Review: ‘How to Train Your Dragon’ (2025), starring Mason Thames, Gerard Butler, Nico Parker and Nick Frost

June 11, 2025

by Carla Hay

Nico Parker, Mason Thames and Toothless in “How to Train Your Dragon” (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures)

“How to Train Your Dragon”

Directed by Dean DeBlois

Culture Representation: Taking place on the fictional island of Berk, the fantasy/action film “How to Train Your Dragon” (based on the 2003 children’s novel of the same name) features a predominantly white cast of characters (with a multiracial people, black people and indigenous people) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: In a Berk culture where humans are supposed to hunt and kill dragons, the misfit son of Berk’s leader befriends a dragon and doesn’t want to kill any dragons.

Culture Audience: “How to Train Your Dragon” will appeal mainly to people who are fans of the “How to Train Your Dragon” franchise and family-oriented fantasy films that teach respect for animals.

Gerard Butler and Toothless in “How to Train Your Dragon” (Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures)

The unsurprising live-action remake of the 2010 animated film “How to Train Your Dragon” has engaging performances and is more visually dazzling than its fully animated counterpart. The remake falls short in the personalities of the teen supporting characters. The sidekick teen characters in the 2025 remake just aren’t as amusing or as interesting as they are in the 2010 movie.

“How to Train Your Dragon” is based on author Cressida Cowell’s fantasy book series that began with 2003’s “How to Train Your Dragon.” The book series has spawned several feature films and short films. The “How to Train Your Dragon” book series is aimed at children, but the movies have wider appeal to many generations.

The 2025 version of “How to Train Your Dragon” reunites some of the same principal filmmakers who worked on the 2010 “How to Train Your Dragon.” Dean DeBlois, who co-wrote and co-directed the 2010 “How to Train Your Dragon” movie, returns as the sole writer and director of the 2025 “How to Train Your Dragon” and adds the title of producer. John Powell continues as the franchise’s music composer for the “How to Train Your Dragon” movies.

Unlike other live-action remakes of beloved animated films, 2025’s “How to Train Your Dragon” doesn’t make any drastic changes to the plot of the animated movie. This “play it safe” approach is fine, but it doesn’t leave room for doing anything groundbreaking or truly unique to the story. Fortunately, the remake has talented cast members who do the best that they can in bringing these characters to live-action life.

In both “How to Train Your Dragon” movies (which take place in an unspecified period time where there is no electricity or modern technology), the Viking humans on the fictional island of Berk are at war against dragons, which are blamed for killing hundreds of people. The human residents of Berk have retaliated by killing thousands of dragons. Dragons are also blamed for killing livestock that are used for Berk’s food supply.

The dragons come in many shapes and sizes. Most of them live in a secret underground nest that the Berk residents are trying to find. Night Fury dragons are considered the most dangerous and the most elusive dragons to kill. The most important residents of Berk are those who are the most successful dragon slayers. Anyone who finds the secret dragon’s next would be considered a hero in Berk.

The chief of Berk is Stoik the Vast (played by Gerard Butler, who reprises the same Stoik role from the animated “How to Train Your Dragon” films), a gruff and macho widower who hates dragons because his wife was killed by a dragon several years ago. Stoik is raising his and wife’s only child—a 15-year-old son named Hiccup (played by Mason Thames)—to become Stoik’s heir. But so far, Stoik is disappointed because he and many other residents of Berk think that Hiccup is a wimpy coward when it comes to many things, including combat and killing dragons.

Hiccup gets empathy from a grizzled blacksmith/dragon trainer named Gobber (played by Nick Frost), who sometimes acts more like a father figure to Hiccup than Stoik does. Gobber is also Stoik’s longtime best friend. Hiccup is an introverted, misfit loner who lacks confidence and wishes that he could get the respect of Stoik.

Hiccup shows skills in making things with his hands. To prove he has some worth as a potential dragon slayer, Hiccup makes a dragon trap that he places in a remote wooded area. This trap will lead to events that will change the lives of Hiccup and many other people in Berk.

Teenagers in Berk are trained to kill dragons. Gobber leads an elite dragon-slaying training program, which is also an intense competition. The winner of the competition is considered to be on the fast track to becoming a future leader of Berk.

Stoik pressures Hiccup to enroll in this training program, even though Hiccup doesn’t want to kill any dragons. The other teens who are in Gobber’s program are ambitious Astrid (played by Nico Parker); insecure Snotlout (played by Gabriel Howell); goofy Fishlegs (played by Julian Dennison); and bickering fraternal twins Ruffnut (played by Bronwyn James) and Tuffnut (played by Harry Trevaldwyn).

It should be noted that in this fantasy world, Berk is a place where people have varying accents, for no reason given. Stoik has a thick Scottish accent. Hiccup and Astrid have American accents. (Parker is British in real life.) Fishlegs has a New Zealand accent because Dennison is from New Zealand. Almost everyone else has English accents.

In the early days of the training program, Astrid is resentful of Hiccup because she thinks he is underserving scion who gets unfair advantages in life because of nepotism. Astrid, who comes from a working-class background, openly tells Hiccup that she plans to become the next chief of Berk when she’s old enough. Hiccup responds by saying that Astrid, not Hiccup, is the type of child that Stoik wants.

Snotlout has similar “daddy issues” because he desperately wants the respect and approval from his emotionally aloof father Spitelout (played by Peter Serafinowicz), who is one of the dragon-slaying warriors in Stoick’s army. Fishlegs is mainly the training group’s comic relief. Ruffnut and Tuffnut are bratty and try to outdo each other, but these two characters are less appealing in the 2025 version of “How to Train Your Dragon” than the 2010 version.

One day, Hiccup finds out that a jet-black, young male Night Fury dragon has been caught in his trap. Hiccup takes out a knife to kill it, but he can’t do it. Instead, he lets the dragon free from the trap. The dragon is hostile to Hiccup but doesn’t hurt Hiccup.

Half of the dragon’s tail is missing from a trap injury, which prevents the dragon from flying. Hiccup feels guilty about making the dragon disabled. And so, he brings food to the dragon and eventually makes a prosthetic that he attaches to the dragon’s tail so the dragon can fly. Hiccup names the dragon Toothless because the dragon has retractable teeth.

As already shown in the movie’s trailer, Hiccup eventually earns the trust of Toothless and learns to ride on Toothless like someone would ride on a flying horse. Hiccup keeps his budding friendship with Toothless a secret because he knows it’s taboo and he could get punished for befriending a dragon. The movie’s trailer already shows that Toothless won’t be kept a secret for very long.

The rest of “How to Train Your Dragon” plays out exactly like you think it will, if you’ve seen enough of these types of movies and especially if you saw the 2010 “How to Train Your Dragon.” The characters of Hiccup, Astrid, Stoik and Spitelout greatly benefit from live-action performances. Thames is especially good at making Hiccup believable in the action and dramatic scenes.

The 2025 version of “How to Train Your Dragon” excels the most in its visual effects, which are award-worthy. Toothless is even more adorable and soulful in the 2025 version of “How to Train Your Dragon” than he was in the 2010 version. The action sequences in the 2025 movie are thrilling, immersive and occasionally stunning. The 2025 version “How to Train Your Dragon” didn’t take any risks in changing major parts of the story, but sometimes it’s better not to mess with a classic.

Universal Pictures will release “How to Train Your Dragon” in U.S. cinemas on June 13, 2025. A sneak preview of the movie was shown in U.S. cinemas on June 11, 2025.

Review: ‘Y2K’ (2024), starring Jaeden Martell, Rachel Zegler, Julian Dennison, the Kid Laroi and Fred Durst

December 17, 2024

by Carla Hay

Jaeden Martell, Rachel Zegler and Julian Dennison in “Y2K” (Photo by Nicole Rivelli/A24)

“Y2K” (2024)

Directed by Kyle Mooney

Culture Representation: Taking place in an unnamed U.S. city from December 31, 1999 to January 2, 2000, the sci-fi/horror/comedy film “Y2K” features a predominantly white cast of characters (with a few African Americans, Latin people and Asians) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: A group of high school students and other people battle against machines and gadgets that have become homicidal on January 1, 2000.

Culture Audience: “Y2K” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of the movie’s headliners, filmmaker Kyle Mooney, and silly horror comedies where teenage characters are the main focus.

Fred Durst, Lachlan Watson, Jaeden Martell, Daniel Zolghadri and Rachel Zegler in “Y2K” (Photo by Nicole Rivelli/A24)

The horror comedy “Y2K” is about people versus machines that go on a homicidal rampage during a Y2K electronic crisis. The real haywire mess is this entire dimwitted movie that cares more about resurrecting Limp Bizkit’s old hits than having a good story. Unfortunately, “Y2K” takes what could have been a potentially great concept for a horror movie and squanders it on a bunch of mindless scenes, most of which are neither funny nor scary.

Former “Saturday Night Live” cast member Kyle Mooney makes his directorial debut with “Y2K,” which he co-wrote with Evan Winter. “Y2K” had its world premiere at the 2024 SXSW Film and TV Festival. The movie takes place in an unnamed U.S. city but was actually filmed in New Jersey, in Ringwood, Chatham Borough, and Clark.

“Y2K” is based on the real-life scare that people around the world had in the late 1990s, when computers and other electronic-operated machines were predicted to malfunction on January 1, 2000, because the machines supposedly weren’t programmed for any year past 1999. That massive electronic meltdown didn’t happen in real life, but the plot of “Y2K” speculates what would have happened if machines didn’t just melt down but also went on a killing spree. The production notes for “Y2K” say that Mooney thought of the movie’s concept “in the haze of a New Year’s hangover.” And unfortunately, the ends results are “Y2K” looks like a movie that was written and directed in a brain-addled haze.

“Y2K” uses a lot of the same, tired clichés that are found in many horror movies where the main characters are teenagers. Cliché #1: A nerdy and introverted protagonist with a more outgoing best friend both want to be accepted by the “cool kids” in their school. In “Y2K,” these two outsiders are shy Eli (played by Jaeden Martell) and goofy Daniel “Danny” Bannon (played by Julian Dennison), who are both juniors (16 or 17 years old) at the same high school. Eli and Danny share a passion for pop, rock and electronica music, so expect to hear a lot of songs that were mainstream hits in the 1990s, such as Chumbawamba’s “Tubthumping” and Fatboy Slim’s “Praise You.”

Cliché #2: The geeky protagonist has a secret crush on a pretty and popular student, who already has another love interest. In “Y2K,” the characters who are the couple in this love triangle are Laura (played by Rachel Zegler) and Soccer Chris (played by the Kid Laroi), who are supposed to be the “it couple” of the school. Chris (who is called “Soccer Chris” because he’s a star on the school’s soccer team) is predictably an arrogant jerk, while Laura is predictably nice to everyone. It’s all a movie contrivance for audiences to root against Chris and root for underdog Eli to get together with Laura.

Cliché #3: The protagonist and his sidekick are bullied by other students. In “Y2K,” the school bullies are a bunch of stoners who listen to hard rock/heavy metal. They include a loudmouth leader named Farkas (played by Eduardo Franco) and an androgynous follower named Ash (played by Lachlan Watson), who is an aspiring filmmaker and an avid fan of rock band Limp Bizkit. Ash constantly carries a portable video camera, which becomes a source of contention later in the movie.

And here comes another teen horror movie cliché: The teen house party that goes horribly wrong. “Y2K” begins on December 31, 1999, when Eli and Danny plan to crash an unsupervised house party held at Chris’ house. Eli, who is an only child, lives with his parents Robin (played by Alicia Silverstone) and Howard (played by Tim Heidecker), who are in the movie for less than 10 minutes. Eli gets embarrassed and uncomfortable when his parents reminisce about how Robin taught Howard how to French kiss during the couple’s college romance.

Even though Eli and Danny are best friends, Eli is still hurt by something cruel that Danny did to Eli: In a desperate attempt to get attention from the “cool kids,” Danny told a lie to other students that Eli drank Danny’s urine. Danny told Eli that he was sorry for fabricating this disgustng story, but Eli is still being bullied over this lie. It’s a sore spot in the otherwise solid friendship of Danny and Eli.

Before Eli and Danny go to the house party, they visit their older friend Garret (played by Mooney), who is a clerk at their favorite video store. Garret openly abuses drugs (he has a fondness for marijuana and psychedelics) and is a walking stereotype of a spaced-out weirdo. Garret is harmless, but “Y2K” viewers have to sit through many bad jokes that Garret tells in this movie. Danny smokes some marijuana with Garret in the video store’s storage/employee room, while Eli declines the offer to smoke and only seems interested in drinking alcohol.

At the house party, many of the teens are aware of the Y2K scare but are unconcerned about it. Danny tries to liven things up by playing a homemade CD of his favorite songs and dancng to the music. Danny’s fun-loving personality attracts the attention of a pretty girl named Madison (played by Ellie Ricker), and it doesn’t take long before Danny and Madison start kissing each other. Eli somewhat mopes around and tries not to notice how the relationship between Laura and Chris is still going strong. Chris has figured out that Eli has a crush on Laura and angrily tells Eli to not make any moves on Laura because “you’re a dud.”

As the clock strikes midnight for January 1, 2000, all hell breaks loose in the house. Machines and gadgets—such as a microwave oven, a toy jeep and a blender—suddenly turn deadly. This review won’t go into too many details about who gets killed and who survives. However, it’s enough to say that there’s a “chief villain” machine that can best be described as looking like the original “Lost in Space” robot, with a computer monitor for a head.

Some of the teens escape from Chris’ house, including Eli, Laura, Ash and an aspiring rapper named CJ (played Daniel Zolghadri), who says he’s in a hip-hop group called Prophets of Intelligence. And you know what that means: Expect to see a scene in “Y2K” of CJ and his horrible rapping.

The teens spend most of their time outside, trying to hide from the chief villain robot and other deadly machines that could be on the loose. The teens bicker over things such as whether or not Ash’s portable video camera will turn against them as a weapon. And then, they encounter Limp Bizkit lead singer Fred Durst (who plays a version of himself) hiding somewhere by himself, and “Y2K” continues its downward spiral into stupidity and plot holes.

During all of this chaos, the teens don’t think about seeing if they get help from authorities. They also don’t try to get in touch with their parents or other family members. Is it because there’s no electricity or phone communications during this apocalypse? No, because a pivotal scene in the movie shows someone being able to easily use the Internet on a desktop computer. Remember, this movie takes place during a time when accessing the Internet was done mostly by dial-up phone connections.

Because “Y2K” is partially a tribute to Limp Bizkit (Ash’s devotion to the band is a huge part of Ash’s character), it should come as no surprise that Durst performs Limp Bizkit songs from the late 1990s, such as “Break Stuff ” and Limp Bizkit’s cover version of George Michael’s “Faith.” These performance scenes will no doubt have “Y2K” viewers rolling their eyes at the cheesiness of how these scenes are staged. Everything looks forced and phony.

The cast members perform adequately, but the “Y2K” screenplay is so relentlessly sloppy and moronic, there’s almost no suspense or real amusing moments. “Y2K” also has some empty preaching about the dangers of becoming addicted to electronic devices/machines. If this “Y2K” movie were a computer, it would be a computer afflicted with a bug that causes it to repeatedly malfunction.

A24 released “Y2K” in U.S. cinemas on December 6, 2024. The movie will be released on digital and VOD on December 24, 2024.

Review: ‘Godzilla vs. Kong,’ starring Alexander Skarsgård, Millie Bobby Brown, Rebecca Hall, Brian Tyree Henry, Shun Oguri, Julian Dennison and Demián Bichir

March 29, 2021

by Carla Hay

Godzilla and King Kong in “Godzilla vs. Kong” (Photo courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures)

“Godzilla vs. Kong”

Directed by Adam Wingard

Culture Representation: Taking place in various other parts of the world, the action flick “Godzilla vs. Kong” features a racially diverse cast (white people, African Americans, Asians and Latinos) who are part of the scientific community, corporate business or are underage students.

Culture Clash: Gigantic monster enemies Godzilla and King Kong cross paths, while some greedy corporate people want to exploit the monsters’ power sources in order to make deadly weapons.

Culture Audience: “Godzilla vs. Kong” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of “Godzilla” and “King Kong” movies and don’t care if the story is badly written, sloppily directed and populated with hollow human characters.

Alexander Skarsgård, Rebecca Hall and Kaylee Hottle in “Godzilla vs. Kong” (Photo by Chuck Zlotnick/Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures)

The tedious and atrociously made train wreck that is “Godzilla vs. Kong” probably will please people who have extremely low standards for action flicks. But considering that several superhero movies have proven that action movies can be entertaining spectacles with distinct and memorable characters, there’s really no excuse for why “Godzilla vs. Kong” stinks more than any toxic excrement that can be expelled from these fictional monsters’ bodies. “Godzilla vs. Kong” is the epitome of a “cash grab” film that lazily exploits the nostalgic brand names of beloved creature feature films. In “Godzilla vs. Kong,” the filmmakers do almost nothing to create intriguing characters that can exist in a cinematic art form.

Directed by Adam Wingard and written by Eric Pearson and Max Borenstein, “Godzilla vs. Kong” takes an annoying amount of time building up to the inevitable fight scenes described in the movie’s title. The filmmakers inexplicably overstuffed the movie with a lot of characters that barely do anything except act egotistical (if they’re the villains) or look anxious (if they’re the heroes). The human characters who are involved in the most action and decision making in the movie are reduced to spouting idiotic dialogue that makes the monsters in the movie look more intelligent.

Yes, it’s another movie about a creature that threatens to destroy the world, while humans think they can stop the destruction in time, and the greedy ones think they can get rich off of this crisis. That’s pretty much the plot of every movie about Godzilla, King Kong or other giant monster. Pitting two supersized titan monsters against each other should raise the stakes even higher, but “Godzilla vs. Kong” fails in delivering an enjoyable story and has an ending that falls very flat. The movie’s visual effects from Luma Pictures are adequate but not outstanding.

“Godzilla vs. Kong” begins with King Kong living in a biodome on Skull Island, where he is being observed by scientists for research. Leading the team of scientists is Dr. Ilene Andrews (played by Rebecca Hall), who is a single mother to an adopted deaf/mute daughter named Jia (played by Kaylee Hottle), who’s about 9 or 10 years old. Apparently, Ilene cares more about her research than the safety of her underage daughter. Jia is allowed to be in many completely dangerous situations that would be more than enough for child protective services to get involved.

But dumb movies like “Godzilla vs. Kong” pander to the lowest common denominator by showcasing people with horrific parenting skills and acting as if nothing is wrong with it. And if that means making it look like kids should be allowed to be in the line of fire and actively fighting these monstrous and deadly creatures, then so be it. Kaylee and some of the other underage characters in “Godzilla vs. Kong” are portrayed as having uncanny knowledge and skills that the adults don’t possess. It’s just more pandering to a kiddie audience or people with a child’s mentality.

The movie (which was filmed in Hawaii and Australia) jumps all over the place in a haphazard manner, but here are the main locations in the film:

  • Skull Island, where King Kong lives until he’s brought out of hiding for reasons explained in the movie. It’s also where Ilene and her daughter Jia live until they decide to travel to wherever Kong will be relocated.
  • Apex Cybernetics, a high-tech corporation in Pensacola, Florida, is involved in cybertechnology related to military defense weapons. The CEO of Apex is a typical money-hungry villain named Walter Simmons (played by Demián Bichir), who has a conniving daughter named Maya Simmons (played by Eiza González), who wants to take over the business someday. Walter’s loyal right-hand henchman is Apex chief technology officer Ren Serizawa (played by Shun Oguri). Apex also has an engineer named Bernie Hayes (played by Brian Tyree Henry), who ends up becoming a whistleblower.
  • Monarch Relief Camp, also in Pensacola, is the temporary home of refugees who were displaced by the destruction caused in the 2019 movie “Godzilla: King of the Monsters.” It’s where divorced dad Mark Russell (played by Kyle Chandler), a former Monarch animal behavior and communication specialist, works to help refugees. Mark has a headstrong and independent teenage daughter named Madison (played by Millie Bobby Brown), who wants to follow in his footsteps as scientist who studies animals.
  • Denham University of Theoretical Science is a think tank in Philadelphia where the workaholic and underappreciated Dr. Nathan Lind (played by Alexander Skarsgård) is working on a top-secret theory/experiment. Aren’t they all in movies like this one?
  • Hong Kong, where some of the characters in the story take a rocket, because apparently it’s not enough just to have transportation by planes, ships, trains or automobiles.
  • Tokyo, because you shouldn’t have a Godzilla movie without Godzilla fighting in Tokyo.
  • Hollow Earth, a place somewhere below the earth’s surface that was discovered in “Godzilla: King of the Monsters.” This location also plays a major role in “Godzilla vs. Kong.”

In “Godzilla vs. Kong,” King Kong somehow got access to a javelin (it’s never explained how), and like an Olympic champ, he throws it at the sky while he’s on Skull Island. The javelin pierces the biodome ceiling, so that’s how King Kong finds out that the world he’s been living in has been hermetically sealed.

You know what that means. King Kong becomes restless because he knows he belongs somewhere else. It isn’t long before Ilene and the rest of the scientists find out that King Kong has literally cracked their carefully constructed façade.

Ilene comments about King Kong to a co-worker named Ben (played by Chris Chalk): “The habitat is not going to hold him much longer.” Ben replies, “We need to think about off-site solutions.” Ilene then says, “The island is the one thing that’s kept him isolated. If he leaves, Godzilla will come for him. There can’t be two alpha titans.” Oh yes, there can, or else this movie wouldn’t exist.

The decision is made to move Kong out of Skull Island. King Kong is tranquilized and strapped to a cargo ship. And you just know that tranquilizer is going to eventually wear off. Somehow, Kong’s energy is sensed by Godzilla, who comes out of hibernation from deep in the ocean. Godzilla goes on a rampage in trying to find Kong. It’s all just filler until these two creatures face off against one another.

What does this have to do with Apex? The company has discovered a subterranean ecosystem that’s as “fast as any ocean light.” It has an energy life force that Apex wants to find in order to make a weapon that will defeat Godzilla.

Nathan, a former Monarch employee, says that he tried and failed to find the mysterious Hollow Earth entry. He believes in genetic memory, a theory that says all titans share a common impulse to return to their evolutionary source. Nathan wants to tag along with Ilene and her crew to find the power source that’s in Hollow Earth.

But since “Godzilla vs. Kong” isn’t interested in keeping things simple with only essential characters, there are more people who want to get to Hollow Earth too. There are the Apex villains, of course. And then there’s a motley trio that’s meant to be the movie’s comic relief but they end up saying a lot of corny lines and getting into stereotypical slapstick predicaments.

This trio consists of Apex engineer Bernie, who’s decided he’s going to expose Apex’s dastardly plans; teenage Madison, who apparently skips school so she can save the world in “Godzilla” movies; and her schoolmate Josh Valentine (played by Julian Dennison), who’s the type of character that Dennison is known to play in movies: a sarcastic brat. Josh is also the clownish “klutz” of the group who’s prone to be more terrified than the others. Meanwhile, Bernie sometimes acts like he’s uttering lines that were rejected from a bad stand-up comedy act.

How did Bernie get mixed up with these kids? Bernie is the host of a podcast called the Titan Trade Podcast, where he spouts “insider” conspiracy theories about Apex but doesn’t reveal his true identity. Even though Bernie’s voice and his irritating motormouth personality would be recognizable to his Apex co-workers on this podcast (Bernie makes no effort to disguise his voice), the movie wants people to believe that Bernie’s been able to keep his podcast identity a secret while he’s spilling confidential company information to the world.

“Something bad is going in here,” Bernie warns in one of his podcast episodes. He says that he’s going to download evidence of a “vast” corporate conspiracy. “It’s more than a leak. It’s a flood,” he adds. “And this flood is going to wash away all of Apex’s lies.” And with that announcement, Bernie essentially tells the world that he’s a company whistleblower, without thinking that the company could possibly catch on to his exposé plan before he actually does it. So dumb.

Madison listens to the podcast and essentially drags a reluctant Josh along when they meet Bernie. Madison uses Josh because he has a car and she doesn’t. As if to put an emphasis on how Bernie is the “out of touch” adult in this trio, he has a very outdated flip phone that he uses a lot in the movie. It might be some type of weird irony that a guy who works as an engineer at a highly advanced tech company doesn’t even have a smartphone, but it just makes Bernie look even more dimwitted, considering all the benefits of a smartphone that he would need on this mission.

Because “Godzilla vs. Kong” is meant to be a family-friendly film, there are the obligatory sappy moments to make it look like this isn’t just a movie with fights and explosions. Jia has an emotional bond with King Kong that’s intended to tug at people’s heartstrings, because somehow she’s taught him sign language without her mother knowing. Ilene eventually finds out, but you have to wonder how much of neglectful parent Ilene must be if she let her daughter spend enough time alone with King Kong that Ilene didn’t know that Jia has now become King Kong’s personal American Sign Language tutor. Kids these days.

And while this awful movie whips around from place to place like a flea in search of a mangy dog, somehow the filmmakers forgot to have any meaningful story arc for Madison’s father Mark (who was a protagonist in “Godzilla: King of the Monsters”), who is completely sidelined in “Godzilla vs. Kong.” The parents in this movie are insultingly portrayed as incapable of making truly effective decisions unless the kids show them the right way.

There’s nothing wrong with precocious kid characters, but not at the expense of making the adults with years of scientific knowledge look clueless next to kids who haven’t even graduated from high school yet. The movie completely undervalues and dismisses the life experiences of adults whenever the kid characters are in the same scene. It’s why “Godzilla vs. Kong” has the mentality of video game or a cartoon instead of a live-action movie.

“Godzilla vs. Kong” doesn’t even bother giving the villains anything memorable about their personalities, which is what all worthwhile “good vs. evil” stories are supposed to do. Heroes often have bland, interchangeable personalities, but villains are the ones who are supposed to get the biggest audience reactions in these stories. And audiences like to see some of the clever ways that villains make mischief. None of that happens in “Godzilla vs. Kong.”

There could have been so much improvement to the movie’s lackluster human interactions if the villains were compelling. Walter is very generic, Ren doesn’t talk much, and Maya is a completely unnecessary character. All of the actors in “Godzilla vs. Kong” give performances like they know they’re in a movie where they don’t have to show much acting talent and it’s all about the paychecks they’re getting.

As for the Godzilla vs. King Kong fight scenes that come too late in the movie, they are extremely predictable but at least better than the witless dialogue that the audience has to endure whenever the movie’s scenes focus only on the humans. In order for a monster movie to have the most impact, viewers should care not just about the fight scenes but also about the people whose lives are in danger. And in that regard, “Godzilla vs. Kong” stomps out a lot of humanity to distract viewers with CGI action that isn’t even that great in the first place.

Warner Bros. Pictures will release “Godzilla vs. Kong” in U.S. cinemas and on HBO Max on March 31, 2021. The movie was released in several countries outside of the U.S. on March 25 and March 26, 2021.

Copyright 2017-2026 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX