Review: ‘Shelter’ (2026), starring Jason Statham

February 2, 2026

by Carla Hay

Jason Statham and Bodhi Rae Breathnach in “Shelter” (Photo by Daniel Smith/Black Bear Pictures)

“Shelter” (2026)

Directed by Ric Roman Waugh

Culture Representation: Taking place in the United Kingdom, the action film “Shelter” features a predominantly white cast of characters (with some black people and Asians) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: A former MI6 agent, who faked his own death and lived for 10 years as a recluse, comes out of hiding when the U.K. government finds out he’s still alive, and he has to protect himself and an orphaned teenage girl from getting killed by assassins.

Culture Audience: “Shelter” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of star Jason Statham and derivative action movies where a “hero” puts himself in charge of rescuing a “damsel in distress.”

Billy Nighy and Jason Statham in “Shelter” (Photo by Daniel Smith/Black Bear Pictures)

Compared to other predictable Jason Statham action flicks, “Shelter” is woefully deficient. His “hero” character is protecting an orphaned teenage girl he barely knows. He drags her into a violent mess instead of dropping her off at an orphanage. The girl he’s protecting isn’t a family member, nor she is the one being hunted by the story’s villains.

No, she’s just a girl who is forced to tag along when the “hero” gets caught up in the ridiculous shootouts and dangerous car chases that inevitably ensue. Why? Because Statham’s “hero” character in the movie has an ego that’s so huge, he can’t imagine anyone else protecting this teenage girl, even though he’s the one who’s actually the target of assassins.

By forcing this girl to go on the run with him, the “hero” actually makes himself look more conspicuous to the people who are trying to find him. It’s not the only thing that doesn’t make sense in this lazy and derivative movie. “Shelter” has contradictions galore in its villain motive plot about the United Kingdom government using advanced technology as surveillance of the “hero” and other U.K. residents.

Directed by Ric Roman Waugh and written by Ward Parry, “Shelter” (which is a title as generic and forgettable as this movie) takes place in the United Kingdom, primarily in Scotland and England. “Shelter” was actually filmed in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The first 30 minutes of this 107-minute film could’ve been cut in half, and it wouldn’t have changed the story’s weak plot.

“Shelter” begins by showing a recluse named Michael Mason (played by Statham), who just goes by the name Mason, living on an unnamed island in Scotland. Mason has a lighthouse right outside the house where he lives. He has no technology, by choice. He also has a small fishing boat and fishing equipment in his garage, which are indications that he is a self-sufficient fisherman. Mason’s only companion is a male German Shepherd, whom he has not bothered to name.

An unnamed middle-aged fisherman (played by Michael Shaeffer) and his niece Jessica “Jessie” Kelly (played by Bodhi Rae Breathnach), who’s about 15 or 16 years old, are regular visitors who bring supplies that Mason has purchased. However, Mason won’t allow Jessie and her uncle to come up the tall outdoor stairs that lead to the front door of his home, and he doesn’t want to talk to them. He just wants them to drop off supplies at the bottom of the stairs.

Jessie is curious and a little annoyed about Mason being so standoffish. She doesn’t know his name at this point. In fact, Jessie and her uncle don’t know anything about this cranky loner. And so, one day, she breaks Mason’s “no contact” rule and goes up the stairs to his house and knocks on the door to deliver the supplies.

When Mason answers the door, Jessie asks why he won’t talk to her and her uncle. She also asks why they can’t come up the stairs to leave the supplies. Not surprisingly, Mason snaps at her and gruffly says, “Don’t come up here again.” Jessie leaves a small wrapped gift box on the steps as a friendly token.

A storm is brewing that day, and Jessie’s uncle is on his fishing trawler in the ocean. The storm quickly gets worse, with giant tidal waves forming. Jessie takes a rowboat to try to reach him. The uncle idiotically shouts at Jessie to come closer to his boat, when he really should’ve told her to go back to shore where it’s safe.

And soon, the uncle’s boat capsizes. Jessie’s rowboat, which is even less sturdy, capsizes too. Mason sees all of this happen from his house, so he takes out his boat and comes to the rescue. He’s able to save Jessie, but not the uncle, who dies while trapped underwater inside his boat.

Mason takes an unconscious Jessie back to his house. She wakes up, and Mason matter-of-factly tells her the sad news that her uncle has died. She’s devastated, of course, because her uncle was her guardian and only known family member.

Jessie’s left leg got injured in this boating accident, so Mason decides she can stay at his place while she recovers. During this recovery process, Jessie decides to name Mason’s dog Jack, and she tries to get Mason to open up and tell more about himself, but he refuses.

However, Mason sure knows a lot about Jessie, as he informs her. For example, Mason tells Jessie that knows that Jessie’s mother died a few years ago, and Jessie never knew her father. (It’s later revealed that Jessie’s mother died of cancer.) Mason refuses to take Jessie anywhere for medical help. He also refuses to contact anyone to see if Jessie can find a new home. Somehow, Mason knows that no one is going to be looking for Jessie.

In other words, Mason doesn’t really have a plan on what to do with Jessie. It would be illegal for Mason to keep Jessie in his home for an extended period of time without the authority to do so. It’s called child abduction. But this plot hole is temporarily pushed aside because one day, about five or six men dressed in black tactical gear invade Mason’s home.

One of the home invaders shoots Mason’s dog. Another man kidnaps Jessie. The rest of the movie is a series of sterotypical chase scenes, physical fights and shootouts. And you already know who will come out on top.

Who exactly is Mason? This isn’t spoiler information: He’s really a former MI6 agent who faked his own death 10 years ago because he refused government orders to murder an innocent man. Mason was able to stay under the radar until this home invasion. It’s explained later in the movie that corrupt U.K. government officials on the highest levels, including Mason’s former MI6 boss, want to find Mason and assassinate him.

The last half of “Shelter” shifts mainly to London, where U.K. Prime Minister Fordham (played by Harriet Walter) conspires with the equally corrupt MI6 chief Steven Manafort (played by Bill Nighy) to secretly and illegally increase the use of a controversial advanced surveillance network called Total Human Engagement Analytics (THEA), which violates all sorts of U.K. privacy laws. In addition to using camera surveillance in public areas, THEA is intended to bring more invasive surveillance in private areas.

Steven was actually in the midst of a public inquiry about THEA, which he tried to explain as being beneficial for preventing terrorist attacks. The televised inquiry—led by a politician named Haneron (played by Anna Crilly), who is a strong supporter of residents’ privacy— turns into a public-relations disaster for Steven. Prime Minister Fordham then privately meets with Steven and tells him that she wants him to resign from MI6, so they can secretly continue their THEA plans together.

The person appointed to replace Steven as the leader of MI6 is Roberta (played by Naomi Ackie), who was Steven’s second-in-command. Roberta doesn’t do much in this movie except stand around in dark control-room offices with giant video screens, as she looks at these screens and computers, or she talks on the phone to subordinates who tell her information that the subordinates found out themselves. It’s really a waste of Ackie’s acting talent.

What does this THEA conspiracy have to do with Mason? Someone was using Mason’s secret location in Scotland as a technology proxy for a terrorist named Timur Tchermoev, whom the U.K. government had been tracking. Using THEA technology, the U.K. government tracked this activity to Mason’s hiding place in Scotland, which led to the home invasion. Body cam footage from the invading tactical team revealed that Mason, not terrorist Timur, was really living at this house.

And now, Mason’s secret is out that he faked his own death. Steven finds out that Mason is still alive. Steven wants Mason to be murdered because Mason knows too many damaging secrets about MI6. Steven is also very angry at Mason for abandoning MI6, which Steven considers an unforgivable act of betrayal. Steven orders an assassin named James Workman (played by Bryan Vigier) to lead the charge in hunting down Mason.

It’s a plot that’s too convoluted and nonsensical, considering “Shelter” is just another subpar action film where the “hero” is able to take on several opponents at once and kill and/or disable them all, even though he’s outnumbered by those who have more weapons. And somehow, the “hero” has the luck of getting so-called elite operatives who bungle their hunt for him at every turn. “Shelter” has absolutely no suspense and no surprises.

And for someone who’s trying to “stay under the radar” from the people trying to kill him, Mason has a funny way of doing it: He’s got a terrified teenager with him almost all of the time. Not only does Jessie make Mason more noticeable than if he had dodging killers on his own, all of this fugitive chaos makes it harder for him when he has to look out for someone else besides himself.

At one point, Mason barrels his way into a very crowded nightclub with Jessie (she’s the only underage teenager in the nightclub), just so he can talk to a former enemy—a gangster named Kamal (played by Tom Wu)—because Mason wants to ask Kamal to take Jessie somewhere safe out of the country. Mason doesn’t bother to ask Jessie if she wants to leave the U.K. to live somewhere else.

Again: Has Mason not heard of orphanages or child welfare services? It makes no sense that he thinks it’s necessary for Jessie to be involved in his problems that could get both of them killed. This movie reduces Jessie to being a “damsel in distress” gimmick to elevate the macho posturing of the “hero.”

If you’re thinking that “Shelter” has a secret plot twist that Mason is really Jessie’s biological father, think again. That is not a plot twist in this unimaginative movie. Even though it would be a cliché plot twist, it would make more sense than what’s in “Shelter,” which makes Mason look like someone with an unhinged hero complex to force an innocent teenager into dodging asassins with him.

You won’t see anything new from Statham’s acting in “Shelter,” a dreadful dud of a movie that gets worse as it goes along. The best performance in the movie’s cast is from Breathnach, who does the necessary acting to look convincing enough in her role. Nighy seems as if he’s enjoying the role of playing a scheming and evil bureaucrat, but the character is just another hollow villain in just another Statham movie. Daniel Mays has a small supporting role as a technology whiz named Booth, the person who invented THEA.

The action scenes in “Shelter” are nothing special. The movie is too contradictory in repeating that THEA is such powerful surveillance technology, but then scene after scene shows this THEA technology has trouble finding Mason, even though he’s frequently moving out in the open on streets with his teenage captive. There’s no sugarcoating it: Jessie is unnecessarily and unlawfully being held captive by Mason for most of this movie, just so Mason can look like a “hero.” Don’t try to find any logic in a mindless movie whose entire plot has no logic.

Black Bear Pictures released “Shelter” in U.S. cinemas on January 30, 2026.

Review: ‘The Thursday Murder Club,’ starring Helen Mirren, Pierce Brosnan, Ben Kingsley and Celia Imrie

August 25, 2025

by Carla Hay

Celia Imrie, Ben Kingsley, Helen Mirren and Pierce Brosnan in “The Thursday Murder Club” (Photo by Giles Keyte/Netflix)

“The Thursday Murder Club”

Directed by Chris Columbus

Culture Representation: Taking place in the fictional city of Fairhaven, England, the comedy/drama film “The Thursday Murder Club” (based on the 2020 novel of the same name) features a predominantly white cast of characters (with a few black people and one person of Middle Eastern heritage) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: Four people, who live in an upscale retirement home, find themselves investigating a cold-case murder and multiple recent murders that affect whether or not the retirement home will displace the residents.  

Culture Audience: “The Thursday Murder Club” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of movie’s headliners, the book on which the movie is based, and well-acted murder mysteries that have touches of comedy.

Pictured in center: Naomi Ackie and Daniel Mays in “The Thursday Murder Club” (Photo by Giles Keyte/Netflix)

“The Thursday Murder Club” is a charming and enjoyably comedic adaptation of the popular novel about four retirees who like to solve murder mysteries. The talented cast’s performanes overcome some cornball moments. “The Thursday Murder Club” doesn’t reinvent the murder mystery genre, but it’s a welcome addition to the short list of movies where senior citizens are crime-fighting sleuth protagonists.

Directed by Chris Columbus and written by Katy Brand and Suzanne Heathcote, “The Thursday Murder Club” is adapted from Richard Osman’s best-selling 2020 novel of the same name. “The Thursday Murder Club” takes place in the fictional small city of Fairhaven, England. The movie’s main location of a manor-styled retirement home was actually filmed at Englefield House in Berkshire, England.

“The Thursday Murder Club” begins at Coopers Chase, the retirement home that is at the center of the story. Coopers Chase has its own church and cemetery. The residents of Coopers Chase are kept busy with a variety of activities, including painting and archery.

Three of the Coopers Chase residents, who call themselves the Thursday Murder Club, are having their weekly Thursday meeting to discuss a cold case that they are investigating as amateur sleuths. These unofficial private investigators will also find themselves involved in a current murder case that will affect their residency at Coopers Chase.

The three residents are retired MI6 agent Elizabeth Best (played by Helen Mirren), the self-assured leader of the group; retired work union activist Ron Ritchie (played by Pierce Brosnan), a flirtatious ladies’ man; and retired psychiatrist Ibrahim Arif (played by Ben Kingsley), a thoughtful intellectual. Elizabeth is happily married to retired academic Stephen Best (played by Jonathan Pryce), who has early on-set dementia. Ron is twice-divorced and has an adult son in his 30s. Ibrahim is a “confirmed bachelor” whose past love life is briefly revealed in a scene toward the end of the movie.

The cold case that the Thursday Murder Club members discuss at the beginning of the movie is the murder of Angela Hughes (played by Ellie Keighley), a woman in her 20s who fell from the second-floor window of her apartment at approximately 12:48 a.m. on May 11, 1973. Angela was found with a knife in her abdomen. According to the police report, Angela’s boyfriend—25-year-old mechanic/British Army veteran Peter Mercer (played by Will Stevens)—saw Angela fall to the ground after hearing two voices coming from the open window.

Peter said that he saw a masked man run away from the apartment shortly after Angela fell. Peter told police investigators that he chased after the masked man, but the masked man escaped. Peter was cleared as a suspect. Not long after Angela’s death, Peter disappeared and remained a missing person. Angela’s murder case has been unsolved ever since.

When the Thursday Murder Club members are discussing this case, they use a portable drawing board that has newspaper clippings and other items related to the case, including a gruesome photo of the crime scene. It’s during this meeting that they meet another resident for the first time: Joyce Meadowcroft (played by Celia Imrie), a retired nurse who is a widow. Joyce happens upon the Thursday Murder Club while Joyce is giving her adult daughter Joanna (played by Ingrid Oliver) a tour of Coopers Chase.

The sight of the murder scene photo is jarring to Joanna, but Joyce is intrigued. Joanna—a bachelorette who works as a hedge fund executive—wants Joyce to live in an apartment in London. Joyce refuses because she likes living in Coopers Chase, where she has a better chance of making friends. Joyce doesn’t think she’ll be able to make friends in a neighborhood that has “hipsters and vegan bakeries.”

Elizabeth notices that Joyce was unfazed by the gruesome crime scene photo and correctly deduces that Joyce must have some type of medical background. She asks Joyce if it’s possible, based on the amount of blood in the photo, if Angela was still alive when she fell to the ground. Joyce says that it depends.

Elizabeth figures that Joyce can be useful to the Thursday Murder, so she invites Joyce to join as a temporary member. Joyce is the replacement for longtime member Penny Gray (played by Susan Kirkby), a Coopers Chase resident who is in a coma from an unnamed illness and isn’t expected to recover. Penny’s loyal husband John Gray (played by Paul Freeman) is the veterinarian for Coopers Chase, which has a pack of llamas.

The Thursday Murder Club’s investigation into the Angela Hughes murder case gets put on hold due to a more pressing matter: The residents of Coopers Chase are outraged that one of the property owners plans to tear down the cemetery and the manor and build luxury apartments and an event space there instead. This owner is the sleazy and callous Ian Ventham (played by David Tennant), who has a disdain for elderly people and doesn’t care that the Coopers Chase residents, many of whom signed lifetime leases, will be displaced because of his plans.

Despite these leases, the property can be sold or converted due to a loophole in the lease contracts. However, Ian won’t get his way so easily. Someone who is very much against converting and selling the property is co-owner Tony Curran (played by Geoff Bell), who made his fortune in questionable ways. Tony is a rough-and-tumble type who has long been affiliated with underground criminal groups, but nothing has been proven in a court of law. Tony’s aunt Maud (played by Ruth Sheen) lives at Coopers Chase, which is one of the reasons why Tony wants Coopers Chase to continue to be retirement home.

Tony and Ian openly argue about this proposed sale in front of some of the residents, including the Thursday Murder Club. Tony promises the residents that he won’t let Coopers Chase be sold. Ian is also going through another battle: He’s embroiled in a bitter and expensive divorce case with his soon-to-be-ex-wife. Ian’s divorce expenses are why he’s so eager to sell the converted Coopers Chase property to the highest bidder.

Meanwhile, Ian secretly makes a deal with Coopers Chase chief handyman named Bogdan (played by Henry Lloyd-Hughes) to oversee digging up the cemetery, where Ian plans to start rebuilding the property into luxury apartments. (Ian wanting to build an apartment complex where a cemetery used to be is an indication of his callousness and how he isn’t as business-savvy as he thinks he is.) Bogdan is a Polish immigrant who needs the job to help pay for his ailing mother in Poland.

While this turmoil is going on, the Fairhaven Police Department has sent a police constable named Donna de Freitas (played by Naomi Ackie) to Coopers Chase to give a speaking appearance/tutorial on home security. Elizabeth think this lecture will be boring and asks questions instead that are related to the Angela Hughes murder. Donna is patient but seems a bit frazzled by the feisty attitude of some of the Coopers Chase residents.

Elizabeth, who is always thinking of ways that people can be useful to the Thursday Murder Club, invites Donna to have lunch with her and the Thursday Murder Club after this lecture. It’s during this lunch that Elizabeth gets Donna to admit that Donna (who used to work for the London Police Department) is bored at the Fairhaven Police Department, where she works in a male-dominated environment and is assigned lightweight administrative duties. The worst crimes that Donna is allowed to deal with are traffic violations. And she has to do subservient things, such as serve tea to her male colleagues, who treat her like secretary.

As Donna is about to leave, Ron’s handsome and friendly son Jason (played by Tom Ellis) arrives. Jason, who visits Tom two or three times a week, is a famous ex-boxing champion whose boxing career ended due to an injury. Jason now makes a living by appearing on celebrity-oriented reality show competitions, such as “Celebrity MasterChef” and “Dancing on Ice.” Donna is star-struck when she meets Jason.

Coopers Chase is rocked to the core when co-owner Tony is found bludgeoned to death in his home. The movie shows in the moments before Tony was murdered in his house’s foyer, he saw the intruder, and he knew this person, who is not seen committing the murder. The Fairview Police Department’s detective chief inspector Chris Hudson (played by Daniel Mays) is the lead investigator in this murder case.

It should come as no surprise that Chris is an arrogant and sexist buffoon who is no match for the Thursday Murder Club. Through a series of circumstances, Donna becomes involved in the investigation, which goes through a series of twists and turns. And the investigators have more to handle because Tony isn’t the only person who gets murdered.

“The Thursday Murder Club” has a few deliberately clownish moments (such as a scene where Elizabeth and Joyce “infiltrate” the Fairhaven Police Station), but the movie has some pointed and serious observations of ageism, sexism and how people have different perspectives of dying. Joyce is initially thrilled that she’s getting to investigate a current murder case in the Thursday Murder Club until the other members remind her that Tony’s death means that they’ve lost an ally in the fight to prevent Coopers Chase from being turned into an apartment complex.

The movie stays faithful to the book by giving distinct personalities to the main characters, which are enlivened by the cast members’ performances. Elizabeth is a no-nonsense character who shows her softer side when she’s with her husband. Ron is outspoken and passionate and sometimes seems to want to prove that he’s as smart as Elizabeth. Ibrahim is calm, logical and empathetic. Joyce, as a newcomer to the club, is eager to fit in and impress others. A running joke in the story is Joyce likes to make pastries as gifts to people who are interviewed.

The supporting cast members also do well in their less-expansive roles. The standout supporting performances are from Tennant (who is hilarious as a greedy corporate villain, even though the Ian character is a bit cartoonish) and Ackie as Donna, whose self-confidence blossoms as she gets more involved in the investigation. Richard E. Grant has a memorable cameo as a pivotal character named Bobby Tanner.

“The Thursday Murder Club” has a few jokes that are unique to the movie. For example, there’s a scene that references Mirren’s Oscar-winning role as Queen Elizabeth II in 2006’s “The Queen.” (And just by coincidence, her “Thursday Murder Club” character is also named Elizabeth.)

The marvelous production design and excellent cinematography add to the movie’s appeal. “The Thursday Murder Club” does justice to the lengthy book by making it a breezy, easy-to-digest version of the story. “The Thursday Night Murder Club” novel turned into a beloved book series. Based on what the first “Thursday Night Murder Club” movie delivers, it has all the makings of becoming a popular series too.

Netflix will release “The Thursday Murder Club” on Netflix and in select U.S. cinemas on August 28, 2025. The movie was released in U.K. cinemas on August 22, 2025.

Review: ‘Sorry, Baby’ (2025), starring Eva Victor, Naomi Ackie, Lucas Hedges, John Carroll Lynch, Louis Cancelmi and Kelly McCormack

June 27, 2025

by Carla Hay

Eva Victor in “Sorry, Baby” (Photo courtesy of A24)

“Sorry, Baby” (2025)

Directed by Eva Victor

Culture Representation: Taking place in an unnamed Massachusetts city, the comedy/drama film “Sorry, Baby” features a predominantly white cast of characters (with a few black people) who representing the working-class and middle-class.

Culture Clash: Over a five-year period, a young woman copes with the aftermath of being sexually assaulted by someone she used to trust.

Culture Audience: “Sorry, Baby” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of the movie’s headliners and comedy/dramas with quirky protagonists.

Naomi Ackie and Eva Victor in “Sorry, Baby” (Photo courtesy of A24)

“Sorry, Baby” is a unique comedy/drama about coping with sexual trauma, from the perspective of an intelligent and quirky woman. Some viewers might be bored by the slow pacing, but this movie has enough wit and authenticity to keep most viewers interested. “Sorry, Baby” is the type of movie where you know within the first 15 minutes whether or not you will care to know more about the protagonist.

Written and directed by Eva Victor, “Sorry, Baby” is Victor’s feature-film directorial debut. The movie had its world premiere at the 2025 Sundance Film Festival, where “Sorry, Baby” won the Waldo Salt Screenwriting Award. “Sorry, Baby” takes place in an unnamed city in Massachusetts, where the movie was filmed on location in various Massachusetts cities. The story is told non-chronologically in five chapters, with each chapter reflecting the life of the protagonist, from the ages of 27 to 32.

“Sorry, Baby” begins with a chapter titled “The Year With the Baby,” which is also the title of the last chapter in the movie. The opening scene is a joyous reunion of two best friends: introverted Agnes (played by Victor) and extroverted Lydie (played by Naomi Ackie), who were roommates and attended the same grad school, where they studied English literature. Agnes and Lydie now live in different states.

Agnes, who is 31 years old in this chapter, lives in a house by herself in a rural part of Massachusetts. Lydie, who has come to visit Agnes, lives with Lydie’s spouse in New York. Agnes has an isolated existence where her closest neighbor is several yards away, and she doesn’t have any close friends except for Lydie. Nothing is told about Agnes’ biological family.

As the two friends reconnect, they start off with small talk. They both say that they miss the ability to see each other in person on a regular basis. They both say that they wished that they lived closer together. And then, Lydie breaks some joyous news to Agnes: Lydie is about 10 weeks pregnant.

Agnes is very happy for Lydie, who seems a little worried about Agnes. Agnes says that everything is fine. She also shares some good news of her own: She’s been promoted from being a part-time professor to a full-time professor at the same college where she and Lydie went to grad school.

During Lydie’s visit, Agnes nearest neighbor randomly shows up unannounced. His name is Gavin (played by Lucas Hedges), who’s about the same age as Agnes. Gavin is socially awkward and has an obvious crush on Agnes. The movie implies that Gavin might have some learning disabilities because Agnes reminds Gavin where he lives and politely tells him to go back home.

Later, Lydie and Agnes both have a reunion dinner with three people who were in their same study group in grad school: Devin (played by Cody Reiss), Logan (played by Jordan Mendoza) and Natasha (played by Kelly McCormack), who has an obsessive jealousy of Agnes. Natasha works at the same college and has always considered Agnes to be her biggest rival.

Natasha is hosting this dinner party, which quickly becomes tense when Natasha is rude to Agnes. When Agnes excuses herself to use the restroom, Lydie verbally cuts into image-conscious Natasha in a passive-aggressive way: Lydie complains to Natasha that there’s a bone in the fish that Lydie was served. Lydie admonishes Natasha for not being careful enough in checking for bones in the fish served to Natasha’s dinner guests.

The chapter titled “The Year With the Bad Thing” is the most pivotal chapter in the story. It’s a flashback to when Agnes was 27 years old and living with Lydie while they were both in grad school. Agnes, Lydie, Natasha, Devin and Logan were in a small study group that had a professor named Preston Decker (played by Louis Cancelmi) as their advisor.

Preston, who is a divorced father in his mid-to-late 40s, treats Agnes as if he thinks she’s his best student. Natasha, who wants to be “teacher’s pet,” believes that Preston gives special treatment to Agnes. Natasha pathetically tries to get praise from Preston, who is casually dismissive of Natasha.

In a private conversation at home, Lydie mentions to Agnes that Preston seems attracted to Agnes. Lydie asks Agnes if Agnes is interested in hooking up with Preston. A slightly mortified Agnes says no because she’s not interested in Preston and because Agnes knows it would be ethically wrong on many levels to have a sexual relationship with a faculty member who will influence her academic grades. Meanwhile, Lydie openly talks about her sex life to Agnes and drops a hint about Lydie’s true sexuality that is confirmed later in the story.

During a crucial period of time in the students’ academic careers, Preston wants to give in-depth feedback to Agnes about her dissertation and invites her over to his house for this discussion, to make up for cutting short their previous meeting in his office. The movie shows Agnes leaving Preston’s house several hours after she arrived. What happened during this house meeting is not shown but is described in detail by Agnes to Lydie after Agnes goes back to their home.

The trailer for “Sorry, Baby” already hints that the “something bad” that happens to Agnes is a sexual assault that prompted her to get a medical check-up, with Lydie accompanying her as comfort. In one of the movie’s most uncomfortable scenes, the unnamed doctor (played by Marc Carver) who examines Agnes is uncaring and glib when he finds out why Agnes wants this medical exam. Later, Agnes comes across a disheartening roadblock when she reports what happened to her and she attempts to get justice.

The chapter titled “The Year With the Questions” (the movie’s shortest chapter) shows Agnes in a jury duty situation. “The Year With the Good Sandwich” chapter has its best scene when Agnes has a panic attack while driving in her car, and she is helped by a kind stranger named Pete (played by John Carroll Lynch), who sees Agnes when she drives into a convenience store parking lot during this panic attack. “Sorry, Baby” is at its best when Agnes copes with indignities and reminders that she can’t escape her trauma by trying to forget that it happened.

“Sorry, Baby” also has a subplot about Agnes finding some comfort with Gavin, but it’s not the type of comfort that’s about people falling in love. It’s the type of comfort where she knows she will never fall in love with Gavin (even though he wants it to happen), but she wants to have a “friends with benefits” situation. Is she using Gavin for her own selfish needs? Yes, but Gavin is a consenting partner, even if his feelings for Agnes aren’t mutual.

Ackie gives a vibrant performance as outspoken Lydie, but Lydie is not in most of the movie. Agnes is front and center in this story. Where “Sorry, Baby” falls short is in telling more about who Agnes is outside of her career, her limited social interactions, and how she deals with her trauma. Shortly after her sexual assault, Agnes adopts a stray kitten (whom she names Olga), who becomes Agnes’ constant companion after Lydie moves away.

There is nothing revealed about Agnes’ family and nothing revealed about what she likes to do in her spare time besides reading. There’s a brief scene of Agnes in her classroom and another brief scene of Agnes getting positive feedback in the evaluation that leads to her job promotion. Agnes’ choice to have her students read Vladimir Nabokov’s 1955 novel “Lolita” (about a literature professor who sexually abuses his 12-year-old stepdaughter) is shown in “Sorry, Baby” as an example of how people can react differently to sexual controversy. But there are many unanswered questions about Agnes that make her depiction in the movie somewhat shallow at different times.

Still, Victor’s portrayal of Agnes has many meaningful insights into Agnes’ personality in other ways. Agnes is the type of person who doesn’t use her physical attractiveness to “get ahead” in her career. She’s eccentric but not mentally unstable. She’s an unapologetic literature nerd who’s not standoffish, but she has a hard time meeting anyone (other than Lydie) who’s on the same wavelength as she is.

These insights into Agnes’ life bring vitality to the story and will make interested viewers curious to see what will happen to Agnes. Because of Victor’s capable writing, directing and acting, “Sorry, Baby” brings some dark comedy to the disrespectful ways that people can degrade each other and emotional resonance to the compassionate ways that people can uplift each other. Most of all, “Sorry, Baby” isn’t about finding out if Agnes gets “closure” for her trauma, because it’s a story that takes a worthwhile glimpse at part of her bumpy journey along the way.

A24 released “Sorry, Baby” in select U.S. cinemas on June 27, 2025, with an expansion to more U.S. cinemas on July 25, 2025. The movie will be released on digital and VOD on August 5, 2025.

Review: ‘Mickey 17,’ starring Robert Pattinson, Naomi Ackie, Steven Yeun, Toni Collette and Mark Ruffalo

March 5, 2025

by Carla Hay

Naomi Ackie and Robert Pattinson in “Mickey 17” (Photo courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures)

“Mickey 17”

Directed by Bong Joo Ho

Culture Representation: Taking place in 2054, on the fictional planet of Niflheim, the sci-fi comedy/drama film “Mickey 17” features a predominantly white cast of characters (with some black people and Asians) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: An “expendable” worker, who is regenerated as a clone after he dies, gets involved in an “us versus them” conflict with the oppressive elites who control Niflheim society.

Culture Audience: “Mickey 17” will appeal mainly to people who are fans of the movie’s headliners, filmmaker Bong Joo Ho and sci-fi movies that take familiar topics and put them in a unique setting.

Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette in “Mickey 17” (Photo courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures)

“Mickey 17” gets messy when it crams and juggles varying ideas and tones. Despite these flaws, this sci-fi movie can be engaging because of the performances and the movie’s dark comedy about sociopolitical issues and technology. “Mickey 17” is both a satire and a warning of what life could be like if humans populated another planet and lived in a cult-like society.

Written and directed by Bong Joo Ho, “Mickey 17” is his highly anticipated follow-up to 2019’s Oscar-winning South Korean drama “Parasite,” the first non-English-language movie to win Best Picture. “Mickey 17” had its world premiere at the 2025 Berlin International Film Festival. “Mickey 17” is better than the average sci-fi movie but it’s not as Oscar-worthy as “Parasite,” simply because the screenplay for “Mickey 17” tends to wander, with important characters disappearing with no explanation for large chunks of the film.

Bong’s movies often have themes of the divides between social classes, with lower classes rising up in some kind of rebellion against the privileged elite upper classes. In “Mickey 17,” these social-class conflicts don’t go away just because people move to a new planet that is populated by humans who previously lived on Earth. Most of the story takes place on a planet called Niflheim, where the terrain is snowy and icy all year.

“Mickey 17” takes place in the year 2054—four-and-a-half years after the humans from Earth arrived by a giant spaceship to inhabit Niflheim. The humans still live on this spaceship, presumably because it’s too cold to have regular housing. But it’s also a way for the humans to be easier controlled and surveilled by the totalitarian leaders in charge of this new society.

The beginning of “Mickey 17” shows title character Mickey Barnes (played by Robert Pattinson), the story’s narrator, is lying down on the ground and nearly covered in snow. Mickey has severely injured his leg from a fall on down an icy crevasse. Mickey can’t get up because of this injury.

A man named Timo (played by Steven Yeun), who’s armed with a gun, appears above the crevasse and asks Mickey, “You haven’t died yet? They’re going to reprint you out tomorrow anyway. What’s it like to die?” Timo doesn’t get the answer to that question because a giant creature (about 20 feet tall that looks like a combination of a walrus and a “Dune” sand worm) suddenly appears and seems to swallow Mickey.

The movie then shows that Mickey is back on the spaceship, inside of a body scan chamber. When he comes out of the chamber, he is actually a 3-D printed scan clone of himself. His previous memories are uploaded to his brain. Mickey is kind-hearted but simple-minded and socially awkward. It’s possible for something to go wrong in the cloning process, and his clone could have a different personality.

In voiceover narration, Mickey explains what’s going on here. The version of Mickey who is the narrator is version 17, also known as Mickey 17. Flashbacks show much of what happened as Mickey 17 tells the story. People who aren’t inclined to like science fiction might feel disconnected or confused by a great deal of this movie.

Mickey says that he and Timo know each other because they were friends when they lived on Earth in a U.S. city that is never named. According to Mickey (who now calls Timo a “shitty friend”), Timo convinced Mickey to invest with him to open a macaron store, which ended up being a commercial failure. Mickey and Timo had borrowed money from a loan shark named Darius Blank (played by Ian Hanmore) to open the store.

Timo and Mickey are heavily in debt to Darius, who wants immediate payment. Darius sends some thugs to kidnap and beat up Timo and Mickey, who are told that they will be murdered if they don’t pay off their debt to Darius very soon. Mickey and Timo have no doubt that this threat will be carried out, because they’ve seen the torture that Darius and his goons have inflicted on others, but Mickey and Timo still don’t have the money to pay the debt.

It’s around this time that a former U.S. congressman named Kenneth Marshall (played by Mark Ruffalo), who has a cult-like following, has made international news for launching a spaceship that will take a select number of people to Niflheim, a planet previously not inhabited by humans. An unnamed religious group is believed to be funding this in-demand migration. It’s mentioned in the movie that Kenneth lost his two most recent elections. Clearly, migrating to Niflheim is a way for Kenneth to reinvent himself as a powerful leader of this new society.

Kenneth has a Lady Macbeth-type wife named Yifa (played by Toni Collette), who is the real schemer and manipulator of this couple. Kenneth is mostly a blustering buffoon who does what Yifa advises or orders him to do, but Kenneth puts up a front that he’s the one who’s really in charge. Kenneth and Yifa are treated like famous royalty on Niflheim, where Kenneth stars on a live TV show called “Tonight With Kenneth Marshall.” Kenneth and Yifa take full advantage of this celebrity worship by abusing their power and inflicting cruel punishment on those who disobey their orders.

It doesn’t take long for Mickey and Timo to sign up to go on this migration to Niflheim, in order to escape their troubles on Earth. The movie implies that almost everyone who wants to be part of this migration signs up for similar reasons, so that they can start a new life on another planet. Mickey makes a mistake that changes the course of his existence on Niflheim.

On the application form to go to Nifleim, Mickey checks the box that lists him as an “expendable”—a low-life human who will allow the Niflheim government to do whatever it wants to his body. Even when given a chance to change his application so he won’t be classified as an expendable, Mickey declines to do so, mainly because he thinks he’ll have a better chance of his application getting approved if he’s listed as an expendable.

Mickey explains in a voiceover that after he arrived in Niflheim, he found out that expendables are exploited to do all types of dangerous explorations and scientific experiments that could kill them. However, Niflheim has a cloning machine (the body scan chamber) that can do 3-D clone printouts of people who previously died. This technology was illegal on Earth but is legal on Niflheim. Expendables such as Mickey are revived as clones after they die, with their previous memories uploaded into their brains.

On Niflheim, the expendables are treated as the lowest of the low in the social class hierarchy. Mickey is living a bleak and lonely existence where he has died and has been printed out as a clone multiple times. Sad sack Mickey thinks it’s his deserved “punishment” because he feels a lot of guilt for accidentally causes his mother’s death when he was 5 years old: While he was a front-seat passenger in the car that she was driving, he pushed a brake button in the car that caused the car to crash. (The actual crash is never shown in the movie.)

One bright spot in Mickey’s Niflheim life happens when the original Mickey Barnes meets Nasha Barridge (played by Naomi Ackie), an assertive and feisty government employee who works as a soldier, a police officer and a firefighter. Timo is also some type of government soldier and sometimes works in a group with Mickey, Nasha and two female soldiers who are best friends: Kai Katz (played by Anamaria Vartolomei) and Jennifer Chilton (payed by Ellen Robertson). Timo isn’t seen again for most of the movie until a crucial part of the story. Mickey’s and Timo’s lives before Niflheim are shown in the movie, but Nasha’s life when she was on Earth is never revealed.

One day, in the public cafeteria where the “working class” residents gather to eat, almost everyone in the cafeteria goes into a star-struck frenzy when Kenneth and Nifa make a surprise appearance. Mickey and Nasha are the only two people in the room who don’t go gaga over Kenneth and Nifa. Nasha and Mickey lock eyes across the room, as two people do in movies where you know those two people are going to hook up.

And sure enough, Nasha becomes Mickey become best friends and loved. Nasha stays loyal to Mickey, even when he has died and is cloned over and over. Nasha is also very possessive of Mickey. In another cafeteria scene, Kai somewhat flirts with Mickey while she’s seated next to him. Timo is seated on the other side of Mickey.

When Nasha sees Kai talking flirtatiously with Mickey, Nasha immediately pushes Timo aside so she can get his seat. Nasha then grabs Mickey and starts making out with him. Nasha’s unspoken message is clear to Kai: “This is my man. Stay away from him.”

Meanwhile, Kenneth has decided that the walrus-like creatures that live outside the spaceship are a threat, even though there’s no proof that these creatures kill humans. Kenneth decides that these creatures are to be called “creepers.” A storyline involving the creepers takes up the last third of the movie.

Niflheim has a law that no two clones can exist at the same time. As already revealed in the “Mickey 17” trailer, another clone of Mickey (Mickey 18) gets created when Mickey 17 is still alive, which causes havoc in Mickey 17’s world. Pattison does some of his best acting in the movie when Mickey 17 and Mickey 18 are interacting with each other. This clone drama, the creepers, the love story of Mickey and Nasha, and Niflheim’s sociopolitical and environmental issues make for an abundance of storylines in “Mickey 17.” Sometimes these storylines are woven together skillfully; other times, they become jumbled.

“Mickey 17” has plenty to showcase when it comes to the inner thoughts of Mickey and his clones who are shown in the movie. However, other characters in the movie are either caricatures (Kenneth and Nifa) or are underdeveloped (everyone else except Mickey). It’s to the credit of the talented cast members that they bring these characters to life to make viewers interested. That interest can spark viewer curiosity about these memorable characters, but many questions about these characters are never answered.

Visually, “Mickey 17” will delight sci-fi fans because the world of Niflheim looks realistic, even though Niflheim is an awful place to live under the oppressive rule of Kenneth and Nifa. Because “Mickey 17” is another Bong movie where there are conflicts between the “haves” and “have nots,” there’s an inevitable showdown that is the suspenseful highlight of the movie. Some scenes in “Mickey 17” are dark and depressing, while other scenes are absurdly comedic and heartwarming. “Mickey 17” refuses to be pigeonholed into one consistent tone, which some viewers might see as an unforgivable flaw, while other viewers might see as part of the movie’s charm.

Warner Bros. Pictures will release “Mickey 17” in U.S. cinemas on March 7, 2025.

Review: ‘2073,’ starring Samantha Morton

December 27, 2024

by Carla Hay

Samantha Morton in “2073” (Photo courtesy of Neon)

“2073”

Directed by Asif Kapadia

Culture Representation: Taking place in 2073 in the fictional U.S. city called New San Francisco, the docudrama film “2073” features a racially diverse group of people (white, black, Latin, Asian and Indigenous) who portray apocalypse survivors (in the drama scenes) or who are real-life political activists.

Culture Clash: The politically liberal activists who make comments for the documentary predict that an apocalypse will happen in the 21st century due to environmental, socioeconomic and political issues.

Culture Audience: “2073” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of director Asif Kapadia and “end of the world” movies that place almost all the blame on politically conservative people.

A scene from “2073” of the Golden Gate Bridge in California affected by wildfires (Photo courtesy of Neon)

Pretentious and derivative, “2073” is a doomsday docudrama that combines dreary apocalypse scenes with left-wing political lecturing. There’s too much whining and not enough talk about practical solutions. The “end of the world” warnings in this movie just add up to a lot of annoying hot air. The so-called experts interviewed for this movie just want to blame the world’s problems on people who don’t share their liberal political beliefs.

Directed by Asif Kapadia, “2073” had its world premiere at the 2024 Venice International Film Festival. The movie made the rounds at several other film festivals in 2024, including the BFI London Film Festival and DOC NYC. Kapadia won an Oscar for the 2015 Amy Winehouse documentary “Amy.” Unfortunately, “2073” is a low point in his filmmography.

Although “2073” is undoubtedly a film that has noble intentions, it has a heavy-handed approach. The movie has an obvious political agenda, but that agenda’s credibility is lowered with the movie using fictional, scripted scenes as examples of the gloom and doom predicted in the movie. Kapadia and Tony Grisoni co-wrote the “2073” screenplay.

The concept of “2073” isn’t very original. According to the movie’s synopsis, “2073” is inspired by Chris Marker’s “iconic 1962 featurette ‘La Jetée,’ about a time traveler who risks his life to change the course of history and save the future of humanity.” As explained in the beginning of “2073,” the scripted portions of the movie take place in 2073—37 years after “the event,” which obviously means an apocalypse. In other words, this apocalypse happened in 2036, which is just 12 years after the release of this movie.

The scripted drama scenes in “2073” are in a fictional city called New San Francisco, which is described as the capital of the Americas. In this bombed-out city, there’s an electronic billboard showing news reports about Chairwoman Ivanka Trump. What entity has Ivanka Trump as a chairwoman? Don’t expect this ridiculous movie to answer that question. The “2073” filmmakers’ obvious intention is to provoke viewers who would get upset at the thought of Ivanka Trump being chairwoman of anything.

The movie’s drama scenes follows the depressing and solitary life of an apocalypse survivor (played by Samantha Morton), whose name is listed in the end credits as Ghost. Ghost, who is a voiceover narrator for these drama scenes, is seen living in a dark and destroyed building while avoiding being seen by other people as much as possible. According to Ghost, her memory was “slipping through [her] fingers, like sand.”

Ghost also says she’s in hiding because one day “they” came for her. “I ran. I’m still running. My life is turning into one of those sci-fi comics I used to read. There are others here—survivors, renegades.” Other scenes in the movie show that the Americas—or at least New San Francisco—is being run by an oppressive government that rounds up “renegades” and tortures them.

Ghost is trying to avoid detection from an artificial intelligence being called Jack. “He listens and watches everything,” Ghost says about Jack. “You can’t trust anyone anymore. People thought the world would end, but the world goes on. It’s us who’ll end.”

It’s all so tedious to watch this watered-down ripoff of Big Brother from George Orwell’s doomsday “1984” novel, which was published in 1949 and predicted a dystopian future. In “2073,” Naomi Ackie has a small and ultimately inconsequential role as a professor character. Morton’s acting as Ghost is adequate by can’t overcome the weak screenplay.

As for the “talking heads” interviews in the documentary sections of “2073,” these comments are presented as voiceovers, presumably not to distract from the movie’s dramatic images of Ghost suffering in a decrepit place where food and water are scarce. In the documentary parts of the movie, the people commenting are politically liberal activists from Europe, North America, and Asia. The documentary doesn’t explain why, in a movie about the “end of the world,” there is no commentator representation from other largely populated continents, such as Africa and Australia.

Almost all of the activist commentators are also journalists and/or writers, such as Maria Ressa, Carole Cadwalladr, Rana Ayyub Ben Rhodes, Rahima Mahmut, Silkie Carlo, Cori Crider, George Monbiot, Nina Schick, Douglas Rushkof, Carmody Grey, James O’Brien, Anne Applebaum and Antony Lowenstein. The other commentators are Amazon Labor Union founder Chris Smalls, computer scientist Tristan Harris and environmental activist Alessandra Korap.

The problem with “2073” is that the documentary parts of the movie are just soundbite compilations that recycle whatever rants these people have already said or written in other movies or media reports. Want to know about Ressa’s crusade for freedom of the press in her native Philippines? There was already an excellent documentary about it: 2020’s “A Thousand Cuts,” directed by Ramona S. Díaz. Labor union leader Smalls is the star of the 2024 documentary “Union,” (directed by Stephen Maing and Brett Story), which chronicles Amazon Labor Union becoming the first union at corporate giant Amazon.

The “2073” doomsday warnings about the environment are very “been there, done that” and were already well-presented by Al Gore in the Oscar-winning 2006 documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” (directed by Davis Guggenheim), as well as in many other documentaries and news reports about climate change. And that why it’s so boring and basic to hear political strategist/security expert Sherri Goodman say in “2073” commentary: “We are truly in a climate emergency.”

Other concerns brought forth in the documentary parts of “2073” have to do with government surveillance, civil rights and the erosion of democracy. The essential messaging of “2073” is that (1) anyone who’s involved in conservative politics is contributing to the end of the world; (2) only progressive political liberals are smart enough to tell you that; and (3) if you don’t believe the commentators in the movie, then you must be an idiot. It’s a very condescending tone that can be an absolute turn-off to people (even liberals) who are open-minded and intelligent enough to make up their own minds about how they feel about world issues.

It’s appalling that so many journalists are interviewed for “2073” but their comments in the movie are not really about investigative journalism but are just soundbite rants that say nothing new. By not presenting anything substantial to prove that opposing viewpoints are wrong, “2073” fails at being balanced and is actually quite didactic in its “political liberals are always right” messaging. For a more informative look at the world’s problems and effective ways to deal with these problems, progressive liberals can watch MSNBC or read Mother Jones and don’t need to watch “2073,” a misguided movie that is unrelenting in its paranoia and political divisiveness that don’t give any logical and hopeful solutions.

Neon released “2073” in select U.S. cinemas on December 27, 2024.

Review: ‘Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody,’ starring Naomi Ackie, Stanley Tucci, Ashton Sanders, Tamara Tunie, Nafessa Williams and Clarke Peters

December 21, 2022

by Carla Hay

Naomi Ackie in “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” (Photo by Emily Aragones/TriStar Pictures)

“Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody”

Directed by Kasi Lemmons

Culture Representation: Taking place from 1983 to 2012, in various parts of the world, the dramatic film “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” features a cast of African American and white characters representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: Entertainment superstar Whitney Houston has struggles with her public image, her sexuality, fame, drugs, her parents and a volatile marriage to singer Bobby Brown. 

Culture Audience: Besides appealing to the obvious target audience of Whitney Houston fans, “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” will appeal primarily to people who want to see music-video-styled recreations of her life and relatively tame depictions of her biggest public scandals.

Nafessa Williams and Naomi Ackie in “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” (Photo by Emily Aragones/TriStar Pictures)

At times, “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” looks more like a cliché checklist of the legendary diva’s high points and low points instead of being an insightful biopic. However, the cast members’ performances, led by a dynamic Naomi Ackie, elevate this uneven movie. The recreations of some of Whitney Houston’s most beloved performances and music videos are among the highlights of this biopic, which sometimes gets dragged down by corny dialogue and tedious pacing.

Directed by Kasi Lemmons and written by Anthony McCarten, “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” is a movie sanctioned by the Whitney Houston estate, which is overseen by her sister-in-law Pat, who is one of the movie’s producers. Whitney Houston—who died at age 48 in 2012, of a drug-related drowning in a Beverly Hills hotel bathtub—has been the subject of some tell-all documentaries and books since her death. Therefore, the only people who might be surprised by what’s in “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” are those who don’t know what’s already been revealed in these tell-all stories or in the tabloid media.

That’s why everything in “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” feels like a retread with nothing fresh or innovative to offer in telling Whitney’s story. However, the movie delivers in its intention to be a nostalgia trip for her music and in doing faithful and meticulous staging of many of Whitney’s iconic moments. This is a movie made for fans who don’t want to see anything too shocking or too unflattering about Whitney.

Ackie’s performance as Whitney admirably captures some of the magic of this entertainment superstar. However, this depiction of Whitney never looks like a true embodiment but more like a better-than-average imitation. Some of Ackie’s real singing is in the movie, but the majority of Whitney’s singing in the movie consists of the real Whitney’s recordings. (And wisely so, since no one can completely duplicate Whitney’s extraordinary vocal talent and style.) Ackie, who is British in real life, also does a credible but not outstanding imitation of Whitney’s speaking voice.

Because this movie does not aspire to be prestigious, award-winning art, “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” serves its purpose in delivering Whitney’s hits as a soundtrack to the portrayal of her life’s melodrama. Much of the real-life raunchiness and decadence are toned down to make her story more appealing to audiences of wide age ranges. The movie never takes the time to understand Whitney’s inner thoughts, but instead gives viewers plenty of behind-the-scenes drama that was already exposed years ago.

There are some touches of comedy that generally work well to lighten the mood. But sometimes, “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” tries too hard to gloss over much of her emotional pain. Anything truly depressing in her life (which might have contributed to her drug addiction) is never fully examined, because the movie then jumps back into showing another Whitney performance. In other words, these are surface-level portrayals of Whitney’s problems.

For example, the 1991 miscarriage that Whitney had while filming the 1992 film “The Bodyguard” (her feature-film debut, which spawned the blockbuster soundtrack of the same name) gets less than two minutes of screen time. It breezes by with a scene of Whitney being comforted on a hospital bed by then-fiancé Bobby Brown (played by Ashton Sanders), with him telling her they can have other children in the future. And the miscarriage is never mentioned again. In real life, according to several people who knew Whitney and talked about her in interviews, this miscarriage had a profound and traumatic effect on her, but you’d never know it from watching this movie.

“Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” screenwriter McCarten also wrote the divisive screenplay for “Bohemian Rhapsody” (the Oscar-winning 2018 biopic of British rock band Queen), which got a lot of criticism for jumbling the band’s timeline too much and fabricating important details. “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” doesn’t have those problems, since the movie sticks to the basic, well-known facts of Whitney’s life. The film’s tweaks to Whitney’s life timeline are minor and do not significantly rewrite factual history. The movie shows a good balance of Whitney in the recording studio and on stage, but the depictions of how she deals with her personal problems are often reduced to soundbites.

“Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” (which takes place from 1983 to 2012) is told mostly in chronological order, except for the movie opening with the introduction to her performance at the 1994 American Music Awards. It’s a scene that the movie circles back to at the end of the film, which concludes in a somewhat long, drawn-out and awkward way: Her entire medley performance (of “I Loves You, Porgy,” “And I Am Telling You I’m Not Going” and “I Have Nothing”) is recreated on screen when the end credits should have already been rolling.

The movie depicts Whitney’s rise to stardom, beginning in 1983, when she was 19 or 20 years old and a backup vocalist for her gospel singer mother Cissy Houston (played by Tamara Tunie), who had a great deal of influence on Whitney as a singer. Cissy is portrayed as loving but also very strong-willed and domineering with Whitney. As a performer, Cissy was well-known but not rich by any stretch of the imagination.

Cissy’s headlining status was mostly at large nightclubs and small theaters. And even though Whitney’s cousin is Dionne Warwick, Whitney’s godmother was Aretha Franklin, and the Houston family mingled with showbiz royalty, Whitney grew up in a middle-class home in the New Jersey cities of Newark and East Orange. Cissy often spent a lot of time away from home as a touring artist to pay the family’s bills. Cissy’s then-husband John Houston (played by Clarke Peters) was also Cissy’s manager. Like many famous divas, Whitney’s first manager was also her father.

As shown and told repeatedly in the movie, Cissy and John (who would eventually divorce in 1990, after 31 years of marriage) frequently argued because John expected Cissy to be more attentive to the family despite her busy touring schedule, while Cissy resented having to be the family’s main source of income for years. Whitney’s older brothers Michael (played by JaQuan Malik Jones) and Gary (played by Daniel Washington) are briefly seen near the beginning of the movie, in a scene where all three siblings are smoking marijuana together in one of the family’s bedrooms. In real life, Gary (who married Pat in 1994) and Michael have admitted that they introduced Whitney to marijuana and cocaine, which became longtime addictions for her. (Whitney’s older brother John Houston III is not shown and is barely mentioned in the movie.)

How did John and Cissy Houston’s troubled marriage affect Whitney? The movie quickly depicts a young adult Whitney looking sad and disturbed as she listens to her parents arguing in another room. But she’s never really shown opening up to anyone about how all of this turmoil affected her. By the time Whitney meets Robyn Crawford (played by Nafessa Williams), who’s three years older than Whitney, on a basketball court, Whitney is all too happy to name drop the famous people who are in her family, in order to impress Robyn. The movie portrays Whitney and Robyn’s first meeting in 1983, when they actually met in 1980.

As shown in the movie, Whitney and Robyn became fast friends and eventually became lovers. For a while, Whitney and Robyn lived together before Whitney became famous and during the early years of her fame. It’s a romance that the real Crawford publicly confirmed in her 2019 memoir “A Song for You: My Life With Whitney Houston,” after years of speculation and gossip about the true nature of their relationship. Brown, who was married to Whitney from 1992 to 2007, also told intimate details about his volatile relationship with Whitney (which included love-triangle jealousy between him and Crawford) in his 2016 memoir “Every Little Step: My Story.”

“Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” then shows the expected rise to fame of Whitney, beginning with a very contrived-looking scene of Cissy seeing Arista Records founder Clive Davis (played by Stanley Tucci) in the audience before the start of one of Cissy’s shows at Sweetwater’s Club in New York City. Cissy pretends to lose her voice, so that a confused Whitney would go on stage in Cissy’s place. Whitney sings a cover version of George Benson’s 1977 song “The Greatest Love of All,” which later became a hit from Whitney’s 1985 self-titled debut album. Clive is predictably blown away by Whitney’s talent; some variations of “I can make you star” scenes happen; Whitney signs a record deal with Arista; and Whitney becomes an instant smash.

Throughout the movie, Whitney is shown being torn between her public image and how she lived in private. From the beginning of her career at Arista, it was planned that she would have the image of a clean-cut princess who would have wide crossover appeal among many races and generations. Behind the scenes, Whitney is shown as someone who was already using drugs, and she didn’t really like wearing the dresses and wigs that she was pressured to wear as part of her “princess” image.

Behind the scenes, Whitney and Robyn were open about their relationship, but Whitney’s father/manager and other handlers told Whitney to appear like a heterosexual bachelorette who wanted to eventually get married to a man. Because of Whitney’s religious Christian upbringing, the movie shows her often being personally conflicted about her same-sex romance with Robyn, while Robyn had no such doubts. When the tabloid media would later report that Whitney was a lesbian, Whitney would deny it, which is technically an accurate denial, because she was also sexually attracted to men, and she probably identified as queer or bisexual.

When Whitney has a short-lived affair with singer Jermaine Jackson (played by Jaison Hunter), her duet partner on 1985’s “Nobody Loves Me Like You Do,” the movie shows Robyn flying into a rage and trashing the home where she and Whitney live. The movie does not mention that Jermaine was married to his first wife, Hazel Gordy (daughter of Motown founder Berry Gordy), at the time of Jermaine’s affair with Whitney. Eventually, Whitney and Robyn moved on to other love partners, but Robyn and Whitney continued to work together.

The movie also shows how Whitney’s relationship with Robyn led to clashes with Whitney’s father/manager John (who didn’t like that Whitney hired inexperienced Robyn as Whitney’s personal assistant) and later conflicts with Whitney’s husband Bobby, when Robyn had been promoted at the time to being Whitney’s creative director. (“She’s my princess!” John sneers at Robyn, during one of the movie’s cringeworthy lines of dialogue.) When the addictions to drugs and alcohol got out of control for Whitney and Bobby, the movie portrays Robyn as one of the few people in the couple’s entourage who would try to put a stop to it. But those efforts got stubborn resistance from self-destructive Whitney and Bobby. Robyn, who eventually quit working with Whitney in 2000, left the entertainment business.

Whitney’s relationship with Robyn in the early years of Whitney’s career are the scenes that seem the most genuine in portraying the “real” Whitney Houston. In a somewhat amusing scene, Robyn and Whitney both barge into John’s office, where he and his mistress/secretary Barbara (played by Andrea Eversley) are interrupted while being affectionate with each other. Whitney reacts like she knows that her father has been cheating on her mother, but Whitney doesn’t want to talk about it. Meanwhile, before Barbara leaves the room, she calls Whitney the family nickname for Whitney—Nippy—and Whitney and Robyn give each other a look, as if they’re thinking, “Say what? How dare she use the name Nippy!”

“Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” has repetitive scenes of Whitney being bothered by criticism that she wasn’t “black enough” for some black audiences because of her choice of music, her mainstream success and her “America’s sweetheart” image. In other scene, Whitney gets defensive and angry with a radio DJ who tells her that many black people think she’s a sellout to her race. Whitney also makes a point of telling people that she didn’t grow up spoiled and rich.

The movie shows how Whitney tries to keep her composure in the audience when she gets booed at the 1989 Soul Train Music Awards while her name was announced as one of the show’s nominees for Best Music Video, and losing in that category to Janet Jackson. Robyn is Whitney’s date at this show. The movie alters a few details, because the booing incident actually happened at the 1988 Soul Train Music Awards, not at the 1989 Soul Train Music Awards.

The 1989 Soul Train Music Awards was where Whitney met Bobby, who was seated in front of her. Whitney gets his attention by swinging her purse deliberately so that the purse hit his head. (In real life, Whitney said she got his attention by kicking his chair, and he was really irritated by it.) Sanders portrays Bobby as someone who can be both a selfish troublemaker and a generous charmer, but the movie still leaves out some of the worst public information about Bobby.

Tucci’s portrayal of music mogul Clive is surprisingly subdued and not as interesting as it could have been, considering the real Clive Davis (who is one of the movie’s producers) has a reputation for being very charismatic. The movie shows Whitney telling Clive before she makes her first album with Arista that she doesn’t want to make white music or black music. She just wants to make great music. It’s one of several examples of the movie’s hokey dialogue that doesn’t ruin the movie but certainly lowers the quality of the film. Another example is when Clive first sees Whitney perform at Sweetwater’s Club, and he declares to his subordinate Gerry Griffith (played by Lance A. Williams), who persuaded Clive to be there: “I believe I’ve heard the greatest voice of her generation.”

The movie makes a half-hearted attempt to explain why Whitney didn’t go to rehab sooner for her addictions. In a scene shortly before Whitney records her first album, Clive promises that he won’t judge her or lecture her about her personal life. It isn’t until Whitney starts canceling performances, and the record company is losing money in other ways because of her drug problems, that Clive finally intervenes and tells her that she needs to go to rehab. It’s a very over-simplified scene because there were a lot more people involved in enabling Whitney and getting her to go to rehab. Her first public stint in rehab was in 2005.

What stands out most in this movie are undoubtedly the near-perfect recreations of Whitney’s on-stage performances, with the best highlight being Whitney’s performance of “The Star-Spangled Banner” at Super Bowl XXV in 1991. The scene is shown with the pomp and circumstance of immersing audiences into a VIP experience of that spectacular performance. Even though in real life, Whitney used a prerecorded track instead of singing live, the energy in the performance and her vocal expressions are what really captivated people the most.

Other recreations in the movie include Whitney’s performance of “Home” on “The Merv Griffin Show” in 1983; her music videos for 1985’s “How Will I Know,” 1987’s “I Wanna Dance With Somebody,” 1992’s “I Will Always Love You” and 1998’s “It’s Not Right But It’s Okay”; and 1994’s Whitney: The Concert for a New South Africa. The movie also has performances depicting some of her tours spanning several decades, from the 1980s to her ill-fated 2009-2010 last tour. The songs she performs in these concert scenes include “I’m Your Baby Tonight,” “I’m Every Woman,” “So Emotional” and “One Moment in Time.” There’s also a depiction of Whitney’s musical director Rickey Minor (played by Dave Heard) convincing a reluctant and skeptical Whitney in a rehearsal space to do her 1994 American Music Awards medley and rehearsing it for the first time.

The movie accurately shows how her final tour wasn’t exactly a triumph, since many of the shows were not well-attended, started late, or were canceled. In addition, Whitney got some negative reviews for not being able to hit the same notes that she could in the past. Whitney’s financial problems and her legal battles with her father (who sued her for $100 million in 2002, as he was dying in a hospital) are also depicted like more plot developments in a soap opera. Pat Houston (played by Kris Sidberry), who took over as Whitney’s manager after Whitney fired her father, is portrayed as the person who pointed out to Whitney that John Houston’s irresponsible spending led to Whitney’s losing so much money, she describes her fortune as “almost gone” in a scene where she confronts her father about it.

For every showstopping musical performance in the movie, the off-stage recreations are hit and miss, usually marred by shallow dialogue and very contrived scenarios. When Bobby and Whitney begin dating and are labeled an “odd couple” by the media, Bobby is defensive and tells Whitney why they have so much in common: “We from the ‘hood!” Bobby’s marriage proposal in a limousine is made to look intentionally comedic. As soon as Whitney says yes, he confesses that one of his ex-girlfriends is pregnant with their second child. Whitney gets angry, storms out of the limo, and the couple has one of many arguments shown in the movie.

Whitney and Bobby’s 1992 wedding, which was extravagant and had about 800 guests in real life, looks like a cheap imitation in the movie, which does a quick montage that makes it look like hardly anyone was at the wedding. Don’t expect the movie to give much insight into how Whitney was as a mother. Whitney and Bobby’s daughter, Bobbi Kristina (played as an adolescent by Bria Danielle Singleton), is portrayed as Whitney’s sidekick who doesn’t have much of a personality. (Bobbi Kristina’s tragic death at age 22 in 2015 is not mentioned in the movie.)

To its credit, “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” is more candid and a better-made film than Lifetime’s relatively low-budget 2015 movie “Whitney” (starring Yaya DaCosta as Whitney), which was directed by Angela Bassett. Lifetime’s “Whitney” movie was not sanctioned by the Whitney Houston estate, which might be why “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” excels in showing Whitney as a music artist. For all of its shortcomings, “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” at least gets it right when it comes to representing Whitney’s musical essence that remains her greatest legacy.

TriStar Pictures will release “Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody” in U.S. cinemas on December 23, 2022.

Copyright 2017-2026 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX