem neighborhood, where no one really knew who the Beatles were and didn’t bother them.
“Beatles ’64” does not ignore the obvious: In 1964, racial segregation was still a way of life in much of America, which is why almost all the people who attended Beatles performances in 1964 were white. “Beatles ’64” includes some archival footage of unidentified African Americans in New York City being asked what they thought of the Beatles. Most gave lukewarm to positive responses, with comments admiring the group’s songs and unique image. But one young man calls the Beatles “disgusting” and says he prefers jazz groups such as the Miles Davis Quintet and the John Coltrane Quartet.
“Beatles ’64” also has brief footage of a family only identified as the Gonzalez family watching the Beatles on “The Ed Sullivan Show.” The unnamed teenage girl in the family watches intently and seems to enjoy the performance. Her father, who’s sitting in the background, seems bored and unimpressed with the Beatles. It’s another example of the generational divide about the Beatles at the time, but it’s also the documentary’s way of showing that the Beatles didn’t have only white fans in 1964.
The message is clear in the documentary: Although racial segregation was a big problem in America, the documentary points out that the Beatles themselves weren’t racists and didn’t hesitate to befriend and work with people who weren’t white. Robinson comments that music concerts, especially those attended by young people, helped bring different races together in America: “The saving grace was the music because those kids had a common love.”
The Beatles faced a different type of prejudice that had to do with social class—mainly from people who thought the band’s long hair and rock music made the Beatles low-class degenerates. McCartney says in the documentary that when the Beatles (who all came from working-class families) visited the British Embassy in New York City in 1964, there was blatant snobbery directed at the Beatles. McCartney says that any insults or snubs that the Beatles experienced ultimately didn’t matter: “We didn’t give a flying fuck. They were at the embassy. We were on the road rockin’!”
Starr’s interviews for the documentary are lighthearted and don’t provide anything profound or illuminating—unless you think it’s profound that Starr remarks that his drum kit in 1964 was smaller than usual because he wanted the drum kit to be able to fit on the stage so he could be as close as possible to his band mates. Starr is interviewed by “Beatles ’64” producer Martin Scorsese in a room full of stage costumes that were being sold by Julien’s Auctions. McCartney, Starr, Sean Ono Lennon (John Lennon’s son with second wife Yoko Ono) and Olivia Harrison (George Harrison’s widow) are among the producers of “Beatles ’64.”
As for the fans interviewed in the documentary, many of the them get very emotional when remembering how Beatlemania impacted their lives in 1964. For writer Joe Queenan, he says the Beatles helped him cope with having an abusive alcoholic father. Queenan weeps when he says the first time he heard “She Loves You” was in December 1963, when he heard the song playing on his sister’s radio. Queenan says life was pretty dark for him, but when he heard the Beatles’ music, “It’s like the light came on.”
Vickie Brenna-Costa, writer Jane Tompkins and writer Jamie Bernstein (eldest child of famed composer/conductor Leonard Bernstein) were teenagers in New York in 1964 and did a lot of the things that Beatlemaniac teen girls did back then. (There’s some archival footage of Brenna-Costa waiting outside the Plaza Hotel, where the Beatles were staying.) The documentary has archival footage of Leonard Bernstein defending the Beatles’ artistry at a time when much of the classical music community looked down on rock music.
Danny Bennett, a music producer, shows some of the Beatles merchandise that he collected when he was a teenager in the 1960s, including a Beatles dress, Beatles athletic shoes and Beatles nylon stockings. Bennett makes a point of repeating that he never wore the women’s attire. He also shows part of the seat that he had at Shea Stadium, where he saw the Beatles in concert. Bennett says that he got this memorabilia item when Shea Stadium was being torn down, and he convinced an engineer working on the demolition to let him have part of the seat as a memento.
Jack Douglas, a successful American music producer who worked with Lennon and rock band Aerosmith in the 1970s, has the documentary’s most interesting personal story about how Beatlemania affected his life. This review won’t reveal all the details, but the story is how in 1964, 15-year-old Douglas traveled by ship with another young musician friend to make a pilgrimage to Liverpool. The two pals ran into immigration problems and briefly became local celebrities in Liverpool because of these problems. Years later, when Douglas was working at a recording studio in the early 1970s, he met Lennon and had a “full circle” moment that Douglas describes in the documentary.
“Beatles ’64” is by no means perfect. The documentary sometimes has editing that’s clumsy or has abrupt transitions. There’s archival commentary from philosopher/media guru Marshall McLuhan talking about electricity’s impact on pop culture. This McLuhan footage doesn’t really fit with the rest of the documentary. Sananda Maitreya (the artist formerly known as Terence Trent D’Arby) is interviewed about being a Beatles fan, but his interview looks out of place in this documentary because he was born in 1962, so he was too young to remember Beatlemania in 1964.
And although there’s a plethora of footage of the Beatles joking around and looking happy in this documentary, there’s only the most superficial acknowledgements of the dark sides of fame. Harry Benson, a photographer who accompanied the Beatles on tour in 1964, briefly mentions that all of the Beatles, especially Lennon, were worried about violence in America, in the wake of Kennedy’s assassination. It’s somewhat haunting to hear this tidbit of information, considering the fact that Lennon—just like Kennedy—was also murdered by gun violence.
The celebrity realities of hangers-on and groupies are barely discussed in the documentary, even though it’s a well-documented fact that the Beatles indulged in sexual attention from many women during this 1964 tour. At the time, Lennon was married to his first wife Cynthia, while Starr was in a serious relationship with Maureen Cox, who would become Starr’s first wife in 1965. Both marriages ended in divorce. Both women (who are now deceased) are seen briefly in the documentary but are not seen speaking.
“Beatles ’64” shows that Murray the K, a famous New York radio DJ from WINS-AM, latched on to the Beatles in 1964, to increase his own popularity. He’s seen interviewing the Beatles and hovering in the background in a lot of the documentary’s archival footage. Murray the K notoriously called himself “the fifth Beatle,” even though that title was more accurately bestowed on Beatles manager Brian Epstein, who is seen quickly in the documentary’s footage. Epstein died of an overdose of barbituates and alcohol in 1967, when he was 32. Murray the K (whose real name was Murray Kaufman) died in 1982, at the age of 60.
The documentary also glosses over and ignores the use/abuse of drugs and alcohol, even though many books and reports about the Beatles say that the band members were using amphetamine pills and drinking heavily during this period of time. “Beatles ’64” has some archival video footage of the band members surrounded by unidentified people at a nightclub. Everyone looks kind of drunk, but there’s no comment from McCartney and Starr about this footage. Bob Dylan famously introduced the Beatles to marijuana when he met the band in 1964, but that information is completely left out of the documentary.
Another obvious omission: “Beatles ’64” is about Beatlemania in 1964, yet the documentary has no mention of the Beatles’ critically acclaimed 1964 hit movie “A Hard Day’s Night,” a fictional comedy in which the Beatles portrayed themselves dealing with Beatlemania. “A Hard Day’s Night” (directed by Richard Lester and written by Alun Owen) was nominated for two Academy Awards: Best Original Screenplay and Best Score (Adaptation). “A Hard Day’s Night” was also significant because it’s how Harrison met his first wife Pattie Boyd, a model who had a very small role in the movie as a schoolgirl.
Lennon and McCartney—the chief songwriters of the Beatles—wrote many early Beatles songs while in hotels during Beatles tours. However, “Beatles ’64” offers very little insight into the crafting of Beatles songs that were written in 1964. Instead, “Beatles ’64” has somewhat repetitive footage of Beatles fans (again, mostly teenage girls) trying to get a glimpse of the Beatles—whether the fans were gathered outside a building where the Beatles were, chasing after vehicles that were transporting the Beatles, or trying to enter places where the Beatles were and getting stopped by security personnel.
“Beatles ’64” also spends the vast majority of its screen time showing or discussing the Beatles in New York City, even though the band traveled to several other cities on the band’s 1964 North American tour. Oscar-nominated filmmaker David Lynch (who was 18 years old and living in Alexandria, Virginia, in 1964) is one of the few Beatles fans in the documentary who talks about seeing the band somewhere other than New York in 1964. He describes seeing the Beatles perform for the first time in Washington, D.C., at a venue that usually had boxing matches, and the band performed in a boxing ring. Lynch says he wasn’t prepared for the overwhelming experience of Beatlemania at that concert. For a more comprehensive look at the Beatles on tour, see director Ron Howard’s 2016 documentary “The Beatles: Eight Days a Week – The Touring Years,” a film that was approved by Apple Corps, the Beatles’ estate company.
Despite shortcomings of omitted or incomplete information, “Beatles ’64” is undeniably an entertaining documentary to watch. It’s not a complete story of what Beatlemania was like in 1964, but the stories from several Beatles fans—as well as the comments from McCartney and Starr—give this documentary a lot of charm. Whether viewers have a casual or ardent interest in the Beatles, there’s plenty to enjoy when watching this retrospective film that puts an emphasis on the happiness that the Beatles brought to people’s lives.
Disney+ premiered “Beatles ’64” on November 29, 2024.