Review: ‘Juliet & Romeo,’ starring Clara Rugaard, Jamie Ward, Jason Isaacs, Dan Fogler, Rebel Wilson, Rupert Everett and Derek Jacobi

May 9, 2025

by Carla Hay

Clara Rugaard and Jamie Ward in “Juliet & Romeo” (Photo courtesy of Briarcliff Entertainment)

“Juliet & Romeo”

Directed by Timothy Scott Bogart

Culture Representation: Taking place in the 1301, in Verona, Italy, the musical film “Juliet & Romeo” (based on the play “Romeo & Juliet”) features a predominantly white cast of characters (with some black people and Latin people) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: A teenage boy and a teenage girl fall in love with each other, even though their families are feuding with each other. 

Culture Audience: “Juliet & Romeo” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of William Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” and the movie’s headliners, but this bland and muddled musical’s drastic change to the original story’s ending might be too much of a turnoff to many viewers.

A scene from “Juliet & Romeo.” Pictured from left to right: Sarah Lazzaro, Tayla Parx, Rupert Everett, Rebel Wilson, Clara Rugaard, Lidia Vitale, Jason Isaacs, Nicholas Podany, Max Parker and Zac Bellward. (Photo courtesy of Briarcliff Entertainment)

“Juliet & Romeo” is a musical with forgettable songs, a romance with no sizzle, and an ending with a terrible revision and tone-deaf announcement about an unwanted sequel. Everyone in this misguided flop looks like they’re doing Renaissance Faire cosplay. Without question, “Juliet & Romeo” will be ranked as one of the worst “Romeo and Juliet” movie adaptations of all time. The movie is supposed to take place in Verona, Italy, in 1301, but it looks and sounds like a Hollywood throwaway musical from 2001.

Written and directed by Timothy Scott Bogart, “Juliet & Romeo” (which takes place over the course of four days) is such a mind-numbing misfire, Juliet (played by Clara Rugaard) and Romeo (played by Jamie Ward) are only in a handful of scenes together. And when Romeo and Juliet are together, they spend most of their time being coy and talking about superfical nonsense. Not once do you believe that these two characters have such a deep connection and a burning passion for each other that they would literally die for each other, which is the famous ending of the “Romeo and Juliet” play that William Shakespeare wrote in the 1590s. And brace yourselves: Bogart has said in interviews that he conceived his “Juliet & Romeo” movies to be a trilogy.

The pop/rock songs in “Juliet & Romeo” aren’t completely terrible, mainly because talented people are singing the songs. Evan Kidd Bogart (Timothy Scott Bogart’s younger brother) and Justin Gray wrote the original songs for “Juliet & Romeo.” The problem with the songs is that they don’t have any catchy and memorable hooks. The lyrics are very bland and don’t add much to the story of Romeo and Juliet. These songs could be on any D-list pop album and you wouldn’t be able to tell that these songs were written for a movie about Romeo and Juliet.

The first scene of “Juliet & Romeo” is actually the funeral of Romeo and Juliet, who are shown embracing each other in a coffin. The funeral service is conducted by Friar Lawrence (played by Derek Jacobi), a clergyman who flip-flops during the story when it comes to his approval of Romeo and Juliet’s romance. The movie then flashes back to three days earlier and shows what happens during those three days and then shows the funeral that took place on the fourth day and what happened after the funeral.

While it’s possible that some people seeing this movie have never heard of the famous ending of “Romeo and Juliet,” by putting Romeo and Juliet’s funeral in the movie’s first scene, it ensures that this spoiler information is revealed from the start. It also shows that the filmmakers don’t have enough respect for the intended impact of the original ending of “Romeo and Juliet” because not only did they reveal this information too early in the movie, but they also used it as a cheap gimmick to fabricate a very different ending. This altered ending is as cringeworthy and superficial as the rest of the movie.

A great deal of the tragedy of “Romeo and Juliet” is because these two doomed lovers died mainly because their prominent Verona families are locked in a bitter feud and would not accept the couple’s relationship. Romeo comes from the Montague family, led by his parents Lord Montague (played by Jason Isaacs) and Lady Montague (played by Lidia Vitale), who are cold and domineering. Juliet comes from the Capulet family, led by her parents Lord Capulet (played by Rupert Everett) and Lady Capulet (played by Rebel Wilson), who are gregarious and manipulative.

Romeo also has a loyal adopted brother named Mercutio (played by Nicholas Podany), who was adopted as an orphan. Also in Romeo’s family is his cousin Benvolio (played by Max Parker), who doesn’t have a personality that stands out. Juliet has a hothead cousin named Tybalt (played by Ferdia Walsh-Peelo), who is constantly picking fights with Romeo. Expect to see many brawls and chase scenes on streets and in alleyways, as if this movie is confused and thinks it’s “West Side Story.”

Why are the Montagues and the Capulets feuding? Don’t expect this movie to give clear answers. There’s a lot of shouting and scheming about who’s going to be loyal to the government and who’s gong to be loyal to the Pope. At one point, Lord Montague slaps Romeo hard in the face and snarls, “You stand with this family, or you stand alone, son.” Meanwhile, Juliet’s parents give her distress by arranging for her to be engaged to a count named Paris (played by Dennis Andres), whom she doesn’t know. Juliet finds out about this engagement before she’s even met Paris.

“Juliet & Romeo” spends way too much time on side characters. Juliet has a clique of female friends named Rosaline (played by Tayla Parx), Veronica (played by Martina Ortiz Luis) and Lilly (played by Quinn Scott Bogart) who are like a tame 1301 Verona version of the “Sex and the City” women. There’s even a “female empowerment” sextet song titled “The Mask I Wear,” where each of them gets a solo with Lady Capulet and a newly created character named Vesante (played by Ledisi), whose purpose just seems to be so Grammy-winning singer Ledisi could have a role in this movie. Too bad the song packs a punch like a limp wrist.

Mercutio is having a romance with Veronica, so the movie shows them on dates and the first time that they spend the night together. Rosaline had a thing going with Tybalt, but she loses interest in him because he’s too much of a jerk. Is this the Romeo and Juliet story, or is it a teen soap opera? And by the way, Romeo, Juliet, and most of their friends in this movie look much older than the teenagers they are supposed to be.

Surprisingly, Walsh-Peelo (who’s arguably the most talented male singer in the “Juliet & Romeo” cast; see the 2016 movie “Sing Street” for proof) does not get any solo songs as Tybalt, the story’s chief villain. He’s only heard in the group song “Streets on Fire,” which also features Rugaard, Ward, Parx, Ledisi, Podany and Parker. It seems like such a waste of Walsh-Peelo’s musical talent.

Other characters in the movie include Juliet’s nurse from childhood (played by Sarah Lazzaro), who would be called a nanny in modern times, but her character is sidelined for the teen romances. There’s also an unnamed apothecary (played by Dan Fogler), who invents the fateful potion that is consumed by Romeo and Juliet. He is depicted in this movie as a “mad scientist” type who does experiments on rats. And if you waited your whole life to see this story’s friar and apothecary do a duet called “I Should Write This Down” in a musical, then “Juliet & Romeo” is the movie for you.

Juliet and Romeo meet when she is visiting Verona from France, where she has been living as a student. They flirt with each other, but she won’t tell him her name the first time that they meet. Later, when Romeo is getting chased in an alley fight by Tybalt and some of his cronies, Juliet grabs Romeo and kisses him so that his face can be obscured. We’re supposed to believe that the guys chasing Romeo suddenly forget what he’s wearing because they don’t notice Romeo kissing Juliet as Tybalt and his fighting pals run right past Romeo and Juliet.

When Juliet and Romeo kiss again in another scene, she says to him: “I can’t tell if your poetry is prose.” She pauses and says, “Poetry it is then,” as she leans into him to give him another kiss. Rugaard is a little more convincing than Ward at showing emotions, but they lack the necessary chemistry together to be believable as a legendary couple. Ward shows more passion in the fight scenes than the love scenes, which is not the way to do things in one of the most famous love stories of all time.

Some of the cast members in “Juliet & Romeo” were in Timothy Scott Bogart’s 2023 feature-film directorial debut “Spinning Gold,” a very flawed biopic of his father Neil Bogart, a record company executive who helped artists such as Kiss, Donna Summer and Parliament-Funkadelic become major stars. Parx, Fogler and Ledisi were in “Spinning Gold,” which had the cast members do their own singing when performing songs from famous artists. “Spinning Gold” and “Juliet & Romeo” have the same problems: good singing trapped in a movie with a bad screenplay and mishandled direction. And when a movie about Romeo and Juliet doesn’t have an authentic-looking romance, it’s doomed to fail.

Briarcliff Entertainment released “Juliet & Romeo” in U.S. cinemas on May 9, 2025.

Review: ‘The Last Supper’ (2025), starring James Oliver Wheatley, Jamie Ward, Charlie MacGechan, Nathalie Rapti Gomez, Robert Knepper and James Faulkner

March 14, 2025

by Carla Hay

Jamie Ward in “The Last Supper” (Photo courtesy of Pinnacle Peak Pictures)

“The Last Supper” (2025)

Directed by Mauro Borrelli

Culture Representation: Taking place in the years 32 and 33 A.D., in Judaea (later known as Israel), the dramatic film “The Last Supper” features a predominantly white group of people (with a few Middle Eastern people) depicting the Christian story of Jesus Christ and his last days before he was crucified.

Culture Clash: Jesus Christ was betrayed by his apostle Judas Iscariot and crucified by Romans for saying that he was the Son of God.

Culture Audience: “The Last Supper” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in watching faith-based movies that are depictions of stories in the Christian Bible.

James Oliver Wheatley, Charlie MacGechan and Jamie Ward in “The Last Supper” (Photo courtesy of Pinnacle Peak Pictures)

“The Last Supper” has some pacing issues, but the movie gives an adequately entertaining interpretation of this well-known Christian story. The movie’s performances are credible and not as cringeworthy as those in other low-budget faith-based movies. This film knows its target audience and does not deviate too far from the source material of the Christian Bible.

Directed by Mauro Borrelli (who co-wrote “The Last Supper” screenplay with John Collins), “The Last Supper” could have done the predictable narrative by having the story told from the perspective of Jesus Christ. Instead, the story is told from the perspective of Peter, one of Jesus’ apostles. Peter is the narrator of the movie, which delves a little more into the motives of Judas Iscariot, the apostle who betrayed Jesus.

“The Last Supper” (which takes place in Judea, later known as Israel) begins in the year 32 A.D., near the Sea of Galilee, to show the Loaves and Fishes miracle, also known as the Feeding of the 5,000. In this scene a starving crowd of about 5,000 people have gathered near the sea to greet Jesus, who has a reputation as a miracle worker. Jesus (played by Jamie Ward) is able to turn five loaves of bread and two fish into enough fish and loaves of bread to feed the crowd and still have some left over. Jesus also performs another miracle by giving the ability to see to a blind boy.

Local leaders offer Jesus a chance to be “king among men.” Jesus turns down the offer by saying, “My kingdom is not of this world.” Judas (played by Robert Knepper), who is overly ambitious and craves power, is dismayed that Jesus has turned down this offer. Judas does not understand Jesus’ humility. By contrast, Peter (played by James Oliver Wheatley) is in constant awe and admiration of Jesus.

One year later, in 33 A.D., the Cleansing of the Temple happens, when Jesus is at the main temple in Jerusalem and gets angry when he sees that merchants have taken over the temple courtyard. Jesus thinks it’s disrespectful and sinful for people to buy and sell things in a sacred place of worship. He overturns the merchant tables and yells at the merchants: “My house is a house of prayer! And you have turned it into a den of thieves!”

As far as the merchants are concerned, this is vandalism by self-righteous hoodlum who thinks he’s the Messiah. Jesus has now made several enemies in Judea. Caiaphas (played by James Faulkner) is the High Priest of Israel and becomes the chief schemer to murder Jesus. Caiaphas attempts to bribe Judas to help with this assassination plot, but Judas refuses. Caiaphas keeps the offer open in case Judas changes his mind.

Throughout the movie, Judas is shown as being conflicted over whether or not to betray Jesus. This conflict is depicted as Satan (played by Ahmed Hammoud) appearing to Judas as a demon and as a snake while saying tempting words to Judas. These scenes are like something out of a fairly mild horror movie. They aren’t gory scenes, but they might be a little too intense for viewers under the age of 8.

“The Last Supper” also depicts the ongoing tensions between Jews and Romans during this time period. At the time that Jesus is alive, the Romans had control of Judea. The Romans would ultimately decide Jesus’ fate when he was arrested for claiming to be the Messiah.

The movie’s namesake scene of a fateful Passover dinner is a highlight of the movie. Jesus washes the feet of apostle John (played by Charlie MacGechan) as a sign of humility, in one of the more memorable scenes in the film. The movie does not show the crucifixion, but it has some scenes of Jesus being whipped. This violence is not too explicit, but it might be disturbing to some viewers.

One of the things that the movie could have done better is give personalities to the apostles who aren’t Peter, Judas and John. Peter is loyal but he has his flaws, and his loyalty will be test. Judas is brooding and morally conflicted. John is a fun-loving good guy.

The rest of Jesus’ 12 apostles are blank slates when it comes to their personalities in the movie. Andrew (played by Fredrik Wagner), James (played by Ottavio Taddei), Philip (played by Vincenzo Galluzzo), Bartholomew (played by Abdeslam Bouhssini), Thomas (played by Billy Rayner), Matthew (played by Youssef Ben Hayoun), James the Lesser (played by Youssef Tounzi), Thaddaeus (played by Yassin Aamir) and Simon the Zealot (played by Harry Anton) don’t say much in the movie, compared to Peter, Judas and John.

Jesus’ mother Mary (played by Mayssae El Halla) and Mary Magdalene (played by Nathalie Rapti Gomez), the reformed sex worker who becomes part of Jesus’ entourage, are also underdeveloped characters. All of the villains except for ruthless Caiaphas have vague or non-existent personalities. Pontius Pilate, the Roman official who presided over the trial of Jesus, is not in this movie.

Some of “The Last Supper” is dragged down by slow pacing. However, the performances—particularly Wheatley as Peter and Knepper as Judas—stand out as realistically human. Ward’s depiction of Jesus is satisfactory and very empathic. During scenes where Jesus gets tearfully emotional, people in the audience might feel the same way.

The cinematography, musical score and costume design for “The Last Supper” are admirable, considering the movie’s budget is lower than most cinematic versions of Biblical stories. Is this version of “The Last Supper” outstanding? No. But it’s not terrible either. It’s a solid option for anyone who is inclined to see this type of movie and doesn’t want to see disturbing scenes about Jesus’ crucifixion.

Pinnacle Peak Pictures released “The Last Supper” in select U.S. cinemas on March 14, 2025.

Copyright 2017-2025 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX