Review: ‘Dance First,’ starring Gabriel Byrne, Fionn O’Shea, Sandrine Bonnaire, Léonie Lojkine, Bronagh Gallagher, Maxine Peake and Aidan Gillen

August 24, 2024

by Carla Hay

Gabriel Byrne in “Dance First” (Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures)

“Dance First”

Directed by James Marsh

Some language in French and Irish with subtitles

Culture Representation: Taking place in Ireland, France and briefly in Norway, from 1911 to 1989, the dramatic film “Dance First” (a biopic of writer Samuel Beckett) features an all-white group of people representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: Samuel Beckett leaves his native Ireland to live in France as a writer, and he becomes entangled in the French Resistance against Nazis and personal problems in his love relationships.

Culture Audience: “Dance First” will appeal mainly to people who are fans of Beckett and the movie’s headliners, but the movie leaves out a lot of information about the work that made Beckett famous.

Fionn O’Shea in “Dance First” (Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures)

“Dance First” (a biopic of writer Samuel Beckett) crafts his life story like a stylish but uneven patchwork quilt. The cast members’ performances can keep viewers interested when some scenes drag with monotony. The movie mostly ignores his creative talent.

Directed by James Marsh and written by Neil Forsyth, “Dance First” gets its title from this quote attributed to Beckett: “Dance first, think later.” Beckett (who was born in Foxrock, Ireland, in 1906, and died in Paris in 1989) was best known for his plays “Waiting for Godot” and “Endgame,” but he also wrote novels, poems and short stories. Beckett also worked as a theater director.

“Dance First” (which was filmed in black and white) had its world premiere at the 2023 San Sebastian International Film Festival. In the production notes for “Dance First,” director Marsh has this description of the movie: “It’s an unusual biography of Samuel Beckett, unusual because it reviews his life through the lens of his mistakes.” The movie’s synopsis reads, in part: “Literary genius Samuel Beckett lived a life of many parts: Parisian bon vivant, WWII Resistance fighter, Nobel Prize-winning playwright, philandering husband, recluse. But despite all the adulation that came his, way he was a man acutely aware of his own failings.”

The problem is that by focusing mostly on Beckett’s failings and mistakes, “Dance First” comes across as an incomplete picture that ultimately does not do justice to Beckett as a well-rounded and complex person. The movie goes out its way to sideline meaningful insights to Beckett as an artist, which is the aspect of his life that has the most public interest. Instead, “Dance First” is a series of scenes showing how his relationships mostly made him feel sad or restless.

“Dance First” is divided into five chapters, with all but one named after a pivotal person in his life. For the purposes of this review, the real people will be referred to by their last names. The characters in “Dance First” will be referred to by their first names.

“Dance First” opens with a scene taking place in 1969, when 63-year-old Samuel (played by Gabriel Byrne) is in Oslo, Norway, to receive the Nobel Prize for Literature. (“Dance First” was actually filmed in Belgium.) Sitting next to Samuel at the ceremony is his wife Suzanne Dechevaux-Dumesnil (played by Sandrine Bonnaire), a French pianist who married him in 1961. As Samuel is being praised on stage, he looks disgusted and mutters to Suzanne, “What a catastrophe.”

Samuel angrily strides on stage to accept the prize, which he grabs as if it’s a worthless trinket. He then quickly walks out of the venue, climbs up on a water tower, and finds himself in a desert-like area where he sees a man (also played by Byrne), who looks just like him. That’s because the other man is also Samuel, who is seen talking to himself in interlude scenes for the rest of the movie, which shows him from the ages of 5 to the last year of his life at age 83.

It’s always a risk when a movie wants to be a serious dramatic biopic but then introduces fantasy elements that have a main character talking to a physical embodiment of himself. This risk doesn’t quite pay off in “Dance First,” because it comes across as a gimmicky distraction. The two Samuels often argue with each other, which is the movie’s way of showing that Samuel has inner conflicts.

The “real” Samuel is stubborn and cranky in old age, while “alter ego” Samuel is somehow wise enough to know what the future holds and gives the “real” Samuel advice that the “real” Samuel doesn’t necessarily want to hear. The entire movie has an off-kilter tone of making the “real” Samuel look back on his life, with the “alter ego” Samuel trying to make him feel shame and regret for his mistakes.

The “real” Samuel tells “alter ego” Samuel that he doesn’t deserve this Nobel Prize, so he wants to give the prize money to charity. The “real” Samuel then starts to have memories of people from his past, as a way to determine whom he should contact to possibly donate the money. It’s supposed to give Samuel’s reminiscing an extra layer of gravitas, but it just further muddles the story.

“Dance First” then takes a detour into a chapter called “Mother,” because Samuel says “it all starts with mother.” This chapter of the movie begins by showing Samuel’s childhood at age 5 (played by Cillian Hollywood) and age 10 (played by Caleb Johnston-Miller), when he was raised by two very different parents. Samuel’s mother May Beckett (played by Lisa Dwyer Hogg) is domineering and overly critical. (In real life, Samuel Beckett’s mother’s first name was Maria, and she worked as a nurse.) May constantly corrects Samuel on how he pronounces and writes words.

Samuel’s father William Beckett (played by Barry O’Connor), who is barely in the movie, is kind and loving. In real life, William Beckett was a quantity surveyor. There are some brief scenes of William doing things such as walking with boyhood Samuel in a field, but the character of William remains a mostly passive presence who does nothing to stop May’s psychological torment of Samuel. In real life, Samuel Beckett had a brother named Frank, who was four years older that Samuel, but Frank is erased from this movie’s story.

Predictably, the negative parental experiences have more of an impact on Samuel. As a teenager and young adult, Samuel (played by Fionn O’Shea) and May continue to clash with each other. By now, Samuel has become an aspiring writer, but his mother seems to relish in humiliating him with cruel critiques. In one of the movie’s more dramatic scenes, May thinks that something Samuel wrote is an unflattering depiction of her.

“You’re demonizing me!” May yells at him. Samuel replies, “You only imagine it is you because the whole world is you.” It’s implied by not said aloud that May is a narcissist who might have a mental illness or personality disorder. Samuel’s love/hate relationship with his mother and his need for her approval will play out in different ways with other women in his life, particularly the woman would become his wife.

In other scene, teenage Samuel asks May if she read something that she wrote. She replies with disapproval that what he wrote was too sexually provocative. “There will always be a call for titillation,” May says dismissively.

When he asks her again, “Did you read it?” May snarls with contempt: “What a waste!” May hurling this insult at Samuel is a memory that is shown more than once in the movie at different points in Samuel’s life. There are a few flashbacks of May shouting “What a waste!,” as a way to show how Samuel has long-lasting emotional scars from being verbally abused by his mother.

When young adult Samuel announces to May that he wants to move to Paris to become a writer and will never go back to Ireland, May makes this bigoted and bizarre remark about continental Europe: “The continent is populated almost entirely by homosexuals.” Samuel says that May is flawed if she thinks she can control him. “I gave you everything,” May says indignantly. Samuel replies, “I hope for your sake it’s not true.”

This is the type of dialogue that you might expect from a second-rate soap opera, not a biopic about a “literary genius.” But it goes on like this for the rest of “Dance First.” Much credit should be given to the talented cast members who do the best they can with the often-cringeworthy lines that they have to utter.

The movie’s chapter “Lucia” shows Samuel as a college student in Paris. Samuel meets a young woman about the same age named Lucia Joyce (played by Gráinne Good), a singer/dancer who happens to be the daughter of acclaimed author James Joyce (played by Aiden Gillen), who is one of Samuel’s idols. There’s a scene where Samuel verbally gushes over James like a fanboy. However, James seems somewhat jaded and unimpressed by this young admirer, who ends up working with James as an assistant. Samuel and Lucia have a doomed romance that is also given the soap opera treatment in this movie.

The movie’s chapter “Alfy” is about the period of Samuel’s life when he joined the French Resistance against the Nazis. The chapter’s namesake is Alfred Péron (played by Robert Aramayo), a French Jew who befriends Samuel. In real life, Péron was Beckett’s French teacher when Beckett was a student at Trinity College in Dublin. It’s in this chapter that Samuel meets young adult Suzanne (played by Léonie Lojkine), who becomes his most trusted person to give him advice and evaluations for his writing.

The chapter titled “Suzanne” shows the troubled marriage of Samuel and Suzanne, who have a better relationship as artists than as spouses. Samuel is chronically unfaithful to Suzanne, but another woman unexpectedly captures his heart when they begin a relationship in the late 1950s: Barbara Bray (played by Maxine Peake), a British widow who worked as a script editor for the BBC. Barbara is warm and understanding as an obvious counterpoint to Suzanne, who can be cold and critical.

Samuel and Suzanne were dating each other but not yet married when Samuel got involved with Barbara. Samuel ultimately choses to marry Suzanne. The movie shows Samuel and Suzanne eloping in a very simple civil ceremony. Barbara takes the rejection in stride and continues to be involved with Samuel, although the movie makes it look like their relationship became platonic in their elderly years.

According to “Dance First,” Samuel married Suzanne because he felt that Suzanne was better than Barbara for giving brutally honest reviews of his work. A Freudian psychologist would have a field day in an analysis of how the dynamics between Samuel and Suzanne are a repeat of the dynamics between Samuel and his mother, although Suzanne was not as vicious as Samuel’s mother.

The chapter titled “Le Fin” (which means “The End” in French) shows the last years of Samuel’s life. By the time the movie reaches this point, there are major milestones and artistic achievements that the real Beckett had that are never seen in the movie. Byrne and Bonnaire give fine performances as a married couple who have learned to live with a very flawed marriage. However, the artistic bond that holds the marriage together is woefully underrepresented in “Dance First.”

It’s frustratingly counterproductive to make a movie that revolves largely around a marriage where the spouses’ only enduring respect for each other is as artists, but then the movie never bothers to show meaningful scenes of them creating this art that is so important to them. There are some bland scenes of Samuel using a typewriter, or Suzanne reading snippets of Samuel’s work back to him and telling him what she thinks. Even though the movie’s black and white cinematography looks great, “Dance First” is not the movie to see if you want to get fascinating behind-the-scenes stories about how the real Beckett created his most influential work. “Dance First” is told in chapters, but it’s like reading a biography where many of the chapters that should be there were deliberately removed.

Magnolia Pictures released “Dance First” in select U.S. cinemas on August 9, 2024. The movie was released on digital and VOD on August 16, 2024.

Review: ‘Wolf’ (2021), starring George MacKay, Lily-Rose Depp, Eileen Walsh and Paddy Considine

December 12, 2021

by Carla Hay

George MacKay in “Wolf” (Photo courtesy of Focus Features)

“Wolf” (2021)

Directed by Nathalie Biancheri

Culture Representation: Taking place in an unnamed part of England, the psychological drama “Wolf” features a nearly all-white cast of characters (with one biracial/black person) representing the working-class and middle-class.

Culture Clash: A young man who thinks he’s a wolf is sent to a psychiatric institution for other young people who think that they are wild animals. 

Culture Audience: “Wolf” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in strange and badly bungled movies about people who have mental health issues.

Lily-Rose Depp in “Wolf” (Photo courtesy of Focus Features)

If you want to see an aimless movie where people who think they are wild animals are physically and emotionally abused in a psychiatric institution, then “Wolf” is the movie for you. These scenarios are repeated to the point of extreme irritation, with no character development and no insight into these patients’ personalities and how long they’ve thought of themselves as these wild creatures. In fact, after seeing “Wolf,” viewers will learn almost nothing about the patients in the movie, except how they react to torture methods that are inflicted upon them under the guise of “aversion therapy.” The instutition employees who cause this abuse are equally hollow.

Written and directed by Nathalie Biancheri, “Wolf” is a 99-minute movie that might have been better off as a short film. That’s because the movie’s skimpy plot is just enough for a short film, but most definitely not enough for a feature-length film. Unfortunately, the movie’s misleading trailer makes “Wolf” look like it’s going to be a suspenseful horror film. The only horror that viewers might experience is the horror of knowing that they’re wasting time watching a boring movie that’s trying very hard to be artsy, but it’s really just monotonous and unimaginative.

“Wolf” is the type of movie that is such a turnoff, some viewers probably won’t finish watching it until the very end. Those who watch the entire movie will find out from the underwhelming conclusion that “Wolf” was a confused and badly mishandled concept from the beginning. Although the cast members seem to be giving it their all in their performances, they don’t have much to work with when they have two-dimensional characters to portray.

Let’s start with one of the movie’s biggest flaws: It’s a shoddy portrayal of species dysphoria, the real-life psychiatric disorder where people think they are not human beings but actually belong to another species. The big romance in the film is between two patients who are supposed to have species dysphoria, but they act mostly like humans in a love affair, not the wild creatures that they’re supposed to think they are. This dismissal of their wild creature personas completely ruins the movie’s concept that these two people are supposed to truly believe that they’re wild creatures. There’s no consistency to this movie’s premise, which was flimsy from the start.

The protagonist of “Wolf” is a young man in his late 20s named Jacob (played by George MacKay), who thinks he’s a wolf. In the beginning of the movie, Jacob’s parents drop him off at the unnamed institution with sadness and desperate optimism that Jacob will be “cured” of his delusion that he’s a wolf who’s meant to roam free in a forest. Get used to seeing a shirtless Jacob in several dream-like forest scenes, where he crawls on all fours, sniffs objects around him, and howls with his face thrust up in the air.

The institution appears to be somewhere in the United Kingdom, since most of the patients have British accents, but a few of the patients and employees have American accents. Do not expect to learn anything about Jacob during this movie except that he thinks he’s a wolf. But he somehow forgets he’s a wolf when he sees a pretty young woman in her 20s crawling around outside in the garden area of the institution. Jacob looks at her like a man who is sexually attracted to a woman. Jacob soon finds out that this patient’s name is an American named Cecile (played by Lily-Rose Depp), and she thinks she’s a wildcat.

Since when are wolves sexually attracted to wildcats? And aren’t canines and felines supposed to be natural enemies, especially the wild ones in each species? That tells you all you need to know about how dumb this movie is because it keeps contradicting itself with how “delusional” these characters are supposed to be with their species dysphoria. When Jacob and Cecile begin their inevitable “courtship” (which isn’t spoiler information, because it’s in the movie’s trailer), they talk and act like humans whenever it suits them.

The movie wants to push this idea that Jacob and Cecile are having a “forbidden” odd-couple interspecies romance, but it’s hard to take that idea seriously when Cecile uses her very human hands to pleasure Jacob’s very human private parts while he’s locked up in a cage. Viewers are supposed to believe that wildcats’ natural sexual activities and instincts now magically include “hand jobs”—or is it “paw jobs”? Who knew that a wildcat’s paws can just automatically do the same things that fingers on a human hand can do? Don’t tell that the filmmakers of “Wolf” though, because they want the species dysphoria in this movie to just be just something that characters can put on and take off as easily as a pair of underwear.

Why is Jacob locked up in a cage? It’s his punishment for refusing to admit to the institution officials that he’s a human being, not a wolf. Apparently, this psychiatric institution thinks that the best way to get people to not feel like animals is to put them in an animal cage and treat them like a wild animal. Is it any wonder that their “therapy methods” are failing? It’s just more of this movie’s stupidity on display.

“Wolf” has mind-numbing repetition of Jacob and other institution patients being yelled at, physically abused, and threatened by the institution officials to start acting like humans, or else they’ll get more abuse. The institution also resembles a prison in how there are high fences around the property, and the patients are under supervised lockdown at night. Because “Wolf” is a low-budget film that mainly takes place in or near one building, there’s a relatively small number of people in the cast.

As such, there are really only a few people who are shown to be in charge of the abuse in this hell hole that’s passing itself off as a psychiatric care facility. The most sadistic employee is only identified as the Zookeeper (played by Paddy Considine), a snarling supervisor who sometimes imitates a wild animal too, in order to scare the patients. Considine’s performance is very over-the-top, almost to the point of being unintentionally campy.

If patients really get out of line, they’re sent to the office of the institution’s general manager, Dr. Sullivan, who’s briefly shown in the movie. Dr. Sullivan gives this stern warning to one of the patients who ends up in his office: “You won’t get anywhere by fighting us!” Dr. Sullivan is barely in the movie, so there’s no sense of how long he’s been in charge and which other bureacrats from the institution are making the decisions in how this barbaric place operates.

There’s an unnamed American female staffer (played by Eileen Walsh), who is not as cruel as the Zookeeper, but she’s still abusive and controlling. During the course of the movie, it’s revealed that this female staffer has been some kind of guardian to Cecile, whose parents are either dead or they want nothing to do with her. Cecile’s role in the institution is made even more unclear when she is shown doing employee duties such as janitorial work or work in the kitchen. Later in the story, it’s shown that she has more privileges than the other patients.

Don’t expect any clear answers to questions about Cecile’s background. Just like all the other characters in this movie, her backstory is non-existent, which is one of the main reasons why all of the characters’ personalities are such huge voids. When Jacob asks Cecile how long she’s been at the institution, she replies, “Too long.” When they first see each other, they crawl on all fours, circle each other, and sniff each other like animals. But it’s all just a moronic charade, because during most of the “courtship” between Jacob and Cecile, they definitely act like humans.

In fact, what makes “Wolf” almost laughable is how so much of it looks like an actors’ workshop where people were told to rehearse acting like animals. This phoniness dilutes any terror that the movie might have intended. The “group therapy” sessions consists of people squawking and grunting in a room to mimic the sounds of whatever animal they think they are. Most of the patients are in their late teens or 20s. They include:

  • Rufus (played by Fionn O’Shea), who thinks he’s a feral German Shepherd.
  • Jeremy (played by Darragh Shannon), who thinks he’s a squirrel.
  • Ola (played by Amy Macken), who thinks she’s a spider.
  • An unnamed young woman (played by Elsa Fionuir), who thinks she’s a horse.
  • Annalisa (played by Karise Yansen), who thinks she’s a panda.
  • Judith (played by Lola Petticrew), who thinks she’s a parrot.
  • Ivan (played by Senan Jennings), who thinks he’s a duck.

For reasons that aren’t explained, Ivan is the only patient who is an underage child. He’s about 6 or 7 years old, so any cruelty to him is supposed to be more disturbing than what’s inflicted on the older patients. Rufus is the patient who comes the closest to being on the road to “recovery,” so he’s used as an example of being a “model patient.” All that means is that Rufus is predictably going to be used as a snitch if any of the other patients rebel.

The Zookeeper is the one who leads the “aversion therapy” that takes place outdoors in the nearby woods. Some of this “therapy” includes forcing the patients to simulate human hunting of animals. It’s supposed to tap into their human side, as Annalisa explains to newcomer Jacob. When the patients are outdoors, they are often pulled around on leashes or chains.

Another tactic is to try to get the patients to feel pain or nausea for doing things just like their wild animal counterparts. For example, Jeremy is ordered to climb up a tree like a real squirrel would. Some of the Jeremy’s fingernails break off in this futile effort, but he’s still forced to try to climb the tree, even when his fingers start bleeding. When Jeremy stops because of the pain, the Zookeeper exclaims triumphantly: “You see? You’re not really a rodent!”

It should come as no surprise that there are scenes of people eating food that humans aren’t supposed to eat. The “therapy” methods are so counter-productive and ridiculous, viewers already know that this institution doesn’t care about “curing” its patients, because how else would it stay in business if everyone was “cured” and never came back? And because the movie tells so little about the patients, there’s hardly anyone to root for in this clumsily constructed story.

After a patient “graduates” from the institution, there’s a “severance ceremony,” where the patient burns a photo of the animal that they previously identified as. But it all proves to be a very superficial exercise because the “relapse” rate is high. And there are scenes showing that many of the patients say what the officials want to hear, but then go back to their animal ways when none of the officials is looking.

There are hints that people outside the institution know what a terrible place it is. Rufus’ mother (played by Mary Lou McCarthy) storms into the institution one day and insists on taking him out of there when she hears about the abuse. However, the Zookeeper is able to manipulate her into thinking that the institution is her only chance of “curing” Rufus, and she ends up letting Rufus stay there.

In another scene, an unidentified man wearing a pig’s mask throws a rock through a closed window of the institution building while yelling, “Animal freaks!,” and then running away before he can be caught. The people inside the building look on in shock, but then they continue to do what they were doing, as if nothing happened. This vandalism is the only indication that people in the community have fear and loathing of this institution. The institution’s effect on the community could have been an intriguing subplot if explored in a clever way. However, this institutiton seems to be very good at hiding its secrets, because no investigation by law enforcement or social services is ever conducted during this movie.

One of the worst things about “Wolf” is that it’s so heavy-handed with its point that humans can be the worst animals of all. But in sloppily making this point (there are too many plot holes and missing details), Biancheri and the other “Wolf” filmmakers didn’t give much humanity or even a basic personal story to any of the movie’s main characters. And that leaves this movie called “Wolf” as the equivalent of a wild creature that wants to take a savage bite out of society, but in the end is just toothless.

Focus Features released “Wolf” in select U.S. cinemas on December 3, 2021.

Copyright 2017-2024 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX