2026 Golden Globe Awards: ‘One Battle After Another,’ ‘Adolescence’ are the top winners

January 11, 2026

by Carla Hay

“One Battle After Another” team members at the 83rd Annual Golden Globe Awards at the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, California, on January 11, 2026. Pictured from left to right: actor Benicio del Toro, actress Teyana Taylor, producer Sara Murphy, actress Chase Infiniti, actor Leonardo DiCaprio, writer/director/producer Paul Thomas Anderson and actor Sean Penn. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/CBS)

With four prizes each, Warner Bros’ Pictures’ “One Battle After Another” and Netflix’s “Adolescence” were the top winners at the 83rd Annual Golden Globes, which were presented at the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, California, on January 11, 2026. CBS had the live U.S. telecast and Paramount+ livestreamed the show, which was hosted by comedian Nikki Glaser. The Golden Globes are voted for by approximately 300 entertainment journalists from various countries.

“One Battle After Another” won the award for Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy, while “One Battle After Another” co-star Teyana Taylor won the prize for Best Female Actor in a Supporting Role in Any Motion Picture. Paul Thomas Anderson, who wrote and directed “One Battle After Another,” was awarded the prizes of Best Director and Best Screenplay. “One Battle After Another” was the leading contender going into the ceremony, with nine nominations.

“Adolescence” won the prize for Best Limited Series, Anthology Series, or Motion Picture Made for Television. “Adolescence” also won an award in every actor/actress category for which “Adolescence” was nominated: Best Male Actor in a Limited Series, Anthology Series, or Motion Picture Made for Television (for Stephen Graham); Best Supporting Male Actor on Television (for Owen Cooper); and Best Supporting Female Actor on Television (for Erin Doherty). “Adolescence” had five nominations going into the ceremony.

Winning two prizes each were Focus Features’ “Hamnet,” Warner Bros. Pictures’ “Sinners,” Netflix’s “KPop Demon Hunters” and Neon’s “The Secret Agent.” “Hamnet” won in the categories of Best Motion Picture – Drama and Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role in a Motion Picture – Drama, with the latter award going to Jessie Buckley. “Sinners” received the prizes for Cinematic and Box Office Achievement and Best Original Score, with the latter award going to composer Ludwig Göransson. “KPop Demon Hunters” won for Best Motion Picture – Animated and Best Original Song, with the latter award going to the writers of “Golden.” The Brazilian drama “The Secret Agent” won in the categories of Best Motion Picture – Non-English Language and Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role in a Motion Picture – Drama, with the latter award going to Wagner Moura.

In the television categories, HBO Max’s “The Pitt” and Apple TV’s “The Studio” won two awards each. “The Pitt” garnered wins for Best Television Series – Drama and Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role in a Television Series – Drama, with the latter award going to Noah Wylie. “The Studio” won the prizes for Best Television Series – Comedy and Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role in a Television Series – Comedy, with the latter award going to Seth Rogen.

Although most of the ceremony’s winners were in attendance, a few were no-shows, such as Michelle Williams of Hulu’s “Dying for Sex” (Best Female Actor in a Limited Series, Anthology Series, or Motion Picture Made for Television) and Ricky Gervais of Netflix’s “Ricky Gervais: Mortality” (Best Performance in Stand-Up Comedy on Television). This was the first year that the Golden Globes had a prize for Best Podcast, which was awarded to Spotify’s “Good Hang With Amy Poehler.” The category for Best Original Score was not televised this year, but the winner was announced during a part of the ceremony that was not on television.

As of 2025, the non-competitive prizes for the Cecil B. DeMille Award (for achievement in movies) and the Carol Burnett Award (for achievement in television) are no longer part of the main Golden Globes ceremony but instead are presented in a separate ceremony called the Golden Gala. In 2026, highlights from the Golden Gala were televised in a CBS TV special titled “Golden Eve,” on January 8. In 2026, Helen Mirren received the Cecil B. DeMille Award, and Sarah Jessica Parker received the Carol Burnett Award.

Emmy Award-winning producing duo Glenn Weiss and Ricky Kirshner of White Cherry Entertainment returned as executive producing showrunners for the 83rd Annual Golden Globes. Dick Clark Productions planned, hosted, and produced the 83rd Annual Golden Globes.

Presenters at the show were Amanda Seyfried, Ana de Armas, Ayo Edebiri, Charli xcx, Chris Pine, Colman Domingo, Connor Storrie, Dakota Fanning, Dave Franco, Diane Lane, Don Cheadle, Fran Drescher, George Clooney, Hailee Steinfeld, Hudson Williams, Jason Bateman, Jennifer Garner, Joe Keery, Judd Apatow, Julia Roberts, Justin Hartley, Kathryn Hahn, Keegan-Michael Key, Kevin Bacon, Kevin Hart, Kyra Sedgwick, Lalisa Manobal, Luke Grimes, Macaulay Culkin, Marlon Wayans, Melissa McCarthy, Mila Kunis, Miley Cyrus, Minnie Driver, Orlando Bloom, Pamela Anderson, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Queen Latifah, Regina Hall, Sean Hayes, Snoop Dogg, Wanda Sykes, Will Arnett and Zoë Kravitz.

“Adolescence” team members at the 83rd Annual Golden Globe Awards at the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, California, on January 11, 2026. Pictured from left to right: actress/executive producer Hannah Walters, actor/executive producer/writer Stephen Graham, actress Erin Doherty, executive producer Mark Herbert, executive producer Jeremy Kleiner, executive producer Philip Barantini, executive producer/writer Jack Thorne, actor Owen Cooper and actor Ashley Walters. Pictured at far right are presenters Ayo Edebiri and Hailee Steinfeld. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/CBS)

The following is the complete list of nominees and winners for the 83rd Annual Golden Globes:

*=winner

BEST MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA

  • FRANKENSTEIN (Netflix)
  • HAMNET (Focus Features)*
  • IT WAS JUST AN ACCIDENT (NEON)
  • THE SECRET AGENT (NEON)
  • SENTIMENTAL VALUE (NEON)
  • SINNERS (Warner Bros. Pictures)

BEST MOTION PICTURE – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

  • BLUE MOON (Sony Pictures Classics)
  • BUGONIA (Focus Features)
  • MARTY SUPREME (A24)
  • NO OTHER CHOICE (NEON)
  • NOUVELLE VAGUE (Netflix)
  • ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER (Warner Bros. Pictures)*

BEST MOTION PICTURE – ANIMATED

  • ARCO (NEON)
  • DEMON SLAYER: KIMETSU NO YAIBA INFINITY CASTLE (Aniplex, Crunchyroll, Sony Pictures Entertainment)
  • ELIO (Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures)
  • KPOP DEMON HUNTERS (Netflix)*
  • LITTLE AMÉLIE OR THE CHARACTER OF RAIN (GKIDS)
  • ZOOTOPIA 2 (Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures)

CINEMATIC AND BOX OFFICE ACHIEVEMENT

  • AVATAR: FIRE AND ASH (Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures)
  • F1 (Apple Original Films)
  • KPOP DEMON HUNTERS (Netflix)
  • MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – THE FINAL RECKONING (Paramount Pictures)
  • SINNERS (Warner Bros. Pictures)*
  • WEAPONS (Warner Bros. Pictures, New Line Cinema)
  • WICKED: FOR GOOD (Universal Pictures)
  • ZOOTOPIA 2 (Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures)

BEST MOTION PICTURE – NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE

  • IT WAS JUST AN ACCIDENT (NEON) – FRANCE
  • NO OTHER CHOICE (NEON) – SOUTH KOREA
  • THE SECRET AGENT (NEON) – BRAZIL*
  • SENTIMENTAL VALUE (NEON) – NORWAY
  • SIRĀT (NEON) – SPAIN
  • THE VOICE OF HIND RAJAB (WILLA) – TUNISIA

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A FEMALE ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA

  • JESSIE BUCKLEY (HAMNET)*
  • JENNIFER LAWRENCE (DIE MY LOVE)
  • RENATE REINSVE (SENTIMENTAL VALUE)
  • JULIA ROBERTS (AFTER THE HUNT)
  • TESSA THOMPSON (HEDDA)
  • EVA VICTOR (SORRY, BABY)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A MALE ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA

  • JOEL EDGERTON (TRAIN DREAMS)
  • OSCAR ISAAC (FRANKENSTEIN)
  • DWAYNE JOHNSON (THE SMASHING MACHINE)
  • MICHAEL B. JORDAN (SINNERS)
  • WAGNER MOURA (THE SECRET AGENT)*
  • JEREMY ALLEN WHITE (SPRINGSTEEN: DELIVER ME FROM NOWHERE)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A FEMALE ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

  • ROSE BYRNE (IF I HAD LEGS I’D KICK YOU)*
  • CYNTHIA ERIVO (WICKED: FOR GOOD)
  • KATE HUDSON (SONG SUNG BLUE)
  • CHASE INFINITI (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)
  • AMANDA SEYFRIED (THE TESTAMENT OF ANN LEE)
  • EMMA STONE (BUGONIA)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A MALE ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

  • TIMOTHÉE CHALAMET (MARTY SUPREME)*
  • GEORGE CLOONEY (JAY KELLY)
  • LEONARDO DICAPRIO (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)
  • ETHAN HAWKE (BLUE MOON)
  • LEE BYUNG-HUN (NO OTHER CHOICE)
  • JESSE PLEMONS (BUGONIA)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A FEMALE ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN ANY MOTION PICTURE

  • EMILY BLUNT (THE SMASHING MACHINE)
  • ELLE FANNING (SENTIMENTAL VALUE)
  • ARIANA GRANDE (WICKED: FOR GOOD)
  • INGA IBSDOTTER LILLEAAS (SENTIMENTAL VALUE)
  • AMY MADIGAN (WEAPONS)
  • TEYANA TAYLOR (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)*

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A MALE ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN ANY MOTION PICTURE

  • BENICIO DEL TORO (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)
  • JACOB ELORDI (FRANKENSTEIN)
  • PAUL MESCAL (HAMNET)
  • SEAN PENN (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)
  • ADAM SANDLER (JAY KELLY)
  • STELLAN SKARSGÅRD (SENTIMENTAL VALUE)*

BEST DIRECTOR – MOTION PICTURE

  • PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)*
  • RYAN COOGLER (SINNERS)
  • GUILLERMO DEL TORO (FRANKENSTEIN)
  • JAFAR PANAHI (IT WAS JUST AN ACCIDENT)
  • JOACHIM TRIER (SENTIMENTAL VALUE)
  • CHLOÉ ZHAO (HAMNET)

BEST SCREENPLAY – MOTION PICTURE

  • PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)*
  • RONALD BRONSTEIN, JOSH SAFDIE (MARTY SUPREME)
  • RYAN COOGLER (SINNERS)
  • JAFAR PANAHI (IT WAS JUST AN ACCIDENT)
  • ESKIL VOGT, JOACHIM TRIER (SENTIMENTAL VALUE)
  • CHLOÉ ZHAO, MAGGIE O’FARRELL (HAMNET)

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE – MOTION PICTURE

  • ALEXANDRE DESPLAT (FRANKENSTEIN)
  • LUDWIG GÖRANSSON (SINNERS)*
  • JONNY GREENWOOD (ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER)
  • KANGDING RAY (SIRĀT)
  • MAX RICHTER (HAMNET)
  • HANS ZIMMER (F1)

BEST ORIGINAL SONG – MOTION PICTURE

  • “DREAM AS ONE” – AVATAR: FIRE AND ASH (Music by: Miley Cyrus, Andrew Wyatt, Mark Ronson, Simon Franglen. Lyrics by: Miley Cyrus, Andrew Wyatt, Mark Ronson, Simon Franglen)
  • “GOLDEN” –KPOP DEMON HUNTERS (Music by: Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seo, Park Hong Jun. Lyrics by: Kim Eun-jae (EJAE), Mark Sonnenblick)*
  • “I LIED TO YOU” – SINNERS (Music by: Raphael Saadiq, Ludwig Göransson. Lyrics by: Raphael Saadiq, Ludwig Göransson)
  • “NO PLACE LIKE HOME” – WICKED: FOR GOOD (Music by: Stephen Schwartz. Lyrics by: Stephen Schwartz
  • “THE GIRL IN THE BUBBLE” – WICKED: FOR GOOD (Music by: Stephen Schwartz. Lyrics by: Stephen Schwartz)
  • “TRAIN DREAMS” – TRAIN DREAMS (Music by: Nick Cave, Bryce Dessner. Lyrics by: Nick Cave)

BEST TELEVISION SERIES – DRAMA

  • THE DIPLOMAT (NETFLIX)
  • THE PITT (HBO MAX)*
  • PLURIBUS (APPLE TV)
  • SEVERANCE (APPLE TV)
  • SLOW HORSES (APPLE TV)
  • THE WHITE LOTUS (HBO MAX)

BEST TELEVISION SERIES – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

  • ABBOTT ELEMENTARY (ABC)
  • THE BEAR (FX ON HULU)
  • HACKS (HBO MAX)
  • NOBODY WANTS THIS (NETFLIX)
  • ONLY MURDERS IN THE BUILDING (HULU)
  • THE STUDIO (APPLE TV)*

BEST TELEVISION LIMITED SERIES, ANTHOLOGY SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION

  • ADOLESCENCE (NETFLIX)*
  • ALL HER FAULT (PEACOCK)
  • THE BEAST IN ME (NETFLIX)
  • BLACK MIRROR (NETFLIX)
  • DYING FOR SEX (FX ON HULU)
  • THE GIRLFRIEND (PRIME VIDEO)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A FEMALE ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES – DRAMA

  • KATHY BATES (MATLOCK)
  • BRITT LOWER (SEVERANCE)
  • HELEN MIRREN (MOBLAND)
  • BELLA RAMSEY (THE LAST OF US)
  • KERI RUSSELL (THE DIPLOMAT)
  • RHEA SEEHORN (PLURIBUS)*

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A MALE ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES – DRAMA

  • STERLING K. BROWN (PARADISE)
  • DIEGO LUNA (ANDOR)
  • GARY OLDMAN (SLOW HORSES)
  • MARK RUFFALO (TASK)
  • ADAM SCOTT (SEVERANCE)
  • NOAH WYLE (THE PITT)*

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A FEMALE ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

  • KRISTEN BELL (NOBODY WANTS THIS)
  • AYO EDEBIRI (THE BEAR)
  • SELENA GOMEZ (ONLY MURDERS IN THE BUILDING)
  • NATASHA LYONNE (POKER FACE)
  • JENNA ORTEGA (WEDNESDAY)
  • JEAN SMART (HACKS)*

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A MALE ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES – MUSICAL OR COMEDY

  • ADAM BRODY (NOBODY WANTS THIS)
  • STEVE MARTIN (ONLY MURDERS IN THE BUILDING)
  • GLEN POWELL (CHAD POWERS)
  • SETH ROGEN (THE STUDIO)*
  • MARTIN SHORT (ONLY MURDERS IN THE BUILDING)
  • JEREMY ALLEN WHITE (THE BEAR)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A FEMALE ACTOR IN A LIMITED SERIES, ANTHOLOGY SERIES, OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION

  • CLAIRE DANES (THE BEAST IN ME)
  • RASHIDA JONES (BLACK MIRROR)
  • AMANDA SEYFRIED (LONG BRIGHT RIVER)
  • SARAH SNOOK (ALL HER FAULT)
  • MICHELLE WILLIAMS (DYING FOR SEX)*
  • ROBIN WRIGHT (THE GIRLFRIEND)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A MALE ACTOR IN A LIMITED SERIES, ANTHOLOGY SERIES, OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION

  • JACOB ELORDI (THE NARROW ROAD TO THE DEEP NORTH)
  • PAUL GIAMATTI (BLACK MIRROR)
  • STEPHEN GRAHAM (ADOLESCENCE)*
  • CHARLIE HUNNAM (MONSTER: THE ED GEIN STORY)
  • JUDE LAW (BLACK RABBIT)
  • MATTHEW RHYS (THE BEAST IN ME)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A FEMALE ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE ON TELEVISION

  • CARRIE COON (THE WHITE LOTUS)
  • ERIN DOHERTY (ADOLESCENCE)*
  • HANNAH EINBINDER (HACKS)
  • CATHERINE O’HARA (THE STUDIO)
  • PARKER POSEY (THE WHITE LOTUS)
  • AIMEE LOU WOOD (THE WHITE LOTUS)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY A MALE ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE ON TELEVISION

  • OWEN COOPER (ADOLESCENCE)*
  • BILLY CRUDUP (THE MORNING SHOW)
  • WALTON GOGGINS (THE WHITE LOTUS)
  • JASON ISAACS (THE WHITE LOTUS)
  • TRAMELL TILLMAN (SEVERANCE)
  • ASHLEY WALTERS (ADOLESCENCE)

BEST PERFORMANCE IN STAND-UP COMEDY ON TELEVISION

  • BILL MAHER (BILL MAHER: IS ANYONE ELSE SEEING THIS?
  • BRETT GOLDSTEIN (BRETT GOLDSTEIN: THE SECOND BEST NIGHT OF YOUR LIFE)
  • KEVIN HART (KEVIN HART: ACTING MY AGE)
  • KUMAIL NANJIANI (KUMAIL NANJIANI: NIGHT THOUGHTS)
  • RICKY GERVAIS (RICKY GERVAIS: MORTALITY)*
  • SARAH SILVERMAN (SARAH SILVERMAN: POSTMORTEM)

BEST PODCAST

  • ARMCHAIR EXPERT WITH DAX SHEPARD (WONDERY)
  • CALL HER DADDY (SIRIUSXM)
  • GOOD HANG WITH AMY POEHLER (SPOTIFY)*
  • THE MEL ROBBINS PODCAST (SIRIUSXM)
  • SMARTLESS (SIRIUSXM)
  • UP FIRST (NPR (NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO)

Review: ‘Desert Law,’ starring members of police departments in Arizona’s Pima County

January 10, 2026

by Carla Hay

Isaiah Alavrez in “Desert Law” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Desert Law”

Culture Representation: The documentary series “Ozark Law” features a racially diverse group of people (mostly white, Latin and black) who are connected in some way to law enforcement in Arizona’s Pima County.

Culture Clash: Law enforcement officials deal with various people for real or perceived law violations.

Culture Audience: “Desert Law” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in low-budget true crime docuseries that show how law enforcement works in a specific region of the United States.

“Desert Law” is a very boring and inferior version of “Cops.” This docuseries takes place in Arizona’s Pima County, but the show’s generic law enforcement interactions don’t set this series apart from all the other shows that imitate “Cops.” Ever since “Cops” debuted in 1989, there’s been a slew of copycat shows that have the same format, which is supposed to give viewers the feeling that each episode is a “ride-along” with the patrol officers who are featured on the show.

“Desert Law” is produced by Twenty Twenty Productions for A&E. A&E did not make screener episodes available for review before the series premiere. Therefore, only the series’ first episode, titled “Welcome to Pima County,” will be featured in this review. Tucson is the largest city in Pima County.

“Desert Law” has the expected captioned statements that people who are seen being arrested on the show are innocent until proven guilty, and charges could be reduced or dropped. With few exceptions, if someone is shown being arrested on “Desert Law,” the show has a caption listing that person’s charge or charges. The show does not reveal the names or show the faces (which are blurred out) of most of the who are seen being questioned, detained or arrested by law enforcement in each episode.

Part of the attraction of watching a show like “Cops” is to see the expressions on people’s faces when they interact with the police, especially when people are caught doing something wrong. Because “Desert Law” doesn’t show the faces of people in these circumstances, it makes the show look blander and more generic than similar-concept shows that don’t hide the faces of people who interact with law enforcement. It’s one of the many reasons why “Desert Law” is a forgettable docuseries about cops on the job.

In the beginning of the first “Desert Law” episode, it’s mentioned that the police who work in this part of Arizona often have to work in temperatures that reach more than 100°F. You wouldn’t know it from watching this episode, which filmed Pima County police from May 23 to May 26 (Memorial Day weekend) in 2025. You don’t see anyone mentioning the heat. You don’t even see people sweating, even though most of what is shown in “Desert Law” takes place outdoors.

The police featured in the episode are hard-working and dedicated, but there isn’t much insight into who they are, other than they seem to be on their best behavior because they’re being filmed. Detective Scott McLeod gets the most screen time and talks about his many years on the job (17 years at the time this episode was filmed) and how he would quit being a law enforcement officer if he lost his ability to care about people.

In the beginning of the episode, it’s mentioned that Memorial Day is a busy weekend for law enforcement because of all the partying going on. Will these cops make a lot of arrests of rowdy, intoxicated people? No. Almost all the calls that the police are shown responding to are fairly tame, except for the first and last incidents in the episode.

The first incident shows McLeod and a deputy named Rebecca Allen as among the police who get involved in a vehicle chase that also has a police helicopter joining in on the hunt. The suspect gets out of a truck, after trying to ram other cars to get out of the way. Luckily, no one is hurt during this chase. The suspect gets tased by police and is arrested.

Fentanyl and drug paraphernalia are found in the suspect’s truck. He’s arrested on multiple charges, including resisting arrest and possession of a narcotic drug. McLeod comments, “This town is plagued with fentanyl.” It’s the only fentanyl-related arrested that’s shown in the episode.

The episode then drags with fairly uneventful incidents. Deputy Isaiah Alvarez responds to a call in the city of Ajo about a suspected thief who stole items from a gas station convenience store. The man who is stopped by police is hostile and defensive, as he’s detained in a police car and rants about being abused by police in the past. He turns out not to be the theft suspect, but he is arrested for an outstanding warrant for disorderly conduct.

A deputy named Anthony Stewart is a British immigrant who good-naturedly jokes about how people react to his British accent. Stewart is seen patrolling a park after it’s closed, to look for trespassers. On three separate occasions, Stewart is shown catching three different couples having sex in a vehicle in a deserted parking lot. No one is arrested, and he lets each couple go with a warning.

Stewart also has a friendly warning response to a nervous young woman who is seen wandering alone in the park’s parking lot. She makes repeated apologies because she says she didn’t known the park was closed. He tells her to leave (her car is parked nearby) and to drive safely. Not exactly dangerous crime-busting cases.

On a residential street away from the park, Stewart is shown responding to a noise complaint about a loud party, whose hosts agree to lower the volume of the party. One of the party hosts makes a remark to Stewart about Stewart’s British accent, by asking if Stewart is from London and asking if Brits say “bloody hell” and “crikey.” Stewart says he’s from England, but not the city of London. Stewart also tells him that although “bloody hell” is a British term, “crikey” is Australian slang from Australia.

This episode of “Desert Law” shows more people getting a warning instead of getting arrested. A man is briefly detained for driving in the wrong direction on a highway. It turns out that his SUV had an expected malfunction and can only operate in reverse. He thanks the police for helping him.

In a separate incident, McLeod detains a man who’s with a topless, emaciated-looking female passenger in the man’s car. A small amount of drugs are found in the vehicle. After McLeod asks him how long he’s been addicted, the man admits he’s addicted to drugs, especially cocaine. Because not enough drugs are found in the car, the detainee and his companion are let go with a warning. The drug-addicted man makes a not-very-convincing comment that he will consider getting professional help for his addiction.

The last incident shows someone getting arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) and failing to remain at the scene of a fatal car accident. The male suspect was driving a truck that hit another man on a highway. The accident victim was dead by the time the police arrived. The suspect, who is shown refusing to take a breathalyzer test, has a passenger who is a cooperating witness. It’s the most compelling case, but it’s rushed in so quickly in the last 10 minutes of the episode, it barely makes an impact.

Two deputies are featured in this DUI investigation: Anthony Pool and Dylan Ellis-Hollings. Pool has the more memorable personality because he brags that his nickname is The DUI Guy because of all the DUI arrests that he’s made. Pool claims that he’s responsible for “50%” of the DUI arrests in Pima County. The show doesn’t verify if this claim is true or not.

“Desert Law” might be adequate enough for people who don’t get tired of TV shows that document what law enforcement does on the streets. However, there’s a glut of these shows that all tend to look the same. The police work that helps society can be commended, but in “Desert Law,” viewers won’t learn anything new if they’ve seen these types of “ride-along” shows many times before.

A&E premiered “Desert Law” on January 7, 2026.

Review: ‘Crime in Progress,’ an episodic series about various crimes and investigations captured mostly on police camera footage

January 9, 2026

by Carla Hay

Roxanne Sanchez in “Crime in Progress” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

“Crime in Progress”

Culture Representation: The documentary series “Crime in Progress” features a racially diverse group of people who are connected to law enforcement or crimes in some way.

Culture Clash: The TV series has compilation of mostly police camera footage (such body cams and dashboard cams) to show how police reacted to a crime in progress.

Culture Audience: “Crime in Progress” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of low-budget true crime documentaries that show the perspectives of law enforcement at crime scenes and investigating crimes.

A fugitive tries to hide from New Mexico police in “Crime in Progress” (Photo courtesy of A&E)

Using raw footage that is mostly from police cameras, “Crime in Progress” is a gripping and suspenseful true crime documentary series, thanks to skillful editing. Each episode has a different case, with no narration or post-investigation interviews. “Crime in Progress” has captions to explain certain things in each episode. It’s a simple but compelling format.

“Crime in Progress” is produced for A&E by the A+E Factual Studios group. Kelly McClurkin is the showrunner, as well as an executive producer, for “Crime in Progress.” Only the first episode of “Crime in Progress” was available to review before the series premiered. 

The first episode, titled “Nowhere to Hide,” chronicles the race-against-time hunt for a fugitive who shot and killed police officer Justin Hare in Tucumari, New Mexico, close to 5 a.m. on March 5, 2024. Hare had been responding to a 911 call about a man wearing a hoodie who was trying to flag down passing motorists on a highway. The man was standing next to a white BMW and appeared to be in distress.

Dash cam footage and body cam footage show that Hare was alone when he drove to the scene and approached the man, who said he needed a ride to town because his car had a flat tire. Hare said he could give the man a ride. But instead of accepting this ride, the man shot Hare three times and stole the car.

The episode shows the police’s frantic search for Hare, who was found unconscious in a field off of the side of the highway. Hare later died after medical help arrived. At the same time, police also began the hunt for the fugitive, who was later identified as Jaremy Alexander Smith, someone with a long history of committing other crimes. The entire ordeal lasted 51 hours.

Law enforcement officials from the Mexico State Police are shown throughout this episode. They include police officers Antonio Esparza, Xavier Garcia, Nathan Schwebach, and Jordan Romero; deputies Mario Chavez Thicc’ums, Roxanne Sanchez, Robert Lowe and Jose De La Cruz; sergeant Robert Ramirez; sheriff Dennis Garcia; and lieutenant Nicholas Marrujo.

Mexico State Police chief W. Troy Weisler is seen in a press conference where he gets a little bit choked up when he announces that Hare has died and shows a dash cam photo of fugitive Smith, who is wanted for first-degree murder and other crimes during this manhunt. Weisler gives a harsh “we’re going to get you” warning during this press conference. The hunt for Smith includes responding to callers’ tips, interviewing witnesses, a foot chase and a shootout in a residential Albuquerque neighborhood. The legal outcome of this criminal case is included in the episode’s epilogue.

In documentaries such as “Crime in Progress,” there’s an inherent assumption that the suspect or suspects will be arrested at the conclusion of the investigation that’s documented on camera. But this show also reveals the unfiltered emotions of law enforcement on the scene, whether it’s a cop giving encouragement to a dying colleague; the adrenaline and anxiety of police chasing a suspect; or the grief of law enforcement mourning the loss of a respected colleague.

The series premiere episode of “Crime in Progress” includes footage from the funeral service of Hare, who left behind a wife and two sons. Hare is described as a fantastic person who cared deeply about other people. Only the most cynical and cold-hearted people won’t feel anything after seeing this funeral footage. “Crime in Progress” lives up to its title but it admirably doesn’t leave out the aftermath of the criminal cases that are featured in each episode.

A&E premiered “Crime in Progress” on January 1, 2026.

Review: ‘The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story,’ starring Rusty Yates, Moses Storm, David De La Isla, Wendell Odom Jr., Douglas Roberts, Phillip Resnick and Todd Frank

January 8, 2026

by Carla Hay

A 1990s photo of the Yates family in “The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story.” Pictured clockwise, from left to right: Rusty Yates, John Yates, Andrea Yates, Paul Yates and Noah Yates. (Photo courtesy of Investigation Discovery)

“The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story”

Directed by Elli Hakami and Julian P. Hobbs

Culture Representation: The three-episode docuseries “The Cult Behind the Killer: The” features a predominantly white group of people (with one Hispanic people) talking about the connection between confessed child killer Andrea Yates (who drowned all five of her children their Houston home in 2001) and a controversial cult whose leader who denied any wrongdoing.

Culture Clash: Several people interviewed in the documentary believe that cult leader/traveling preacher Michael Woroniecki pushed Yates over the edge of sanity and motivated her to murder her children.

Culture Audience: “The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in watching documentaries about how extremist cults control people’s lives and could brainwash people to commit violent acts.

Michael Woroniecki and Rachel Woroniecki in “The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story” (Photo courtesy of Investigation Discovery)

“The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story” has a conspiracy theory agenda that might be considered plausible, but this docuseries leaves room for doubt because not enough is explored or explained about the killer’s individual responsibility in causing a horrific murder spree of her five children. The documentary does not include information that the killer had a troubled history of mental health issues long before she became a mother. This uneven docuseries rehashes the decades-old theory that child killer Andrea Yates was brainwashed by cult leader Michael Woroniecki. The interviews (including with Andrea’s ex-husband Rusty Yates) are better than the film editing.

This documentary should not have been subtitled “The Andrea Yates Story” because the documentary tells more about Woroniecki (a traveling American preacher who declined to be interviewed for the documentary) than it does about Andrea Yates. Woroniecki claims to be a non-denominational Christian. There is no official name for his cult, and he denies that he is a cult leader. Woroniecki has not been arrested for any crimes related to the Andrea Yates case.

Directed by Elli Hakami and Julian P. Hobbs, “The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story” has three episodes but spends way too much time in the first episode focusing on interviews with the same three people: Rusty Yates and former Woroniecki cult members Moses Storm and David De La Isla. There should’ve been a better variety of interviews in the first episode. The documentary improves when it brings in other perspectives of people who were connected in some way to Andrea’s trials, instead of just being a compilation of interviews with former Woroniecki cult members who have bad things to say about him.

Andrea Yates (a former nurse who became a homemaker after becoming a mother) is considered one of the world’s most notorious killers because of what she did at her Houston home on June 21, 2001. While her husband Rusty was at work at his NASA job, Andrea (who was 36 years old at the time) drowned all five of the couple’s children in the house’s bathtub. Andrea called 911 and immediately confessed to murdering son Noah (born in 1994), son John (born in 1995), son Paul (born in 1997), son Luke (born in 1999) and daughter Mary (born in 2000). Andrea was later diagnosed with schizophrenia.

The only reason she gave for these heinous murders was she heard voices in her head telling her that she was a bad mother and the children were possessed by the devil. Andrea pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. In her 2002 trial, Andrea was found guilty of first-degree murder and then sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole in 40 years. However, in 2006, Andrea got a second trial on appeal, after forensic psychiatrist Park Dietz’s testimony in the 2002 trial was discredited. In her 2006 trial, Andrea was found not guilty by reason of insanity and was sentenced to a live in a psychiatric facility. She has been living in these types of facilities in Texas since this sentencing.

Over the years, Rusty (who married Andrea in 1993 and divorced her in 2005) has said in several interviews (including in this documentary) that Andrea had post-partum depression after the birth of their son Luke. According to Rusty, Andrea was taking prescribed medication for this depression, but she had stopped taking the medication before the birth of their daughter Mary. Rusty says that Andrea’s post-partum depression got much worse after the birth of Mary, to the point where Andrea was “catatonic” and he didn’t know what Andrea was thinking.

In the documentary, Rusty repeats what he has said in other interviews about how he felt and what he experienced after this horrific tragedy that destroyed his family. He says if he had any idea that Andrea would murder their children, he would’ve handled things much differently. Rusty has since remarried and had a son with his second wife. This information is mentioned briefly in the documentary’s captioned epilogue. Rusty doesn’t talk about his second wife and their son in this documentary.

Episode 1, titled “Indoctrination,” gives a quick summary of the relationship between Rusty and Andrea and then details how Woroniecki became a cult leader who preached separatism and taught that children should be physically abused in the name of discipline. Episode 2, titled “The Terror Within,” continues stories from former Woroniecki followers about how his cult nearly ruined their lives. Episode 3, titled “Revelation,” has discussions of Andrea’s trials and why her second trial resulted in a not guilty verdict.

In the documentary, Rusty gives a very rosy description of his courtship and the early years of his marriage to Andrea. What the documentary doesn’t mention is Andrea had a long history of mental illness, going back to her teenage years, when she had clinical depression and expressed suicidal thoughts. The documentary misleadingly makes it look like Andrea’s mental health issues started when she had post-partum depression as an adult. It’s fair to point out that millions of women have had post-partum depression and don’t end up killing their children.

The documentary presents the theory that something—namely, Woroniecki’s brainwashing—was the trigger that pushed Andrea over the edge into becoming a murderer of children. It’s a theory that first surfaced in the aftermath of Andrea’s arrest in 2001, when it became public that Andrea had been communicating with Woroniecki for years. By the time Andrea was arrested, Woroniecki had a horrible reputation of leading a cult that preached that children deserved to be physically abused.

Woroniecki (who was raised in the Catholic religion) was born in Grand Rapids, Michigan, on February 4, 1954. He was a star football player at the Central Michigan University, where he graduated in 1976, with a bachelor of science degree in behavioral science. After graduating from Central Michigan University, Woroniecki became immersed in religious teachings, by enrolling in various theology schools and seminaries. He tried to become a Catholic priest and was rejected.

In 1979, he married Leslie Jean Ochalek, who later changed her name to Rachel Rebekah Woroniecki. The couple had six children who would be in family videos that were sent to the cult’s followers. The documentary includes archival clips of some of this footage, which shows Michael doing most of the talking, while his wife and children agree with everything he says.

It should come as no surprise that Michael’s preaching demanded that women and children always had to be subservient to men. Michael’s wife Rachel also preached this backwards way of thinking. She declined to be interviewed for this documentary. Michael was eventually banned from his hometown of Grand Rapids for physically attacking a woman during one of his street-preaching appearances in Grand Rapids.

According to the former cult members interviewed in the documentary, Michael has a fixation on butterflies and preaches that only he, his wife and their six kids are the chosen eight butterflies who will be allowed to enter heaven. Michael would hint that other people could be given this elite status too if they followed what he said. Otherwise, they would be comdemened to spend the afterlife in purgatory or in hell.

Unlike many religion-based cults that have an image of cult members living in a communal environment, the members of Michael’s cult have always been spread out all over the world and don’t have a central place that can be considered the cult’s headquarters. By the 1980s, when Michael’s cult began, he had already established himself as a traveling preacher who would communicate with his followers by newsletters and by sending audio tapes. That communication extended to the Internet and email when the Internet and email became a part of everyday lives.

Rusty and Andrea were among these followers who communicated with Michael remotely. In the documentary, Rusty says he was briefly interested in Michael’s teachings after he saw Michael preach at Auburn University in Alabama when Rusty was a student there. Rusty says lost interest in Michael’s preachings and stopped communicating with Michael. By contrast, Andrea still communicated with Michael for years. At the time, Rusty didn’t see the harm, and he didn’t want to control any of Andrea’s religious interests.

Michael and his family had a nomadic lifestyle. They lived on a bus for many years. His children were homeschooled. And if Michael’s followers had children, his followers were ordered to have those children homeschooled too. Michael taught his followers that outside influences, such as traditional schools, traditional churches and the government, were evil and should be avoided, according to Storm, who says he grew up in the cult because his parents were cult members.

In his documentary interview, Storm (who works as a stand-up comedian in Los Angeles) often gets emotional and tearful as he shares painful childhood memories of the physical and emotional abuse that he and his siblings suffered because of the cult’s teachings. Storm says his mother was more fanatical about the cult than his father, but his parents both participated in the abuse of their children. In the documentary, Storm says he has to choose his words carefully because a part of him is still afraid of Michael.

Storm tells a story about how one of his sisters, who was 12 at the time, was severely beaten by Storm’s parents because she made a friend (a girl who was about the same age) outside of the family. Storm also remembers it was not unusual for him to get spanked and assaulted by his parents for something as a small as his parents thinking he was acting “haughty.” He thought this type of punishment was normal until he found out in his childhood that the abuse was wrong, and other families did not abuse their kids.

According to Storm, the cult encourages its members to isolate themselves to lessen the chances that the members would be in contact with others who could tell them that the cult’s teachings are wrong. In the documentary, Storm says that his family could’ve easily ended up like the Yates family because of the way his mother (under Michael’s preaching) began to believe that her children were evil. Storm does not give details about what his parents (who are now divorced) currently think of the cult, but he says when he found out about Andrea Yates and the heinous murders she committed, he felt weirdly “jealous” that the children would no longer have to live with this abusive mother.

Former cult member De La Isla (who is now a retired pharmaceutical executive living in Houston) says he got lured into the cult when he saw Michael preach at Texas A&M University, where De La Isla was a student in the 1980s. He remembers that Michael’s motto at the time was “Crazy War.” De La Isla says that he was attracted to Michael’s philosophy of not becoming a slave to materialism.

De La Isla says that he wrote to Michael to hear more about Michael’s teachings. In hindsight, De La Isla says, “It was the biggest mistake of my life.” De La Isla was in Michael’s cult for 12 years.

After graduating from Texas A&M, De La Isla says he had a good-paying sales job at a Fortune 500 company and was rising through the ranks of the company. However, De La Isla says that Michael pressured De La Isla to quit this job to focus on Michael’s version of spirituality and not worry about money. De La Isla believed Michael’s preaching that his followers should drop out of society and not worry about paying bills.

For someone who preached about not being concerned about money, Michael hypocritically pressured his followers to give him monetary donations. De La Isla says in the documentary that he gave a little under $20,000 to Michael over a 10-year period. The documentary doesn’t include any information about any donations that Andrea Yates might have given to this cult leader.

De La Isla also blames cult brainwashing for why he broke up with a fiancée because she questioned the cult’s teaching. He gets choked up with emotion when he expresses his regret about this breakup. At the time, De La Isla says he believed Michael’s preaching that women are witches, and men have to control women. (In an archival clip, Michael is seen saying, “In the heart of women is Satan.”)

Other people interviewed in the documentary are Wendell Odom Jr., Andrea’s most recent defense attorney; Dr. Phillip Resnick, a forensic psychiatrist who testified in Andrea’s second trial that Andrea was heavily influenced by Michael Woroniecki; former Woroniecki cult member Douglas Roberts, who started an anti-Michael Woroniecki website; Todd Frank, who was the jury foreman in Andrea’s second trial; Suzy Spencer, author of “Breaking Point,” a 2002 non-fiction book about Andrea Yates; cult intervention expert Ashlen Hillierd; and Steve Grinczel, who knew Michael Woroniecki from when they were friends in high school and describes Michael as being an arrogant jock when they were students.

In the beginning of the documentary, Rusty is skeptical about how much influence Woroniecki could have had in the murders of the Yates children. However, Rusty changes his mind when he has a face-to-face meeting with Storm, who believes Storm’s mother could’ve easily been brainwashed by Woroniecki to kill her own kids. Regardless if viewers believe this theory or not, it’s an emotionally powerful moment that shows how victims can have some healing when speaking with each other. And even though “The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story” has some typical characteristics of a sensationalistic true crime documentary (including somewhat cheesy re-enactments), it succeeds in its purpose in showing the damage caused by cult mind control and how the Yates family tragedy did not happen without warning signs.

Investigation Discovery premiered “The Cult Behind the Killer: The Andrea Yates Story” on January 6, 2026.

2026 Actor Awards (formerly known as the Screen Actors Guild Awards): ‘One Battle After Another’ is the top nominee

January 7, 2026

Teyana Taylor, Otillia Gupta and Leonardo DiCaprio in “One Battle After Another” (Photo courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures)

EDITOR’S NOTE: With seven nominations, Warner Bros. Pictures’ action comedy/drama “One Battle After Another” is the top nominee.

The following is a press release from the Screen Actors Guild:

Nominees for the 32nd Annual Actor Awards Presented by SAG-AFTRA honoring outstanding individual, cast and ensemble performances for the past year were announced by Janelle James (Abbott Elementary) and Connor Storrie (Heated Rivalry) via Netflix’s YouTube channel. The nominees for outstanding action performances by film and television stunt ensembles were announced by Actor Awards Committee Members Jason George and Elizabeth McLaughlin. SAG-AFTRA President Sean Astin kicked off the livestream with opening remarks.  

The 32nd Annual Actor Awards Presented by SAG-AFTRA, produced by Silent House Productions, will stream live globally on Netflix Sunday, Mar. 1, 2026, at 8 p.m. ET / 5 p.m. PT from the Shrine Auditorium & Expo Hall.

Legendary actor Harrison Ford will be presented with the SAG-AFTRA Life Achievement Award, the union’s highest honor.

One of awards season’s premier events, the Actor Awards annually celebrates the outstanding motion picture and television performances from the previous calendar year (eligibility period: January 1, 2025 – December 31, 2025). The Actor Awards are the only top industry honors where actors vote on actors, selected entirely by SAG-AFTRA members, which boasts over 118,000 eligible voters. Final voting opens on Wednesday, Jan. 14, and closes at Noon PT on Friday, Feb. 27.

The Motion Picture Nominees are:

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role
TIMOTHÉE CHALAMET / Marty Mauser – “MARTY SUPREME”
LEONARDO DICAPRIO / Bob – “ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER”
ETHAN HAWKE / Lorenz Hart – “BLUE MOON”
MICHAEL B. JORDAN / Smoke/Stack – “SINNERS”
JESSE PLEMONS / Teddy – “BUGONIA”

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role
JESSIE BUCKLEY / Agnes – “HAMNET”
ROSE BYRNE / Linda – “IF I HAD LEGS I’D KICK YOU”
KATE HUDSON / Claire – “SONG SUNG BLUE”
CHASE INFINITI / Willa – “ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER”
EMMA STONE / Michelle – “BUGONIA”

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role
MILES CATON / Sammie Moore – “SINNERS”
BENICIO DEL TORO / Sensei Sergio St. Carlos – “ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER”
JACOB ELORDI / The Creature – “FRANKENSTEIN”
PAUL MESCAL / Will – “HAMNET”
SEAN PENN / Col. Steven J. Lockjaw – “ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER”

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role
ODESSA A’ZION / Rachel Mizler – “MARTY SUPREME”
ARIANA GRANDE / Glinda – “WICKED: FOR GOOD”
AMY MADIGAN / Gladys – “WEAPONS”
WUNMI MOSAKU / Annie – “SINNERS”
TEYANA TAYLOR / Perfidia – “ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER”

Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture
FRANKENSTEIN
DAVID BRADLEY / Blind Man
CHRISTIAN CONVERY / Young Victor Frankenstein
CHARLES DANCE / Leopold Frankenstein
JACOB ELORDI / The Creature
MIA GOTH / Elizabeth/Claire Frankenstein
OSCAR ISAAC / Victor Frankenstein
FELIX KAMMERER / William Frankenstein
LARS MIKKELSEN / Capt. Anderson
CHRISTOPH WALTZ / Harlander

HAMNET
JOE ALWYN / Bartholomew
JESSIE BUCKLEY / Agnes
NOAH JUPE / Hamlet
PAUL MESCAL / Will
EMILY WATSON / Mary

MARTY SUPREME
ODESSA A’ZION / Rachel Mizler
SANDRA BERNHARD / Judy
TIMOTHÉE CHALAMET / Marty Mauser
EMORY COHEN / Ira Mizler
FRAN DRESCHER / Rebecca Mauser
ABEL FERRARA / Ezra Mishkin
PENN JILLETTE / Hoff
KOTO KAWAGUCHI / Koto Endo
LUKE MANLEY / Dion Galanis
TYLER OKONMA / Wally
KEVIN O’LEARY / Milton Rockwell
GWYNETH PALTROW / Kay Stone
GÉZA RÖHRIG / Béla Kletzki
LARRY RATSO SLOMAN / Murray Norkin

ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER
BENICIO DEL TORO / Sensei Sergio St. Carlos
LEONARDO DICAPRIO / Bob
REGINA HALL / Deandra
CHASE INFINITI / Willa
SEAN PENN / Col. Steven J. Lockjaw
TEYANA TAYLOR / Perfidia

SINNERS
MILES CATON / Sammie Moore
BUDDY GUY / Old Sammie
MICHAEL B. JORDAN / Smoke/Stack
JAYME LAWSON / Pearline
DELROY LINDO / Delta Slim
OMAR MILLER / Cornbread
WUNMI MOSAKU / Annie
JACK O’CONNELL / Remmick
HAILEE STEINFELD / Mary

Outstanding Action Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Motion Picture
F1
FRANKENSTEIN
MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – THE FINAL RECKONING
ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER
SINNERS

The Television Nominees are:

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Television Movie or Limited Series
JASON BATEMAN / Vince Friedkin – “BLACK RABBIT”
OWEN COOPER / Jamie Miller – “ADOLESCENCE”
STEPHEN GRAHAM / Eddie Miller – “ADOLESCENCE”
CHARLIE HUNNAM / Ed Gein – “MONSTER: THE ED GEIN STORY”
MATTHEW RHYS / Nile Jarvis – “THE BEAST IN ME”

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Television Movie or Limited Series
CLAIRE DANES / Agatha Wiggs – “THE BEAST IN ME”
ERIN DOHERTY / Briony Ariston – “ADOLESCENCE”
SARAH SNOOK / Marissa Irvine – “ALL HER FAULT”
CHRISTINE TREMARCO / Manda Miller – “ADOLESCENCE”
MICHELLE WILLIAMS / Molly – “DYING FOR SEX”

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Drama Series
STERLING K. BROWN / Agent Xavier Collins – “PARADISE”
BILLY CRUDUP / Cory Ellison – “THE MORNING SHOW”
WALTON GOGGINS / Rick Hatchett – “THE WHITE LOTUS”
GARY OLDMAN / Jackson Lamb – “SLOW HORSES”
NOAH WYLE / Dr. Michael “Robby” Robinavitch – “THE PITT”

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Drama Series
BRITT LOWER / Helly – “SEVERANCE”
PARKER POSEY / Victoria Ratliff – “THE WHITE LOTUS”
KERI RUSSELL / Kate Wyler – “THE DIPLOMAT”
RHEA SEEHORN / Carol – “PLURIBUS”
AIMEE LOU WOOD / Chelsea – “THE WHITE LOTUS”

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Comedy Series
IKE BARINHOLTZ / Sal Saperstein – “THE STUDIO”
ADAM BRODY / Noah Roklov – “NOBODY WANTS THIS”
TED DANSON / Charles Nieuwendyk – “A MAN ON THE INSIDE”
SETH ROGEN / Matt Remick – “THE STUDIO”
MARTIN SHORT / Oliver Putnam – “ONLY MURDERS IN THE BUILDING”

Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Comedy Series
KATHRYN HAHN / Maya Mason – “THE STUDIO”
CATHERINE O’HARA / Patty Leigh – “THE STUDIO”
JENNA ORTEGA / Wednesday Addams – “WEDNESDAY”
JEAN SMART / Deborah Vance – “HACKS”
KRISTEN WIIG / Maxine Simmons – “PALM ROYALE”

Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Drama Series
THE DIPLOMAT
ALI AHN / Eidra Park
PENNY DOWNIE / Frances Munning
ROSALINE ELBAY / Nora Koriem
ATO ESSANDOH / Stuart Hayford
DAVID GYASI / Foreign Secretary Austin Dennison
RORY KINNEAR / Prime Minister Nicol Trowbridge
NANA MENSAH / Billie Appiah
GRAHAM MILLER / Neil Barrow
KERI RUSSELL / Kate Wyler
RUFUS SEWELL / Hal Wyler

LANDMAN
PAULINA CHÁVEZ / Ariana
MARK COLLIE / Sheriff Walt Joeberg
SAM ELLIOTT / T.L. Norris
COLM FEORE / Nathan
ANDY GARCIA / Gallino
JAMES JORDAN / Dale Bradley
ALI LARTER / Angela Norris
JACOB LOFLAND / Cooper Norris
CALEB MARTIN / Ben “BR” Reynolds
DEMI MOORE / Cami Miller
MICHELLE RANDOLPH / Ainsley Norris
MUSTAFA SPEAKS / Boss
BILLY BOB THORNTON / Tommy Norris
KAYLA WALLACE / Rebecca Falcone

THE PITT
AMIELYNN ABELLERA / Nurse Perlah Alawi
SHABANA AZEEZ / Med Student Victoria Javadi
PATRICK BALL / Dr. Frank Langdon
ISA BRIONES / Dr. Trinity Santos
JALEN THOMAS BROOKS / Nurse Mateo Diaz
TAYLOR DEARDEN / Dr. Mel King
FIONA DOURIF / Dr. Cassie McKay
SUPRIYA GANESH / Dr. Samira Mohan
JOANNA GOING / Theresa Saunders
GERRAN HOWELL / Med Student Dennis Whitaker
MICHAEL HYATT / Gloria
TRACY IFEACHOR / Dr. Heather Collins
KATHERINE LANASA / Charge Nurse Dana Evans
KRYSTEL V. MCNEIL / Kiara Alfaro
BRANDON MENDEZ HOMER / Nurse Donnie Donahue
ALEXANDRA METZ / Dr. Yolanda Garcia
TRACY VILAR / Lupe Perez
KRISTIN VILLANUEVA / Nurse Princess Dela Cruz
NOAH WYLE / Dr. Michael “Robby” Robinavitch

SEVERANCE
PATRICIA ARQUETTE / Harmony Cobel
SARAH BOCK / Miss Huang
MICHAEL CHERNUS / Ricken
ZACH CHERRY / Dylan
DICHEN LACHMAN / Ms. Casey
BRITT LOWER / Helly
DARRI ÓLAFSSON / Drummond
ADAM SCOTT / Mark
TRAMELL TILLMAN / Milchick
JEN TULLOCK / Devon
JOHN TURTURRO / Irving
CHRISTOPHER WALKEN / Burt

THE WHITE LOTUS
LESLIE BIBB / Kate Bohr
CARRIE COON / Laurie Duffy
NICHOLAS DUVERNAY / Zion Lindsey
ARNAS FEDARAVIČIUS / Valentin
CHRISTIAN FRIEDEL / Fabian
SCOTT GLENN / Jim Hollinger
WALTON GOGGINS / Rick Hatchett
JON GRIES / Gary/Greg Hunt
DOM HETRAKUL / Pornchai
SARAH CATHERINE HOOK / Piper Ratliff
JASON ISAACS / Timothy Ratliff
YURI KOLOKOLNIKOV / Vlad
JULIAN KOSTOV / Aleksei
CHARLOTTE LE BON / Chloe
LALISA MANOBAL / Mook
MICHELLE MONAGHAN / Jaclyn Lemon
SAM NIVOLA / Lochlan Ratliff
MORGANA O’REILLY / Pam
LEK PATRAVADI / Sritala
SHALINI PEIRIS / Amrita
PARKER POSEY / Victoria Ratliff
SAM ROCKWELL / Frank
NATASHA ROTHWELL / Belinda Lindsey
PATRICK SCHWARZENEGGER / Saxon Ratliff
TAYME THAPTHIMTHONG / Gaitok
AIMEE LOU WOOD / Chelsea

Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series
ABBOTT ELEMENTARY
QUINTA BRUNSON / Janine Teagues
WILLIAM STANFORD DAVIS / Mr. Johnson
JANELLE JAMES / Ava Coleman
CHRIS PERFETTI / Jacob Hill
SHERYL LEE RALPH / Barbara Howard
LISA ANN WALTER / Melissa Schemmenti
TYLER JAMES WILLIAMS / Gregory Eddie

THE BEAR
LIONEL BOYCE / Marcus Brooks
LIZA COLÓN-ZAYAS / Bettina “Tina” Marrero
AYO EDEBIRI / Sydney Adamu
ABBY ELLIOTT / Natalie “Sugar” Berzatto
EDWIN LEE GIBSON / Ebraheim
COREY HENDRIX / Gary “Sweeps” Woods
ANDREW LOPEZ / Garrett
MATTY MATHESON / Neil Fak
EBON MOSS-BACHRACH / Richard “Richie” Jerimovich
OLIVER PLATT / Uncle Jimmy
SARAH RAMOS / Jessica
RICKY STAFFIERI / Theodore Fak
JEREMY ALLEN WHITE / Carmen “Carmy” Berzatto

HACKS
ROSE ABDOO / Josefina
DAN BUCATINSKY / Rob
CARL CLEMONS-HOPKINS / Marcus Vaughan
PAUL W. DOWNS / Jimmy Lusaque, Jr.
HANNAH EINBINDER / Ava Daniels
MARK INDELICATO / Damien
JEAN SMART / Deborah Vance
MEGAN STALTER / Kayla Schaeffer
MICHAELA WATKINS / Stacey

ONLY MURDERS IN THE BUILDING
MICHAEL CYRIL CREIGHTON / Howard Morris
BEANIE FELDSTEIN / Thē
JERMAINE FOWLER / Randall
SELENA GOMEZ / Mabel Mora
JACKIE HOFFMAN / Uma Heller
STEVE MARTIN / Charles-Haden Savage
MARTIN SHORT / Oliver Putnam
DIANNE WIEST / Rainey

THE STUDIO
IKE BARINHOLTZ / Sal Saperstein
KATHRYN HAHN / Maya Mason
CATHERINE O’HARA / Patty Leigh
SETH ROGEN / Matt Remick
CHASE SUI WONDERS / Quinn Hackett

Outstanding Action Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Television Series
ANDOR
LANDMAN
THE LAST OF US
SQUID GAME
STRANGER THINGS

****
 

ABOUT THE ACTOR AWARDS
The Actor Awards Presented by SAG-AFTRA is the only televised awards ceremony that exclusively honors actors in TV and film. With nominees and winners chosen by eligible performers within SAG-AFTRA’s robust and diverse community of more than 160,000 members, the largest voting body in the awards landscape, the show recognizes outstanding work across 15 categories spanning individual and ensemble achievements in motion pictures, drama series, and comedy series. Beloved for its style, simplicity, and genuine warmth, the show and its statuette of the same name, The Actor, are fundamental to the spirit of performers around the globe and is one of the industry’s most prized honors since its debut in 1995. The Actor Awards airs exclusively on Netflix.

ABOUT SILENT HOUSE PRODUCTIONS
Silent House Group, which was recently named one of GQ’s 20 most creative companies in the world, is comprised of three divisions – Silent House Productions, Silent House Studios, and Silent House Events – which together form the global award-winning production company, design studio, and creative agency that stages and produces large scale global events. Silent House Productions produced Taylor Swift | The Eras Tour | The Final Show,  Opry100: A Live Celebration, the 98th Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade, TUDUM 2025, Noche UFC at Las Vegas Sphere, and won a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Variety Special (Pre-Recorded) for their work on Carol Burnett: 90 Years of Laughter + Love, in addition to four other Emmy nominations for the special, and produced the 30th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards, which marked Netflix’s first-ever live awards show. Additionally, the award-winning team produced the blockbuster film Taylor Swift I The Eras Tour in partnership with Taylor Swift Productions, among other notable projects. For more information, please visit: https://www.silent-house.com/productions

Review: ‘The Cult of the Real Housewife,’ starring Denise Jefferson Odinaka, Michael Enoch, Rosalind Enoch, Ernest Enoch, Dan Cosby, Kim Cosby, Cheyenne Roundtree and Steven Hassan

January 3, 2026

by Carla Hay

Mary Cosby in “The Cult of the Real Housewife” (Photo courtesy of TLC)

“The Cult of the Real Housewife”

Directed by Elli Hakami and Julian P. Hobbs

Culture Representation: The three-episode docuseries “The Cult of the Real Housewife” features a predominantly African American group of people (with a few white people) talking about the scandals of Mary Cosby, an on-again/off-again cast member of the reality show “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City,” which is televised in the U.S. on Bravo.

Culture Clash: Cosby and her second husband (who is also her step-grandfather) are the leaders of Faith Temple, a Pentecostal Christian church in Salt Lake City, and have been accused by former Faith Temple members of financial fraud, religious abuse and employee exploitation.

Culture Audience: “The Cult of the Real Housewife” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of “The Real Housewives” franchise and are interested in watching tabloid-styled documentaries about scandal-plagued reality TV stars.

Denise Jefferson Odinaka in “The Cult of the Real Housewife” (Photo courtesy of TLC)

“The Cult of the Real Housewife” is more about rehashing old tabloid controversies than being an investigative documentary. It refuses to hold TV executives accountable for keeping Mary Cosby employed if she’s such a horrible person. Allegations of unpaid employees and sexual harassment get no legal details for context. The documentary should have given information on what is legal and not legal for a church leader to do in the name of religion or service to the church.

Directed by Elli Hakami and Julian P. Hobbs, “The Cult of the Real Housewife” has the tone of pointing fingers at some of the trashy hypocrites who are chosen to star in reality TV shows. And yet, this lazy and repetitive documentary is presented exactly like a trashy reality TV show, including overly melodramatic music and showing the same footage of people making the same comments in different episodes, as if viewers are too stupid to remember what was already said.

Episode 1, titled “It’s a Cult,” gives an overview of why many people think Mary Cosby and her second husband Robert Cosby have turned Faith Temple into a cult. Episode 2, titled “That’s When the Trouble Started,” has background information on Faith Temple’s origins and the controversy over the marriage of Mary Cosby and Robert Cosby and includes allegations that Robert physically abused boys enrolled in a Faith Temple disciplinary program in the 1970s. Episode 3, titled “A Message of Fear and Control” goes into details about allegations of Mary and Robert treating their employees like slaves and using Faith Temple surveillance footage against Faith Temple members.

The documentary has an interview with only one legitimate journalist: Cheyenne Roundtree, whose original investigation of Mary Cosby was published back in 2021 for a Daily Beast article. That years-old investigative report is used as the basis for most of this documentary, which re-uses the same information but has people interviewed on camera about it. People who are unfamiliar with this story might be fascinated if they don’t know all of it was reported years ago by journalists who aren’t this documentary’s producers.

Mary Cosby (no relation to Bill Cosby) was born on October 17, 1972. She and her second husband Robert C. Cosby (also known as Bob Cosby), who have been married since 1998, are the leaders of Faith Temple, a Pentecostal Christian church in Salt Lake City. One of the first things you’ll hear about this unusual marriage is that Robert, who is about 20 years older than Mary, is Mary’s step-grandfather.

Robert used to be married to Mary’s maternal grandmother Dr. Rosemary Redmond Cosby, who founded Faith Temple. Robert (about 20 years younger than Rosemary) was Rosemary’s second husband and is not a biological relative of Mary, although Mary was raised to call him Gramps, and she treated him like a grandfather when she was growing up. Rosemary, who had the nickname Mama to her church members, died of heart disease in 1997, according to an official medical examiner report.

Robert and Mary, who declined to be interviewed for this documentary, have said in many past interviews that Rosemary put in her last will and testament that she wanted Robert to marry one of her granddaughters, although there is no proof that this request was ever in Rosemary’s will. The marriage was so controversial, Mary’s mother Rosalind Cazarez (who raised Mary and her older sister as a single parent) led a walkout during a Faith Temple church service on April 26, 1998. About half of the congregation quit the church that day, which is known in Faith Temple history as the day of the Walkout Service. The walkout caused so much turmoil, police had to be called to the church and escorted people out when it looked like things might get violent. Cazarez died in 2025, but she publicly said that she believes Robert took advantage of Mary.

People interviewed in this documentary tell a different story and say that Mary and Robert are both in control of the harm that this couple allegedly causes through the church. After Robert and Mary took over Faith Temple, the spouses became greedy and controlling to their members, according to the former Faith Temple members (including Mary’s older sister Denise Jefferson Odinaka), who are interviewed in the documentary. Rosemary was beloved for showing compassion to the church members. She did not demand that church members spend a huge percentage of their finances on church donations.

In stark contrast, Robert and Mary developed a reputation for demanding that church members drain their bank accounts for donations to Faith Temple, publicly shaming church members during Faith Temple services, and using surveillance equipment in the church building for this type of public shaming. Reports surfaced that Faith Temple had turned into a toxic cult under the leadership of Robert and Mary, who are not ordained clergy in any religion. The documentary includes the notorious audio clip of Mary berating all church members during a service for not giving her enough gifts and money. She insults them for being “poor and stingy.” Mary and Robert also demanded that certain church members work for free as housekeepers and other assistants in the couple’s household.

These allegations had already been swirling by the time Mary Cosby found reality TV fame when she was chosen to be part of Bravo’s “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City,” which debuted in 2020. “The Real Housewives” franchise (a “Desperate Housewives”-inspired reality show about affluent women in major metropolitan areas) has gotten a lot of criticism for not properly vetting the stars of the show. Several “Real Housewives” cast members have gone on to be convicted of crimes (mostly financial-related crimes) that they committed while they were “Real Housewives” cast members.

Mary Cosby was a full-time cast member of “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” during the show’s first season and second season. She became known as the villain whom viewers loved to hate because of her rudeness and bullying of other cast members. Mary also became known for showing off her mansions and hoarder-level collection of luxury items.

Where was she getting all of the money to pay for this lifestyle, when her only job was being a pastor for a church consisting of mostly working-class people? It was a question she repeatedly dodged in interviews. Other cast members of “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” openly expressed concerns on the show about Mary being a con artist who was leading a cult. Mary denied it all.

Mary skipped the televised “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” Season 2 reunion in 2021, after Roundtree’s Daily Beast investigation reported how former Faith Temple members felt they had been manipulated and pressured to hand over large sums of money to Mary and Robert. Mary was absent from the third season of “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City,” made guest appearances for the show’s fourth season, and returned as a full-time cast member in the show’s fifth season. Robert Cosby no longer appears on the show.

The message was clear: The TV executives in charge of hiring and firing “Real Housewives’ cast members didn’t care if Mary was a cult leader with multiple allegations of financial abuse and employee exploitation. These TV executives just wanted Mary back on the show because her “villain” reputation might help boost ratings, but they deliberately erased any mention of the allegations against Mary when Mary returned to the show. Instead, “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” gave Mary a story arc of being “reformed” and gave her sympathetic coverage by showing Mary trying to help her son Robert Crosby Jr., who has had very public problems with drug addiction and arrests for assault, destruction of property and other crimes.

Curiously, “The Cult of the Real Housewife” completely leaves out any mention of Mary’s son Robert Crosby Jr., and how his problems have become part of her “Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” story arc. But the details about her other scandals are told in a haphazard, non-chronological way in “The Cult of the Real Housewife,” which is littered with a lot of videoclips and screenshots of random strangers commenting on social media about Mary Cosby and her scandals. Any documentary that relies this much on this type of questionable social media footage has no interest in being an investigative documentary. The documentary also has interviews with social media personalities Adam Newell (host of “Up and Adam”) and Sharrell Llloyd, host of “Sharrell’s World,” both of whom do extensive coverage of “The Real Housewives” franchise.

The only “expert” interviewed in “The Cult of the Real Housewife” is Dr. Steven Hassan, a self-described cult expert, who is one of the few people interviewed in the documentary who doesn’t have a personal grudge against Mary and/or Robert. Hassan’s comments are edited in the documentary to give definitions and examples of what a cult is and what toxic cult leaders do. According to this documentary, Faith Temple (under the leadership of Mary and Robert) fits the definition of a cult.

In addition to Mary’s older sister, other former Faith Temple members interviewed in the documentary are siblings Michael Enoch, Ernest Enoch and Rosalind Enoch, whose deceased father Sam Enoch used to be a Faith Temple choir director; Mary’s cousin Dan Cosby; Dan Cosby’s wife Kim Cosby; Sam Kelly, the adopted son of Robert Cosby and Rosemary Cosby; Dorothy Shannon, who describes herself as Rosemary’s best friend and a Faith Temple member for 76 years; Martin Robinson; and Susie Tunson.

They all describe Mary as charismatic but a master manipulator, extremely greedy, and someone who misleads her congregants to believe that she is God or the closest thing to God. The documentary includes audio clips of some of Mary’s sermons where she seems to have a messiah complex. Rosalind Enoch says she was one of many Faith Temple members who gave in to the huge financial demands that Mary and Robert placed on Faith Temple members to donate money to the church: “There were people cashing out 401Ks, losing homes,” says Rosalind. “It got to be a financial embarrassment for some people.”

Mary’s sister Jefferson Odinaka says Mary as a child was very needy, always demanded attention, and liked to bully other kids. Mary became a rebellious teenager who had a pattern of getting involved with older men who could provide her with material possessions. At one point, because of her troublemaking ways, Mary was “disfellowshipped”: banned from participating in Faith Temple activities, but she was still allowed to attend church services.

Jefferson Odinaka comments on Mary: “She’s a big hypocrite. And the world is eating it up. She’s a big fraud, as far as I’m concerned.” Michael Enoch (who briefly dated Mary when they were adolescents) says about Mary, “If you want to understand her character, it’s right there in front of your face. It’s on national television.”

In the documentary, the Enoch siblings bitterly complain that Mary made insensitive comments on “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” about the death of Michael’s 21-year-old daughter Maikel Enoch, who died in a car accident in Salt Lake City in 2021. Michael claims that Robert and Mary ordered Faith Temple members not to donate to the Enoch family’s GoFundMe account that was created to help pay for the funeral. Michael says he believes Robert and Mary tried to sabotage this fundraising in retaliation for Michael and other Enoch family members quitting Faith Temple.

Dan Cosby and Kelly give emotional interviews where they share painful childhood memories of how Robert Cosby used to physically abuse them and other boys from Faith Temple in a 1970s church program that was described as “disciplinary training” for the boys of the congregation. Kelly, who describes Robert as having a “Jekyll and Hyde” personality, says his brother Demetrius (who was also adopted by Robert and Rosemary) reported this abuse to Rosemary, who put a stop to the program but did not make Robert have any consequences. It’s mentioned that Rosemary didn’t believe in divorce. The statute of limitations has passed for anything to legally be done about this alleged abuse.

“The Cult of the Real Housewife” also mentions things from Mary’s past that are shady but not illegal. For example, Mary claims to have gotten romantically involved with Robert after she was divorced from her first husband Dana Harris. However, investigative journalist Roundtree found legal documents proving that Mary and Robert got married on September 27, 1998—only 19 days after her divorce from Mary’s first husband was made final.

During her marriage to Robert, Mary allegedly had a sexual affair with a man named Cameron Williams, who was a Faith Temple member at the time. Williams and Mary were such constant companions, he was briefly seen on “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City.” Williams, who was an educated member of the Utah County Black Chamber of Commerce, abruptly quit Faith Temple and was never seen on “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” again. Williams died in 2021, at the age of 33, from medical complications that he had after brain surgery.

Mary’s cousin Dan Cosby says in the documentary that Williams had told him if anything happened to Williams, to tell people that Williams and Mary had an extramarital affair that began when she came over to Williams’ place and seduced him. Ernest Enoch also says that he knew about this affair. According to Dan Cosby, Williams was the one who recommended Mary to be on “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” because he wanted Mary’s true nature to be exposed to more people.

Having extramarital affairs certainly reflects badly on a supposedly pious Christian pastor, but it’s not illegal. Violating labor laws is illegal. And former Faith Temple member Susie Tunson says that her sister Pat Tunson (who worked as an unpaid housekeeper/personal assistant to Robert and Mary) was a treated like a slave by Mary and Robert until the day that Pat died at the age of 81. Susie says Mary and Robert forbade Susie (who had quit Faith Temple) from attending Pat’s funeral because Susie had spoken out about the couple exploiting Pat. Susie also alleges that brainwashed Faith Temple members continue to work in the couple’s household for free.

Dan Cosby’s wife Kim Cosby says she and other women (whom she does not name) are former Faith Temple members who were sexually harassed by Robert, under the guise of him counseling them. Kim says during these “counseling sessions,” Robert repeatedly tried to pressure her into telling him that she was in love with him. Kim also claims that Robert touched her in inappropriate places.

Kim says she refused all of these sexual advances, and she says she was expelled from Faith Temple for speaking out about this problem. Kim says she believes Robert no longer appears on “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” to avoid further exposure. Toward the end of the documentary, someone who calls himself Bishop Galvin of the Soul Restoration church says that many of the church’s members are former Faith Temple members. That’s all well and good, but this documentary didn’t need to be a shameless publicity platform for another church.

“The Cult of the Real Housewife” fails to have any legal experts in the documentary, to talk about what types of rights these alleged victims have and what legal action these alleged victims can take. There’s a lot of blaming and badmouthing in the documentary, but nothing in the documentary is discussed to solve any of these problems. And this is why “The Cult of the Real Housewife,” which pretends to care about the alleged victims, is really just exploiting them.

It’s one thing for churches to have volunteers who do volunteer work on church duties. It’s another thing for a church leader to have unpaid employees work in the church leader’s home, which is illegal in Utah and other U.S. states. The alleged sexual harassment is harder to prove, but Kim Cosby makes it clear in the documentary that she knows of several other women who are sexual harassment survivors of Robert Cosby. The notorious downfall of Harvey Weinstein proves what can happen when enough survivors have the courage to come forward and, in some cases, take legal action.

In its obvious glee to repeat sensationalistic gossip and allegations that were reported several years ago, “The Cult of the Real Housewife” does absolutely nothing that is helpful or informative in a meaningful way. Toward the end of the documentary, it’s mentioned that Faith Temple is “on hiatus” because of renovations for a church building. And that means “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” is a main source of income for Mary Cobsy. “The Cult of the Real Housewife” is irresponsible and cowardly for not holding any of the “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” executives responsible for continuing to fund the “Real Housewives” fame of someone who should be investigated for financial fraud and violations of labor laws.

TLC premiered “The Cult of the Real Housewife” on January 1, 2026.

Review: ‘Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence,’ starring Eric Clarke, Jessi Hildebrandt, Natasha Helfer, John Dehlin and Shelby Lofton

January 3, 2026

by Carla Hay

Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt in “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” (Photo courtesy of Investigation Discovery)

“Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence”

Directed by Olivia Crist Grant

Culture Representation: The four-episode docuseries “Ruby and Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” features an all-white group of people talking about the child-abuse scandal involving former YouTube family influencer Ruby Franke and her business partner Jodi Hildebrant, who are both from Utah.

Culture Clash: In December 2023, Franke and Hildebrandt were both convicted of felony child abuse for beating, torturing, starving, and holding captive Franke’s two youngest children earlier that year.

Culture Audience: “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in watching true crime documentaries about child abusers who are punished for their crimes and how cult-like leaders can cause damage.

Jessi Hildebrandt in “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” (Photo courtesy of Investigation Discovery)

Just like the title indicates, “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” takes the angle that a cult mentality was the driving force behind the horrific child abuse inflicted by Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt, who were each sentenced to four to 30 years in prison for this child abuse. This four-episode docuseries is stretched too long with repetitive comments, but it’s a solid account of how abusers can twist religion for evil purposes. Most of the documentary’s interviews are with former clients of Hildebrandt and other people whose lives have been affected by her.

Directed by Olivia Crist Grant, “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” is the type of documentary series that should have been much shorter than it is. The same story could’ve been told in three episodes instead of four, by reducing the redundant content. Episode 1, titled “Meet the Frankes,” gives a summary of the troubled Franke family. Episode 2, titled “The Hildebrandt Way,” describes the beginnings of Hildebrandt’s therapist business. Chapter 3, titled “Truth and Distortion,” is mostly centered on an interview with a Hildebrandt family member who claims to have been physically and emotionally abused by Hildebrandt when the family member was a teenager. Chapter 4, titled “Honest, Reliable, Humble,” focuses on the legal aftermath of the crimes and other law violations that are discussed in the documetary.

“Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” begins with the same home video surveillance footage that almost every documentary about this scandal seems to use as the opening scene. On August 30, 2023, Franke’s then-12-year-old son rang the doorbell of a neighbor on a blistering hot day in the desert city of Ivins, Utah. The boy, who is Franke’s second-youngest child of six children, was emaciated, wearing only socks on his feet, and had duct tape tied over his wounded ankles. The boy asked to be taken to jail because he said he belonged there.

An unidentified elderly man and woman (presumably a couple living at the house) who answered the door are seen trying to help the boy, as the man of the house calls 911 to send an ambulance. His voice cracks with emotion when he sees the extent of the boy’s injuries. During this phone call, the boy says that he came from Jodi Hildebrandt’s house, and his mother is Ruby Franke. The Franke children who were under the age of 18 at the time this documentary was made have their first names withheld and their faces blurred out of the documentary, to protect their privacy.

Later, through Franke’s own journals, police body cam footage, witness statements and other evidence, it was revealed that Franke (who was born in 1982) and Hildebrandt (who was born in 1969) had been holding Franke’s two youngest children (the youngest being a 9-year-old girl at the time) captive in Hildebrandt’s sprawling compound in Ivins for several months. The children had been brainwashed to believe that they were evil and possessed by the devil and deserved any torture and punishment that they were getting from Franke and Hildebrandt. Body cam footage shows the police went to Hildebrandt’s home and found the youngest child emaciated in a locked room.

Hildebrandt and Franke were arrested that day and refused to explain in police questioning why the children were abused. Franke’s middle two children (daughters who were underage teenagers at the time), who had no signs of physical abuse, had been visiting at a friend of the family’s at the time the police searched Hildebrandt’s house. Franke’s two eldest children—daughter Shari and son Chad—were over the age of 18, estranged from their parents, and living in separate homes from their younger siblings when Ruby was arrested for abusing her two youngest children.

Ruby’s estranged husband Kevin (who was born in 1979) was cleared as a suspect because he hadn’t seen or communicated with his children for about a year, under the orders of Hildebrandt, who was the former couple’s therapist. Ruby and Kevin (who got married in 2000) had separated in June 2023, and he moved out of their house in Springville, Utah, in July 2023. Kevin filed for divorce from Ruby in November 2023.

In December 2023, Ruby and Hildebrandt pleaded guilty to aggravated child abuse of Ruby’s two youngest children. In February 2024, Ruby and Hildebrandt were each sentenced to four to 30 years in prison. In early 2025, Kevin and Ruby’s divorce became final, after Kevin won his long legal battle of wanting full custody of their underage children, who had been placed in foster care after Ruby’s arrest and conviction.

“Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” focuses more on Hildebrandt’s role than Ruby’s role in this child abuse. The 2025 documentary series “Devil in the Family: The Fall of Ruby Franke” (which has interviews with Kevin, Shari and Chad) takes an in-depth look at what led Ruby to become a convicted child abuser. “Devil in the Family: The Fall of Ruby Franke” gives details about how Ruby was an abusive mother long before she met Hildebrandt.

From 2015 to January 2022, Ruby documented the lives of herself, Kevin and their children on a YouTube channel that Ruby founded called 8 Passengers. At its peak, 8 Passengers had nearly 2.5 million subscribers and had six-figure sponsorship deals that totaled between $1 million to $2 million a year. Ruby presented her family as wholesome, loving and devout followers of the Mormon faith, also known as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Ruby shut down the 8 Passengers channel in January 2022, after Ruby was the subject of intense criticism and scrutiny over her harsh parenting tactics. In one video, she admitted that she made her teenage son Chad sleep on a bean bag for seven months as punishment. In another video, Ruby filmed herself telling her then 6-year-old daughter (her youngest child) that the daughter would be deprived of lunch that day because the daughter didn’t make her own lunch.

According to Shari Franke’s 2025 memoir “The House of My Mother: A Daughter’s Quest for Freedom,” Ruby was an even worse abusive tyrant behind the scenes than how she appeared to be on camera, and Kevin was a passive enabler. Shari’s book, which was published in January 2025, is not mentioned in “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence,” which was released in September 2025. In the book and in Shari’s interview for “Devil in the Family: The Fall of Ruby Franke,” Shari says that Ruby would physically beat all of the children, who were too afraid to report this abuse because they feared they would not be believed.

Hildebrandt is a divorced mother who is estranged from her family, but she was able to amass a small fortune by marketing herself as a therapist/life coach for families, particularly families headed by married couples. Through a Mormon-centered counseling company she founded in 2007 called ConneXions, Hildebrandt became a cult-like leader who destroyed many marriages instead of saving them, according to people who’ve given interviews about Hildebrandt in this documentary and elsewhere. The former clients of Hildebrandt who are interviewed in the documentary are identified only by their first names in the documentary, even though some of them have been interviewed in other documentaries and news reports that identify them by their first and last names.

The former Hildenbrandt clients who are interviewed in the documentary tell the same stories that have already been told about Hildebrandt and ConneXions in other documentaries. Most of ConneXions’ married clients got divorced because Hildebrandt had a domineering counseling style that dictated the types of sexual intimacy her clients could have, which is a typical tactic used by cult leaders. Many of her clients spent so much money on ConneXions and Hildebrandt’s “counseling services,” it ruined or damaged the clients’ finances.

Hildebrandt discouraged sexual intercourse for married couples, she preached that masturbation was deviant and sinful, and she taught that porn addiction is looking at porn at least once a year. According to several of her former clients, Hildebrandt often drove a wedge between husbands and wives, by convincing the wives to separate from or divorce their husbands because Hildebrandt said the husbands were addicted to porn. The husbands were also convinced they were addicted to porn and agreed to the separations or divorces that Hildebrandt ordered.

Hildebrandt almost always placed the blame on the husbands for ruining their own marriages. A former Hildebrandt client named Trey says in the documentary that he estimates that Hildebrandt was directly responsible for “hundreds” of divorces. Another former Hildebrandt client named Adam, who says his marriage was a casualty of her “counseling,” says that Hildebrandt taught this philosophy to the couples who got separated or divorced under her counseling: “The relationship had to end before it can be reborn.”

Michael, another former ConneXions client, says Hildebrandt ruined his marriage because he alleges that Hildebrandt convinced his wife that it was okay to physically abuse their daughter. Michael says he saw proof (physical injuries) of this abuse and reported the abuse to Child Protective Services. But he says CPS didn’t investigate, and his wife was able to convince a court to give her joint custody of their daughter. In their custody battle, Michael had been fighting to have his ex-wife lose custody of their daughter. He says he still fears and suspects that his ex-wife is abusing their child in ways that don’t show physical injuries.

Ruby and Kevin Franke separated under these circumstances. However, Hildebrandt took her relationship with Ruby far beyond what therapists are supposed to take with a client: In 2022, the year that Hildebrandt and Ruby started a social media platform business together called Moms of Truth, Hildebrandt moved in with Ruby and Kevin because Hildebrandt said she was afraid to live in her own home because she believed the devil was out to get her. It wasn’t long before Hildebrandt ordered Kevin and Ruby to sleep in separate bedrooms, and Hildebrandt and Ruby began sleeping in the same bed together.

There has been much speculation that Ruby and Hildebrandt were lovers during the time that Hildebrandt lived in the Franke home and continuing up until this toxic duo got arrested. Shari Franke says in her memoir that she believes that her mother Ruby and Hildebrandt were sexually involved with each other. In the book, Shari describes seeing the bedroom that Ruby and Hildebrandt shared as looking like a honeymoon suite, with candles and massage oils.

In her book, Shari also remembers once seeing Hildebrandt coming out of the locked bedroom and getting the impression that Hildebrandt was acting as if she had a recent sexual encounter with Ruby. Shari has said she did not ask or discuss with Ruby or Hildebrandt if they were lovers. In interviews (not in this documentary), Shari says she has no interest in communicating or having any contact with Ruby and Hildebrandt.

Hildebrandt’s love life has been shrouded in a lot of speculation and mystery that no documentary or news report has been able to expose, except for public information about Hildebrandt being married from 1993 to 1996. Hildebrandt’s ex-husband and her two adult children have not spoken publicly about her. Her children, who are now adults, reportedly were estranged from her long before her arrest. “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” drops another hint that Hildebrandt is a closeted lesbian or queer woman in the third episode, when Jessi Hildebrandt, who is a child of Jodi’s brother, says that Jodi’s mother once told Jessi that Jodi had “special friendships” with girls when Jodi was a teenager.

Jodi was raised in a strict Mormon family as one of seven siblings. Her father was a pilot in the U.S. Air Force. Before moving to Utah, Jodi had lived in Arizona and in California. The Mormon religion teaches that homosexuality or queerness is a sin. In her counseling, Jodi also preached against homosexuality and queerness. Former client Trey says he cut ties from ConneXions and Hildebrandt after he saw Hildebrandt verbal bully a man to come out as gay during a group therapy session.

Because almost all of Jodi’s clients were also Mormon, she would have further incentive to hide her true sexuality if she’s a lesbian or queer women. If Jodi really is a closeted lesbian or queer women, it’s not unusual for closeted queer people to publicly be homophobic because they feel deep shame or self-hatred for their own homosexuality or queerness. It would be the same reason why Ruby Franke would want to hide or deny that she had a same-sex relationship Jodi, if this sexual relationship existed.

Documentaries have not given any information so far about what type of wife and mother Jodi was. However, Jessi Hildebrandt (whose current pronouns are “they/them”) has given several interviews, including in this documentary, about how Jodi physically and emotionally abused Jessi. In 2010, before Jodi was estranged from her entire family, her married brother ordered his then-16-year-old child Jessi to live with Jodi because Jessi had come out as queer and had some rebellion issues, such as skipping school.

Jessi lived with Jodi for several months. In the documentary, Jessi says Jodi’s abuse included Jessi being locked in rooms for up to 12 hours a day; Jessi’s mouth being duct taped; Jessi being forbidden to talk to other people without Jodi’s permission; Jessi not being allowed to read or use the Internet; and Jessi getting frequent beatings from Jodi. Jessi says that Jessi reported this abuse to police, but nothing happened because Jessi had no proof, and Jodi was considered an upstanding member of the community.

Jessi says that Jodi tried to convince Jessi that Jessi was possessed by the devil. In the documentary, Jessi says about Jodi: “She wanted to make my life so miserable, it would force the sin out of me.” Jessi says that Jodi punished teenage Jessi for sexually experimenting with teenage girls. As for Jodi being arrested for and convicted of abusing the Franke kids, Jessi comments: “It didn’t surprise me.”

One of the biggest failings of other documentaries about the Hildebrandt/Franke child abuse scandal is how they ignore or barely mention the Mormon Church’s role in continuining to refer clients to Jodi, even after there was evidence that she wasn’t a good therapist. The high divorce rate among her clients after they were “counseled” by her should’ve been a big red flag, especially in a religion where divorce is a big stigma. “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” addresses the Mormon Church’s enabling of Jodi, but the documentary doesn’t uncover a lot of groundbreaking information.

The documentary mentions that Hildebrandt’s therapist license was suspended for about 18 months, beginning in 2012, because she breached the confidentiality of a client by telling private information about him to a therapy group. She was still able to grow the business because she continued to get client referrals from Mormon church officials, who knew about her suspended license. “Ruby & Jodi: A Cult of Sin and Influence” doesn’t name any Mormon church officials, but ConneXions president Pam Bodtcher (a close friend of Jodi’s) is mentioned multiple times as one of the worst enablers.

Bodtcher did not resonded to requests to be interviewed for the documentary, but Michael (the former ConneXions client who says his ex-wife abused their daughter) is currently suing Ruby Franke, Jodi Hildebrandt and ConneXions for racketeering. Michael claims that Bodtcher knew about people being abused under Jodi’s direction, but Bodtcher did nothing to stop it. As of this writing, the lawsuit is pending.

Eric Clarke, attorney for Utah’s Washington County, was a prosecutor in the Hildebrandt/Franker case, says in the documentary that there isn’t enough evidence to bring criminal charges against Bodtcher. He says that Jodi abused religion to convince others to commit evil acts. Clarke comments on the case that resulted in Ruby and Jodi becoming convicted child abusers: “We had evidence Ruby was inflicting the abuse, but we also had evidence that Jodi was causing it.”

Former client Adam is the person whose confidentiality was breached by Jodi in the case that got her license suspended for 18 months, beginning in 2012. In the documentary, Adam says that the private information that Jodi revealed about him to a therapy group was that Adam had been sexually abused as a child. Adam says that his ex-wife used this information in a custody battle and distributed this information to Brigham Young University (where he worked at the time) and to the Mormon Church.

As a result, Adam got fired from his job at Brigham Young University, which settled a wrongful termination dispute with Adam over his dismissal from the job. Adam’s parents Paul and Deborah, whose last names are also not mentioned in the documentary, back up Adam’s story. Even though Jodi’s therapist license was suspended for 18 months, she still operated ConneXions by presenting herself as a life coach, not a licensed therapist, and her business grew because of client referrals that she was still getting from the Mormon Church.

Other people interviewed in the documentary are KSL-TV Salt Lake City reporter Shelby Lofton; Mormon therapist Dr. Julie Hanks; psychologist Dr. John Dehlin, who describes himself as a former Mormon; sex therapist Natasha Helfer, who describes herself as a former Mormon; social media personalities John Mathias and Lauren Mathias of Hidden True Crime; and a former ConneXions client named Janae. Some of these interviewees have been in other documentaries and news reports about the Hildebrandt/Franke child abuse case.

“Ruby & Jodi: Cult of Sin and Influence” is a fairly good overview of how Jodi used mind control and manipulation to get people to do her bidding. The documentary falls short at being a more balanced look at showing that Ruby had child abuse accusations against her long before Ruby got involved with Jodi. More information was also needed about who in the Mormon Church could have enabled Jodi’s misdeeds as a therapist/life coach. But if you want to see a documentary where several people who knew Jodi before her imprisonment have things to say about her, then “Ruby & Jodi: Cult of Sin and Influence” fulfills that purpose.

Investigation Discovery premiered “Ruby & Jodi: Cult of Sin and Influence” on September 1, 2025.

Review: ‘Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story,’ starring Ethan Prete, Jessi Hildebrandt, Eric Clarke, Jessica Bate, Valerie Jackson, Natasha Helfer and Kathy Kinghorn

December 31, 2025

by Carla Hay

Jodi Hildebrandt’s 2023 arrest mug shot in “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

“Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story”

Directed by Skye Borgman

Culture Representation: The documentary film “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” features an all-white group of people talking about the child-abuse scandal involving former YouTube family influencer Ruby Franke and her business partner Jodi Hildebrant, who are both from Utah.

Culture Clash: In December 2023, Franke and Hildebrandt were both convicted of felony child abuse for beating, torturing, starving, and holding captive Franke’s two youngest children earlier that year.

Culture Audience: “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in watching true crime documentaries about child abusers who are punished for their crimes and how cult-like leaders can cause damage.

Jessica Bate in “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

“Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” is a very lazy and sloppily edited documentary that re-uses the same footage and recycles the same information that’s in other documentaries about the Jodi Hildebrandt/Ruby Franke child abuse scandal. This documentary’s timeline jumps all over the place. And there are some weird editing choices. For example, toward the end of the documentary, a closeup of an unidentified person’s eye is shown multiple times, for no apparent reason.

Directed by Skye Borgman, “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” should have uncovered more information about Hildebrandt’s murky personal background. Instead, the documentary repeats basic information that is already publicly known: Hildebrandt (who was born in 1969) is a divorced mother who is estranged from her family, but she was able to amass a small fortune by marketing herself as a therapist/life coach for families, particularly families headed by married couples. Through a Mormon-centered counseling company she founded called ConneXions, Hildebrandt (who lived in Ivins, Utah) became a cult-like leader who destroyed many marriages instead of saving them, according to people who’ve given interviews about Hildebrandt in this documentary and elsewhere.

Hildebrandt and people from the Franke family are not interviewed in this documentary, although the documentary includes archival footage (mostly police body cam footage and social media footage) that have been also used in several other documentaries about this scandal. The documentary also includes widely reported phone calls that Hildebrandt and Franke made while incarcerated. In these phone calls, Hildebrandt and Franke express no remorse for their crimes and describe themselves as persecuted victims. In one of the phone calls, Hildebrandt blames one of her victims for inflicting torture wounds on himself.

One of the marriages that was negatively affected by Hildebrandt’s interference was the marriage of Ruby Franke and Kevin Franke, who got married in 2000, when Ruby was 18, and Kevin was 21. Ruby and Kevin had six children together (four daughters and two sons) and lived in Springville, Utah. The documentary does not include the first names and faces of the four children who were still under the age of 18 at the time this documentary was released. Shari Franke and Chad Franke—the two eldest children of Ruby and Kevin—were over the age of 18, estranged from Ruby and Kevin, and living in separate homes from their younger siblings when Ruby was arrested for abusing her two youngest children.

Hildebrandt’s crime story is so intertwined with Ruby’s, any documentary about Hildebrandt inevitably has to have a lot of information about Ruby. From 2015 to January 2022, Ruby documented the lives of herself, Kevin and their children on a YouTube channel that Ruby founded called 8 Passengers. At its peak, 8 Passengers had nearly 2.5 million subscribers and had six-figure sponsorship deals that totaled between $1 million to $2 million a year. Ruby presented her family as wholesome, loving and devout followers of the Mormon faith, also known as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

But behind the scenes, Ruby was an abusive tyrant, and Kevin was a passive enabler, according to Shari Franke’s 2025 memoir “The House of My Mother: A Daughter’s Quest for Freedom” and the 2025 documentary series “Devil in the Family: The Fall of Ruby Franke,” which has exclusive interviews with Shari, Chad and Kevin. Ruby shut down the 8 Passengers channel in January 2022, after Ruby was the subject of intense criticism and scrutiny over her harsh parenting tactics. In one video, she admitted that she made her teenage son Chad sleep on a bean bag for seven months as punishment. In another video, Ruby filmed herself telling her then 6-year-old daughter (her youngest child) that the daughter would be deprived of lunch that day because the daughter didn’t make her own lunch.

After the demise of the 8 Passengers channel, Ruby went into business with Hildebrandt, a divorced mother whose two adult children are estranged from her. Together, Ruby and Hildebrandt started a social media platform called Moms of Truth, which promoted and advocated for strict parenting discipline that many people would describe as abusive techniques. Ruby was also actively involved in ConneXions.

The marriage of Ruby and Kevin began to fall apart soon after Ruby became more closely involved with Hildebrant in 2022. At one point, Hildebrandt moved in with Ruby and Kevin because Hildebrandt said she didn’t feel safe in her own house because Hildebrandt claimed the devil was out to get her. Hildebrandt began dictating many aspects of the couple’s life, such as ordering Kevin to sleep in a separate bedroom, while Hildebrandt began sleeping in the same bed as Ruby.

“Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” drops hints that Hildebrandt is a closeted lesbian or queer woman who had a sexual affair with Ruby, even though Hildebrandt’s teachings condemned homosexuality or queer sexuality. The documentary never mentions crucial details confirming that this sexual affair was a probable reality, which would explain why Ruby and Hildebrandt seemed to be obsessed with each other. Before their arrest on August 30, 2023, Ruby and Hildebrandt were acting like live-in partners who were co-parenting Ruby’s underage kids.

The documentary never mentions Shari Franke’s memoir, in which Shari describes an incident before Ruby banned Shari from visiting the family at the Springville house. Shari remembers seeing Hildebrandt coming out of the locked bedroom that Hildebrandt shared with Ruby and having the distinct impression that Hildebrandt and Ruby were lovers, because the bedroom was decorated like a honeymoon suite, with lit candles and massage oils. In the book, Shari describes Hildebrandt looking happy and glowing, as if she just had sex, but Hildebrandt didn’t discuss what she and Ruby were doing behind closed doors.

By June 2022, Ruby and Kevin separated, at the urging of Hildebrandt. By July 2022, Kevin had moved out of the Springville house—a change to the family that was also dictated by Hildebrandt, who had convinced Kevin that he was addicted to pornography and needed to stay away from Ruby and their children. Kevin would have no contact and would not see the children until after the August 2023 arrest of Ruby and Hildebrandt. He didn’t find out until after the arrest how badly his two youngest children had been abused.

“Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” begins with the same home video surveillance footage that almost every documentary about this scandal seems to use as the opening scene. On August 30, 2023, Franke’s then-12-year-old son rang the doorbell of a neighbor on a blistering hot day in the desert city of Ivins. The boy, who is Franke’s second-youngest child of six children, was emaciated, wearing only socks on his feet, and had duct tape tied over his wounded ankles. The boy asked to be taken to jail because he said he belonged there.

An unidentified elderly man and woman (who are presumably a couple living at the house) who answered the door are seen trying to help the boy, as the man of the house calls 911 to send an ambulance. His voice cracks with emotion when he sees the extent of the boy’s injuries. During this phone call, the boy says that he came from Jodi Hildebrandt’s house and his mother is Ruby Franke. 

Later, through Franke’s own journals, police body cam footage, witness statements and other evidence, it was revealed that Franke and Hildebrandt had been holding Franke’s two youngest children (the youngest being a 9-year-old girl at the time) captive in Hildebrandt’s sprawling compound in Ivins for several months. The children had been brainwashed to believe that they were evil and possessed by the devil and deserved any torture and punishment that they were getting from Franke and Hildebrandt. Body cam footage shows the police went to Hildebrandt’s home and found the youngest child emaciated in a locked room.

Hildebrandt and Franke were arrested that day and refused to explain in police questioning why the children were abused. Franke’s middle two children (daughters who were underage teenagers at the time) had been visiting at a friend of the family’s at the time the police searched Hildebrandt’s house. Kevin filed for divorce from Ruby in November 2023. In December 2023, Ruby and Hildebrandt pleaded guilty to aggravated child abuse of Ruby’s two youngest children. In February 2024, Ruby and Hildebrandt were each sentenced to four to 30 years in prison.

In March 2025, Kevin and Ruby’s divorce became final, after Kevin won his long legal battle of wanting full custody of their underage children, who had been placed in foster care after Ruby’s arrest and conviction. This documentary was completed before the news that Kevin Franke married his second wife Becca Bevan in November 2025. Social media postings didn’t make the wedding public until December 2025. The couple got engaged in September 2025. Social media postings of the wedding indicate that Kevin’s eldest children Shari and Chad attended the wedding and approve of this marriage.

“Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” goes back and forth between showing the police body cam footage of this investigation and going into Hildebrandt’s past. This non-chronological timeline might be a little confusing for some viewers who aren’t familiar with this true crime case. It certainly makes “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” look a bit rambling and disjointed.

On the law enforcement side, “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” has interviews with two people who’ve already been in other documentaries about the Franke/Hildebrandt child abuse case: Jessica Bate of the Santa Clara-Ivins Police Department was one of the first police detectives on the scene of the search of Hildebrandt’s house where the youngest Franke child was found. Bate also interviewed Ruby and Hildebrandt after their arrests. Eric Clarke, attorney for Utah’s Washington County, is also interviewed.

Although Bate and Clarke give emotionally effective interviews, they don’t really reveal anything new that they already haven’t talked about in other documentary interviews. Bate comments, “I’d never seen abuse on this level, in a case I’d work on before … It’s a crazy story: An individual influencing other others on how to be a good mom is detained for being a bad mom.” Clarke says in his interview: “But a therapist leading someone to religiously believe that they need to torture their children, I think that’s the more fascinating story.”

If it’s a fascinating story, it’s been told in much better documentaries than “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story,” which limits all the other interviews to people who all have reasons to say bad things about Hildebrandt. The documentary doesn’t adequately address the systemic failures that led to Hildebrandt’s abuse of power and why her disturbing history of child abuse was kept a secret until after her arrest.

Hildebrandt founded ConneXions in 2007. The documentary mentions that Hildebrandt’s therapist license was suspended for about 18 months, beginning in 2012, because she breached the confidentiality of a client by telling private information about him to a therapy group. She was still able to grow the business because she presented herself as a life coach (not as a licensed therapist) and continued to get client referrals from Mormon church officials, who knew about her suspended license. However, “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” makes no mention of trying to interview any of these Mormon church officials about why they enabled Hildebrandt and ignored complaints from her other Mormon clients.

Ethan Prete, a former ConneXions client, is given the most screen time for the documentary’s interviews, to the point where the documentary tells a lot more about his personal life than Hildebrandt’s personal life. Prete says he’s one of many people whose marriages were destroyed by Hildebrandt, who preached in her “counseling” that masturbation was a “sinful” and “deviant,” and looking at porn at least once a year equals porn addiction.

Another former ConneXions client named Valerie Jackson is interviewed. She tells a similar story to Prete’s about going to Hildebrandt for help in her troubled marriage and seeing how Hildebrandt would manipulate wives to turn against their husbands, which would lead to divorce and other marital breakups. At the time Jackson and her then-husband got involved with ConneXions in 2007, the couple had been married for three years. Jackson says Hildebrandt persuaded her married clients to stop having sex with their respective spouses: “She kept telling us, ‘You don’t need sex.'”

Jackson got divorced about a year after she and her then-husband cut ties with ConneXions. Jackson doesn’t completely blame Hildebrandt for Jackson’s divorce, but she says that Hildebrandt had “a hand” in the demise of Jackson’s marriage. Jackson describes Hildebrandt as a master manipulator who convinced many of her clients that Hildebrandt was the only person who could fix their problems through Hildebrandt’s “counseling.”

Jackson says Hildebrandt did damage to more than her personal life. She says that Hildebrandt wrecked Jackson’s finances. Jackson claims that she and her then-husband maxed out all their credit cards to pay for Hildebrandt’s services through ConneXions and were spending more on ConneXions than on their monthly mortgage payments. In total, Jackson estimates that she and her then-husband spent about $50,000 on ConneXions.

There’s no doubt that Hildebrandt is a horrible person, but there are times when some of the documentary’s bitter people who say Hildebrandt ruined their lives come across as a little whiny by not taking some responsibility for their own choices. Some of these people might feel they were conned out of their money or had their marriages ruined by Hildebrandt, but it was still their choice to give over that type of control to Hildebrandt, who was dictating to other people how to have a happy and healthy personal life, when Hildebrandt was not practicing what she was preaching.

And this is where “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” falls very short: All the documentary’s information about Hildebrandt’s personal life has already been reported elsewhere. Almost nothing is told about what type of wife and mother Hildebrandt was, which is an unacceptable lack of investigation for a documentary that’s supposed to be a biography about a convicted child abuser who built a lucrative business from family counseling before being arrested for child abuse.

The documentary mentions basic facts about Hildebrandt: She was born in Tucson, Arizona, and was one of seven children. He father (whose name is not mentioned in the documentary) was an U.S. Air Force Pilot. Her mother is not mentioned at all. As a teenager, Hildebrandt exceled in academics and basketball. In her late teens or early 20s, Hildebrandt became a Mormon missionary and did very well in this job because she had exceptional persuasion skills.

One of the people interviewed in the documentary is Laura Howells Leavitt, who lived and worked with Hildebrandt during their Mormon missionary stint, at a time in the 1990s when female missionaries were extremely rare. Howells Leavitt, who describes Hildebrandt as very charismatic and intelligent, says that she felt inadequate compared to Hildebrandt when they were companion missionaries: “Even though there were three of us [living together as missionaries], Jodi felt like she was the one who was making a difference.”

The documentary mentions that Hildebrandt got married in 1993 and had two children with her then-husband. (The names of her ex-husband and children are not mentioned in the documentary.) The marriage ended in divorce in 1996. No one in the documentary gives the reason for the divorce. The documentary also has no information on how long Hildebrandt has been estranged from her children, who are now adults.

Hildebrandt’s former client Jackson says that Hildebrant once mentioned during a group therapy session that Hildebrandt’s family members despised Hildebrandt and didn’t want to be around her. At the time, Jackson thought it was strange that Hildebrandt would make this confession to clients when Hildebrandt had marketed herself as an expert in happy and healthy family relationships. In hindsight, Jackson understands this confession for being a crack in Hildebrandt’s carefully crafted façade and a glimpse into the troubled personal life of Hildebrandt.

But what about that personal life? Don’t expect this documentary to have any information about who were Hildebrandt’s friends and lovers after her divorce. There are no details about whom Hildebrandt was close to, except for the widely known facts about her close relationship with Ruby.

In 2010, before Hildebrandt was estranged from her entire family, her married brother ordered his then-16-year-old child Jessi Hildebrandt (whose current pronouns are “they/them”) to live with Jodi because Jessi had come out as queer and had some rebellion issues, such as skipping school. Jessi, who is seen in a video conference call interview in the documentary, has given multiple interviews in other documentaries and news reports where Jessi talks about the abuse that Jodi inflicted on Jessi in the several months that Jessi lived with Jodi.

This abuse included Jessi being locked in rooms, being forced to sleep in the snow, and getting frequent beatings from Jodi. Jessi says that Jessi reported this abuse to police, but nothing happened because Jessi had no proof, and Jodi was considered an upstanding member of the community. Jessi says that Jodi tried to convince Jessi that Jessi was possessed by the devil.

In the documentary, Jessi says about Jodi: “She wanted to make my life so uncomfortable that it would force the sin out of me. I would confess to things I didn’t do as a way of trying to get the abuse to stop.” Jessi describes Jodi as being very fixated on equating homosexuality with sin and deviancy.

Christi Judd, who was a neighbor of Jodi’s at the time Jessi lived with Jodi, remembers how Jessi canceled plans to spend friend time with Judd’s son, who is about the same age as Jessi. Judd says that Jessi seemed to be a recluse who disappeared into the house. Judd gets tearful when she thinks about how she now knows that Jessi was an abused captive, but Judd didn’t know and didn’t suspect it at the time because Jodi seemed to be so “normal.”

The only clue that the documentary offers about why Jodi has major hangups about sexuality is by mentioning something that Jodi wrote in her self-help book “You Are Not Not Enough,” which she self-published in 2010. Kathy Klinghorn, a clinical social worker who worked with Jodi for a period of time that the documentary does not detail, reads aloud an except from the book where Jodi says that when Jodi was 7 years old, unnamed teenage boys began sexually abusing her. That’s all the documentary mentions about this alleged abuse.

Natasha Helfer, a former Mormon who is a licensed therapist, is also interviewed. Helfer has been interviewed in other documentaries and news reports about the Hildebrandt/Franke child abuse scandal. Helfer’s only connection to Hildebrandt is that Helfer says many of Helfer’s clients are former clients of Hildebrandt. Helfer has nothing new to add that she hasn’t already talked about before in interviews that she did elsewhere.

“Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” looks like a hastily assembled documentary that cobbles together a lot of widely used archival footage with interviews that reveal no new information. There are decades of Hildebrandt’s personal life that are not investigated and remain a mystery in this slipshod documentary. Instead, “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” has the usual clichés of a “bandwagon jumping” true crime documentary: tacky ominous music, a limited range of interviews, and a jumbled narrative that copies information that other documentaries have already covered.

Netflix premiered “Evil Influencer: The Jodi Hildebrandt Story” on December 30, 2025.

Review: ‘Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal,’ starring Lance Haight, Trey Warner, Kyle Dunphey, Maryhan Munt, Brian Buckmire and Kalhan Rosenblatt

December 30, 2025

by Carla Hay

An 2010s archival photo of Ruby Franke and Kevin Franke in “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” (Photo courtesy of Channel 5 Broadcasting)

“Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal”

Directed by Ali Naushahi and Olivia Witt

Culture Representation: The documentary film “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” features a predominantly white group of people (with one African American) talking about the child-abuse scandal involving former YouTube family influencer Ruby Franke and her business partner Jodi Hildebrant, who are both from Utah.

Culture Clash: In December 2023, Franke and Hildebrandt were both convicted of felony child abuse for beating, torturing, starving, and holding captive Franke’s two youngest children earlier that year.

Culture Audience: “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” will appeal primarily to people who are interested in watching true crime documentaries about child abusers who are punished for their crimes and how family vlogging can have a dark side.

Lance Haight in “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” (Photo courtesy of Channel 5 Broadcasting)

“Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” is the first documentary film about the scandal of the first famous social media family influencer who became a convicted child abuser. It’s a fairly straightforward documentary that has a well-rounded mix of interviews of law enforcement, journalists, and people who knew Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt before Franke and Hildebrandt went to prison for child abuse. More facts have since emerged since this documentary premiered on television in 2024, but this documentary has a fairly comprehensive summary of the facts, along with commentary from people who were involved with the case or closely followed the case.

Directed by Ali Naushahi and Olivia Witt, “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” is a British TV production that was renamed “Abused by Mom: The Ruby Franke Scandal” for American television. The documentary is narrated by actress Jane Perry, who gives voiceover narration in an appropriately serious tone. The documentary follows a traditional format of mixing archival footage with footage that was filmed exclusively for the documentary.

“Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” begins by showing the now-notorious home video surveillance footage from August 30, 2023, when Franke’s then-12-year-old son rang the doorbell of a neighbor on a blistering hot day in the desert city of Ivins, Utah. (All of the Franke children who were still under the age of 18 when this documentary was released do not have their names mentioned in the documentary.) The boy, who is Franke’s second-youngest child of six children, was emaciated, wearing only socks on his feet, and had duct tape tied over his wounded ankles. The boy asked to be taken to jail because he said he belonged there.

The elderly couple (whose names are also not revealed) who answered the door are seen trying to help the boy, as the man of the house calls 911 to send an ambulance. His voice cracks with emotion when he sees the extent of the boy’s injuries. During this phone call, the boy says that he came from Jodi Hildebrandt’s house and his mother is Ruby Franke. At the time, Franke was a social media influencer whose specialty was parenting advice, while Hildebrandt was therapist/life coach who was Franke’s business partner.

Later, through Franke’s own journals, police body cam footage, witness statements and other evidence, it was revealed that Franke (who was born in 1982) and her business partner Hildebrandt (who was born in 1969) had been holding Franke’s two youngest children (the youngest being a 9-year-old girl at the time) captive in Hildebrandt’s sprawling compound in Ivins for several months. The children had been brainwashed to believe that they were evil and possessed by the devil and deserved any torture and punishment that they were getting from Franke and Hildebrandt.

Body cam footage shows the police went to Hildebrandt’s home and found the youngest child emaciated in a locked room. Hildebrandt and Franke were arrested that day and refused to explain in police questioning why the children were abused. Franke’s middle two children (daughters who were underage teenagers at the time) had been visiting at a friend of the family’s at the time the police searched Hildebrandt’s house. Franke’s two eldest children (daughter Shari and son Chad), who were over 18 and estranged from their parents, were living in separate residences.

At the time of this abuse, Ruby Franke and her husband Kevin (who had been married since 2000) were separated, and he had been told to stay away from his wife and kids. This separation had been ordered by Hildebrandt, who had been the former couple’s therapist/life coach under a business that Hildebrandt founded called ConneXions. Hildebrandt had accused Kevin (who was born in 1979) of being addicted to porn because he admitted that he looked at porn. Hildebrandt had also moved into the Franke household for a while, but after the separation, Ruby began to live with Hildebrandt.

Body cam footage shows Kevin being questioned by police on the day that his two youngest children had been found emaciated and abused. He denied knowing anything about his kids being in danger and seemed shocked by what police had found at Hildebrandt’s house. Because Kevin had not been in any contact with and had not seen his children for about a year, he was ruled out as a suspect.

Kevin filed for divorce from Ruby in November 2023. In December 2023, Ruby and Hildebrandt pleaded guilty to aggravated child abuse of Ruby’s two youngest children. In February 2024, Ruby and Hildebrandt were each sentenced to four to 30 years in prison. In early 2025, Kevin and Ruby’s divorce became final, after Kevin won his long legal battle of wanting full custody of their underage children, who had been placed in foster care after Ruby’s arrest and conviction.

Ruby (who lived in Springville, Utah) was a controversial social media influencer, who in 2015, launched a successful family vlog called 8 Passengers, starring herself, Kevin and their six children. At its peak, 8 Passengers had nearly 2.5 million subscribers and had six-figure sponsorship deals that totaled between $1 million to $2 million a year. Ruby presented her family as wholesome, loving and devout followers of the Mormon faith, also known as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Hildebrandt, who is also Mormon, marketed Hildebrandt’s therapist counseling sessions almost exclusively to Mormon clients.

By January 2022, 8 Passengers went defunct, after Ruby was the subject of intense criticism and scrutiny over her harsh parenting tactics. In one video, she admitted that she made her teenage son Chad sleep on a bean bag for seven months as punishment. In another video, Ruby filmed herself telling her then 6-year-old daughter (her youngest child) that the daughter would be deprived of lunch that day because the daughter didn’t make her own lunch.

After the demise of the 8 Passengers channel, Ruby went into business with Hildebrandt, a divorced mother whose two adult children are estranged from her. Together, Ruby and Hildebrandt started a social media platform called Moms of Truth, which promoted and advocated for strict parenting discipline that many people would describe as abusive techniques. Ruby was also actively involved in ConneXions, whose main business was counseling married Mormon couples.

A disturbingly high percentage of these couples got divorced because of Jodi’s domineering style of “counseling,” says Trey Warner, a former ConneXions client who is interviewed in the documentary. Warner says he was one of a minority of people who didn’t go to ConneXions for marriage counseling, but Warner says he saw many couples’ marriages ruined because Hildebrandt manipulated the wives to divorce their husbands. The documentary mentions that Hildebrandt’s therapist license was suspended in the early 2010s because she breached the confidentiality of a client by telling private information about him to a therapy group.

An unnamed woman, whose face is not shown in the documentary, describes herself in the documentary as a friend of the Franke family. She blames Hildebrandt for breaking up the marriage of Ruby and Kevin. The couple had separated in June 2022. Kevin moved out of the family home in July 2022. In interviews with police, Kevin said Hildebrandt made him feel guilty for looking at porn and convinced Kevin that he had a porn addiction, which Hildebrandt said required Kevin to stay away from Ruby and their children.

By September 2022, neighbors and eldest child Shari were calling police to report that the four youngest Franke children (all under the age of 18 at the time) were spending hours and sometimes days alone in the Springville house. Nothing came of these reports because every time police showed up at the house to check on the kids, no one answered the door. Without a warrant or any witnessed abuse of the children, the police had no choice but to walk away. It has since been revealed in news reports, Shari Franke’s 2025 memoir “The House of My Mother: A Daughter’s Quest for Freedom,” and in the 2025 documentary series “Devil in the Family: The Fall of Ruby Franke” that before Ruby and Kevin separated, they had ordered Shari and Chad to stay away from the house and threatened to have Shari and Chad arrested for trespassing if Shari and Chad went to the house. By early 2023, the underage Franke children were being homeschooled.

Much of “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” tells this tragic story through archival footage that shows how the image that Ruby presented on camera was very different from who she was in real life. Springville Police Department chief Lance Height says in the documentary that the Franke case is the worst case of child abuse he’s ever seen. Other people interviewed in the documentary are Utah News Dispatch reporter Kyle Dunphey; NBC News Internet culture reporter Kalhan Rosenblatt; psychologist/parenting expert Maryhan Munt; [Cult]ure Shock YouTube channel founder Kendra Lee Bryann; The Mirror U.S. reporter Fiona Leishma; and ABC News legal contributor/attorney Brian Buckmire. “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” is a no-frills documentary that avoids tabloid-like sensationalism and is an informative and cautionary tale that shows warning signs to look out for if people suspect child abuse.

Channel 5 (in the United Kingdom) premiered “Abused by Mum: The Ruby Franke Scandal” on May 5, 2024. Peacock premiered the movie (retitled to “Abused by Mom: The Ruby Franke Scandal”) on August 13, 2024.

Review: ‘Murder in Monaco,’ starring Jon Green, Mike Griffith, Lady Colin Campbell, Isabelle Vincent, Bill Browder, Sonia Herkrath and Luigi Ciardelli

December 18, 2025

by Carla Hay

A photo of Edmond Safra in “Murder in Monaco” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

“Murder in Monaco”

Directed by Hodges Usry

Some language in French and Italian with subtitles

Culture Representation: The documentary film “Murder in Monaco” features a predominantly white group of people (with one Asian person) discussing the controversial murder case of Lebanese Brazilian billionaire banker Edmond Safra, who was killed during a fire in his Monaco home on December 3, 1999, at the age of 67.

Culture Clash: Even though Safra’s personal nurse was convicted of and served time in prison for the arson responsible for the fire, the nurse maintains that he did not kill Safra, and there are have been other theories of who caused Safra’s murder.

Culture Audience: “Murder in Monaco” will appeal primarily to people who are fans of true crime documentaries about murders that have conflicting theories about who caused the murders.

Jon Green, formerly known as Ted Maher, in “Murder in Monaco” (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

The documentary “Murder in Monaco” will make viewers’ heads spin with how it explores different theories of who caused the 1999 death of billionaire Edmond Safra. The movie has compelling interviews with flamboyant personalities. However, “Murder in Monaco” needed tighter editing, because of a few of the people who are interviewed tend to overshadow the narrative with their own biased agendas.

Directed by Hodges Usry, “Murder in Monaco” begins by giving a background on Monaco, the European country that is considered a playground for the wealthy. Safra was Jewish but was born in Lebanon and was also a Brazilian citizen. His wealth came from his family’s banking business. Safra died in his Monaco mansion (named the Belle Epoque) during an arson fire on the night of December 3, 1999. He was 67.

His wife Lily Safra, whom he was married to since 1976, was in another part of the mansion at the time, and escaped unharmed. Edmond, who had Parkinson’s disease, was being looked after that night by two of his personal nurses: Vivian Torrente and Ted Maher. Edmond and Torrente were both found dead from smoke inhalation in the mansion’s penthouse. Maher, an American who had relocated to Monaco for this job, was taken to a hospital with stab wounds in his abdomen and his left thigh. Maher claimed that home invaders stabbed him.

The documentary focuses on the three main theories of who murdered Edmond:

(1) The Russian Mafia. In May 1999, Edmond had reported Russian Mafia money laundering to the FBI. The documentary includes news reports and interviews with people saying that Edmond was paranoid that he would be assassinated in retaliation for reporting these crimes to the FBI.

(2) Ted Maher. He eventually admitted to starting the fire. People have speculated he had intended to stage the fire, in order to save Edmond, look like a hero, and possibly get large financial rewards for saving Edmond.

(3) Lily Safra. Edmond had changed his will weeks before his death to cut out his brothers from his inheritance and have Lily as the primary beneficiary of Edmond’s fortune.

Curiously, even though Edmond had about 25 security guards/bodyguards working for him, they were not on duty protecting him at the time that he died. The documentary has an anonymous interview with someone with the alias Mr. X, who is identified as the person who was working as Edmond’s security chief in 1999. Mr. X claims that Lily told him to give all of the security personnel the night off on December 3, 1999. Mr. X says that when he told Edmond about this unusual demand, Edmond told him to ignore Lily’s orders. However, Mr. X says he was fired by Lily when he defied Lily’s orders.

Maher, who legally changed his name to Jon Green sometime in the 2010s, is interviewed in the documentary. He explains how he got the job working for Edmond as a personal nurse. Green/Maher says that he and his then-wife Heidi were living in New York City and working as hospital nurses when the nurses at their job went on strike.

The couple decided to earn some extra money as nannies, and they ended up taking care of kids whose parents were caterers to wealthy people, including clients Edmond and Lily Safra. These parents told Green/Maher that there was a job opening to be a personal nurse for Edmond Safra and recommended Green/Maher for the job. Green/Maher says Lily interviewed him for the job, and he was quickly hired.

In the documentary, Green/Maher gives a hard-to-believe story that contradicts some of his previous statements that he gave in court when he went on trial for the arson. Maher initially told police that he was attacked by unidentified home invaders and lost consciousness multiple times. Maher said he had been hit over the head with a lamp. In fact, there were no signs of an intrusion. Maher denies that he stabbed himself.

Green/Maher says in the documentary that investigating police forced him to sign a false confession that was in French, by threatening to harm his then-wife Heidi. The police said that Green/Maher was given an English translation of the confession before Green/Maher signed it. However, in the documentary, Green/Maher admits that he set the fire by lighting paper in a trash can because he says that Edmond ordered him to sound the alarm during the “home invasion.” Green/Maher says that the only alarm he knew how to trigger was the smoke alarm, which is why he says he started the fire.

When asked who he think plotted to have Edmond killed that night, Green/Maher says in the documentary he thinks it was “the Russians,” but that Lily could have been involved too. Green/Maher also says that days before Edmond died, he was kidnapped by unidentified Russians, who held him captive in a van. Green/Maher says these so-called kidnappers forced him to go along with a plan for the alleged home invasion.

In the documentary, Green/Maher adamantly states that he’s not lying and says he had no reason to kill Edmond. He describes working for Edmond as his “dream job.” He also says that in the days leading up to Edmond’s death, he had been looking for a new place to live because Green/Maher had gotten employer approval to have his wife and kids relocate from New York City to Monaco.

Heidi Maher, who was Green/Maher’s wife at the time, declined to be interviewed in the documentary, but she is seen making comments in archival footage, some of which look like home movies. In the footage, she is seen growing increasingly frustrated and eventually mistrusting of him. She divorced him before he went on trial in 2002.

Before the divorce, Heidi dropped a lawsuit against Lily Safra, whom she had accused of using intimidation tactics against her when she had traveled to Monaco after Green/Maher had been arrested. Green/Maher says he believes that Lily paid off Heidi because he says that Heidi bought a penthouse condominium and paid for it in full shortly after dropping the lawsuit. The documentary mentions that there is no proof that Lily paid Heidi anything.

Even though Green/Maher knows how to tell interesting stories, he’s not the most reliable narrator in this documentary. He also implies that Lily had something with why it took more than an hour for the fire department to respond after he said he made an emergency phone call for help during the fire. There has never been any proof that the fire department was paid or given an incentive to delay responding to the fire, as Green/Maher seems to imply.

Green/Maher went on trial in 2002. He was convicted of the arson that caused the fire, and was sentenced to nine years in prison when he could’ve gotten a maximum sentence of life in prison. Green/Maher couldn’t stay out of trouble for long after he was sentenced to prison. On January 31, 2003, while he was scheduled to be transferred to a prison in France, Green/Maher and fellow inmate Luigi Ciardelli (who is interviewed in the documentary) escaped from their Monaco prison by using saws and making rope out of trash bags. Ciardelli describes Green/Maher as a con artist who makes bad decisions.

Green/Maher was caught within seven hours of this escape because he made the foolish mistake of using a borrowed credit card number to check into a hotel in Nice, France. The credit card owner was a priest in the United States whom Green/Maher had called to confess that he had escaped from prison and needed money to pay for a hotel. Green/Maher also said that he called Heidi after escaping from prison, but she abruptly ended the call because she said she didn’t want to get in trouble for aiding a fugitive.

The priest and Heidi both contacted authorities about these phone calls, which led to Green/Maher quickly being captured and arrested again. An additional nine months was added to his prison sentence for this botched prison escape. In the documentary, Green/Maher bitterly complains that he made the mistake of trusting the people who turned him in for the prison escape. This blame is an indication that he’s probably a narcissist who likes to always make himself a victim in the problems that he causes.

Lily (a Brazilian native who came from a middle-class family before she married into wealth) died in 2022 and filed lawsuits against many people or companies that suggested she caused Edmond’s death. Edmond was Lily’s fourth husband. Two of the people who got sued by her are interviewed in the documentary: a British Jamaican aristocrat/author named Lady Colin Campbell and investigative journalist Isabelle Vincent. Campbell (who is very haughty, impatient and bossy in this documentary) is described as a Safra family friend. In the documentary, Campbell calls Lily a “praying mantis” (an insect predator).

Campbell and Vincent say they think Lily should have been a suspect in Edmond’s death. Vincent, who covered the case extensively for the New York Post, talks about going to Brazil to uncover details about Lily’s mysterious background, including the suspicious death of Lily’s second husband, a wealthy businessman named Alfredo Monteverde. Monteverde died in 1969, within weeks of changing his will to make Lily the primary beneficiary of his fortune. Monteverde died of two gunshot wounds to his chest. His death was officially ruled a suicide.

Someone who says they believe Green/Maher is Michael “Mike” Griffith, who was Green/Maher’s attorney for the arson charges and represented him during Green/Maher’s trial in 2002. Griffith is another “larger than life” personality in the documentary who makes a big show of trying to convince people what they think the “truth” should be. Griffith makes some comments that indicate that he thinks Lily was somehow involved with Edmond’s death, or she at least paid people off who knew too much.

Another person interviewed in the documentary is Sonia Herkrath, who was Edmond’s nursing chief of staff. Herkrath is described in the documentary as someone who clashed with Green/Maher when they worked together because of employee rivalry. Herkrath describes Green/Maher as having a “Jekyll and Hyde” personality. Not surprisingly, she thinks Green/Maher is the only person responsible for Edmond’s death and that Green/Maher was rightfully convicted of the arson. In the documentary, Green/Maher admits that he and Herkrath didn’t like each other, but he denies that he was trying to get her job.

“Murder in Monaco” director Usry occasionally appears on camera in the documentary, especially during the last 20 minutes that detail how, in 2022, Usry got involved in another criminal case where Green/Maher says he was falsely accused. The outcome of this unexpected twist in the story won’t be revealed in this review, in case people want to see the documentary and find out the details there. However, Usry does admit on camera that he got emotionally attached to Green/Maher and was inclined to believe him until the 2022 string of incidents that made Usry question Green/Maher’s credibility.

Perhaps the biggest flaw in the documentary is how it focuses so much on Safra’s death, it completely downplays that someone else died in the same room that night: his nurse Torrente. The documentary does not include her personal story at all, which comes across as distasteful to ignore who she was, as if the documentary’s filmmakers didn’t think she was important enough to mention beyond her name. A little more information about her would’ve gone a long way to showing respect for this victim.

Other people interviewed in “Murder in Monaco” are American businessman Bill Browder and Monaco attorney Sandrine Setton. They don’t have much to add to the story. Browder says he and Edmond had a joint venture called the Hermitage Centre, which did a lot of business with Russians. The Hermitage Centre ended up losing “$900 million of our clients’ money,” according to Browder. Browder says that Edmond made Browder feel paranoid that they were both going to be killed by disgruntled Russians, and Edmond encouraged Browder to hire more security personnel.

Setton was a young and relatively inexperienced attorney when she represented Green/Maher before American defense attorney Griffith was hired for the arson case. She says that she and Griffith fundamentally disagreed on the defense strategy. Griffith wanted to claim that Green/Maher’s signed confession was false and coerced. Setton says that she believed that it would be better for Green/Maher to not claim that it was a false and coerced confession, so that Green/Maher could possibly get a lighter sentence if he pleaded guilty.

The format of “Murder in Monaco” uses many of the same stereotypical true crime documentary elements, such as overly dramatic music, repetitive footage, and quick-cutting editing. The interviewees have their titles related to the case shown in large-captioned letters (such as “THE NURSE,” “THE INVESTIGATOR,” “THE ARISTOCRAT”), as if this documentary were a game of Clue, and you have to guess which character committed the crime and where and how.

“Murder in Monaco” will probably irritate viewers who expect true crime documentaries to give definitive answers to questions that remain in crime cases. Green/Maher gets a little too much screen time, considering what is revealed about him at toward the end of the movie. However, for people who appreciate documentaries that show various theories in a crime case and let viewers make up their own minds, then “Murder in Monaco” is a satisfactory but not an outstanding documentary to watch.

Netflix premiered “Murder in Monaco” on December 17, 2025.

Copyright 2017-2026 Culture Mix
CULTURE MIX