Review: ‘Babylon’ (2022), starring Brad Pitt, Margot Robbie, Diego Calva, Jean Smart, Jovan Adepo and Li Jun Li

December 16, 2022

by Carla Hay

Margot Robbie and Diego Calva in “Babylon” (Photo by Scott Garfield/Paramount Pictures)

“Babylon” (2022)

Directed by Damien Chazelle

Some language in Spanish and French with subtitles

Culture Representation: Taking place in the Los Angeles area, from 1926 to 1952, the dramatic film “Babylon” features a predominantly white cast of characters (with a few Latinos, African Americans and Asians) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy who are connected in some way to the movie industry.

Culture Clash: A Mexican immigrant finds himself in various entanglements—including a volatile relationship with an ambitious actress—when he goes from being a service employee to a high-ranking executive at a movie studio. 

Culture Audience: “Babylon” will appeal primarily to fans of writer/director Damien Chazelle; stars Brad Pitt and Margot Robbie; and repetitive, overly long movies about people behaving badly that don’t have much else to say.

Lukas Haas (far left), Margot Robbie (second from right) and Brad Pitt (far right) in “Babylon” (Photo by Scott Garfield/Paramount Pictures)

“Babylon” is cinematic vomit wrapped up in a pretty package. This movie stinks of being a phony, self-indulgent mess, but because of the pretty package, some people will insist that it’s great. And with a total running time of 189 minutes, “Babylon” wears out its welcome long before those three-plus hours are over. What’s even more irritating about “Babylon” is that it has a pretentious tone that it’s some kind of groundbreaking film. It’s not groundbreaking at all. It’s just a miscalculated, big-budget dud with awards aspirations but with a second-rate plot of a trashy B-movie.

Written and directed by Damien Chazelle (the Oscar-winning director of 2016’s “La La Land”), “Babylon” is being marketed as an “exposé” of the dark side of Hollywood, particularly from the mid-1920s to the early 1930s, when most of the movie takes place. (The entire time range of “Babylon” spans from 1926 to 1952.) This long-winded train wreck is actually just a series of scenes showing hollow people acting vain and stupid, while indulging in promiscuous sex, illegal drugs and unrelenting shallowness. It is decadence that looks overly staged, not natural, and certainly not fascinating. And that’s one of the biggest problems with “Babylon.”

An example of how “Babylon” looks too contrived is shown early in the movie, in a scene that is supposed to depict a sex orgy at a mansion in Bel Air, California. Everything about the sex looks too choreographed and fake, which automatically makes this scene lose any sex appeal that it intended to have. The scene is supposed make “Babylon” viewers feel like voyeurs, but all it does is make viewers think that what the cast members are doing in these sex scenes are too precise and perfectly timed to look convincing.

“Babylon” also overuses cheap and tawdry gimmicks of showing bodily functions—defecating, urinating and vomiting—with the type of juvenile glee of someone who tells not-very-funny vulgar jokes, just to try to shock people, when it’s actually not very shocking at all. The bodily functions aren’t offensive on their own, but they’re cynically used in the movie as an obvious ploy to get people to think that Chazelle is being “bold” and “daring,” just because he’s never had these types of scenes in his previous films. When these kinds of crass, “gross-out” scenes are in “Jackass” movies, at least they’re usually funny, and they aren’t pretending to be prestigious art. “Babylon” takes itself way too seriously to even be a good dark comedy.

“Babylon” begins in 1926, by showing service employee Manuel “Manny” Torres (played by Diego Calva), a Mexican immigrant who wants to break into showbiz, with two of his co-workers (played by J.C. Currais and Jimmy Ortega) while making a delivery in Bel Air. They are driving a truck that’s towing an elephant in an open cart that’s tied by rope to the truck. The elephant is being transported to a Bel Air mansion, where rich movie-studio mogul Don Wallach (played by Jeff Garlin) is having a party later that night. The elephant is supposed to be at the party, simply as a way for the party host to show off that he has the money to bring an elephant to his home.

The rope on the truck breaks while the truck is on a steep incline. The workers try frantically to prevent the cart containing the elephant from sliding down the incline. And for their efforts, the elephant defecates all over them, with everything shown in graphic detail. What the elephant does to these workers is kind of like what “Babylon” does to viewers who have the fortitude to sit through this asinine dump of a movie.

The party is where viewers first see the other main characters in “Babylon.” Most of these characters have very few redeeming qualities, as if it’s Chazelle’s way of saying that Hollywood in the 1920s attracted mostly corrupt and morally bankrupt people. People with a strong sense of personal ethics don’t last long in this story. “Babylon” is not interested in showing the reality that Hollywood has always attracted a wide variety of people, not just people who are heinous. “Babylon” only wants to give the most screen time and a narrow view to the ones that care the most about clawing their way to the top and possibly destroying the competition.

Movie star Jack Conrad (played by Brad Pitt), a sex symbol in silent films, thinks he’s at the top of his game. But his career has been fading and will soon be damaged by the arrival of talking pictures (movies with sound, also known as talkies) in the late 1920s. Jack is dropped off at the party by his soon-to-be ex-wife Ina Conrad (played by Olivia Wilde, making quick cameo in the movie), who is furious with Jack because he’s been openly cheating on her. Jack and Ina have a hostile conversation in their car, where she berates him for his infidelity and for speaking with a fake Italian accent to people he wants to impress. Before she speeds away in anger, Ina yells that she wants a divorce.

Nellie LaRoy (played by Margot Robbie) is a crude, fame-hungry aspiring actress, who literally crashes the party by crashing her car into another car in full view of the security guards outside. (It’s a minor fender bender.) And then, she argues with the security guards, who prevent an uninvited Nellie into the party. Expect to see Nellie doing a lot more yelling throughout “Babylon,” because her nasty temper is the epitome of her limited personality.

Manny, who witnesses this spectacle when it happens, is immediately infatuated with Nellie because of her physical beauty. And so, Manny lies when he tells the security guards that Nellie is an important person who’s been invited to the party. It’s the beginning of a dysfunctional relationship between Manny and Nellie, where she uses him to get her out of messes and help her in her career, while Manny hopes that Nellie will fall in love with him.

Elinor St. John (played by Jean Smart) is a very jaded and influential gossip columnist, who uses her lofty media position to give and take away clout, in regards to how people want their public images to be perceived. Not long after Manny arrives at the party as a “jack of all trades” service worker, Elinor makes a sexual advance at him, but he politely declines. Elinor is at the party mainly as an observer. She considers herself to be much smarter and tougher than the average Hollywood power player.

Sidney Palmer (played by Jovan Adepo) is a trumpet player in a jazz band where Sidney is considered the star. Sidney and his band have been hired to perform at this mansion party. Later, they get a chance to star in feature films, during the early years of talking pictures, and when it was trendy to have jazz stars perform their music in these movies.

Lady Fay Zhu (played by Li Jun Li) is an androgynous, openly queer or lesbian entertainer, who is described in the “Babylon” production notes as “Marlene Dietrich by way of Anna May Wong.” Fay develops an infatuation with Nellie, but Fay finds out the hard way that Fay’s sexuality is not as accepted by Hollywood star makers as it is when she goes to private parties or performs in nightclubs.

Some of the other “Babylon” characters, who have varying degrees of importance to the overall story include movie producer George Munn (played by Lukas Haas), who is Jack’s best friend, enabler and producing partner; Estelle Conrad (played by Katherine Waterston), Jack’s haughty next wife, a Broadway actress who looks down on people in the movie industry; and James McKay (played by Tobey Maguire), a wealthy, perverted and sadistic businessman who loans money to Nellie and threatens her life when she doesn’t pay him back.

Some of the industry players depicted in “Babylon” include movie producer Irving Thalberg (played by Max Minghella), who is based on the real Thalberg, but is a very bland and generic character in “Babylon,” when he shouldn’t be; media mogul William Randolph Hearst (played by Pat Skipper); and movie director Ruth Adler (played by Olivia Hamilton), a rare woman who helms major studio films. Hamilton is one of the producers of “Babylon” and is also Chazelle’s real-life wife, so it’s perhaps no coincidence that she was cast as one of the few women who has any real power in the movie.

Operating on the fringes of the Hollywood elite are Bob Levine (played by Flea), a sleazy “fixer” hired by movies studios to conceal scandals; Robert Roy (played by Eric Roberts), Nellie’s unsophisticated and domineering father/manager, who is not respected by many of the power players; The Count (played by Rory Scovel), a wannabe actor who supplies drugs to people in the movie industry; Max (played by P.J. Byrne), Ruth Adler’s ill-tempered and antisemitic assistant director; Wilson (played by Ethan Suplee), one of James McKay’s sycophant employees; and Constance Moore (played by Samara Weaving), a silent-film star whom Nellie sees as a rival.

Expect to see a lot of cocaine-fueled debauchery and nonsense in “Babylon,” as Nellie predictably becomes not only a silent-film starlet but also a self-destructive drug addict. Manny, with Jack’s help, breaks into the movie industry and ends up becoming a high-ranking production executive at a movie studio, but Manny keeps letting Nellie’s problems become his problems too. Meanwhile, Jack struggles with maintaining his status as a movie star when talking pictures literally make him a laughingstock with movie audiences.

“Babylon” can’t even be very original when it comes to the “scandals” in the story. Early on in the movie, a young, aspiring actress named Jane Thornton (played by Phoebe Tonkin) meets an untimely death during the party at the Wallach mansion in Bel Air. Before she dies, Jane is shown having a drug-induced, kinky sexual encounter with an older, wealthy man named Orville Pickwick (played by Troy Metcalf), who is overweight and wants Jane to call him “daddy” while she urinates on him.

Jane and Orville are just lazily written caricatures of real-life actress Virginia Rappe and actor Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle, who went on trial for (and was later acquitted of) Rappe’s death, after she passed away in 1921, during a party they both attended in San Francisco. In “Babylon,” when Jane’s death is discovered in the Wallach mansion, there’s a frantic rush to cover it up. “Babylon” changes the outcome of this real-life scandal, but viewers who know about the stars of the silent-film era will immediately notice that Orville and Jane are based on Arbuckle and Rappe.

“Babylon” has eye-catching cinematography and production design to make everything look dazzling. The costume design, hairstyling and makeup are mostly adequate but also very questionable, since Nellie sometimes looks like she’s from the 1970s, not the 1920s. And the film editing in “Babylon” cannot be praised for a movie this bloated and unwieldy.

The “Babylon” cast members, particularly Robbie, give performances where they look like they want to be noticed and rewarded with industry prizes. Ironically, in a movie that overloads on empty excess, the best and most realistic scene in “Babylon” is a simple but well-acted conversation between Elinor and Jack in Elinor’s office, when Elinor explains to Jack why he’s becoming a has-been.

Elinor is one of many underdeveloped characters in “Babylon,” which puts most of the emphasis on the antics of Nellie and Jack. Manny gets sidelined for a great deal of the movie and only becomes a big part of the story again when Manny is needed to help Nellie. Manny’s meteoric rise in the movie industry, which could have been shown in riveting details, instead is merely a backdrop to whatever reactions that Manny has to the drug-addled hedonism that is going on around him and in which he sometimes participates.

“Babylon” tries to make “social statements” about Hollywood’s mistreatment of queer people and people of color during this time period. However, those statements reek of glib tokenism. Fay is never presented as a whole person but only as a fetish for people who want to see a woman kiss other women, or as an Asian woman whose purpose is to satisfy white people’s sexual fantasies about Asian women.

Similarly, “Babylon” also treats Sidney as a token, because his biggest scene is a humiliating racist experience that he has on a movie set: Sidney is ordered to put blackened makeup on his face so that his skin will look as dark as his bandmates. “Babylon” has no interest in presenting Sidney as a fully formed human being. The movie does not care to reveal anything about his personal life or backstory, whereas the personal lives and backstories of other characters are on full (and sometimes disgusting) display.

“Babylon” is also insulting in how it wants audiences to spend a little more than three hours watching a movie overstuffed with scenes where it’s just a lot of people shouting at each other, doing drugs, and being paranoid about their careers—and somewhere in between, a few movies get made. The snake wrestling scene with Nellie is particularly idiotic, as anyone with basic medical knowledge of poisonous snake bites can tell you. All of these superficial and time-wasting shenanigans don’t add up to much of a cohesive story, but are really just a lot of scenes strung together like a pointless, rambling essay.

Nellie will be the most talked-about character in “Babylon,” but she isn’t even that compelling, because she comes across as a dime-a-dozen Hollywood starlet, not a true star. (The Nellie character is partially based on the real-life Clara Bow.) “Babylon” never shows Nellie having any actual talent as an actress or having a charismatic personality, which would be two of the main reasons why people would root for this air-headed egomaniac. Nellie berates and degrades people who try to help her, she’s a pathetic drug addict, and she only turns on the charm when she wants something from someone.

The character of Jack is presented as having some empathy for other people, such as in scenes where he treats service employees very well, and when he helps Manny get his first big break in the movie industry. But the way Jack is written in “Babylon” is that he’s essentially a stereotypical Hollywood “bad boy” who parties too much and is chronically unfaithful to his wife/partner. There’s a very “been there, done that” attitude that Jack seems to have, but the same could be said about how this entire character is portrayed in “Babylon.”

Pitt in “Babylon” is really just doing a 1920s version of what was already seen in writer/director Quentin Tarantino’s 2019 film “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” which was set in 1969. “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” which also co-starred Pitt and Robbie, was about fictional has-been actor Rick Dalton (played by Leonardo DiCaprio) and his stunt double/best friend Cliff Booth (played by Pitt, in an Oscar-winning role), as they encounter members of Charles Manson’s cult, with Robbie in the role of real-life bombshell starlet Sharon Tate. “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” and “Babylon” both have themes about what the quest for fame will do to people in Hollywood and how changing trends in Hollywood can affect people’s careers. It’s easy for anyone to see which is the better movie.

Chazelle has a devoted fan base of people who think he can do no wrong. Many of those people are likely to heap rapturous praise on the soulless “Babylon,” just because Chazelle wrote and directed it and got some big-name stars to be in the movie. People who aren’t as susceptible to getting blinded by celebrity names can see “Babylon” for what it is: A vanity project created by filmmakers with enough money to throw around at a movie that’s just a series of scenes of people being obnoxious, with not much else to say. A very pretentious montage near the end of “Babylon” tries to look like an artsy tribute to filmmaking, but it just looks out-of-place in a film that’s already immersed in a lot of tackiness and storytelling muck.

There are plenty of artfully made and entertaining films about people doing very bad things. Oscar-winning director Martin Scorsese has made a career out of doing these kinds of movies. Simply put: “Babylon” is Chazelle’s ambitious but failed attempt to make a movie like Scorsese makes movies.

The reason why so many Scorsese films are classics, while “Babylon” will be known as a very expensive misfire, comes down to the believability of the characters and the story. People watching “Babylon” will feel like they’re watching privileged actors and actresses playing dress-up instead of truly embodying their characters. If the purpose of “Babylon” is to show how Hollywood can squander talent with overpriced and aimless movies, then that is perhaps the only area where “Babylon” truly succeeds.

Paramount Pictures will release “Babylon” in U.S. cinemas on December 23, 2022. The movie will be released on digital and VOD on January 31, 2023. “Babylon” will be released on Blu-ray and 4K Ultra HD on March 21, 2023.

Review: ‘Studio 666’ (2022), starring Dave Grohl, Taylor Hawkins, Pat Smear, Rami Jaffee, Chris Shiflett and Nate Mendel

February 24, 2022

by Carla Hay

Dave Grohl in “Studio 666” (Photo courtesy of Open Road Films)

“Studio 666” (2022)

Directed by BJ McDonnell

Culture Representation: Taking place in Encino, California, the horror comedy “Studio 666” features a nearly all-white cast of characters (with a few African Americans and Latinos) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: World-famous rock band Foo Fighters temporarily live in a run-down Encino mansion with a sordid history to record their 10th album, and they have many sinister and supernatural encounters.

Culture Audience: “Studio 666” will appeal mainly to people who are Foo Fighters fans and anyone who doesn’t mind watching campy horror flicks, no matter how derivative and disjointed they are.

Pictured clockwise, from left: Nate Mendel, Pat Smear, Rami Jaffee, Chris Shiflett, Dave Grohl and Taylor Hawkins in “Studio 666” (Photo courtesy of Open Road Films)

“Studio 666” gets bogged down in too many dull horror stereotypes to be consistently campy fun. “Studio 666” will no doubt please people who automatically like anything from Foo Fighters, the Grammy-winning rock band whose members star as themselves in this misfire of a movie. There are Foo Fighters interviews that are funnier than what “Studio 666” fails to accomplish in being an original horror comedy for the band. There’s very little that’s original in “Studio 666,” which has silly jokes that come and go in spurts, just like all the blood and vomit that spew out in this gory movie.

Directed by BJ McDonnell, “Studio 666” was written by Jeff Buhler and Rebecca Hughes, with the screenplay based on a story idea by Foo Fighters lead singer/guitarist Dave Grohl. The movie has a simple concept of the band temporarily living in an abandoned mansion to record Foo Fighters’ 10th album. It isn’t until after they’ve moved in that they find out that the mansion has some dark secrets and is apparently haunted.

It’s yet another haunted house/demon possession movie delivered with very little imagination and intrigue, because everything in the movie just rehashes what hundreds of similar horror movies have already done. “Studio 666” could have been an edgy spoof of the music industry and the process of recording of an album, but the movie just goes down a predictable route of people getting killed off, one by one, in ways that are neither scary nor funny. This movie has practically no jump scares, and the ending drags on for too long. Predictably, the visual effects often look cheap, sloppy and unconvincing.

The opening scene of “Studio 666” shows a murder taking place in a mansion in Encino, California, in 1993. A terrified woman is crawling on the floor with her left leg bloodied and a bone sticking out of the leg. There’s recording equipment and musical instruments in the room. Nearby, the mutilated corpse of a man is on some stairs. The woman screams, “Why? We did everything!” The killer (an unidentified man) then goes in the room and bashes her head in with a weapon.

“Studio 666” then fast-forwards to the present day. Seated at an office conference table are the Foo Fighters band members: frontman Dave Grohl (the band leader), drummer Taylor Hawkins, guitarist Pat Smear, guitarist Chris “Shifty” Shiflett, bass player Nate Mendel and keyboardist Rami Jaffee. (For the purposes of this review, their characters in the movie will be referred to by their first names.)

Also in this meeting is the band’s manager Jeremy Shill (played by Jeff Garlin), who is grumpy and agitated. “Where’s my record?” he asks the band about the Foo Fighters’ 10th album. Dave points to his own head and replies, “It’s all up in here.”

Jeremy tells the band that this album can’t be delayed any longer because he’s heavily in debt and he’s tired of hearing excuses for why they haven’t done the album yet. He says to Dave about these excuses: “It all amounts to frozen shit.” This is what’s supposed to pass as an amusing joke in the movie.

Dave then says that for this album, he doesn’t want to do the same old thing and record at the same old studios. He wants to try something new. And so, Jeremy calls a real-estate colleague named Barb Weems (played by Leslie Grossman), who suggests what she says will be the perfect place for the band to record the album. It should come as no surprise that it’s the same Encino mansion where the murders happened from the movie’s opening scene. (“Studio 666” was filmed on location in Encino.)

When Barb shows the band around the mansion, the house is in a pathetic state, with a dirty swimming pool filled with leaves and other indications that the property has been neglected for a long time. Barb tries to make the house sound more attractive, when she tells the band, “This place has some serious rock and roll pedigree.” She mentions that a famous unnamed music producer used to have a recording studio there, and he used to throw wild parties in the 1970s and 1980s.

Barb then leads them to what she says is the “coolest room in the house.” Of course, it’s the room where the murders took place, but Barb doesn’t tell them this crucial fact. All she will say is that back in the 1990s, a famous band started to record an album in the house, but the group never finished the album because the band members didn’t get along with each other. Don’t expect a real explanation of what happened in that house in 1993, because the “Studio 666” filmmakers didn’t care about having intriguing story for this movie.

When the band and Barb gather in the room where the murders took place, Dave says that he senses a “weird energy” that makes him uncomfortable. He claps his hands together several times. Each time he claps, a grisly scene is shown taking place at the house that the audience can see, but that no one in the movie can see. Ultimately, Dave likes the way the acoustics sound in the room, so he and the rest of the band decide to rent the house to record the album.

Dave is so consumed with finishing the album as soon as possible that he immediately comes up with the idea that everyone in the band should move in the house to record the album. Most of the other band members gripe about it and say that Dave should be the one to tell their families about this decision. Rami, who’s depicted as the band’s oddball ladies’ man, lives with his grandmother. This leads to a not-very-funny joke where Chris tells Rami that he had sex with Rami’s grandmother. Some sex noises are edited in to conjure up this memory, and Rami blurts out: “Stay away from my bubbe!”

Soon after Foo Fighters settle in at the mansion and have their equipment set up, the band’s sound engineer/roadie Krug (played by Kerry King, former guitarist of Slayer) gets electrocuted and dies. It’s one of those “burned to a crisp” deaths—and an indication of more grisly scenes to come. This death was no accident because it was caused by an evil spirit that can shapeshift. Before this electrocution, an entity that looked like black smoke with hands lurks around the equipment, unbeknownst to the people in the house.

Dave then begins having nightmares in repetitive scenes where he seems to be in danger, but then he wakes up and finds out it’s all a dream. He’s also certain that there’s a mysterious man dressed as a house caretaker (played by Marti Matulis), who’s been lurking around the house. No one else seems to see this stranger, which makes it obvious that Dave is going to be the target of something evil. Dave’s nightmarish visions also happen during the day, such as when he’s barbecuing in the backyard, and he sees Krug’s head in the barbecue pit.

And to make matters worse for Dave, he has writer’s block and can’t seem to come up with any new songs. This is an example of the terrible dialogue in the film. Dave exclaims about his inability to concentrate: “My mind is flooded! Sometimes it’s like Prince. Sometimes it’s like Slayer. Sometimes it’s Lawrence fucking Welk.”

Not long after they arrive at the mansion, the band members meet next-door neighbor Samantha (played by Whitney Cummings), who is star-struck, flirtatious and nosy. Dave asks Samantha if she’s seen a man who’s the mansion’s caretaker. She replies, “No, Dave. This house has been empty for years.” Samantha and Rami seem to be attracted to each other, so you know where this is going, of course.

Samantha occasionally stops by for unannounced visits, but Dave thinks that she’s very annoying. As a gift, she brings some lemon bars that she says are frosted with cocaine. Dave says it’s all just a distraction, so he tells Rami to get rid of Samantha. Rami just uses it as an opportunity to let Samantha know that he’s interested in hooking up with her. These scenes could have been hilarious, but they’re just so dimwitted because the dialogue is so lackluster and boring.

Dave soon discovers an old recording studio in the house’s basement. When he plays the reel-to-reel tape, he hears heavy metal music that sounds like wannabe Black Sabbath from the 1970s. And suddenly, he doesn’t have writer’s block anymore and is inspired by what he hears.

Under Dave’s leadership, the band soon adopts this heavier and darker sound. (In real life, Foo Fighters recorded their “Studio 666” soundtrack songs under the name Dream Widow.) There’s no mystery over very what this music is supposed to represent. It isn’t long before Dave’s personality starts changing drastically, and the body count starts piling up.

One of the many ways that “Studio 666” disappoints is how it underuses the talents of the movie’s professional actors. Will Forte has a thankless and uninteresting role as a food delivery person. It’s essentially a cameo, because he’s in the movie for less than 10 minutes.

The character of Samantha is severely underdeveloped and could have been the source of some genuinely off-the-wall or cutting-edge comedy. Instead, Samantha utters mostly forgettable lines, while Cummings just mugs for the camera in this role. Lionel Richie has a brief cameo (less than two minutes) as himself, in one of the movie’s few scenes that can be considered laugh-out-loud funny. Jenna Ortega shows up in a small role toward the end of the movie. The character that she plays in the movie won’t be revealed in this review, but it’s worth mentioning that “Studio 666” is one of three 2022 horror movies that Ortega is in (“Scream” and “X” are the other two), making her quite the “scream queen” of the year.

No one is expecting the Foo Fighters members to be great actors. But for a band that is very charismatic in real life, “Studio 666” presents all of them as characters with cardboard personalities. Grohl and Jaffee are the only true standouts, because they have scenes where they get to show some wackiness that inject a little bit of spark in this tedious horror movie that waters everything down except for the gore. Grohl and Jaffee are also the two band members who look the most comfortable being actors on camera. The rest of the band members are really just bland supporting characters in their own movie and give performances that range from awkwardly stiff to trying too hard.

“Studio 666” is the type of niche horror movie that looks like it should have been released directly to video. Instead, the movie’s first release is in cinemas, but “Studio 666” is not worth seeing for the price of a movie ticket, unless people are die-hard Foo Fighters fans. People who want to see real Foo Fighters entertainment are better off watching a Foo Fighters concert to see what the band does best: Play music and not try to be movie stars in an embarrassing horror flick.

Open Road Films will release “Studio 666” in U.S. cinemas on February 25, 2022.

March 26, 2022 UPDATE: Foo Fighters drummer Taylor Hawkins has died at the age of 50. This obituary from the Associated Press has more details.

Review: ‘This Is The Year,’ starring Lorenzo James Henrie, Vanessa Marano, Jake Short, Bug Hall, Alyssa Jirrels, Gregg Sulkin and Jeff Garlin

October 20, 2021

by Carla Hay

Bug Hall, Jake Short, Alyssa Jirrels, Lorenzo James Henrie and Vanessa Marano in “This Is the Year” (Photo courtesy of Vertical Entertainment)

“This Is the Year”

Directed by David Henrie

Culture Representation: Taking place in an unnamed U.S. city, the romantic comedy “This Is the Year” features a predominantly white cast of characters (with a few Latinos and African Americans) representing the working-class and middle-class.

Culture Clash: On the verge of graduating from high school, a nerdy student tries to win over his dream girl, even though she already has a boyfriend.

Culture Audience: “This Is the Year” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in watching predictable and unimaginative teen romantic comedies.

Gregg Sulkin and Alyssa Jirrels in “This Is the Year” (Photo courtesy of Vertical Entertainment)

“This Is the Year” is yet another vapid teen romantic comedy about a nerd who’s pining over his dream girl. It rips off the same formula that’s already been done by countless other movies with the same type of story. There’s almost nothing that’s very charming about “This Is the Year,” as it lumbers along to its predictable ending. Expect to see a lot of annoying characters played by people who look too old to be in high school.

Directed by David Henrie, “This Is the Year” is one of those movies that was made primarily by family members so they could give each other jobs in a movie. David Henrie’s brother Lorenzo James Henrie is the movie’s star: He plays the dorky protagonist. One of the movie’s producers is James “Jim” Henrie, the father of David Henrie and Lorenzo James Henrie. It’s undoubtedly nepotism, but the result is an amateurish movie that has absolutely no originality in the story arc and how everything ends.

David Henrie co-wrote the “This Is the Year” screenplay with Sienna Aquilini, Pepe Portillo and Bug Hall. All that means is that it took four people to put their names on a screenplay that uses many of the same ideas that numerous other teen romantic comedies have already used. You can predict in your sleep what’s going to happen in this movie.

How many times have we seen this plot in teen romantic comedies? A socially awkward outcast at high school has a secret crush on the girl of his dreams, who’s pretty, popular, and barely knows that he exists, or she wants to put him in the “friend zone.” In many cases, she already has a boyfriend or a love interest who is the nerd’s chief rival. The nerd comes up with a scheme to win over her affections, but various obstacles and embarrassments get in the way.

Meanwhile, if the nerd has a teenage girl who’s his platonic best friend, she helps him in his quest to date the dream girl. However, things happen where it becomes obvious who will eventually end up together at the end. Someone has an “a-ha” moment, and there’s a race against time for someone to reveal true feelings to someone else. It’s all so cliché and boring.

If teen romantic comedies stick to this formula like hack filmmaker glue, the movie can sometimes be enjoyable if the performances are good and if the screenplay has hilarious dialogue. Unfortunately, “This Is the Year” has none of that. Adding to this movie’s lack of authenticity, the filmmakers couldn’t be bothered to cast actors who look believably close to being the ages of high school students when these actors are supposed to be portraying high school students.

In “This Is the Year,” Lorenzo James Henrie is Josh, the geeky central character. Josh is close to graduating from an unnamed high school in an unnamed U.S. city. (“This Is the Year” was actually filmed in Alabama, but no one in this movie sounds like they’re from Alabama.) Josh lives next door to his best friend Molly (played by Vanessa Marano), who is homeschooled. Josh and Molly both work part-time at a local movie theater. Molly is intelligent and has a fun-loving attitude toward life. She completely understands Josh and vice versa. (You know where this is going, of course.)

Josh’s only other close friend is a fellow student named Mikey (played by Jake Short), who can be somewhat bratty and sarcastic. Josh and Mikey are in the same graduating class at their high school. Mikey lives with his older brother Donnie (played by Bug Hall), who is in his 30s. Donnie became Mikey’s guardian, ever since their widower father ran off with a woman shortly after Donnie and Mikey’s mother died of cancer. This abandonment has left emotional scars on the brothers that they don’t really want to talk about with anyone.

Josh’s last big assignment for an unnamed class is to write an essay about what he learned from his experiences in high school. The teacher of the class is Mr. Elmer (played by Jeff Garlin), who is concerned because Josh hasn’t handed in the essay by the deadline. If Josh doesn’t complete this assignment, he won’t be able to graduate. When Mr. Elmer talks to Josh about it, Josh insists that he can’t finish the essay until he’s experienced the last day of high school.

Why does Josh feel this way? As Josh explains to Mr. Elmer, he’s obsessed with a 1980s teen drama movie called “Fireworks at Beaumont Prep.” In that movie, the teen protagonist had a high school experience that changed dramatically when he got the girl of his dreams on his last day of high school. Josh feels like he can relate to this character, which is portrayed by an actor called Patrick J. Michael (played by “This Is the Year” director David Henrie).

Josh tells Mr. Elmer, “I can’t describe my high school experience yet because it’s not over.” Mr. Elmer gives Josh an extension of a few days to finish the essay. His essay is now due on a Sunday, which we all know will be the same day that Josh will have something life-changing to write about by the time this movie ends. What could possibly happen in a few days that could change Josh’s life?

It just so happens that Josh has found out that Mikey and Donnie’s cousin Zoey (played by Alyssa Jirrels) has moved back into the area because of her parents’ recent divorce. Josh hasn’t seen Zoey since they were very young kids, and she didn’t make a good impression on him then because Zoey bit him at a party. However, Josh changes his mind about Zoey when he sees what she looks like now: Zoey has blossomed into a stereotypical “dream girl” who’s in these types of movies: blonde, pretty and thin. Josh is instantly smitten.

There’s a big problem for Josh though: Zoey already has a boyfriend. He’s a stuck-up British guy in his 20s named Kale (played by Gregg Sulkin), who is a rich and well-connected aspiring artist. After Zoey graduates from high school, Zoey and Kale have plans to move to Los Angeles, where Kale wants to pursue his artist career.

And what do you know: To Josh’s dismay, Zoey tells him that the school is letting her graduate a few days earlier than the rest of the class, and she’s moving to Los Angeles the next day. The timeline in this movie is weird and makes no sense. In one scene, Josh and Zoey see each other for the first time in several years. When Josh is at school after his awestruck “reunion” with Zoey, he has a meeting with Mr. Elmer about his essay being due. It’s supposed to be about a less than a week before Josh’s last day of high school.

But then, a few scenes later, Zoey tells Josh that she’s graduating early. That means (1) either Josh didn’t know that Zoey was a student at the school for quite some time or (2) Zoey is having one of the shortest school stints ever as a transfer student. The first scenario is highly unlikely since Zoey is the cousin of Josh’s close friend Mikey, who would’ve mentioned it if she had moved back in the area months or weeks ago. The second scenario is more likely what the filmmakers want viewers of this movie to believe.

When Zoey and Josh see each other for the first time in years, he’s carpooling with Mikey, while Donnie is driving. Donnie and Mikey stop over at Zoey’s place to pick her up to take her to school. The timeline is off-kilter and frankly quite stupid in how quickly all of these things have happened to Josh in just a few days: He discovered that Zoey is in his same graduating class, she’s graduating early, and she’s moving to Los Angeles with Kale the next day. And somehow, Josh thinks he’s in love with Zoey and can win her over in this short period of time. It’s not romantic. It’s creepy and obsessive.

Zoey and Kale are taking a road trip for their relocation to Los Angeles. Josh is a big fan of the alternative rock group Lovely the Band, and he finds out that Zoey is a big fan too. And what a coincidence: Lovely the Band is headlining at an upcoming sold-out festival. (Lovely the Band has a cameo performance in the movie, because you already know that the characters are going to this festival.) Zoey doesn’t have the wristband tickets needed to go to the concert, so Josh lies and tells her that he has these wristbands. Josh’s scheme is to somehow find a way to get Zoey to go with him to this concert, which will take place over a weekend. And he doesn’t have a car.

Meanwhile, Donnie has recently bought a dirty and beat-up food truck because he and Mikey have plans to start a food truck business together after Mikey graduates from high school. Donnie says he’s going to refurbish the truck, and he expects Mikey to help him. The truck has a “Star Wars”-inspired name with a bad pun: The Milleniyum Falcon, because the food is supposed to be “yummy.” However, Mikey has a secret: He applied to Texas A&M University and he got accepted. Mikey is afraid to tell Donnie, because he doesn’t want Donnie to feel like Mikey will abandon Donnie for college.

Josh is desperate for transportation to the concert. Apparently, he doesn’t have a car at home that he could use, and he doesn’t have the money to rent a car. It should come as no surprise that Josh lies to Mikey and Donnie by saying that he has wristbands for all of them to see Lovely the Band, and they should take the Milleniyum Falcon on a road trip to the concert—on one condition: Zoey needs to go with them too. Josh says that the wristbands will be there for him to pick up at the venue’s will call center.

Molly knows about Josh’s deceitful scheme, and she insists on going on the road trip too. Molly says that she wants to make sure that nothing goes wrong with Josh. Sure, Molly. Whatever you say.

And what about Zoey’s boyfriend Kale and their plans to move to Los Angeles? Kale suddenly gets an opportunity to meet with someone who can help him with his career. And the meeting is around the same time that Zoey wants to go on the road trip to the concert. Gee, what a coincidence.

Kale isn’t too pleased about Zoey spending time with what he thinks are a bunch of dorks, but he’s more concerned about advancing his career. Zoey is 18 and a legal adult, so there’s nothing that can stop her from going. (Parents are practically non-existent in this movie.) And so, Zoey ends up going on this road trip with Josh, Molly, Mikey and Donnie in a junkpile food truck named the Milleniyum Falcon. You can easily figure out what happens from then on.

There’s sort of a bizarre subplot with “This Is the Year” director David Henrie portraying a guy in his late 20s or early 30s named Sebastian, who meets these travelers during the trip. Sebastian is supposed to be an exact look-alike for Patrick J. Michael, the “Fireworks at Beaumont Prep” actor whom Josh idolizes. (Josh and other people repeatedly mention the physical resemblance.) Sebastian immediately fixates on Molly and makes it known that he wants to date her. It’s kind of inappropriate because she’s supposed to be a high school student, and he knows it.

Yes, technically Molly could be the age of consent (which is 18 in most U.S. states), but it’s still an icky part of the movie because Molly is not emotionally mature enough to be dating a man that age. Out of all of the movie’s principal actors who are depicting high school students, Marano is the only one who comes the closest to looking like she could be in high school. All the other “high school students” in the movie look old enough to be closer to the age of 30 instead of 18.

There are many other unrealistic and dopey scenarios that take place in “This Is the Year.” The entire movie is built on a flimsy premise anyway. And viewers won’t have much sympathy for Josh and his pathetic lies. Zoey is your basic bland beauty in movies like this one. Josh’s attraction to her is obviously mostly physical, which makes him look almost as shallow as conceited Kale.

The only characters in the movie who don’t come across as people who deserve to have duct tape put over their mouths are Molly and Donnie, but even they have moments that are irritating to watch. Molly goes along with Josh’s horrible con game, which puts her on a certain level of sleazy. Donnie is harmless and goofy, but he really needs to get a life if he’s hanging out this much with high schoolers in his free time.

In addition to the horrendous screenplay, “This Is the Year” doesn’t have any acting performances that rise above mediocre. The movie’s comedy is very phony and forced. And there are absolutely no surprises at all. Well, maybe one big surprise: This movie is so hackneyed and boring, you might be surprised if you can get through it all without falling asleep.

Vertical Entertainment released “This Is the Year” in select U.S. cinemas, on digital and VOD on September 24, 2021.

Copyright 2017-2024 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX