Review: ‘The Man in My Basement,’ starring Corey Hawkins, Willem Dafoe, Anna Diop, Jonathan Ajayi, Gershwyn Eustache Jnr., Pamela Nomvete and Tamara Lawrance

September 6, 2025

by Carla Hay

Willem Dafoe and Corey Hawkins in “The Man in My Basement” (Photo courtesy of Andscape/Hulu)

“The Man in My Basement”

Directed by Nadia Latif

Culture Representation: Taking place in 1994, in Sag Harbor, New York, the dramatic film “The Man in My Basement” (based on the 2004 novel of the same name) features a predominantly African American cast of characters (with some white people) representing the working-class, middle-class and wealthy.

Culture Clash: An unemployed man, who is close to losing his house because of his unpaid debts, accepts an offer from a mysterious stranger, who wants pay the man at least $65,000 to secretly let him live in the house’s basement.

Culture Audience: “The Man in My Basement” will appeal mainly to people who are fans of the movie’s headliners, the book on which the movie is based, and psychological thrillers that have vague endings that many people would consider unsatisfying.

Corey Hawkins in “The Man in My Basement” (Photo courtesy of Andscape/Hulu)

Just like the mysterious renter Anniston Bennet, this misguided psychological mystery comes undone in a self-imposed prison of half-baked ideas, rules that are broken, and a muddled identity. The talented cast can’t save this mess. “The Man in My Basement” is the type of movie that starts out intriguing, but it squanders the potential to be a good movie with too many rushed, sloppy and nonsensical scenes in the last third of the movie.

Directed by Nadia Latif and co-written by Latif and Walter Mosley, “The Man in My Basement” is based on Mosley’s 2004 novel of the same name. The movie takes place in 1994, in the village of Sag Harbor, New York. (The movie was actually filmed in Sag Harbor and in the United Kingdom’s Wales.) “The Man in My Basement” (which is Latif’s feature-film directorial debut) had its world premiere at the 2025 Toronto International Film Festival.

“The Man in My Basement” begins by showing a poker game taking place in the house owned by Charles Blakey (played by Corey Hawkins), who lives alone in the middle-class house that he inherited from his mother Valerie, who died in 1985. Charles’ father died when he was a child. Charles and his mother were each born in this house. Charles used to live with his elderly uncle Brent Blakey (played by Brian Bovell, seen in flashbacks), but Brent died in 1991.

Charles, who has no siblings, is a never-married bachelor in his 30s. He lives in a neighborhood called Sag Harbor Hills, a historically African American community. The house that he owns has been in his family for eight generations. Charles mentions later on in the movie that he’s the last person in his immediate family who has the last name Blakey.

Charles is playing poker with his best friend Ricky Winkler (played by Jonathan Ajayi) and their friend Clarence Mayhew (played by Gershwyn Eustache Jnr.) in a game that quickly becomes hostile and turns into a physical fight. The three men are discussing Charles’ dire financial predicament: Charles has been unemployed for months, he’s fallen behind on his mortgage payments, and the house is very close to getting foreclosed on by Sag Harbor Bank.

Because the house has been owned by Charles’ family for generations, it can be presumed that at some point in the past, Charles took out a mortgage on this house and has been unable to pay that mortgage. The conversation about Charles’ financial predicament is making Charles uncomfortable, so he annoys Clarence by calling Clarence the nickname Clara. It’s a nickname that Clarence dislikes. Clarence warns Charles not to call him Clara again. But, of course, Charles does call him Clara again.

Clarence throws a beer bottle at Charles. The bottle narrowly misses Charles, who lunges at Clarence. Clarence calls Charles “lazy, ungrateful” and the derogatory “n” word name. The tussle turns into a brawl that goes outside. Ricky breaks up the fight and does his best to keep the peace. A still-infuriated Clarence leaves in a huff after telling Charles, “I hope they take your goddamn house.”

The next morning, Charles gets a visit from a mysterious stranger who knocks on Charles’ door. The stranger introduces himself as Anniston Bennet (played by Willem Dafoe), who says that he’s from Greenwich, Connecticut. Anniston confirms that Charles is the owner of the house and makes an unusual request: Anniston asks to rent Charles’ basement for “a couple of months,” or 65 days to be exact.

Charles replies, “This house ain’t for sale or rent … I live alone, and I like it like that.” Anniston is polite and takes this rejection in stride. Anniston leaves his business card with Charles and tells Charles to contact him in case Charles changes his mind. The business card shows that Anniston works for a company called Tannenbaum & Ross Investment Group.

Much of the first third of the movie is about Charles becoming increasingly desperate for money. Ricky, who is a construction worker, tells Charles about a construction company that is hiring extra workers. Ricky and Charles go to the construction site, but the hiring manager Wilson Ryder (played by Mark Arnold) chooses Ricky and other men and immediately rejects Charles, who has no other job prospects.

It’s not revealed until later in the movie that Charles has been unemployed for months because he was involved in a theft scandal at Sag Harbor Bank, where he used to be an employee. (The details of the scandal, such as if Charles is guilty or not, are revealed in the movie.) Sag Harbor Bank’s highest-ranking manager John Paterson (played by Bret Jones) was Charles’ boss and is also the person who’s the chief administrator for Charles’ mortgage. Charles strongly suspects that John has been saying bad things about Charles to potential employers. Charles privately blames John for Charles’ inability to find a job.

Charles’ cousin Lainie (played by Kayla Meikle) works as a mid-level manager at the bank. She is unsympathetic about Charles’ plight and refuses to help him. She suggests that Charles should take an offer that the bank received from a unidentified buyer who wants to purchase the house, but Charles refuses to consider selling the house. Charles calls his aunt Peaches (played by Shellia Kennedy) to ask her for a $2,500 loan. She says no and expresses irritation with Charles because she hadn’t heard from him in months, and now that he’s contacted her, all he seems to want from her is money.

Things get so bad for Charles, he’s counting loose change to see if he has enough money to pay for gas for his car’s nearly empty gas tank. With his options running out, Charles calls the phone number on Anniston’s business card. Charles gets voice mail and leaves a message to say that he’s possibly interested in renting out the basement to Anniston, but Anniston has to give more information first about how much he’s willing to pay.

In the meantime, Ricky suggests that Charles should look around Charles’ house for any valuable items that could be sold. Ricky recommends that Charles set up a meeting with an antiques dealer named Narciss Gully (played by Anna Diop), whom Ricky knows. Narciss can come to Charles’ house and do an appraisal of any items he wants to sell.

Ricky privately makes a verbal agreement in advance with Charles to get a 10% commission on any items sold by Narciss, whose specialty is in African and African American artifacts. Charles somewhat reluctantly agrees to this deal. When Charles and bachelorette Narciss meet, Charles feels an immediate attraction to her, but he plays it cool. Narciss seems to be attracted to him too, but their first meeting is strictly platonic.

Narciss finds three African masks in the house and tells Charles that the masks could be worth $40,000 to $100,000. Charles’ elation turns into disappointment when Narciss tells him that it would take up to three months to get a response from any antiques dealers willing to buy any of the masks and up to nine months for any museums to respond. Charles can’t wait that long because he’s supposed to pay his defaulted loan in less than a week.

It’s around this time that Anniston returns Charles’ phone call and tells him what he will pay to rent Charles’ basement. Anniston offers a payment of $1,000 a day, for a total of $65,000 in cash. The first $10,000 would be paid as a deposit. Anniston then would pay $20,000 on the move-in day. The remaining $35,000 would be paid at the end of the 65 days.

The only requirement that Anniston has is that Charles can’t tell anyone about this basement rental deal, and no one can know that Anniston is living at the house. Charles takes the offer. Anniston has a matter-of-fact tone in how he speaks, and he’s very persuasive. However, there’s still something obviously suspicious about him because of his weird demands.

On the day that Anniston moves in, and as workers put his belongings in the basement, Anniston tells Charles that he’s renting the basement so Anniston can “disappear” for a while. Anniston is adamant in saying that he doesn’t want any visitors and doesn’t want anyone to know that he’s there. Charles asks him if Anniston is mixed up in anything illegal and wants to know exactly what Anniston does for a living.

Anniston replies that he’s in the “reclamations” business. Anniston further explains that he finds properties that have hidden wealth. “I locate the wealth. And I acquire the property that contains it. Then, I receive a stipend based on the value of my reclamation. Nowadays, it’s called globalization, outsourcing, the cost of doing business.”

If Charles is feeling any doubts about this deal, he pushes these doubts aside. At this point, all he cares about is making the payment on his defaulted loan so he can keep his house. When Charles goes to Sag Harbor Bank, he curses out bank manager John before smugly giving John a wad of cash to cover the debt that was due to be paid in a few days.

Charles is in for a shock when he goes home and finds a zoo-sized cage in the basement. Anniston has locked himself inside the cage, which has a chair, table and a few books. Anniston says he wants to stay in the cage for the entire 65 days. Charles will have to provide the food, liquids and waste management for Anniston, who says he plans to spend most of his time reading in the cage. The basement has a water hose that’s close enough to the cage, so Anniston can use the hose to clean himself.

Charles hates this idea of having to take care of Anniston while Anniston locks himself in cage. Charles says he wants to back out of their deal. However, Anniston convinces Charles to do a two-week trial for their deal. After the two weeks, if Charles wants to end the deal, then he can keep the money that Anniston already paid. But if Charles wants to complete the original deal of letting Anniston stay there for 65 continuous days, then Charles will be paid an increased total of $130,000.

“The Man in My Basement” takes quite a long time (nearly half of the movie) before it gets to this crucial point. The movie tries to inject some horror elements that are clumsily handled and ultimately don’t do much for the story. For example, Charles has hallucinations and nightmares, many of which are dead-end jump scares. There’s also a mysterious German Shepherd that keeps showing up in places where Charles goes. Don’t expect any answers about the significance of this dog.

“The Man in My Basement” also has a mishandled and ultimately useless “love triangle” subplot about Ricky, Charles and Ricky’s girlfriend Bethany (played by Tamara Lawrance), whom Charles has known since they were teenagers. Apparently, Bethany has had a longtime crush on Charles. However, they never dated each other because he ignored her attempts to start a romance with him.

Bethany is still very attracted to Charles and would probably dump Ricky if she thought she had a chance of being in a relationship with Charles because she still flirts with Charles when they’re alone together. It’s hinted that Charles could also have some feelings of attraction for Bethany because he masturbates when he hears Bethany and Ricky having sex upstairs in Charles’ house while Charles is downstairs on the living room couch. Ricky thinks Bethany could be the woman he permanently settles down with, and he tells Charles that Ricky will probably take his relationship with Bethany to the next level.

“The Man in My Basement” has some unexplained lapses in logic. The movie makes a point of showing that Charles has a nosy neighbor named Irene Littleneck (played by Pamela Nomvete), who is the caregiver for an adult relative named Chastity, who lives in the same house as Irene. Irene lives close enough to Charles where she (and anyone else close by) can see the comings and goings of anyone who goes inside Charles’ house through the front door.

On the day that Anniston moved in, he and Charles had a conversation in the front of Charles’ house that could easily be seen by anyone close enough to see them together—including the workers hired to move Anniston’s belongings into the basement. Anniston’s biggest requirement for this basement rental deal is that he doesn’t want anyone except Charles to know he’s at the house, but Anniston has a less-than-smart way of keeping it a “secret.” Later in the movie, Anniston does other things (which won’t be revealed in this review) that will frustrate or annoy viewers because these things contradict some of the strict “rules” that Anniston has for this bizarre arrangement that he has with Charles.

Although “The Man in My Basement” has compelling performances from Hawkins and Dafoe, the movie spirals into “fever dream” nonsense and never recovers. “The Man in My Basement” is a cluttered mix of ideas and themes, such as childhood trauma, manifestations of a guilty conscience, race relations, African American heritage, and generational wealth. These ideas and themes become a lot like the items stored in Charles’ basement: They’re haphazardly arranged, and the people responsible for sorting things out just don’t really know what to do with everything.

Hulu will release “The Man in My Basement” in select U.S. cinemas on September 12, 2025. The movie will premiere on Hulu and Disney+ on September 25, 2025.

Review: ‘Kindred,’ starring Tamara Lawrance, Jack Lowden and Fiona Shaw

November 27, 2020

by Carla Hay

Fiona Shaw and Tamara Lawrance in “Kindred” (Photo courtesy of IFC Films/IFC Midnight)

“Kindred”

Directed by Joe Marcantonio

Culture Representation: Taking place in an unnamed rural part of England, the dramatic thriller “Kindred” features an almost all-white cast of characters (with one black person and one Indian person) representing the working-class, the middle-class and the wealthy.

Culture Clash: After the father of her unborn child dies, a pregnant woman is held captive by the domineering paternal grandmother who wants to raise the child as her own.

Culture Audience: “Kindred” will appeal primarily to people who are looking for an artsier, British version of a Lifetime movie, but without a predictable ending.

Chloe Pirrie, Fiona Shaw, Tamara Lawrance and Jack Lowden in “Kindred” (Photo courtesy of IFC Films/IFC Midnight)

Just like the pregnant protagonist in “Kindred” is essentially imprisoned by her unborn child’s domineering grandmother, viewers will often be frustrated by how this dramatic film can hold people hostage with the hope that things will get better for the protagonist. “Kindred” succeeds in conveying the stifling atmosphere of someone being held captive, under the guise of “it’s for your own good.” But this oppressive tone is almost to a fault, because parts of the movie drag with too much repetition and the sense that the captured heroine could’ve made better choices to get out of her predicament. The movie’s ending will disappoint a great deal of the audience who might be expecting something more formulaic.

However, what will keep most viewers interested in the movie are the compelling performances of the two actresses who portray the women at the center of this power struggle over an unborn child. “Kindred” (which takes place in England) shows hints of being a horror film, but it’s mostly a dramatic thriller about a family feud. It’s one of those movies where the villain doesn’t think she’s evil but sincerely believes that what’s she’s doing is morally right and in the best interest of her family.

“Kindred” is the feature-film debut of director Joe Marcantonio, who co-wrote the screenplay with Jason McClogan. There are parts of the movie where you have to wonder if the screenwriters actually consulted with enough women (especially any women who’ve been pregnant) for some level of authenticity, because some of the actions of the expectant mother in this story just don’t ring true for a pregnant woman who’s trying to save herself and her unborn child. Or maybe this is just a case of a movie that knows it’s got to fill up its feature-length time by having the protagonist make dumb decisions.

At any rate, the movie’s target audience seems to be primarily women, and yet the filmmakers aren’t too concerned with filling in some blanks about the main characters that women usually like to know about for movies like “Kindred.” The movie largely redeems itself in a scene with a heart-to-heart conversation between the heroine and the chief villain to fill in some of those blanks. (It’s the best scene in the movie.) But the romance that sets off the series of events in this movie is barely explained.

In the beginning of “Kindred,” Ben Clayton (played by Edward Holcroft) and his live-in girlfriend Charlotte (played by Tamara Lawrance), who appear to be in their late 20s or early 30s, are getting ready to go over to his widowed mother’s house for a visit that the couple is dreading. Ben tells Charlotte, “She’s going to hate me,” as an indication that they’re going to tell his mother some news that will make her angry and/or sad. Charlotte replies, “Stop worrying. It’s going to be okay.”

Unfortunately, the movie never mentions why Ben and Charlotte are together and for how long. It would certainly go a long way in explaining why viewers are supposed to believe that this couple is compatible and have made a life-changing choice that they are now going to tell Ben’s mother: Ben and Charlotte are planning to move to Australia. Viewers are supposed to assume that Ben and Charlotte are a happy couple just because they’re together, without getting any sense of what Ben and Charlotte might have in common or what their life goals are when they get to Australia.

Ben and Charlotte arrive at his mother’s house, which is a very large manor in an unnamed rural part of England. Ben is very nervous, while Charlotte is much calmer. Ben’s bossy mother Margaret (played by Fiona Shaw) isn’t the only one in the house who’s got him on edge. There’s a man named Thomas (played by Jack Lowden) who lives there and who’s about the same age as Ben.

Thomas has a very odd relationship with Margaret, who treats Thomas like a son but also treats him like a servant who’s at her beck and call, 24 hours a day. Thomas acts as the house’s butler, chef and handyman. He’s very amiable and eager-to-please, but it’s clear that he will do anything that Margaret tells him to do. Charlotte later finds out the hard way.

Ben is noticeably jealous of Thomas, especially when Margaret describes Thomas as Ben’s “brother.” Ben is quick to reply every time: “He’s not my brother.” It doesn’t come out until later in this movie (and this isn’t really a spoiler) why Thomas is living with Margaret.

Ben’s father William died of cancer when he was a child. Years later, when Ben was a teenager, Margaret got romantically involved with an abusive man, who came to live in the manor with his son. That son was Thomas.

It’s never made clear in the movie if Margaret actually married this abusive man, but she describes the relationship later in the movie as “the biggest mistake of my life.” It also explains why she treats Thomas like a son, because Thomas has lived with Margaret, ever since he and his father moved into the house. Thomas’ father died years ago when Thomas was a teenager. His cause of death is revealed in the movie.

This reason for why Thomas is considered “family” to Margaret isn’t revealed until the last third of the film, but it actually would’ve been better to have revealed this information sooner in the film. Up until then, viewers have to keep guessing how Thomas came into Margaret’s life, why she treats Thomas like a son, and why she’s closer to Thomas than she is to her own biological son.

When Ben and Charlotte tell Margaret their big news about moving to Australia, Margaret predictably takes it very hard. She can’t believe that Ben wouldn’t want to stay in England and live at the manor, which he is sure to inherit from her. Ben tells his mother that he doesn’t care about the manor. Margaret gets so upset that she abruptly leaves the room. Thomas invites them to stay for the lunch that was prepared, but Ben and Charlotte decide that the visit has already gone badly, so they both decide to leave.

It’s never really stated what Ben does for a living, but Charlotte works as an outdoor employee at a farm. All the movie shows her doing at work is shoveling hay at a horse stable, when she suddenly vomits. Her co-worker Jane (played by Chloe Pirrie) is nearby and comes to her aid. Charlotte is feeling dizzy, so they decide to go to the nearest hospital to get Charlotte some medical assistance.

Charlotte then gets some news that’s a surprise to her but not a surprise to anyone who knows that when a woman of childbearing age suddenly vomits and feels dizzy in a movie, chances are that means she’s pregnant. Charlotte doesn’t have her own doctor because the doctor who ends up treating her during this pregnancy is named Dr. Richards (played by Anton Lesser), who seems to be the chief doctor in this small-town medical facility. Charlotte meets Dr. Richards for the first time during this hospital visit. And what do you know? He happens to be Margaret’s doctor too.

Why doesn’t Charlotte have her own doctor in a nation with universal health care? It’s never explained why, but viewers can speculate that Charlotte probably mistrusts doctors because Charlotte’s mother (who is either dead or totally estranged from her) had a history of mental illness. Her mother, who used to be a piano teacher, was diagnosed with perinatal psychosis and postpartum depression. In other words, the mental illness was exacerbated by the pregnancy and birth of Charlotte.

Needless to say, Charlotte had a very unhappy childhood. It’s never explained who really raised Charlotte and at what point in her life Charlotte cut off communication with her mother. But it’s clear, based on Charlotte’s negative reaction to finding out that she’s pregnant, Charlotte doesn’t think that she’s ready to become a mother and she has some deep-seated fears that she could pass on mental-illness genes to her unborn child. One of the first things that she asks Dr. Richards when he tells her that she’s pregnant is how she can get an abortion. He advises her to discuss the pregnancy with Ben first.

But Charlotte doesn’t really get a chance to do that, because by the time she returns home to the modest cottage that she shares with Ben, he has already decorated it with pregnancy congratulations. How did Ben find out? Dr. Richards told Margaret about Charlotte’s pregnancy, and Margaret told Ben.

It’s a blatant violation of patient/doctor confidentiality and something that could get a doctor in trouble. Charlotte knows that, and she half-jokingly says that she could report Dr. Richards for this violation. Ben’s enthusiasm over the pregnancy slowly makes her change her mind about having an abortion. However, she ignores this red flag that the doctor would go behind her back and violate her patient privacy.

Although Charlotte changes her mind about the abortion and decides to keep the baby, one thing that she hasn’t changed her mind about is moving to Australia with Ben. Margaret assumes that Ben and Charlotte will get married before the baby is born and that the couple will want to stay in England and live in the manor, but Margaret is wrong about all of those assumptions. Ben and Charlotte are firm in telling her that they have no plans to get married and they are still moving to Australia.

Charlotte and Ben try to comfort Margaret by telling her that they can still keep in touch through visits and videoconferencing, but Margaret flies into a rage and tells them how ungrateful they are and that they’re making a big mistake. Margaret screams, “You are not stealing my flesh and blood to go to the other side of the planet!” Margaret also cruelly says that it would be easier for Charlotte to decide to move to Australia because Charlotte has no family, but Margaret can’t understand why Ben would want to move.

Ben and Charlotte reach a stalemate with Margaret, but the couple remains in solidarity to continue with what was planned. Their lives take a tragic turn when Ben is doing some work in a stable, he accidentally gets kicked in the head by a horse, and he dies in the hospital. Charlotte and Margaret are devastated, of course. Thomas is also saddened, but Ben’s death doesn’t affect him as deeply as it does Margaret and Charlotte.

When they get the news at the hospital that Ben has died, Margaret blurts out to Charlotte that it’s Charlotte’s fault that Ben died. Charlotte becomes enraged and lunges at Margaret and starts to strangle her. Thomas is able to break up the altercation by pulling Charlotte off of Margaret. The implication is clear: Charlotte can be a tough and violent fighter, but she doesn’t really act that way for most of the movie.

Charlotte doesn’t have any family or friends to turn to during her overwhelming grief. And she gets more bad news a few days later when Margaret tells her that Ben had stopped paying the mortgage on the cottage (which was in his name) and it’s being sold in foreclosure. Really? That quickly? This is the part of the movie where a lot of viewers might yell at the screen that Margaret is probably lying.

After all, it’s clear that Ben feared and mistrusted his mother so much that he wanted to move far, far away from her and sever any financial ties he had to her. It doesn’t make sense that Charlotte would blindly trust Margaret, even though Margaret makes a half-hearted apology for the mean-spirited remarks that she previously made. And then if you factor in that Dr. Richards can’t be trusted either, you have a recipe for disaster.

Meanwhile, Thomas has already gone to the cottage, packed up Charlotte’s possessions, and brought them to the manor. Charlotte agrees to temporarily stay at the manor until the child is born. The movie makes it looks like Charlotte is so consumed with grief that she can’t be bothered to find another place to live.

However, “Kindred” has a major plot hole because Charlotte never bothers to look into Ben’s financial affairs now that she’s going to be a single mother raising his child. Did Ben have a will? Did he have life insurance? Did Charlotte and Ben have any joint bank accounts? What are the laws in England when it comes to what a child can inherit if the parents were not married but living together in a common-law domestic partner situation?

These are the things an expectant mother in Charlotte’s situation would think about if the father of her child suddenly dies. But these issues are never mentioned in “Kindred.” It’s why the biggest flaw of this movie is how it treats Charlotte as if she’s an idiot.

Charlotte’s willful ignorance kind of contradicts this image that the filmmakers want Charlotte to have of someone who’s been on her own for a while and supposedly knows how to take care of herself. You’d never know it though, by the way they portray Charlotte as this helpless, pitiful and broken person who lets Margaret take over her life.

Faster than you can say “weak-willed doormat,” Margaret convinces Charlotte that her only option is to stay in the manor until the baby is born. Margaret tells Charlotte that she can still move to Australia after the baby is born, but viewers watching this movie can easily see that Margaret has no intention of letting that happen.

Charlotte and Ben being in an interracial relationship is never mentioned as a problem for old-fashioned and stuck-up Margaret. Margaret seems to have more of a problem with Charlotte being from a lower social class than Ben, and she doesn’t want her grandchild in a working-class environment. Margaret expresses some sexism when she openly declares to Charlotte that she hopes that the child will be a boy.

Margaret tells Charlotte that Dr. Richards has ordered Charlotte to be on strict bed rest until the baby is born. But there’s more than just bed rest that Margaret and Thomas use as a means to keep Charlotte confined to the manor. And sure enough, Charlotte soon finds out that the front gates to the manor are padlocked with heavy chains.

Charlotte gets scolded by Margaret for requests to go outside for a simple walk on the manor’s property or to visit Ben’s grave (he’s buried on the property next to his father) or to do anything outside of the manor. In the rare instances where Charlotte is allowed to leave the house, Thomas must always accompany her. Charlotte becomes more isolated to the point where she’s not even allowed to visit Dr. Richards for prenatal care. Against Charlotte’s objections, Margaret has decided that Charlotte will give birth at the manor, not in a hospital.

And things take a very sinister and creepy turn when Charlotte suspects that she is being drugged. On one occasion, she finds remnants of a crushed pill in the tea that Thomas gives her. And Thomas tells her that she wakes up screaming from nightmares, but she can’t remember ever doing it.

And one morning, she wakes up and is startled to find a fully clothed Thomas sleeping next to her in bed, on top of the bed covers. He’s apologetic but he tells her that she had nightmares the night before and begged him to stay with her. It’s another incident that Charlotte says that she doesn’t remember.

Does Charlotte try to escape? Of course, she does. But she makes some really bad, bungling decisions that get in the way of her escape efforts. Does she try to call for help? During the chaotic ride to the hospital when Ben got injured, Thomas claimed that Charlotte’s phone was broken. He promises to get it fixed, but he never does. And when she does get access to a phone, she doesn’t call the police. She turns to other people for help, and that ends up being a very big mistake.

“Kindred” tries to bring some spooky elements into the story, by constantly featuring crows showing up outside at suspenseful moments. And when Charlotte is sleeping, an image of a horse keeps appearing, but it’s implied that horse is part of her dreams. There’s no real supernatural meaning for any of these animals. Margaret isn’t a secret witch and this isn’t a horror story about the manor being haunted by evil spirits.

Instead, the movie goes back to the same repetition of Charlotte trying to think of ways to escape and her efforts somehow being thwarted. Does Charlotte escape? Does she give birth? And if so, what happens to the baby?

Those questions are answered in the movie, which is mainly worth watching for the battle of wills between the heroine and the villain, since Lawrance and Shaw give performances that add depth to their roles that would have been too shallow if portrayed by less-talented actresses. These performances elevate the quality of “Kindred,” which has a lot of characteristics of being a mediocre “woman in peril” movie that will leave some viewers cold.

IFC Films/IFC Midnight released “Kindred” in select U.S. cinemas, digital and VOD on November 6, 2020.

Copyright 2017-2026 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX