Review: ‘Anniversary’ (2025), starring Diane Lane, Kyle Chandler, Madeline Brewer, Zoey Deutch, Phoebe Dynevor, Mckenna Grace, Daryl McCormack and Dylan O’Brien

October 29, 2025

by Carla Hay

Kyle Chandler and Diane Lane (both standing) in “Anniversary” (Photo by Owen Behan/Roadside Attractions and Lionsgate)

“Anniversary” (2025)

Directed by Jan Komasa

Culture Representation: Taking place in the Washington, D.C./Maryland area, from 2024 to 2029, the dramatic film “Anniversary” features a predominantly white cast of characters (with a few black people) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: A tight-knit family is disrupted when a woman, who eventually marries into the family, writes a best-selling book that becomes the bible of a cult-like movement that turns the United States into a totalitarian nation that punishes people for dissenting.

Culture Audience: “Anniversary” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of the movie’s headliners and heavy-handed, soap-opera-type dramas about people in an oppressive society.

Kyle Chandler and Diane Lane in “Anniversary” (Photo by Owen Behan/Roadside Attractions and Lionsgate)

“Anniversary” has a provocative concept about a family affected by the U.S. becoming a massive cult that’s ruled by a totalitarian government. This misguided drama turns into a clumsy mess with hokey and insipid plot twists rushed into the last 20 minutes. The plot twists are not ridiculous on their own, but ridiculous in how they are presented.

The plot twists happen so quickly and melodramatically in the story, it kind of ruins the movie. Meanwhile other parts of the story have huge gaps of missing information that should be in the film. “Anniversary” has the benefit of a talented cast (most of whom give serviceable yet often over-wrought performances), but the cast members are stuck in a movie that is determined to hammer home its points while frequently dropping the hammer.

Directed by Jan Komasa and written by Lori Rosene-Gambino, “Anniversary” takes place from 2024 to 2029, in the Washington, D.C./Maryland area. The movie was actually filmed in Ireland. “Anniversary” has some big ideas, but the movie is quite lazy in developing most of the characters in the family at the center of the story.

“Anniversary” begins by showing a woman in her late 20s rehearsing a greeting in front of a mirror. Her name is Elizabeth “Liz” Nettles (played by Phoebe Dynevor), and she is practicing what she is going to say when she meets the married parents of her boyfriend at the parents’ 25th wedding anniversary party, which will be held at the parents’ Maryland home. “It’s lovely to meet you, Mr. and Mrs. Taylor” Liz says in her rehearsed speech, as she adds a congratulations on the spouses’ 25th wedding anniversary.

The way this opening scene plays out, it’s very much like a Lifetime movie, where you know immediately that this seemingly demure and soft-spoken woman is cold and calculating with a devious plan. In other words, “Anniversary” makes it obvious from the beginning that Liz is up to no good and is going to be the main instigator of the chaos in this family. Liz isn’t seen for more than half of “Anniversary,” but that’s not the movie’s only problem.

The next scene shows Georgetown University sociology professor Ellen Taylor (played by Diane Lane) giving a lecture to a classroom of students. The title of the lecture is “What Is Culture?” Ellen says, “I am neither a liberal or a conservative. I prefer to be a free artist and nothing more—free from violence and lies.”

Ellen then talks about the absurdity of human conditions when people are forced to confront realities that contradict their world views. “Does that sound familiar to anyone in here?” Ellen smirks. “America today, perhaps?” There’s muttering in the audience that implies many of her students agree with her.

Ellen is one-half of the couple celebrating this 25th wedding anniversary. Ellen’s husband is Paul Taylor (played by Kyle Chandler), who owns a restaurant that is frequented by powerful politicians and bureaucrats. Unlike his often-blunt and confrontational wife Ellen, Paul prefers to be non-confrontational and diplomatic.

Paul’s tendency to want to diffuse conflicts is evident in Paul’s first scene in “Anniversary.” Two customers named Senator Coyle (played by Carl Austin) and Senator Hunt (played by Phelim Drew) are having lunch together at Paul’s restaurant. After Paul warmly greets these two senators, they ask Paul to settle a debate: Does New York or Chicago have better pizza? The senators name a New York restaurant and a Chicago restaurant as an example. Paul tactfully answers that one restaurant has better sauce, while the other restaurant has better pizza crust.

The Taylor couple’s anniversary dinner party has about 50 to 75 people in attendance and is held mainly in the backyard of the couple’s home. All four of the couple’s children are in attendance. Several friends and colleagues of Paul and Ellen are also at the party. During the party, the various dynamics in the family are seen and will have an effect on many things that happen later in the movie.

These are four children of Paul and Ellen:

  • Cynthia Taylor (played by Zoey Deutch) is a high-strung attorney who is very focused on her career. Cynthia and her image-conscious attorney husband Rob Thompson (played by Daryl McCormack) are both environmental lawyers. Rob is eager to start a family, but Cynthia doesn’t think it’s the right time and doesn’t seem to like children at all.
  • Anna Taylor (played by Madeline Brewer) is a famous stand-up comedian who is brash, bawdy and very outspoken. Anna, who is queer or a lesbian, has a tendency to get sexually involved with her female personal assistants. Anna can also be a verbal bully when she wants to feel superior to someone.
  • Josh Taylor (played by Dylan O’Brien) is an aspiring writer who feels like a failure because his first book (a sci-fi novel) has recently been rejected by every publisher where it was pitched. Many people in the family are aware that Josh feels insecure because he’s perceived as not as successful as his over-achieving sisters. Josh has brought his new girlfriend Liz (also known as the future troublemaker) as his date to this party, where Liz will meet Josh’s family for the first time.
  • Birdie Taylor (played by Mckenna Grace), the youngest sibling, is a quiet loner who is an aspiring biologist. (She has a mini-scientific lab that she set up in her bedroom.) In the beginning of the movie, Birdie is about 16 or 17 years old and living with her parents. Birdie has a mutual crush on a schoolmate named Moses Ho (played by Sky Yang), whose immigrant mother does some housework for the Taylor family.

It’s mentioned later on in the movie that Paul and Ellen had their children after getting married. One of the disconcerting things about “Anniversary” is that, except for Birdie, none of these adult children look like they’re under the age of 25 when the 25th anniversary party happens. Cynthia, Anna and Josh all look like they’re in their early-to-mid-30s, as were all the cast members playing these characters when they filmed this movie.

The movie never explains how Cynthia is an attorney if she’s under age 25. Although it’s possible in the U.S. to be a practicing attorney who’s under the age of 25, it’s very rare. In other words, the “Anniversary” filmmakers needed to do a better job of casting people who convincingly look like the ages they’re supposed to be in the movie.

“Anniversary” takes place over five years, but in the beginning of the movie, the adult children look too old for people who are supposed to be in their early-to-mid 20s. There was no effort to change how these characters looked over the years, except for changing some of their hairstyles and wardrobe choices. It’s a failure of imagination from the movie’s director and the movie’s makeup department.

The anniversary party goes smoothly except for some tense moments that involve (you guessed it) newcomer Liz. She gives her rehearsed speech when Josh introduces Liz to his parents. Ellen is polite but a little standoffish to Liz. And there’s a reason why, which the movie reveals in a roundabout way: From 2013 to 2016, Liz was a student at Georgetown University, where Ellen was one of Liz’s professors. Liz dropped out of Georgetown because of a feud she had with Ellen.

The feud started because Ellen took offense to an assignment thesis that Liz wrote about how the United States should have only one political party, in order to increase unity among U.S. citizens. Ellen felt that this thesis was very inflammatory and anti-democratic. Ellen flagged the thesis as problematic, which caused some turmoil with Liz’s academic status at the university. Liz argued that she didn’t do anything wrong, but she seemingly backed off from the fight when she dropped out of Georgetown. Ellen didn’t see Liz again until the anniversary party.

When Josh introduces Liz to his parents, he excitedly tells them that he’s helping Liz work on her upcoming book, which Liz describes as a “self-organizing guide.” Ellen eventually tells Liz at the party that she remembers Liz from when Liz was a Georgetown student. Ellen makes it clear to Liz that she still doesn’t trust Liz because of Liz’s controversial thesis. When Ellen privately tries to warn Josh about Liz, Josh responds by telling Ellen that Liz already told him about the past conflicts between Ellen and Liz, and he wants Ellen to move past any grudges and treat Liz with respect.

Ellen suspects that Liz deliberately got involved with Josh as some kind of revenge against Ellen. She also thinks that Liz has dangerously radical ideas and doesn’t want Josh to be brainwashed by these ideas. Ellen voices these concerns to Paul, who tells Ellen that Ellen is being paranoid. Paul is more willing to accept Liz, whom he thinks is harmless. Paul sees that Liz seems to make Josh happy. And for now, that’s all that matters to Paul, when it comes to Liz.

As the relationship between Liz and Josh gets more serious, Liz sends Ellen a gift in the mail: Liz’s published book. It’s called “Change: The New Social Construct.” Ellen notices that the book’s forward is dedicated to “the haters, the doubters, academic stranglers.” Ellen wryly laughs because she thinks the “academic stranglers” description is a thinly veiled dig at Ellen.

Liz’s “Change” book has the same radical ideas that Liz had in her university thesis. The book touts a belief that society is more likely to be unified and peaceful if there weren’t divisions (such as political parties) and if decisions were made for the common good instead of individual freedoms. Liz’s “Change” book is celebrated and taught as a mission by a mysterious think-tank corporation called the Cumberland Company, where Josh and Liz are hired and eventually become wealthy high-ranking leaders.

“Change” ends up selling 10 million copies and has a widespread fan base that becomes a cult for the ideas preached in the book. The “Change” cult ideology becomes so huge, it takes over all aspects of the U.S. government. All political parties are abolished. Government surveillance is everywhere and is used as evidence to persecute people who don’t follow the “Change” groupthink ideology.

Freedom rights for individuals are discouraged or outlawed. People who question, give criticism, or protest against government policies are put on a government watch list or arrested and often falsely accused of serious crimes. Even the American flag is altered, so that the block of stars is in the middle of the flag instead of the side. The last two-thirds of “Anniversary” are about how these drastic changes in America affect the Taylor family.

One of the Taylor family members goes into hiding, out of fear of being arrested. This disappearance serves as a catalyst for most of the trauma cram that happens near the end of the movie. It should come as no surprise which of the family members are the most resistant to the “Change” cult mentality/lifestyle. However, the movie has a very superficial way of presenting these characters, who are mostly underdeveloped.

Ellen has a meltdown that seems to last for the entire five years, where she is seen becoming addicted to smoking marijuana and posting anti-government rants on the Internet. (Not surprisingly, Ellen gets fired from Georgetown University after she did something “un-American” that was caught on video and went viral.) Paul continues to be passive for most of the story until a certain part where he finally shows some backbone, but it might be too late.

Just as Ellen feared would happen, Josh gets married to Liz, starts a family with Liz, and becomes completely sucked into the “Change” lifestyle and cult beliefs. And yet for all of Ellen’s warnings about Liz, this manipulative “mastermind” isn’t seen for most of the movie. Hardly anything is revealed about Liz’s life before her conflicts with Ellen, which means there’s no explanation for why Liz is the way that she is. The only thing that is told about Liz’s personal background is when Liz and Ellen are talking at the 25th anniversary party, and Liz mentions that she’s an “only child by way of a nasty divorce” and that her rage fuels her writing.

Liz being such a mystery just makes the movie look cowardly or unimaginative about depicting someone who is supposed to be the story’s chief villain. A better movie would’ve shown how Liz was able to quickly grow this empire, in order to make the story more believable. Leaders of large cults almost always have some type of magnetic charisma, but the way Liz is written and portrayed in this movie, she’s as dull as a worn-out dishrag.

It’s never depicted on screen whatever Liz did (besides write a book) in her rapid ascent to not just become a leader of the “Change” cult but also a powerful influencer in government policies. She’s never seen actually “working” or hobnobbing with the highest-ranking people in the U.S. government. (Appearing in commercials for the Cumberland Company doesn’t count.) This vagueness about Liz is an example of how “Anniversary” lacks creativity in having memorable characters.

Instead, “Anniversary” wastes time showing several Taylor family arguments in the consecutive yearly increments portraying what happens in the five-year period since Ellen and Paul’s 25th anniversary party. Ellen and Paul’s wedding anniversary is the marking point for each of the years depicted in the movie. As prickly and perceptive Ellen, Lane gives enough humanity that’s needed for her role. Unfortunately, the other characters in the Taylor family are mostly hollow. O’Brien gives a committed performance as Josh, but the character is written as a sad-sack-turned-villain caricature.

The movie’s greatest disservice is in how it doesn’t show enough of the interior lives of the Taylor sisters. Birdie goes through a transformation that is hinted at early in the movie but never explored in a believable way. The story arcs for Cynthia and Anna are also disjointed and look like brief glimpses of their lives instead of making them look like fully formed human beings with lives worth watching. The pacing of “Anniversary” drags in some areas before the movie careens into a very phony-looking, hysteria-filled climax that is more likely to induce eye-rolling disappointment from viewers instead of the intended mind-blowing awe.

Roadside Attractions and Lionsgate released “Anniversary” in U.S. cinemas on October 29, 2025. The movie will be released on digital and VOD on November 21, 2025.

Review: ‘Godzilla vs. Kong,’ starring Alexander Skarsgård, Millie Bobby Brown, Rebecca Hall, Brian Tyree Henry, Shun Oguri, Julian Dennison and Demián Bichir

March 29, 2021

by Carla Hay

Godzilla and King Kong in “Godzilla vs. Kong” (Photo courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures)

“Godzilla vs. Kong”

Directed by Adam Wingard

Culture Representation: Taking place in various other parts of the world, the action flick “Godzilla vs. Kong” features a racially diverse cast (white people, African Americans, Asians and Latinos) who are part of the scientific community, corporate business or are underage students.

Culture Clash: Gigantic monster enemies Godzilla and King Kong cross paths, while some greedy corporate people want to exploit the monsters’ power sources in order to make deadly weapons.

Culture Audience: “Godzilla vs. Kong” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of “Godzilla” and “King Kong” movies and don’t care if the story is badly written, sloppily directed and populated with hollow human characters.

Alexander Skarsgård, Rebecca Hall and Kaylee Hottle in “Godzilla vs. Kong” (Photo by Chuck Zlotnick/Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures)

The tedious and atrociously made train wreck that is “Godzilla vs. Kong” probably will please people who have extremely low standards for action flicks. But considering that several superhero movies have proven that action movies can be entertaining spectacles with distinct and memorable characters, there’s really no excuse for why “Godzilla vs. Kong” stinks more than any toxic excrement that can be expelled from these fictional monsters’ bodies. “Godzilla vs. Kong” is the epitome of a “cash grab” film that lazily exploits the nostalgic brand names of beloved creature feature films. In “Godzilla vs. Kong,” the filmmakers do almost nothing to create intriguing characters that can exist in a cinematic art form.

Directed by Adam Wingard and written by Eric Pearson and Max Borenstein, “Godzilla vs. Kong” takes an annoying amount of time building up to the inevitable fight scenes described in the movie’s title. The filmmakers inexplicably overstuffed the movie with a lot of characters that barely do anything except act egotistical (if they’re the villains) or look anxious (if they’re the heroes). The human characters who are involved in the most action and decision making in the movie are reduced to spouting idiotic dialogue that makes the monsters in the movie look more intelligent.

Yes, it’s another movie about a creature that threatens to destroy the world, while humans think they can stop the destruction in time, and the greedy ones think they can get rich off of this crisis. That’s pretty much the plot of every movie about Godzilla, King Kong or other giant monster. Pitting two supersized titan monsters against each other should raise the stakes even higher, but “Godzilla vs. Kong” fails in delivering an enjoyable story and has an ending that falls very flat. The movie’s visual effects from Luma Pictures are adequate but not outstanding.

“Godzilla vs. Kong” begins with King Kong living in a biodome on Skull Island, where he is being observed by scientists for research. Leading the team of scientists is Dr. Ilene Andrews (played by Rebecca Hall), who is a single mother to an adopted deaf/mute daughter named Jia (played by Kaylee Hottle), who’s about 9 or 10 years old. Apparently, Ilene cares more about her research than the safety of her underage daughter. Jia is allowed to be in many completely dangerous situations that would be more than enough for child protective services to get involved.

But dumb movies like “Godzilla vs. Kong” pander to the lowest common denominator by showcasing people with horrific parenting skills and acting as if nothing is wrong with it. And if that means making it look like kids should be allowed to be in the line of fire and actively fighting these monstrous and deadly creatures, then so be it. Kaylee and some of the other underage characters in “Godzilla vs. Kong” are portrayed as having uncanny knowledge and skills that the adults don’t possess. It’s just more pandering to a kiddie audience or people with a child’s mentality.

The movie (which was filmed in Hawaii and Australia) jumps all over the place in a haphazard manner, but here are the main locations in the film:

  • Skull Island, where King Kong lives until he’s brought out of hiding for reasons explained in the movie. It’s also where Ilene and her daughter Jia live until they decide to travel to wherever Kong will be relocated.
  • Apex Cybernetics, a high-tech corporation in Pensacola, Florida, is involved in cybertechnology related to military defense weapons. The CEO of Apex is a typical money-hungry villain named Walter Simmons (played by Demián Bichir), who has a conniving daughter named Maya Simmons (played by Eiza González), who wants to take over the business someday. Walter’s loyal right-hand henchman is Apex chief technology officer Ren Serizawa (played by Shun Oguri). Apex also has an engineer named Bernie Hayes (played by Brian Tyree Henry), who ends up becoming a whistleblower.
  • Monarch Relief Camp, also in Pensacola, is the temporary home of refugees who were displaced by the destruction caused in the 2019 movie “Godzilla: King of the Monsters.” It’s where divorced dad Mark Russell (played by Kyle Chandler), a former Monarch animal behavior and communication specialist, works to help refugees. Mark has a headstrong and independent teenage daughter named Madison (played by Millie Bobby Brown), who wants to follow in his footsteps as scientist who studies animals.
  • Denham University of Theoretical Science is a think tank in Philadelphia where the workaholic and underappreciated Dr. Nathan Lind (played by Alexander Skarsgård) is working on a top-secret theory/experiment. Aren’t they all in movies like this one?
  • Hong Kong, where some of the characters in the story take a rocket, because apparently it’s not enough just to have transportation by planes, ships, trains or automobiles.
  • Tokyo, because you shouldn’t have a Godzilla movie without Godzilla fighting in Tokyo.
  • Hollow Earth, a place somewhere below the earth’s surface that was discovered in “Godzilla: King of the Monsters.” This location also plays a major role in “Godzilla vs. Kong.”

In “Godzilla vs. Kong,” King Kong somehow got access to a javelin (it’s never explained how), and like an Olympic champ, he throws it at the sky while he’s on Skull Island. The javelin pierces the biodome ceiling, so that’s how King Kong finds out that the world he’s been living in has been hermetically sealed.

You know what that means. King Kong becomes restless because he knows he belongs somewhere else. It isn’t long before Ilene and the rest of the scientists find out that King Kong has literally cracked their carefully constructed façade.

Ilene comments about King Kong to a co-worker named Ben (played by Chris Chalk): “The habitat is not going to hold him much longer.” Ben replies, “We need to think about off-site solutions.” Ilene then says, “The island is the one thing that’s kept him isolated. If he leaves, Godzilla will come for him. There can’t be two alpha titans.” Oh yes, there can, or else this movie wouldn’t exist.

The decision is made to move Kong out of Skull Island. King Kong is tranquilized and strapped to a cargo ship. And you just know that tranquilizer is going to eventually wear off. Somehow, Kong’s energy is sensed by Godzilla, who comes out of hibernation from deep in the ocean. Godzilla goes on a rampage in trying to find Kong. It’s all just filler until these two creatures face off against one another.

What does this have to do with Apex? The company has discovered a subterranean ecosystem that’s as “fast as any ocean light.” It has an energy life force that Apex wants to find in order to make a weapon that will defeat Godzilla.

Nathan, a former Monarch employee, says that he tried and failed to find the mysterious Hollow Earth entry. He believes in genetic memory, a theory that says all titans share a common impulse to return to their evolutionary source. Nathan wants to tag along with Ilene and her crew to find the power source that’s in Hollow Earth.

But since “Godzilla vs. Kong” isn’t interested in keeping things simple with only essential characters, there are more people who want to get to Hollow Earth too. There are the Apex villains, of course. And then there’s a motley trio that’s meant to be the movie’s comic relief but they end up saying a lot of corny lines and getting into stereotypical slapstick predicaments.

This trio consists of Apex engineer Bernie, who’s decided he’s going to expose Apex’s dastardly plans; teenage Madison, who apparently skips school so she can save the world in “Godzilla” movies; and her schoolmate Josh Valentine (played by Julian Dennison), who’s the type of character that Dennison is known to play in movies: a sarcastic brat. Josh is also the clownish “klutz” of the group who’s prone to be more terrified than the others. Meanwhile, Bernie sometimes acts like he’s uttering lines that were rejected from a bad stand-up comedy act.

How did Bernie get mixed up with these kids? Bernie is the host of a podcast called the Titan Trade Podcast, where he spouts “insider” conspiracy theories about Apex but doesn’t reveal his true identity. Even though Bernie’s voice and his irritating motormouth personality would be recognizable to his Apex co-workers on this podcast (Bernie makes no effort to disguise his voice), the movie wants people to believe that Bernie’s been able to keep his podcast identity a secret while he’s spilling confidential company information to the world.

“Something bad is going in here,” Bernie warns in one of his podcast episodes. He says that he’s going to download evidence of a “vast” corporate conspiracy. “It’s more than a leak. It’s a flood,” he adds. “And this flood is going to wash away all of Apex’s lies.” And with that announcement, Bernie essentially tells the world that he’s a company whistleblower, without thinking that the company could possibly catch on to his exposé plan before he actually does it. So dumb.

Madison listens to the podcast and essentially drags a reluctant Josh along when they meet Bernie. Madison uses Josh because he has a car and she doesn’t. As if to put an emphasis on how Bernie is the “out of touch” adult in this trio, he has a very outdated flip phone that he uses a lot in the movie. It might be some type of weird irony that a guy who works as an engineer at a highly advanced tech company doesn’t even have a smartphone, but it just makes Bernie look even more dimwitted, considering all the benefits of a smartphone that he would need on this mission.

Because “Godzilla vs. Kong” is meant to be a family-friendly film, there are the obligatory sappy moments to make it look like this isn’t just a movie with fights and explosions. Jia has an emotional bond with King Kong that’s intended to tug at people’s heartstrings, because somehow she’s taught him sign language without her mother knowing. Ilene eventually finds out, but you have to wonder how much of neglectful parent Ilene must be if she let her daughter spend enough time alone with King Kong that Ilene didn’t know that Jia has now become King Kong’s personal American Sign Language tutor. Kids these days.

And while this awful movie whips around from place to place like a flea in search of a mangy dog, somehow the filmmakers forgot to have any meaningful story arc for Madison’s father Mark (who was a protagonist in “Godzilla: King of the Monsters”), who is completely sidelined in “Godzilla vs. Kong.” The parents in this movie are insultingly portrayed as incapable of making truly effective decisions unless the kids show them the right way.

There’s nothing wrong with precocious kid characters, but not at the expense of making the adults with years of scientific knowledge look clueless next to kids who haven’t even graduated from high school yet. The movie completely undervalues and dismisses the life experiences of adults whenever the kid characters are in the same scene. It’s why “Godzilla vs. Kong” has the mentality of video game or a cartoon instead of a live-action movie.

“Godzilla vs. Kong” doesn’t even bother giving the villains anything memorable about their personalities, which is what all worthwhile “good vs. evil” stories are supposed to do. Heroes often have bland, interchangeable personalities, but villains are the ones who are supposed to get the biggest audience reactions in these stories. And audiences like to see some of the clever ways that villains make mischief. None of that happens in “Godzilla vs. Kong.”

There could have been so much improvement to the movie’s lackluster human interactions if the villains were compelling. Walter is very generic, Ren doesn’t talk much, and Maya is a completely unnecessary character. All of the actors in “Godzilla vs. Kong” give performances like they know they’re in a movie where they don’t have to show much acting talent and it’s all about the paychecks they’re getting.

As for the Godzilla vs. King Kong fight scenes that come too late in the movie, they are extremely predictable but at least better than the witless dialogue that the audience has to endure whenever the movie’s scenes focus only on the humans. In order for a monster movie to have the most impact, viewers should care not just about the fight scenes but also about the people whose lives are in danger. And in that regard, “Godzilla vs. Kong” stomps out a lot of humanity to distract viewers with CGI action that isn’t even that great in the first place.

Warner Bros. Pictures will release “Godzilla vs. Kong” in U.S. cinemas and on HBO Max on March 31, 2021. The movie was released in several countries outside of the U.S. on March 25 and March 26, 2021.

Copyright 2017-2026 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX